(1) No discharge of
dredged or fill material shall be permitted if there is a practicable
alternative to the proposed discharge that would have less adverse impact on
the aquatic ecosystem, so long as the alternative does not have other
significant adverse environmental consequences.
(a) Where the activity associated with the
discharge does not require access or proximity to or siting within wetlands and
waters to fulfill its basic purpose (i.e., is not "water dependent"),
practicable alternatives that do not involve the discharge of dredged or fill
material are presumed to be available, unless clearly demonstrated otherwise.
In addition, all practicable alternatives to the proposed activity, which do
not involve a discharge, are presumed to have less adverse impact on the
aquatic ecosystem unless clearly demonstrated otherwise.
(b) The scope of alternatives to be
considered shall be commensurate with the scale and purpose of the proposed
activity, the impacts of the proposed activity, and the classification,
designation and existing uses of the affected wetlands and waters in the
Surface Water Quality Standards at
314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts
Surface Water Quality Standards.
1.For
activities associated with access for one dwelling unit, the area under
consideration for practicable alternatives will be limited to the lot. For
activities associated with the creation of a real estate subdivision, the area
under consideration will be limited to the subdivided lots and any adjacent
lots the applicant formerly owned, presently owns, or can reasonably obtain an
ownership interest.
2.For any
activity resulting in the loss of more than one acre cumulatively of bordering
and isolated vegetated wetlands and land under water, alternative sites not
presently owned by the applicant which could reasonably be obtained, utilized,
expanded or managed will be considered by the Department, but only if such
information is required in an Environmental Impact Report or in an alternatives
analysis conducted by the Corps of Engineers for an individuals 404
permit.
(c) For
discharges of dredged or fill material associated with an Ecological
Restoration Project, the alternatives analysis shall include a consideration of
the following:
1.Any time of year
restrictions or other conditions recommended by the Division of Marine
Fisheries for coastal waters and the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife for
inland waters.
2.The condition of
the existing ecosystem and the wetlands and waters contained therein.
3.The magnitude and significance of the
benefits of the Ecological Restoration Project in improving the capacity of the
affected ecosystem and the waters and wetlands contained therein to sustain
their designated uses, as identified in
314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts
Surface Water Quality Standards.
4.The magnitude and significance of the
impacts of the Ecological Restoration Project on the existing ecosystem and the
wetlands and waters contained therein and the extent to which the applicant
will:
a.avoid adverse impacts to the existing
ecosystem that can be avoided without impeding the achievement of the project's
ecological restoration goals;
b.minimize adverse impacts to the existing
ecosystem that are necessary to the achievement of the project's ecological
restoration goals; and
c.utilize
best management practices such as erosion and siltation controls and proper
construction sequencing to avoid and minimize adverse construction impacts to
the existing ecosystem and the waters and wetlands contained therein.
(2) No
discharge of dredged or fill material shall be permitted unless appropriate and
practicable steps have been taken which will avoid and minimize potential
adverse impacts to the bordering or isolated vegetated wetlands, land under
water or ocean, or the intertidal zone. However, no such project may be
permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of Rare
Species.
(a) For discharges to bordering or
isolated vegetated wetlands, such steps shall include a minimum of 1:1
restoration or replication. The Department may waive the requirement for 1:1
restoration or replication for Ecological Restoration Projects and for
maintenance or repair (but not replacement, reconstruction, or substantial
enlargement) of existing and lawfully located dams.
(b) An applicant proposing a discharge of
dredged or fill material in connection with the construction, repair,
replacement or expansion of a stream crossing shall be presumed to be taking
appropriate and practicable steps to avoid and minimize potential adverse
impacts to the bordering or isolated vegetated wetlands, land under water or
ocean or the intertidal zone provided that:
1.The applicant demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Department that he or she has developed and will implement
an operation and maintenance plan to ensure that the crossing will function as
designed;
2.If the project includes
the construction of a new non-tidal crossing, the applicant demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Department that the crossing complies with the
Massachusetts Stream Crossing Standards;
3.If the project includes the construction of
a new tidal crossing, the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Department that the project is designed in a manner that does not restrict
tidal flow over the full natural tidal range;
4.If the project includes work on an existing
non-tidal crossing, the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Department that the crossing complies with the Massachusetts Stream Crossing
Standards to the maximum extent practicable; and
5.If the project includes work on an existing
tidal crossing that restricts tidal flow, the applicant demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Department that tidal restriction will be eliminated to the
maximum extent practicable.
