1. "The commission may not
approve an application, unless:
A. Adequate
technical and financial provision has been made for complying with the
requirements of the State's air and water pollution control and other
environmental laws, and those standards and regulations adopted with respect
thereto, including without limitation the minimum lot size laws,
[12
M.R.S.] Sections4807 to
4807-G, the site location of
development laws,
Title 38,
sections481 to
489-E, and the natural resource
protection laws,
Title 38,
sections480-A to
480-Z, and adequate provision has
been made for solid waste and sewage disposal, for controlling of offensive
odors and for the securing and maintenance of sufficient healthful water
supplies;
B. Adequate provision has
been made for loading, parking and circulation of land, air and water traffic
in, on and from the site, and for assurance that the proposal will not cause
congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to existing or proposed
transportation arteries or methods;
C. Adequate provision has been made for
fitting the proposal harmoniously into the existing natural environment in
order to ensure there will be no undue adverse effect on existing uses, scenic
character and natural and historic resources in the area likely to be affected
by the proposal.
(1) In making a determination
under this paragraph regarding whether an applicant has made adequate provision
for fitting the proposal harmoniously into the existing natural environment,
the commission may consider the effect of at least 1.5 feet of sea level rise
by 2050 and 4 feet of relative sea level rise by 2100 as specified by the
Commission by rule adopted pursuant to section 685-A, subsection 3.
(2) In making a determination under this
paragraph regarding development to facilitate withdrawal of groundwater, the
Commission shall consider the effects of the proposed withdrawal on waters of
the State, as defined by
Title 38,
Section 361-A, subsection
7; water-related natural
resources; and existing uses, including, but not limited to, public or private
wells, within the anticipated zone of contribution to the withdrawal. In making
findings under this paragraph, the Commission shall consider both the direct
effects of the proposed withdrawal and its effects in combination with existing
water withdrawals.
(3) In making a
determination under this paragraph regarding a community-based offshore wind
energy project, the commission shall consider the project's effects on scenic
character and existing uses related to scenic character in accordance with
Title
35-A, section3452.
(4) In making a determination under this
paragraph regarding a wind energy development, as defined in
Title
35-A, section3451, subsection 11, that is not
a grid-scale wind energy development, that has a generating capacity of 100
kilowatts or greater and that is proposed for a location within the expedited
permitting area, the commission shall consider the development's or project's
effects on scenic character and existing uses relating to scenic character in
the manner provided for in
Title
35-A, section3452;
C-1. With respect to a wind energy
development that has a generating capacity of 100 kilowatts or greater, the
person proposing the development has received certification from the Department
of Environmental Protection in the manner provided under
Title
35-A, section 3456;
D. The proposal will not cause unreasonable
soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to absorb and hold water
and suitable soils are available for a sewage disposal system if sewage is to
be disposed on-site;
E. The
proposal is otherwise in conformance with this chapter and the regulations,
standards and plans adopted pursuant thereto; and
F. In the case of an application for a
structure upon any lot in a subdivision, that the subdivision has received the
approval of the commission.
The burden is upon the applicant to demonstrate by
substantial evidence that the criteria for approval are satisfied, and that the
public's health, safety and general welfare will be adequately protected. The
commission shall permit the applicant and other parties to provide evidence on
the economic benefits of the proposal as well as the impact of the proposal on
energy resources."12 M.R.S.
§685-B(4)
In addition, the applicant must demonstrate "evidence of
sufficient right, title or interest in all of the property that is proposed for
development or use."12 M.R.S.
§685-B(2)(D)
2. Pursuant to 12
M.R.S. Section685-B,(4) in making a decision on an application for a
community-based offshore wind energy project, the commission may not consider
whether the project meets the specific criteria designated in
12 M.R.S.
Section1862, Subsection
2, paragraph A, subparagraph (6),
divisions (a) to (d). This limitation is not intended to restrict the
commission's review of related potential impacts of the project as determined
by the commission.