Minnesota Administrative Rules
Agency 120 - Commerce Department
Chapter 2742 - COORDINATION OF HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFITS
Part 2742.0300 - MODEL COORDINATION OF BENEFITS CONTRACT PROVISION
Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 13, September 23, 2024
Subpart 1. General.
Subpart 4 contains a model coordination of benefits provision for use in group contracts. That use is subject to parts 2742.0200, subpart 2, items B and C and 2742.0400.
Subp. 2. Flexibility.
A group contract's coordination of benefits provision does not have to use the words and format shown in parts 2742.0100 to 2742.0400. Changes may be made to fit the language and style of the rest of the group contract or to reflect the differences among plans which provide services, which pay benefits for expenses incurred, and which indemnify.
Substantive changes are allowed only as set forth in parts 2742.0100 to 2742.0400.
Subp. 3. Prohibited coordination and benefit design.
A group contract may not reduce benefits on the basis that another plan exists; except with respect to Part B of Medicare, that a person is or could have been covered under another plan; or a person has elected an option under another plan providing a lower level of benefits than another option which could have been elected.
No contract may contain a provision that its benefits are "excess" or "always secondary" to any plan defined in part 2742.0200, subpart 2, except in accord with the rules permitted by parts 2742.0100 to 2742.0400.
Subp. 4. Text of model coordination of benefits provision.
COORDINATION OF THE GROUP CONTRACT'S BENEFITS WITH OTHER BENEFITS
Each contract or other arrangement for coverage under (i) or (ii) is a separate plan. Also, if an arrangement has two parts and coordination of benefits rules apply only to one of the two, each of the parts is a separate plan.
When this plan is a primary plan, its benefits are determined before those of the other plan and without considering the other plan's benefits.
When this plan is a secondary plan, its benefits are determined after those of the other plan and may be reduced because of the other plan's benefits.
When there are more than two plans covering the person, this plan may be a primary plan as to one or more other plans, and may be a secondary plan as to a different plan or plans.
The difference between the cost of a private hospital room and the cost of a semiprivate hospital room is not considered an allowable expense under the above definition unless the patient's stay in a private hospital room is medically necessary either in terms of generally accepted medical practice, or as specifically defined in the plan.
When a plan provides benefits in the form of services, the reasonable cash value of each service rendered will be considered both an allowable expense and a benefit paid.
However, if the other plan does not have the rule described in a. above, but instead has a rule based upon the gender of the parent, and if, as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, the rule in the other plan will determine the order of benefits.
However, if the specific terms of a court decree state that one of the parents is responsible for the health care expenses of the child, and the entity obligated to pay or provide the benefits of the plan of that parent has actual knowledge of those terms, the benefits of that plan are determined first. This paragraph does not apply with respect to any claim determination period or plan year during which any benefits are actually paid or provided before the entity has that actual knowledge.
When the benefits of this plan are reduced as described above, each benefit is reduced in proportion. It is then charged against any applicable benefit limit of this plan.
Certain facts are needed to apply these coordination of benefits rules. [The XYZ Company] has the right to decide which facts it needs. It may get needed facts from or give them to any other organization or person. [The XYZ Company] need not tell, or get the consent of, any person to do this unless applicable federal or state law prevents disclosure of the information without the consent of the patient or the patient's representative. Each person claiming benefits under this plan must give [The XYZ Company] any facts it needs to pay the claim.
A payment made under another plan may include an amount which should have been paid under this plan. If it does, [The XYZ Company] may pay that amount to the organization which made that payment. That amount will then be treated as though it were a benefit paid under this plan. [The XYZ Company] will not have to pay that amount again. The term "payment made" includes providing benefits in the form of services, in which case "payment made" means reasonable cash value of the benefits provided in the form of services.
If the amount of the payments made by [The XYZ Company] is more than it should have paid under this coordination of benefits provision, it may recover the excess from one or more of:
The "amount of the payments made" includes the reasonable cash value of any benefits provided in the form of services.
Statutory Authority: MS s 45.023; 72A.19