This presumption may be overcome by credible evidence from a
competent source showing that based on site considerations, impact on the
resource, or cost considerations, compliance with all applicable provisions of
314 CMR 9.06(2)(b)1. through 5. is not practicable.
(3) Except as otherwise
provided in 314 CMR 9.06(3), no discharge of dredged or fill material shall be
permitted to Outstanding Resource Waters. The discharge of dredged or fill
material to an Outstanding Resource Water in association with an activity
listed in 314 CMR 9.06(3)(a) through (k) may be permitted without requiring the
applicant to obtain a variance in accordance with
314 CMR 9.08 provided
that the Department determines that the discharge of dredged or fill material
may be permitted in accordance with 314 CMR 9.06(1), (2), (4), (5), and (7),
and is not identified in 314 CMR 9.06(4) as a discharge of dredged or fill
material that requires a variance.
(a)
Projects conducted or approved by public or private water suppliers in the
performance of their responsibilities and duties to protect the quality of the
water in the watersheds, or to maintain, operate and improve the waterworks
system, provided that such projects are implemented in accordance with
applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and requirements;
(b) Ecological Restoration
Projects;
(c) Maintenance, repair,
replacement or reconstruction but not substantial enlargement of existing and
lawfully located structures or facilities including buildings, roads, railways,
utilities, dams, and coastal engineering structures;
(d) Where the designation was for public
water supply purposes, activities subject to the comprehensive public water
supply protection program enacted by the legislature for the Ware, Quabbin, and
Wachusett watersheds in the Watershed Protection Act, St. 1992 c. 36 and M.G.L.
c. 92. Any activity for which an applicant has been granted a variance by the
Department of Conservation and Recreation pursuant to 350 CMR 11.06(3):
Variances or for a discharge of dredged or fill material into a tributary that
the Department of Conservation and Recreation has exempted pursuant to 350 CMR
11.06(4): Exemption of a Tributary. A span or other bridging technique shall be
presumed to be a practicable alternative. This presumption may be overcome by
credible evidence from a competent source. The Department will consult with the
Department of Conservation and Recreation in reviewing the
alternatives.
(e) Access for the
construction of dwelling units and associated utilities:
1.For the loss of more than 5,000 square feet
cumulatively of bordering and isolated vegetated wetland and land under water
for access to any number of dwelling units, a span or other bridging technique
is presumed to be practicable.
2.For the loss of less than 5,000 square feet
cumulatively of bordering and isolated vegetated wetland and land under water
for access to any number of dwelling units, an embedded culvert, span or other
bridging technique is presumed to be practicable. These presumptions may be
overcome upon a showing of credible evidence from a competent source that based
on site considerations, impact on the resource, or cost considerations, a span
or other bridging technique is or is not practicable.
(f) Construction of utilities, public or
private roadways or other access except as specified in 314 CMR 9.06(3)(e),
railroad track and rail beds and facilities directly related to their
operation. These activities require use of a span or other bridging technique,
unless the Department determines, based on information contained in a
Department 401 alternatives analysis, a Corps of Engineers Section 404
alternatives analysis, or an Environmental Impact Report and the Secretary's
certificate, that this alternative is not practicable, would not have less
adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem, or would have other significant
adverse environmental consequences.
(g) Operations to clean up, prevent, assess,
monitor, contain, or mitigate releases of hazardous materials or wastes,
including landfill closures and activities undertaken in accordance with M.G.L.
c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000: Massachusetts Contingency Plan.
(h) Projects which have received a variance
under
310 CMR
10.05(10): Variance provided
that consideration has been given to the Outstanding Resource Water designation
in the variance analysis.
(i)
Access to land in agricultural or aquacultural use, of a nature suitable to the
use as defined in
310 CMR 10.04:
Definitions.
(j) Operations to
clean up, prevent, assess, monitor, contain, or mitigate releases of oil or
hazardous materials or wastes, including landfill closures under M.G.L. c. 111,
§ 150A through 150A1/2 and
310 CMR 16.00: Site
Assignment Regulations for Solid Waste Facilities and 19.000: Solid Waste
Management and activities undertaken in accordance with M.G.L. c. 21E and 310
CMR 40.0000: Massachusetts Contingency Plan.
