Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. General.
R.S.
47:287.82 provides that otherwise deductible
interest expenses and costs, intangible expenses and costs, and management fees
directly or indirectly paid to a related member shall be added back to the
corporations gross income.
B.
Exceptions. The taxpayer shall make the add-back unless:
1. the item of income corresponding to the
taxpayers expense, cost, or fee, was in the same taxable year subject to a tax
based on or measured by the related member's net income in Louisiana or any
other state; or
2. the item of
income corresponding to the taxpayers expense, cost, or fee, was in the same
taxable year subject to a tax based on or measured by the related member's net
income in a foreign nation which has in force an income tax treaty with the
United States, if the recipient was a "resident" as defined in the income tax
treaty with the foreign nation; or
3. the transaction giving rise to the
expense, cost, or fee between the taxpayer and the related member did not have
as a principal purpose the avoidance of any Louisiana tax; or
4. the expense, cost, or fee that was paid or
accrued to a related member was "passed through" by the related member or
members to an unrelated third party in an arms-length transaction via a
corresponding expense, cost, or fee payment; or
5. the add-back is unreasonable. The add-back
will be considered unreasonable if the taxpayer establishes that, based on the
entirety of the taxpayer's particular facts and circumstances, the add-back
adjustments would increase the taxpayer's Louisiana income tax liability to an
amount that bears no reasonable relation to the taxpayers Louisiana
presence.
C. Definitions
Indirectly Paid-interest expenses and costs,
intangible expenses and costs, and management fees subject to add-back include
expenses, costs, and fees incurred by a taxpayer if the expense is related to
an intermediate expense, cost, or fee incurred in a transaction between one
related member and a second related member.
a. EXAMPLE. Corporations B and C are related
members with respect to Corporation A. Corporation A is a Louisiana taxpayer
that sells products it purchases from Corporation B on a cost plus basis.
Corporation B licenses intangible property from Corporation C and makes
intangible expense payments to Corporation C based in part on the sales
Corporation B makes to Corporation A. To the extent the intangible expenses
Corporation B pays to Corporation C are reflected in the costs of the products
Corporation A purchases from Corporation B, the direct intangible expenses of
Corporation B are considered to be indirect intangible expenses of Corporation
A. Furthermore, Corporation A is deemed to directly pay an intangible expense
to Corporation B and indirectly pay an intangible expense to Corporation C.
Intangible Expenses-includes but is not
limited to:
a. expenses, accruals, and
costs for, related to, or directly or indirectly incurred in connection with
the acquisition, use, maintenance, management, ownership, sale, exchange, or
any other disposition of intangible property. "Intangible property" includes
stocks, bonds, financial instruments, patents, patent applications, trade
names, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, mask works, trade secrets, "know
how", and similar types of intangible assets;
b. costs related to, or incurred in
connection directly or indirectly with, factoring transactions or discounting
transactions;
c. royalty, patent,
technical, and copyright fees;
d.
licensing fees;
e. other similar
expenses, accruals, and costs.
Management Fees-includes but is not limited
to expenses and costs, including intercompany administrative charges,
pertaining to accounts receivable, accounts payable, employee benefit plans,
insurance, legal matters, payroll, data processing, including assembled
workforce and/or employment data processing, purchasing, procurement,
organizational matters, business structuring matters, taxation, financial
matters, securities, accounting, marketing, reporting, and compliance matters
or similar activities.
Related Entity-
a. a stockholder who is an individual, or a
member of the stockholder's family set forth in
26 U.S.C.
318 if the stockholder and the members of the
stockholder's family own, directly, indirectly, beneficially or constructively,
in the aggregate, at least 50 percent of the value of the taxpayer's
outstanding stock;
b. a
stockholder, or a stockholder's partnership, limited liability company, estate,
trust or corporation, if the stockholder and the stockholder's partnerships,
limited liability companies, estates, trusts and corporations own directly,
indirectly, beneficially or constructively, in the aggregate, at least 50
percent of the value of the taxpayer's outstanding stock; or
c. a corporation, or a party related to the
corporation in a manner that would require an attribution of stock from the
corporation to the party or from the party to the corporation under the
attribution rules of the Internal Revenue Code if the taxpayer
owns, directly, indirectly, beneficially or constructively, at least 50 percent
of the value of the corporation's outstanding stock. The attribution rules of
the Internal Revenue Code shall apply for purposes of determining whether the
ownership requirements of this definition have been met.
Related Member-a person that, with respect
to the taxpayer during all or any portion of the taxable year, is:
a. a related entity;
b. a related party;
c. a component member as defined in
subsection (b) of
26 U.S.C.
1563;
d. a person to or from whom there is
attribution of stock ownership in accordance with subsection (e) of
26 U.S.C.
1563; or
e. a person that, notwithstanding its form of
organization, bears the same relationship to the taxpayer as a person described
in Subparagraphs a to c, inclusive.
D.
Operating Rules
1. Upon request by the
secretary of the Louisiana Department of Revenue, the taxpayer shall produce
documentation substantiating any exceptions to add-back claimed by the
taxpayer.
2. The exceptions
described in Paragraphs B.1. and B.2 of this Section. (corresponding item of
income subject to tax) are allowed only to the extent the recipient related
member includes the corresponding item of income in post-allocation income or
apportioned income reported to the taxing jurisdiction or jurisdictions. Income
offset or eliminated in a combined reporting regime would not qualify for the
subject to tax exception.
a. EXAMPLE.
Corporation A, a Louisiana taxpayer, incurs a $100 intangible expense in a
transaction with Corporation B, a related member with respect to Corporation A.
