(b)
Assessment of Fee.
1.
Assessment. The board of health, upon the receipt of
an application, may assess by a written notice to the applicant a Technical Fee
for said application not to exceed the maximum amount set forth in
310 CMR
16.99.
2.
Form of Payment.
The board shall prescribe the amount of the fee and the manner of payment in
writing to the applicant within ten days of the filing of the application in
accordance with
310 CMR
16.08.
3.
Payment. The
applicant shall pay the Technical Fee in the amount and manner prescribed by
the board of health.
4.
Waiver. The board of health may waive all or a portion
of the Technical Fee. Any such waiver shall be made in writing to the
applicant.
5.
Absence
of assessment or waiver. In the absence of an assessment or waiver
of the Technical Fee by the board of health in accordance with 310 CMR
16.30(2)(b)1., 2. or 4., the applicant may satisfy the Technical Fee payment
requirements by making a payment in the form of a certified or bank check or
money order, in an amount equal to the maximum Technical Fee for the
appropriate facility as specified in
310 CMR
16.99.
(c)
Technical Review
1.
General. The
Technical Fee may be expended for 100% of the allowable cost of reviewing
technical data submitted to the board of health.
2.
Allowable costs.
Allowable costs for technical review include the cost of hiring consultants and
related technical experts to assist the board of health in reviewing the
application, the Department Report on Suitability, the Department of Public
Health's Report and comments, public comments and any subsequent amendments or
additions to the application.
3.
Allowable tasks. Allowable tasks for the consultants
and related technical experts include:
a.
determining completeness and accuracy of data in the application;
b. determining whether the correct analytical
techniques were used, whether valid data were obtained, and whether the data
support the proposed conclusions;
c. determining what other data should be
obtained, the means to obtain it and its potential significance;
d. examining municipal, Department and other
relevant records and consulting with Department staff;
e. visiting the site to make a visual
inspection;
f. preparing and
submitting comments to the Department on technical issues relating to the site
and the site suitability criteria;
g. reviewing the Department Report on
Suitability and other data submitted prior to and during the hearing;
and
h. preparing a written report
of comments and determinations.
4.
Excluded Costs.
Allowable costs for technical review shall not include the cost of conducting
site, environmental or population sampling and analyses, otherwise generating
new data, or performing independent analyses of environmental health impacts.
These costs may qualify as allowable costs for technical assistance in
accordance with 310 CMR 16.30(d)2.
(d)
Technical
Assistance1.
General. The Technical Fee may cover 50% of the cost
of providing expert legal, scientific or engineering assistance to the board of
health to assure that all points of view are adequately presented and evaluated
at the public hearing.
2.
Allowable costs. Allowable costs for technical
assistance include the cost of hiring consultants, technical experts or legal
counsel. Allowable types of technical assistance include:
a. legal counsel to represent the board of
health at the hearing and to examine witnesses at the hearing;
b. scientific and/or engineering experts to
help develop evidence, question witnesses and/or testify at the hearing;
and
c. photographic or graphic
expertise.
(e)
Extraordinary
Expenses1.
Assessment. After commencement of the public hearing,
pursuant to the requirements of
310 CMR
16.20, the board of health may assess in
writing, an additional Technical Fee payment when the following conditions are
satisfied:
a. the evidence proposed to be
obtained by the expenditure of the fee is likely to be critical to the
determination of site suitability; and
b. the applicant has failed to provide such
evidence upon request by the Hearing Officer; and
c. the evidence cannot be acquired without
the expenditure by the board of health of funds in excess of the Technical Fee;
and
d. the evidence did not exist
or was not reasonably discoverable through due diligence by the board of health
prior to the request; or
e. the
evidence is based on new scientific or technical standards or criteria which
were previously unavailable.
2.
Payment or
Appeal. The applicant upon receipt of the written request may:
a. within three days appeal to the Hearing
Officer for a determination as to the appropriateness and reasonableness of the
fee assessment; or
b. make the
appropriate payment as prescribed by the board of health within ten
days.
3.
Hearing Officer's Decision on Appeals.
a.
Standard of
Decision. The Hearing Officer shall determine that an
extraordinary expense request is reasonable only if she or he finds that the
conditions in 16.30(2)(e)1. are satisfied.
b.
Decision by the Hearing
Officer. The Hearing Officer shall issue a written determination
to the applicant and the board of health. When the Hearing Officer determines
the assessment is reasonable the applicant shall make the appropriate payment
as directed by the board of health within six days. When the Hearing Officer
determines the assessment is not reasonable the applicant shall not be required
to make the payment.
4.
Non-payment. The board of health may withhold final
disposition of the site assignment application until the applicant submits the
payment or issue a determination based on the available information.