(k) Maintenance, repair, replacement, or
reconstruction of structures or facilities for water-dependent uses. In
addition, the enlargement of structures or facilities for water-dependent uses
is allowed only in following limited circumstances:
1.in an Outstanding Resource Water that is
designated for purposes other than a public water supply; or
2.in an Outstanding Resource Water that is
located within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern provided that if there
is a resource management plan for the ACEC that has been adopted by the
municipality and approved by the Secretary, the Department determines that: the
enlargement of structures or facilities is consistent with said plan and the
fill or structure associated with the enlargement activity is located entirely
within an area of previously filled tidelands.
(4) The discharge of dredged or fill material
into wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth within 400 feet of the high water
mark of a Class A surface water (exclusive of tributaries) requires a variance
issued by the Department pursuant to
314 CMR 9.08 unless the
discharge of dredged or fill material is associated with an activity conducted
by a public water system under
310 CMR
22.00: Drinking Water or by a public agency or
authority for the maintenance or repair of existing public roads or railways.
The discharge of dredged or fill material to a vernal pool certified by the
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife requires a variance pursuant to
314 CMR 9.08.
(5) No discharge of dredged or fill material
is permitted for the impoundment or detention of stormwater for purposes of
controlling sedimentation or other pollutant attenuation. Discharge of dredged
or fill material may be permitted to manage stormwater for flood control
purposes only where there is no practicable alternative and provided that best
management practices are implemented to prevent sedimentation or other
pollution. No discharge of dredged or fill material is permitted for the
impoundment or detention of stormwater in Outstanding Resource Waters for any
purpose.
(6)
(a)Except as otherwise provided in 314 CMR
9.06, stormwater discharges shall be provided with best management practices to
attenuate pollutants and to provide a setback from the receiving water or
wetlands in accordance with the following Stormwater Management Standards as
further defined and specified in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook:
1.No new stormwater conveyances (e.g.
outfalls) may discharge untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in
wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth.
2.Stormwater management systems shall be
designed so that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed
pre-development peak discharge rates. This Standard may be waived for land
subject to coastal storm flowage as defined in
310 CMR 10.04:
Definitions.
3.Loss of annual
recharge to ground water shall be eliminated or minimized through the use of
infiltration measures including environmentally sensitive site design, low
impact development techniques, stormwater best management practices, and good
operation and maintenance. At a minimum, the annual recharge from the
post-development site shall approximate the annual recharge from
pre-development conditions based on soil type. This Standard is met when the
stormwater management system is designed to infiltrate the required recharge
volume as determined in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater
Handbook.
4.Stormwater management
systems shall be designed to remove 80% of the average annual post-construction
load of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). This Standard is met when:
a.Suitable practices for source control and
pollution prevention are identified in a long-term pollution prevention plan
and thereafter are implemented and maintained;
b.Structural stormwater best management
practices are sized to capture the required water quality volume determined in
accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook; and
c.Pretreatment is provided in accordance with
the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.
5.For land uses with higher potential
pollutant loads, source control and pollution prevention shall be implemented
in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook to eliminate or reduce
the discharge of stormwater runoff from such land uses to the maximum extent
practicable. If through source control and/or pollution prevention all land
uses with higher potential pollutant loads cannot be completely protected from
exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and stormwater runoff, the proponent shall
use the specific structural stormwater BMPs determined by the Department to be
suitable for such use as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.
Stormwater discharges from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads
shall also comply with the requirements of the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act,
M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53, and
314 CMR 3.00: Surface Water
Discharge Permit Program, 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards
and 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program.
6.Stormwater discharges within the Zone II or
Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water water supply and stormwater
discharges near or to any other critical area require the use of the specific
source control and pollution prevention measures and the specific structural
stormwater best management practices determined by the Department to be
suitable for managing discharges to such area as provided in the Massachusetts
Stormwater Handbook. A discharge is near a critical area, if there is a strong
likelihood of a significant impact occurring to said area, taking into account
site-specific factors. Stormwater discharges to Outstanding Resource Waters and
Special Resource Waters shall be removed and set back from the receiving water
or wetland and receive the highest and best practical method of treatment. A
"storm water discharge" as defined in
314 CMR
3.04(2)(a)1. or (b) to an
Outstanding Resource Water or Special Resource Water shall comply with
314 CMR 3.00: Surface Water
Discharge Permit Program and 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Quality
Standards. Stormwater discharges to a Zone I or Zone A are prohibited, unless
essential to the operation of the public water supply.
