Current through Register 1531, September 27, 2024
(1)
Standard Conditions. The conditions in
314 CMR
3.19 apply to every permit issued under
314 CMR 3.00, whether or not
expressly incorporated into the permit.
(2)
Special
Conditions.
(a) In addition to
conditions applicable to all permits [ 314 CMR 3.11(1) and
3.19
], the Department shall establish special conditions, as required on a
case-by-case basis, to provide for and assure compliance with all applicable
requirements of the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, M.G.L. c. 21, §§
26 through 53 and the Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C.
1251
et seq, and the NPDES
regulations at 40 CFR Part 122.
The Department's authority under 314 CMR 3.11(2) includes, but
is not limited to, establishing special conditions in an individual or general
permit in the following areas:
1.
effluent and/or pollutant loading limitations and standards, including as
applied to nutrients;
2. conditions
to ensure compliance with any TMDL established by the Department for receiving
waters;
3. limitations on the
amount of flow authorized to be discharged under the permit;
4. the development, implementation and
enforcement of BMPs and other control measures;
5. monitoring requirements and other means of
verifying the compliance of the discharge with a permit;
6. requirements to conduct pollutant loading
and/or water quality analyses, comprehensive wastewater management planning, or
other technical evaluations during the term of one or more permits;
7. financial security requirements to fund
the operation, maintenance, and the immediate and/or long-term repair or
replacement of permitted facilities or activities;
8. the duration of the permit;
9. recordkeeping and reporting
requirements;
10. where applicable,
schedules of compliance; and
11. in
any given calendar year where the average annual flow of a permitted facility
exceeds 80% of the facility's average design flow, that facility shall submit a
report to the Department describing what steps the permittee will take in order
to remain in compliance with the limitations and conditions in its permit,
including in particular, limitations on the amount of flow authorized to be
discharged under the permit.
(b) In establishing effluent limitations, the
Department shall apply the more stringent of the following:
1. Water quality based effluent limitations
under 314 CMR 3.11(3) and (7); or
2. Technology based effluent limitations
under 314 CMR 3.11(4), (5), (6) and (7).
(3)
Water quality based effluent
limitations. As a minimum, all permits shall contain limitations
which are adequate to assure the attainment and maintenance of the water
quality standards of the receiving waters as assigned in the Massachusetts
Surface Water Quality Standards,
314 CMR 4.00. In establishing
water quality based effluent limitations, the Department shall consider natural
background conditions, existing discharges, the protection of existing
downstream uses, and the attainment and maintenance of beneficial uses in
downstream waters. Toward this end, the Department may provide a reasonable
margin of safety to account for any lack of knowledge concerning the
relationship between the pollutants being discharged and their impact on the
quality of the receiving waters. Water quality based limits may be established
on a seasonal basis at the discretion of the Department.
(4)
Technology based effluent
limitations. Limitations more stringent than those necessary to
satisfy water quality standards shall be applied in accordance with the
applicable provisions of 314 CMR 3.11(5) and (6).
(5)
Technology based effluent
limitations for POTWs. Except as provided in 314 CMR 3.11(12)(a),
technology based limitations for discharges from POTWs shall be the more
stringent of the criteria in 314 CMR 3.11(5)(a) and (b), or, if applicable,
based on the criteria in 314 CMR 3.11(5)(c):
(a) Secondary treatment, defined as that
process or group of process capable of removing from untreated wastewater a
minimum of 85% of the five day biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids,
and virtually all floating and settleable solids, followed by disinfection.
Disinfection of treated effluent may be discontinued at the discretion of the
Department. Limitations defining secondary treatment may be expressed in terms
of concentration as well as mass.
(b) Applicable limitations and standards
promulgated by EPA pursuant to
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 304(d)(1) to comply with the
requirements of
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(b)(1).
(c) The Department may establish technology
based effluent limitations for nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus based
on relevant EPA technology guidelines or a Department determination of the
highest and best practicable treatment technology necessary to ensure
compliance with
314 CMR 4.04(5)
and
4.05(5)(c).
(6)
Technology based
effluent limitations for non-POTWs. Except as provided in 314 CMR
3.11(12)(b), technology based limitations for discharges from non-POTWs shall
be the most stringent of the criteria in 314 CMR 3.11(6)(a) and (b), or, if
applicable, based on the criteria in 314 CMR 3.11(6)(c):
(a) Applicable limitations and standards
promulgated by EPA pursuant to
33 U.S.C.
1251
§§ 304, 306, 307, 316, 318,
and 405 to comply with the requirements of
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301.
(b) Limitations developed on a case-by-case
basis which, in the Department's best professional judgment, define the
appropriate level of control set forth in the The Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C.
