(1)
Mandatory
Disqualification: A candidate with a mandatory disqualification
may not have their disqualification reviewed, unless they successfully dispute
the accuracy or completeness of the record by demonstrating that it falls
within another disqualification category.
(2)
BRC Review Process for
Presumptive and Discretionary Disqualifications: The nature of the
information sought by EEC shall depend on the level of seriousness of the
conduct being reviewed. Failure of the candidate to submit requested
information in the time frames set forth by EEC may result in the candidate
being found "not suitable".
The following steps constitute the review process applicable to
presumptive and discretionary disqualifications:
(a) EEC shall inform the candidate of their
BRC findings and offer the candidate the opportunity to submit other relevant
information.
(b)
Review
of Presumptive Disqualifications: If EEC notifies a candidate that
the BRC reflects a presumptive disqualification, then the candidate may be
required to submit the following documentation within a time frame set forth by
EEC Policy:
1. A written assessment by a
qualified mental health professional who is not the candidate's treating mental
health professional or direct employer. The mental health professional's
assessment must:
a. Describe the nature of the
assessment performed;
b. Originate
from the mental health professional's opinion after completing an evaluation;
and
c. Conclude in writing whether
the candidate poses an unacceptable risk of harm to the persons served by the
program where the candidate is applying.
2. Alternatively, the candidate may submit a
letter from the candidate's criminal justice official, including a probation or
parole officer that the candidate does not pose a risk of harm to the persons
served by the program where the candidate is applying.
3. Failure to supply the requested written
assessment or letter in the time frame set forth by EEC may result in the
candidate being issued a "not suitable" final suitability
determination.
(c) If a
candidate is notified by EEC that the BRC reflects a discretionary or
presumptive disqualification, then the candidate may be required to submit the
following documentation within a time frame set forth by EEC Policy:
1. Police Reports;
2. Docket Sheets;
3. Candidate Statement;
4. Child Welfare Documentation;
5. Reference Letters;
6. Probation or Parole
Documentation;
7. Imprisonment
Papers;
8. Evidence of
Rehabilitation; and
9.
Recommendation from Current or Prospective Employer within the candidate's
discretion (optional).
(d) EEC may obtain additional information
from the police, courts, prosecuting attorney, or any other knowledgeable
source for purposes of completing the review process.
(e)
Standard of
Review: EEC shall require from the candidate clear and convincing
evidence demonstrating the candidate's suitability for licensure, employment or
affiliation in light of the concern for children's safety.
(f)
Review Factors:
In assessing the candidate's suitability given the concern for children's
safety, due weight shall be given to the following factors when evaluating the
candidate's criminal offense(s) or abuse/neglect finding(s):
1. Time since the incident(s);
2. Age of the candidate at the time of the
incident(s);
3. Seriousness and
specific circumstances surrounding the incident(s);
4. Relationship of the incident(s) to the
ability of the candidate to care for children;
5. Number of criminal offenses or findings of
abuse/neglect;
6. Dispositions of
criminal offenses and findings of abuse/neglect;
7. Relevant evidence of rehabilitation or
lack thereof; and
8. Other relevant
information, including information submitted by the candidate.
(g) EEC shall document the reasons
for its final suitability determination.