7.A redevelopment project is required to meet
the following Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable: Standard 2, Standard 3, and the pretreatment and structural
stormwater best management practice requirements of Standards 4, 5, and 6.
Existing stormwater discharges shall comply with Standard 1 only to the maximum
extent practicable. A redevelopment project shall also comply with all other
requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards and improve existing
conditions.
8.A plan to control
construction related impacts including erosion, sedimentation and other
pollutant sources during construction and land disturbance activities
(construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution prevention plan)
shall be developed and implemented.
9.A long-term operation and maintenance plan
shall be developed and implemented to ensure that the stormwater management
system functions as designed.
10.All illicit discharges to the stormwater
management system are prohibited.
(b). The Stormwater Management Standards set
forth in 314 CMR 9.06(6)(a)1. through 10. shall not apply to:
1. A single-family house;
2. Housing development and redevelopment
projects comprised of detached single-family dwellings with four or fewer lots
provided that there are no stormwater discharges that may affect a critical
area;
3. Multi-family housing
development and redevelopment projects, with four or fewer units, including
condominiums, cooperatives, apartment buildings, and townhouses, provided that
there are no stormwater discharges that may potentially affect a critical area;
and
4. Emergency repairs to roads or
drainage systems.
(c).
The Stormwater Management Standards shall apply to the maximum extent
practicable to the following:
1. Housing
development and redevelopment projects comprised of detached single-family
dwellings with four or fewer lots that have a stormwater discharge that may
potentially affect a critical area;
2. Multi-family housing development and redevelopment
projects with four or fewer units, including condominiums, cooperatives,
apartment buildings and townhouses, that have a stormwater discharge may
potentially affect a critical area;
3. Housing development and redevelopment projects
comprised of detached single- family dwellings, with five to nine lots,
provided there is no stormwater discharge that may potentially affect a
critical area; and
4. Multi-family
housing development and redevelopment projects of five to nine units, including
condominiums, cooperatives, apartment buildings, and townhouses, provided there
is no stormwater discharge that may potentially affect a critical
area.
5. Marinas and boatyards
provided that the hull maintenance, painting, and service areas are protected
from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt, and stormwater runoff; and
6. Footpaths, bikepaths and other paths for
pedestrian and/or nonmotorized access.
(d) For phased projects the determination of
whether the Stormwater Management Standards apply is made on the single and
complete project including all phases. When proposing a development or
redevelopment project subject to the Stormwater Management Standards ,
proponents shall consider environmentally sensitive site design that
incorporates low impact development techniques in addition to stormwater best
management practices.
(e) Project
proponents seeking to demonstrate compliance with some or all of the Stormwater
Management Standards to the maximum extent practicable shall demonstrate that:
1. They have made all reasonable efforts to
meet each of the standards;
2. They
have made a complete evaluation of possible stormwater management measures
including environmentally sensitive site design and low impact development
techniques that minimize land disturbance and impervious surfaces, structural
stormwater best management practices, pollution prevention, erosion and
sedimentation control and operation and maintenance of stormwater best
management practices; and
3. If
full compliance with the Standards cannot be achieved, they are implementing
the highest practicable level of treatment.
(f) Compliance with the Stormwater Management
Standards set forth in 314 CMR 9.06(6)(a) to the extent that they are
applicable in accordance with 314 CMR 9.06(6)(b) through (d) does not relieve a
discharger of the obligation to comply with all applicable Federal, State and
local laws, regulations, and permits including without limitation all
applicable provisions of 310 CMR 10.00: Wetlands Protection , 314 CMR 3.00:
Surface Water Discharge Permit Program , 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water
Quality Standards , and 9.00, local land use controls adopted to comply with
310 CMR 22.21: Ground Water Supply Protection or the NPDES General Permit for
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, and the terms and conditions of
NPDES General Stormwater Permits such as the Construction General Permit and
the Multi-sector General Permit.
(7) No discharge of dredged or fill material
shall be permitted in the rare circumstances where the activity meets the
criteria for evaluation but will result in substantial adverse impacts to the
physical, chemical, or biological integrity of surface Waters of the
Commonwealth.