1251
et seq, for the
category of discharger or class of pollutants discharged. In defining the
appropriate level of control hereunder, the Department will consider any draft
or promulgated EPA effluent limitation guidelines, draft or proposed EPA
development documents or guidance, any available state guidance, or any
technology or process which has been demonstrated to be achievable in the
experience of the Department for the class or category of discharger.
(c) The Department may establish technology
based effluent limitations for non-POTWs that are not classified as industrial
by EPA or the Department for nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus based on
relevant EPA technology guidelines or a Department determination of the highest
and best practicable treatment technology necessary to ensure compliance with
314 CMR 4.04(5)
and
4.05(5)(c).
(d) In the case of reissued permits,
limitations which are at least as stringent as those of the previous permit,
unless the effluent limitations imposed by the previously issued permit are
more stringent than subsequently promulgated effluent guidelines and one or
more of the following conditions applies:
1.
The discharger has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the
effluent limitations in the previous permit and has properly operated and
maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the
previous effluent limitations. In this case the limitations in the renewed or
reissued permit may reflect the level of pollutant control actually achieved
(but shall not be less stringent than required by the subsequently promulgated
effluent limitation guidelines).
2.
The circumstances on which the previous permit was based have materially and
substantially changed since the time the permit was issued and would constitute
cause for permit modification or revocation and reissuance under
314 CMR
3.13.
(7)
Calculating Permit
Conditions.
(a) The Department
may express effluent limitations and/or other pollutant loading limitations
established under 314 CMR 3.11 by means of any combination of physical,
chemical, or biological terms (including bioassay), control measures, BMPs, and
other actions, which, in the judgment of the Department, properly define the
level of control applicable to the discharge. Pollutants may be limited
directly or through limitations on other indicator pollutants which, in the
judgment of the Department, will provide the required level of
control.
(b) In order to ensure
that dilution will not be used as a substitute for treatment, limitations will
be based on mass wherever feasible. Pollutants limited in terms of mass may be
limited additionally in terms of other units, and the permit shall require the
permittee to comply with both limitations.
(c) Effluent limitations may be imposed on
internal waste streams before mixing with other waste streams or cooling water
streams when effluent limitations imposed at the point of discharge are
impractical or infeasible. Limits on internal waste streams will be imposed
only when the fact sheet under
314 CMR
2.05 sets forth the exceptional circumstances
which make such limitations necessary, such as when the final discharge point
is inaccessible, the wastes at the point of discharge are so diluted as to make
monitoring impractical, or the interferences among pollutants at the point of
discharge would make detection or analysis impractical.
(8)
Duration of
Permits. Permits shall be effective for a fixed term not to exceed
five years. The Department may issue any permit for a lesser
duration.
(9)
Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements.
(a) Each permit shall contain monitoring
requirements to assure compliance with permit limitations and conditions. The
type, intervals, and frequency of monitoring shall be sufficient to yield data
which are representative of the monitored activity including, when appropriate,
continuous monitoring. Monitoring requirements may include the mass (or other
measurement specified in the permit) for each pollutant limited in the permit,
the volume of effluent discharged from each out fall, and other measurements as
appropriate (including biological monitoring methods when appropriate).
Monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of
314 CMR 3.19(4) and
(10). Permittees shall maintain records of
all monitoring activities in accordance with
314 CMR
3.19(11).
(b) Each permit shall contain requirements to
report monitoring results with a frequency dependent on the nature and effect
of the discharge, but in no case less than once a year. Pollutants for which
the permittee must report violations of maximum daily discharge limitations
under
314 CMR 3.19(20)(e)
shall be listed in the permit.
(10)
Schedule of
Compliance.
(a) A permit may,
when appropriate, specify a schedule leading to compliance with the
Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53 and
The Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C.
1251
et seq, and the NPDES
regulations at 40 CFR Part 122. Any such schedule shall require compliance as
soon as possible, but not later than the applicable statutory deadline under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(b), unless modified in
accordance with the provisions of
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(i) or (k).
Each schedule shall set forth dates to accomplish interim
requirements leading toward compliance. Beginning with the date of permit
issuance, the time between interim dates shall not exceed one year. If the time
necessary for completion of any interim requirement is more than one year and
is not readily divisible into stages for completion, the permit shall specify
interim dates for the submission of reports of progress toward completion of
the interim requirements and indicate a projected completion
date.
(b) The first permit
issued for a new source shall not contain a schedule of compliance. No new
source or new or recommencing discharge shall begin operations or discharge
prior to installation and operation of all treatment works necessary to comply
with the effluent limitations established in the permit.
