Current through Register 1531, September 27, 2024
(1)
(a)
Establishment of Effluent
Limitations. The Department will limit or prohibit discharges of
pollutants to surface waters to assure that surface water quality standards of
the receiving waters are protected and maintained or attained. The level of
treatment for an individual discharger will be established by the discharge
permit in accordance with
314 CMR 3.00: Surface
Water Discharge Permit Program. In establishing water quality based
effluent limitations the Department shall take into consideration natural
background conditions and existing discharges. Discharges shall be limited or
prohibited to protect existing uses and not interfere with the attainment of
designated uses in downstream and adjacent segments. The Department will
provide a reasonable margin of safety to account for any lack of knowledge
concerning the relationship between the pollutants being discharged and their
impact on water quality. Where the Department has not established water quality
based effluent limitations in a permit and a violation of water quality
standards attributable to a discharge occurs, the Department may modify,
suspend or revoke the permit, in whole or in part, for cause in accordance with
314 CMR 3.00.
(b)
Compliance
Schedules. A permit may, when appropriate, specify a schedule
leading to compliance with the Massachusetts and Federal Clean Water Acts and
regulations. The purpose of a schedule of compliance generally is to afford a
permittee adequate time to comply with one or more permit requirements or
limitations that are based on new, newly interpreted or revised water quality
standards that became effective after both issuance of the initial permit for a
discharge and July 1, 1977. The Department may include a schedule of compliance
in a permit at the time of permit reissuance or modification where the
permittee either cannot comply with such permit requirements or limitations, or
there is insufficient information available to determine whether the permittee
can comply with such permit requirements or limitations. A schedule of
compliance shall require compliance at the earliest practicable time, as
determined by the Department. A schedule of compliance shall include dates for
specified tasks or activities leading to compliance and may include interim
effluent limitations, as the Department deems appropriate.
(c)
TMDLs. The
Department may develop and enforce compliance with TMDLs and TMDL
implementation plans for waters or segments impaired by a pollutant or
pollutants.
(2)
Mixing Zones. In applying
314 CMR 4.00, the Department
may recognize a limited area or volume of a waterbody as a mixing zone for the
initial dilution of a discharge. Waters within a mixing zone may fail to meet
specific water quality criteria, provided the following conditions are met:
(a) Mixing zones shall be limited to an area
or volume as small as feasible. There shall be no lethality to organisms
passing through the mixing zone as determined by the Department. The location,
design and operation of the discharge shall minimize impacts on aquatic life
and other existing and designated uses within and beyond the mixing
zone.
(b) Mixing zones shall not
interfere with the migration or free movement of fish or other aquatic life.
There shall be safe and adequate passage for swimming and drifting organisms
with no deleterious effects on their populations.
(c) Mixing zones shall not create nuisance
conditions, accumulate pollutants in sediments or biota in toxic amounts or
otherwise interfere with the existing or designated uses of surface
waters.
(3)
Hydrologic Conditions. The Department will determine
the most severe hydrologic condition at which water quality criteria must be
applied. The Department may further stipulate the magnitude, duration and
frequency of allowable excursions from the magnitude component of criteria and
may determine that criteria should be applied at flows lower than those
specified in order to prevent adverse impacts of discharges on existing and
designated uses.
(a) For rivers and streams,
the lowest flow condition at and above which aquatic life criteria must be
applied is the lowest mean flow for seven consecutive days to be expected once
in ten years. When records are not sufficient to determine this condition, the
flow may be estimated using methods approved by the Department.
(b) In waters where flows are regulated by
dams or similar structures, the lowest flow condition at which aquatic life
criteria must be applied is the flow equaled or exceeded 99% of the time on a
yearly basis, or another equivalent flow agreed upon by the Department and the
federal, state or private entity controlling the flow. The minimum flow
established in such an agreement will become the critical low flow for those
waters covered by the agreement. When the Department issues a 401 Water Quality
Certification of an activity subject to licensing by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, flows shall be maintained or restored to protect
existing and designated uses.
(c)
In coastal and marine waters and for lakes and ponds, the Department will
establish extreme hydrologic conditions at which aquatic life criteria must be
applied on a case-by-case basis. In all cases existing uses shall be protected
and the selection shall not interfere with the attainment of designated
uses.
(d) For rivers and streams
and waters whose flows are regulated by dams or similar structures, human
health based criteria may be applied at the harmonic mean flow. For coastal and
marine waters and lakes and ponds, human health based criteria may be applied
at conditions the Department determines will result in protection at least
equivalent to that provided for rivers and streams.
(4)
National Goal Uses, Partial
Uses, and Variances.
