Code of Maine Rules
94 - INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
089 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Chapter 815 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVOLVING LOAN FUND
Section 089-815-6 - EVALUATION CRITERIA
Universal Citation: 94 ME Code Rules ยง 089-815-6
Current through 2024-38, September 18, 2024
1. In accordance with the criteria in 5 MRSA 13056-F(5), the Commission shall evaluate and seek to fund those proposals that best meet its historic preservation priorities for the State and region and that support its economic and community development and enhancement priorities. The criteria are explained as follows:
A.
The level of historic or
architectural significance. Factors that shall be considered in
determining an EHP's level of historic or architectural significance shall
include but not be limited to its importance to the history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering, or culture of a community, the state, or the nation.
If not already established in a National Register of Historic Places Nomination
Form, the significance of the property will be determined by the Director using
guidance published by the National Park Service. Properties that are not
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places cannot be EHPs
for purposes of the Historic Preservation Revolving Loan Fund.
B.
The value with respect to historic
preservation and rehabilitation. Factors that shall be considered in
determining the value of an EHP with respect to historic preservation and
rehabilitation shall include but not be limited to its significance; its
location relative to other historic properties (e.g. is it part of an historic
district or a complex of historically and functionally related buildings?); its
potential to act as a catalyst for other historic preservation and
rehabilitation activities; its historic and/or cultural affiliation with other
historic properties in the region; and whether it is a rare or unique resource
in the region or state.
C.
The degree to which the property is endangered. Factors that shall
be considered in demonstrating the degree to which an EHP is endangered shall
include but not be limited to an evaluation of physical evidence that documents
current structural conditions (including previous structural repairs,
conditions assessments by preservation engineers or other qualified
professionals, etc.); a review of the history of previous attempts to preserve
the property; the threat of imminent demolition and/or destruction of the
property's character defining features or physical setting; and in the case of
an archaeological site, the threat of ground disturbance that could preclude
future excavation and the recovery of information from it.
D.
The economic significance to the
immediate vicinity and to the State. Factors that shall be considered in
demonstrating the economic significance of preserving an EHP to the immediate
vicinity and to the State shall include but not be limited to its potential to
increase local property tax revenue when rehabilitated; its potential to
attract other revenue and investment; its potential to stimulate additional
historic rehabilitation activity; and its potential to directly or indirectly
foster job creation or retention.
E.
The value with respect to downtown
revitalization, open space conservation or other public purposes.
Factors that shall be considered in demonstrating the value of preserving an
EHP with respect to downtown revitalization, open space conservation or other
public purposes shall include but not be limited to the economic and business
climate of the downtown; the viability of long-term re-use plans; the potential
impact on surrounding properties; the extent to which open space and/or
cultural landscape(s) will be preserved as part of or in concert with the EHP
and its proposed use; whether the EHP is in an area affected or threatened by
sprawl; the types of proposed use, services or businesses to be offered within
the EHP and related open space (e.g. do they serve a local need? How will they
affect the cultural landscape and/or archaeological sites?); and the degree of
public support for preservation of the EHP and/or the overall conservation and
use plan.
F.
The
availability at fair market value. The availability of the EHP at fair
market value shall be determined by comparison of the acquisition price with
the appraised value of the property by a Certified Real Estate Appraiser;
G.
The degree to which the
property is available below fair market value. The degree to which the
EHP is available below fair market value shall be determined by comparison of
the acquisition price with the appraised value of the property by a Certified
Real Estate Appraiser;
H.
The potential marketability. Factors that shall be considered in
ascertaining the potential marketability of the EHP shall include but not be
limited to an assessment of the property's marketability by a Licensed Real
Estate Professional, taking into account the fact that the property will be
offered for sale with a Preservation Easement or Covenant; the location of the
property and the status of the surrounding real estate market; an evaluation of
potential appropriate uses of the EHP; and the advertising and promotion
strategy.
I.
The feasibility
of rehabilitation or restoration and reuse. Factors that shall be
considered in demonstrating the feasibility of rehabilitating or restoring and
reusing the EHP shall include but not be limited to whether it is adaptable in
a manner consistent with local zoning and modern needs/uses; its condition
(e.g. can the building be occupied in its current state, and if not, can the QO
stabilize the building or otherwise mitigate hazardous conditions to facilitate
its sale?); and its accessibility to public right-of-ways, services, and
infrastructure.
J.
The value
of the proposed property with respect to tourism promotion and
development. Factors that shall be considered in measuring the value of
preserving the EHP with respect to tourism promotion and development shall
include but not be limited to its potential appeal to out-of state travelers;
how it fits into an overall tourism development plan; and how its preservation
will preserve or enhance the visual and physical character of a
community.
K.
The degree of
community support. Factors that shall be considered in evaluating the
degree of support for preserving an EHP shall include but not be limited to the
endorsement of municipal governments and their officials; endorsements and/or
other past or current efforts by local or regional organizations involved in
history or historic preservation to preserve the EHP; the support of other
local or regional institutions or organizations (such as local or regional
planning agencies, chambers of commerce, recreational or social clubs, etc.);
the support of local businesses and citizens.
L.
The extent to which the proposed
project involves partnerships or meets multiple criteria. Factors that
shall be considered in evaluating the extent to which the preservation of EHP
involves partnerships shall include but not be limited to documentation that
shows financial or other in-kind materials or services that have been pledged
or provided by private, non-profit or governmental entities or individuals to
support the project; the extent to which public access to the EHP will be
ensured, and the types of public use to be allowed when it is sold by the
QO.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Maine may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.