(11)
Other
Conditions. In addition to the conditions established under 314
CMR 3.11(1) through (10), a permit may include special conditions as follows:
(a) Any requirements established under a
state or other appropriate certification under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 401.
(b) Requirements for POTWs to comply with
pretreatment provisions under
314 CMR 12.00 including:
1. The identification, in terms of character
and volume of pollutants, of any significant indirect discharge into the POTW
subject to the prohibitions and standards of
314 CMR
12.08;
2. The establishment of a POTW pretreatment
program in accordance with
314 CMR 12.10,
including any necessary schedule of compliance for adoption of the
program;
3. The incorporation of an
approved POTW pretreatment program in the permit; and
4. The submittal by a POTW of the reports
required by
314 CMR
12.10(3).
(c) Requirements to control or
abate the discharge of pollutants through the application of best management
practices when:
1. Authorized under of the
Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C.
1251
et seq, § 304(e)
for the control of toxic pollutants and hazardous substances from ancillary
industrial activities;
2. Numerical
effluent limitations are infeasible; or
3. The practices are reasonably necessary to
achieve effluent limitations and standards or to carry out the purposes and
intent of The Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26
through 53 or The Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C.
1251
et seq.
(d) Requirements applicable to the
management of hazardous wastes for treatment works subject to the provisions of
314 CMR 8.00.
(e) Requirements to
monitor, record and report the quality of receiving waters.
(f) Requirements to prepare and submit
monthly operating reports under
314 CMR
12.07.
(g) Requirements imposed in grants made by
EPA or the Department to POTWs under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§§ 201 and 204 or M.G.L. c. 21
§§ 30A and 33 which are reasonably necessary for the achievement of
effluent limitations established pursuant to 314 CMR 3.11(2)(b).
(h) Requirements governing the disposal of
sludge from treatment works.
(i) A
requirement to comply with applicable regulations of the United States Coast
Guard at 33 CFR Part 159, when a permit is issued to a facility that may
operate at certain times as a means of transportation over water.
(j) Requirements that the Secretary of the
Army considers necessary to ensure that navigation and anchorage will not be
substantially impaired.
(k)
Requirements for the periodic submission of reports regarding sewer connections
authorized for the discharge of fewer than 15,000 gallons per day of sewage to
a treatment works.
(12)
Determination of Variance. The Department shall
evaluate variances from technology based effluent limitations as follows:
(a)
For POTWs:
1. If a POTW discharging to coastal waters
obtains a waiver from secondary treatment from EPA under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(h), the permit shall contain,
at a minimum, effluent limitations based on primary treatment with
disinfection.
2. Treatment works
which receive flows from combined sewers may not be capable of meeting the
percentage removal requirements of 314 CMR 3.11(5) during wet weather. For such
treatment works, the Department shall decide on a case-by-case basis whether
any attainable percentage removal level can be defined, and if so, what that
level should be.
3. Concentrations
of five day biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids established under
314 CMR 3.11(5) may be increased where there is a major industrial discharger
to the POTW, provided that:
a. The permitted
discharge of such pollutants, attributable to the industrial category, would
not be greater than that which would be permitted under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(b)(1)(a)(i) or 306 if such
industrial category were to discharge directly to waters of the Commonwealth;
and
b. The flow or loading of such
pollutants introduced by the industrial category exceeds ten percent of the
design flow or loading of the publicly owned treatment works. When such an
adjustment is made, the values for biochemical oxygen demand or suspended
solids shall be adjusted proportionally.
(b)
For Other
Dischargers:
1. Requests for
variances based on the presence of fundamentally different factors from those
on which effluent limitations guidelines were based will be reviewed by the
Department and forwarded to the Regional Administrator of EPA with a written
concurrence, submitted to EPA without a recommendation, or denied. If approved
by EPA, the Department may incorporate the variance in a draft
permit.
2. In accordance with
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 316(a), thermal discharge
effluent limitations may be less stringent than those required by applicable
technology based standards and limitations if the discharger demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the Department that such effluent limitations are more
stringent than necessary to assure the protection and propagation of a
balanced, indigenous community of shellfish, fish and wildlife in and on the
body of water into which the discharge is made. Alternative effluent
limitations may be established for the thermal discharge in accordance with the
provisions of
314 CMR
3.12. In no event shall established thermal
effluent limitations be less stringent than those necessary to meet the
applicable water quality standards under
314 CMR 4.00.
3. Requests for variances for
non-conventional pollutants under
33 U.S.C.
1251
§ 301(g) will be reviewed by the
Department and forwarded to the Regional Administrator of EPA with a written
concurrence, submitted to EPA without a recommendation, or denied. If approved
by EPA, the Department may incorporate the variance in a draft
permit.