(a) The
Department may remove a national goal use that is not an existing use,
designate a segment as partial use, or grant a variance to authorize a
discharge, provided the applicant demonstrates that:
1. Naturally occurring pollutant
concentrations prevent the attainment of the use;
2. Natural, ephemeral, intermittent or
low-flow conditions or water levels prevent the attainment of the use, unless
these conditions may be compensated for by the discharge of sufficient volume
of effluent discharges without violating state water conservation requirements
to enable uses to be met;
3.
Human-caused conditions or sources of pollution prevent the attainment of the
use and cannot be remedied or would cause more environmental damage to correct
than to leave in place;
4. Dams,
diversions or other types of hydrologic modifications preclude the attainment
of the use, and it is not feasible to restore the water body to its original
condition or to operate such modification in a way that would result in the
attainment of the use;
5. Physical
conditions related to the natural features of the water body, such as the lack
of a proper substrate, cover, flow, depth, pools, riffles, and the like,
unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment of aquatic life protection
uses; or
6. Controls more stringent
than those required by sections 301(b) and 306 of the Federal Act would result
in substantial and widespread economic and social impact, this demonstration
may include documentation of median household income or other economic measures
adjusted to reflect the cost of living or other circumstances particular to the
affected area.
(b) Prior
to removal of a use or the designation of a partial use, the Department shall
provide public notice and the opportunity for a public hearing in accordance
with M.G.L. c. 30A and the applicant shall submit to the Department the
information necessary for completion of a Use Attainability Analysis.
(c) The Department may grant a variance for a
specified period of time for a particular discharger and for specific
pollutants so that it can be determined through a Use Attainability Analysis
whether uses can be attained. A variance applicant shall submit to the
Department a detailed assessment of the types of information that will be
needed for completion of the Use Attainability Analysis. A variance may be
granted only for the pollutants causing noncompliance with criteria and all
other provisions of
314 CMR 4.00 apply for the
term of the variance. Prior to granting a variance, the Department will provide
or require public notice and provide an opportunity for a public hearing in
accordance with
314 CMR
2.00: Permit Procedures. An applicant
granted a variance shall submit to the Department information necessary for
completion of a Use Attainability Analysis in accordance with the provisions of
the variance and the permit.
(5)
Natural Background
Conditions. Excursions from criteria due to solely natural
conditions shall not be interpreted as violations of standards and shall not
affect the water use classifications adopted by the Department.
(6)
Procedures for Sampling and
Analyses. All procedures used for the purpose of collecting,
preserving and analyzing samples in connection with
314 CMR 4.00 shall be approved
by the Department.
(a) Approved procedures
currently include the following:
1. E.W. Rice,
R.B. Baird, A.D. Eaton, editors; Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater, 23rd Edition;
published by the American Public Health Association, et al.,
2017;
2. Clean Water Act Analytical
Methods approved by EPA and described at 40 C.F.R. Part 136, as amended by 82
Federal Register 40846, August 28, 2017;
3.
Annual Book of ASTM
Standards. Section 11, vol. 11.01-11.08; published by West
Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2018;
4. Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y., and Lalli, C.M.,
A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater
Analysis; published by New York: Pergamon Press, 1984; and
5.
EPA, Methods for the Determination
of Chemical Substances in Marine and Estuarine Environmental Matrices
- 2nd Edition; EPA/600/R-97/072; published by
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
(b) MassDEP may approve the use of additional
or alternative procedures. Any additional or alternative procedures not listed
in 314 CMR 4.03(6)(a)1. through 5. must meet one or more of the following
evaluation criteria for approval:
1. A
procedure that is authored or approved by a nationally-recognized, competent
and authoritative source, such as the EPA, U.S. Geological Survey, American
Society for Testing and Materials, and the American Public Health
Association.
2. A new or modified
procedure that has been approved through the EPA Alternative Test Procedure
(ATP) Program, or is shown to be compliant with the Clean Water Act ATP program
as described at
40
CFR 136.4 and
136.5.
3. A new or modified procedure that provides
a preferred alternative to a promulgated method due to greater sensitivity,
improved technological rigor, enhanced performance, and/or greater
applicability, and is included as part of an approved Quality Assurance Project
Plan.
(7)
401 Water Quality Certifications. The Department may
apply the standards, and any other appropriate requirement of state law
including, without limitation, regulations promulgated by other state water
resource agencies, such as the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
and the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management, under their respective
statutory authorities, to any activity which may result in a discharge subject
to certification under section 401 of the Federal Act, unless the Department
exercises its discretion to waive certification.