1.
Appointment. The Board shall contract with hearing officers to
perform the duties and exercise the powers set forth in this Chapter. The
hearing officers must have appropriate experience and training, be fair,
impartial, unbiased, and demonstrate a continuing ability to conduct a fair,
efficient and effective appeal process.
2.
Assignment; Removal;
Replacement
A. An appeal will be
assigned by the System to a hearing officer who has no personal or financial
interest, direct or indirect, in the appeal or its outcome, and who has not
been involved directly or indirectly in the matter that is the subject of the
appeal. The fact that a hearing officer is the recipient of a MainePERS benefit
does not constitute, by itself, direct or indirect personal or financial
interest in an appeal or its outcome. The assignment shall be based on
balancing caseloads among contracted hearing officers. The appellant within 15
days after notice of the assigned hearing officer may select an alternative
hearing officer who has contracted with the Board.
(1) The System need not offer as an
alternative any hearing officer who has a substantially larger caseload than
other hearing officers. The appellant may select a hearing officer who was not
offered as an alternative because of a substantially larger caseload if the
appellant shows, within the timeframe for selecting an alternative hearing
officer, that the hearing officer is uniquely qualified to preside over the
appeal.
(2) In an appeal with more
than one appellant, if the appellants cannot agree on an alternative hearing
officer, the hearing officer assigned by the System will serve as hearing
officer.
B. If a party
files a timely allegation of bias, prejudice or personal or financial interest,
either direct or indirect, against the hearing officer, the hearing officer
will promptly determine whether to remove herself/himself as hearing officer
and will include that determination in the record.
C. A hearing officer may also independently
remove themselves from the appeal if the hearing officer cannot be fair,
impartial and unbiased.
D. When a
hearing officer is removed, terminated or cannot continue, the System will
assign the appeal to another hearing officer, and the appellant will have an
opportunity to select an alternative hearing officer consistent with paragraph
A and section
5(3). The new
hearing officer will continue the ongoing appeal process, unless the hearing
officer determines that in order to avoid substantial prejudice to any party it
is necessary to start the process anew.
3.
Duty and powers of the hearing
officer. The hearing officer has the duty to render a fair and impartial
recommended decision to the Board in accordance with section
15. This recommended decision must be
based on the record as a whole and resolve all material issues in the appeal.
In lieu of a recommended decision, the hearing officer may recommend dismissal.
The hearing officer has the following powers:
A. To resolve an appeal without a hearing;
provided that the parties mutually agree to dispense with a hearing, by
issuing:
(1) a recommended decision which
meets the requirements of section
15, to be acted on by the Board under
section 16, on the basis
of the documentary materials which constitute the record; or
(2) a recommended dismissal with prejudice to
be submitted to the Board for approval if, pursuant to section
6(2), the Chief
Executive Officer issues a decision that favors the appellant, in whole or in
part, and the appellant withdraws the appeal with respect to all portions of
the decision of the Chief Executive Officer that are not in the appellant's
favor; or
(3) a recommended
dismissal, with or without prejudice as circumstances warrant, to be submitted
to the Board for approval.
B. Upon adequate notice to the parties, to
schedule the date, time and place or to change the date, time or place and to
continue any conference, hearing, or deadline of any
nature;1
C. Generally working through the appeals
clerk, to notify parties and hold a pre hearing conference, of which all
parties must be notified and at which they may participate, the purposes of
which may include:
(1) determining whether the
appellant elects the expedited or unrestricted appeal process in accordance
with section
6, and explaining the consequences of
the choice of appeal process;
(2)
identifying and clarifying the issues on appeal and determining whether the
appellant intends to introduce issues, not previously considered by the Chief
Executive Officer;
(3) developing
stipulations of fact and admissions as to facts that are not
contested;
(4) identifying exhibits
to apprise the parties as fully as is practicable of the nature of the evidence
to be offered by all parties and to eliminate, as far as possible, the element
of surprise;
(5) identifying
witnesses and the manner in which the testimony will be provided as described
in section
11(2);
(6) identifying any potential parties to the
adjudication whose joinder may foster economy, efficiency and
fairness;
(7) identifying and
resolving disputes as to production of documents and admissibility of evidence,
including the making of evidentiary rulings; and
(8) any other action that will encourage and
maintain a fair, efficient and effective appeal process.
D. To order, where relevant and useful, one
or more independent medical evaluations on conditions that have not previously
been the subject of an independent medical examination, for which the System
will, to the extent reasonably practicable, provide the names of three
appropriately qualified health care providers, among whom the person appealing
will choose and to whom the person will go for evaluation, the costs of which
will be paid by the System;
E. To
return to the Chief Executive Officer or designee for consideration, any issue
raised for the first time in the appeal process, as required pursuant to
section 6(2)(A);
F. To rule on any request at any conference,
during the hearing or at any other time during the appeal process, prior to
delivery of the recommended decision to the Board;
G. Generally working through the appeals
clerk, to set the time for all filings, appearances, and other actions by any
party or parties in connection with the appeal process, in accordance with 5
M.R.S. §17451;
H. To issue subpoena(s) on request of a party
or to deny a request when the hearing officer determines that the testimony or
evidence is not relevant to any issue of fact in the hearing, or otherwise
inadmissible, in accordance with 5 M.R.S. §9060 and section
12 of these rules;
I. After the close of the evidence, the
parties' receipt of a hearing transcript, if any, and the issuance of an Chief
Executive Officer's reconsidered decision as described in section
14, to request that the parties
submit briefs on the issues not decided by the Chief Executive Officer in the
appellant's favor, and to request or allow the parties to make oral argument to
the hearing officer, when the hearing officer deems oral argument to be
necessary or useful;
J. To
ascertain the rights of the parties, to identify and notify all parties that
may be affected by a decision, to ensure that all parties have a full
opportunity to present their claims orally or in writing and to secure
witnesses and evidence to establish their claims, and to assist parties and
witnesses in making full and free statements in order to develop all issues
which may govern the outcome of the appeal;
K. To administer oaths or affirmations to all
witnesses in all hearings;
L. To
regulate the presentation of evidence, including questioning of witnesses and
the participation of parties, in order to ensure an adequate and comprehensive
record of the proceedings and to avoid repetition and delay;
M. To examine witnesses and ensure that
relevant evidence is admitted in the record;
N. To determine the credibility of witnesses
and to decide the weight to be given to testimony and all other
evidence;
O. To take official
notice of facts in accordance with 5 M.R.S. §9058, and parties shall be copied
with the facts noticed, and the source of those facts, which shall be placed of
record;
P. To rule on the
admissibility of evidence;
Q. To
ensure that a complete record is made of the hearing, including recording in
accordance with 5 M.R.S. §9059;
R. To consult with the Board's counsel on
legal issues; provided that, when an appeal raises issues of equity or
constitutionality, the hearing officer must consult with the Board's
counsel.
S. To consult with the
System advisor if the hearing officer requires information concerning general
System structure, policies or practices if the hearing officer determines that
such consultation would be helpful to a determination of the issues on appeal.
If the hearing officer seeks information from the System advisor, such request
shall be in writing and identify the case, and both the request and the
response shall be copied to the parties and placed of record.
T. To recommend dismissal in the event an
appellant fails to appear at a hearing, or otherwise fails to prosecute the
appeal, unless there is a showing of good cause under section
10.
1 The MainePERS office in Augusta
shall be the normal location for hearings, absent a request made in the notice
of appeal or at the pre-hearing conference, together with a showing by the
requesting party of a compelling need for an alternative
venue.