Corporation B files an income tax return in State B where it apportions and/or
allocates 5 percent of its income, but files no other income tax returns. Only
$5 of the intangible expense was allocated/apportioned to State B. Corporation
A must add-back $95 of the otherwise deductible $100 intangible expense
incurred in the transaction with Corporation B.
3. Upon request of the secretary of the
Louisiana Department of Revenue, the exception described in Paragraph B.3 of
this Section. (non-tax business purpose for conducting a transaction) must be
supported by contemporaneous documentation. Documentation shall be considered
contemporaneous if the documentation is in existence and compiled before the
due date (including extensions) for the filing of a return containing the
transaction(s). Mere statements or assertions that a transaction was intended
to allow for better management or greater utilization of intangible assets, or
similarly unsubstantiated claims are not sufficient to establish a principal
non-tax business purpose. Examples of principal non-tax business purposes
include:
a. EXAMPLE. Taxpayer purchases
administrative services such as accounting, legal, hu man resources,
purchasing, etc., from a Related Member and does so at rates comparable to
rates that would be charged by third party service providers.
b. EXAMPLE. Taxpayer borrows funds from a
Related Member and does so at an interest rate and with other terms that are
comparable to rates and terms that would be required by an unrelated third
party lender.
c. EXAMPLE. Taxpayer
incurs royalty expense in connection with the use of intangible assets provided
by a Related Party. The royalty rates and other terms of agreement are
comparable to rates and terms that would be required by an unrelated third
party.
4. The exception
described in Paragraph B.4 of this Section. (expense "passed through" to an
unrelated third party) is limited if the expenses, costs, and fees paid to a
related member are greater than the expenses, costs, and fees the related
member pays to unrelated third parties because only a portion of the expenses,
costs, and fees incurred in connection with a transaction with a related member
is considered to have "passed through" to the unrelated third parties.
a. EXAMPLE. Taxpayer A, a Louisiana taxpayer,
incurs a $100 management fee to Related Member B. Related Member B receives a
total of $400 of related member management fee income ($100 from Taxpayer A
plus $300 from other related payors). Related Member B pays $200 of management
fees to unrelated third parties. Related Member B will be deemed to have passed
through to unrelated third parties only 50 percent of the interest
expense/income it received from Taxpayer A. Only $50 of Taxpayer As $100
related member management fee payment to Related Member B will be deemed to
have been passed through to unrelated third parties and qualify for the
exception described in section B.4. (expense "passed through" to an unrelated
third party).
5. With
respect to both interest and intangible expenses, if the interest or intangible
expense rate charged the taxpayer by the related member exceeds the interest or
intangible expense rate charged the related member by unrelated third party
payees, then the excess expense will not qualify for the exception described in
section B.5 (add-back is unreasonable) and must be added back. If multiple
transaction arrangements exist between the taxpayer and the related member, or
the related member and the unrelated third-party, then a weighted average rate
should be calculated by dividing total expense by total amounts of each base
amount used to determine the expense amounts. The weighted average rate should
then be used to determine the existence of non-qualifying excess interest or
intangible expense.
a. EXAMPLE. Taxpayer B
incurs interest expense of $100 during its taxable year to its parent Company A
(a related member) in order to service a $1,000 debt between B and A. Company
As related member interest rate is 10 percent calculated by dividing its
related member interest expense ($100) by its related member debt ($1000).
Company A makes interest expense payments of $200 to Unrelated Lenders C and D
to service the $4,000 of total debt existing between A and Unrelated Lenders C
and D. As weighted average unrelated third party interest rate is five percent
(5 percent) calculated by dividing total unrelated third party interest expense
($200) by total unrelated third party interest bearing debt ($4,000). Company
B's non-qualifying excess interest is $50. Company B's debt to Company A
($1,000) is multiplied by the excess interest rate Company B incurred over
Company A's average interest rate to unrelated lenders (10 percent-5
percent).
6. With respect
to interest expense, if the taxpayers debt over asset percentage exceeds the
consolidated unrelated third-party debt over asset percentage of its federal
consolidated group (as represented by interest-bearing debt reported on the
schedule L balance sheet(s) included in the consolidated and pro forma federal
income tax returns), then the interest expense associated with the excess debt
must be added back and cannot qualify for the exception described in Paragraph
B.5 of this Section. (add-back is unreasonable). The debt over asset test only
applies to the unreasonable exception.
a.
EXAMPLE. Company A and Taxpayer B are related members. Taxpayer Bs separate
company federal income tax return Schedule L balance sheet shows $1,500 of
assets and $1,000 of interest bearing debt which produces a debt over asset
percentage of 66.7 percent. The Company A and Subsidiaries federal consolidated
income tax return Schedule L balance sheet shows $6,000 of assets and $3,000 of
unrelated third party interest bearing debt which produces a debt over asset
percentage of 50 percent. Because Taxpayer Bs debt over asset percentage of
66.7 percent, exceeds the groups unrelated third party debt over asset
percentage, 50 percent, the amount of Taxpayer Bs related member interest
expense that may qualify for the exception described in section B.5. (add-back
is unreasonable) is limited. The limitation is calculated by multiplying Bs
assets ($1,500) by the lower of the taxpayers debt over asset percentage or the
groups unrelated third party debt over asset percentage (50 percent) and then
multiplying the product ($750) by the lower of the taxpayers related member
interest rate or the related members unrelated third party interest rate (5
percent), which yields an ultimate limitation of
$37.50.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
47:1511.