Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A.
Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter:
Contracted Vocational and Habilitative
Services-those services which are purchased by the Office for Citizens
with Developmental Disabilities through contractual arrangements with private
providers. The services include, but are not limited to, supported employment
and other vocational services provided in conjunction with Louisiana
Rehabilitation Services (LRS), group models of community-based work,
facility-based work and habilitative services as they relate to the acquisition
of vocationally-related skills, community-based skills, daily life skills and
behavior management.
Corrective Action Plan-a set of plans
developed by a provider of vocational and habilitative services in response to
findings of noncompliance with minimum standards. The plans indicate how the
provider will come into compliance with minimum standards, the staff
responsible for implementing such plans and the time by which the corrective
actions will be in place.
Minimum Standards-those standards contained
in this Chapter which are identified by the acronym "MS" and which define
minimally acceptable standards of care for private providers of contracted
vocational and habilitative services.
Monitor/Monitoring Team-staff employed by
the Office for Citizens with Developmental Disabilities who are assigned to
evaluate the practices of providers of contracted vocational and habilitative
services.
Quality Indicators-those standards
contained in this Chapter which are identified by the acronym "QI" and which
reflect best practices in the area of vocational and habilitative services.
When a contracted provider adopts the practices demanded by these standards,
the Office for Citizens with Developmental Disabilities recognizes such a
provider for excellence in programming.
B. Introduction
1. The present standards were developed by a
committee composed of a parent representative, provider agencies, and employees
of the Office for Citizens with Developmental Disabilities (OCDD). Prior to
publication they were distributed for statewide input from provider agencies,
OCDD employees, and legally-established OCDD State and Regional Advisory
Committees.
2. The purpose of these
standards is to establish and maintain high quality, individualized, vocational
and habilitative services for persons with developmental disabilities and to
offer these individuals choice in the types of services and supports to be
rendered.
a. In order to insure the
development of an instrument that addressed quality, the committee developed a
set of principles on which the standards were to be based and measured
against.
b. In addition, the
structure of the standards and the procedures for monitoring them have been
designed to recognize excellence in program practices, to provide direction for
growth and a basis for the provision of technical assistance and training. Both
minimum standards and quality indicators are included in the standards
document. Agencies pursuing excellence will seek to achieve success on some or
all of the quality indicators. The OCDD in turn will recognize such achievement
by awarding a higher class certification.
C. Monitoring Procedures
1. Application. The standards and monitoring
procedures will be applied to all entities contracting with the Office for
Citizens with Developmental Disabilities to provide Vocational and Habilitative
Services.
2. Minimum Standards and
Quality Indicators. Each standard or in some cases portions of standards are
preceded by the letters "MS" for Minimum Standard or "QI" for Quality
Indicator. Contractors are expected to comply with all Minimum Standards (MS)
and compliance with them will be measured at every formal monitoring visit.
Agencies that wish to demonstrate excellence will identify the Quality
Indicators (QI) they are pursuing and be prepared to provide evidence of
compliance.
3. Frequency of
Monitoring
a. In general, each contractor
will be formally monitored by OCDD Regional staff for compliance with these
standards on an annual basis. When a contractor has demonstrated a high degree
of excellence during a monitoring visit (see "Rating System,"§101. C.5.b i), the
annual monitoring requirement will be waived for a one-year period.
b. Regional staff may make aperiodic,
informal visits to the program site where the need for technical assistance may
be assessed. Such informal visits will not be considered part of a formal
monitoring procedure and consequently, will not result in a request for a
corrective action plan. However, observations which are made on such visits may
be documented as evidence to be cited at the time of the formal, annual
monitoring visit. If in the course of an informal visit, a serious condition
which endangers the health and/or safety of a consumer is detected, proper
authorities, including the Department of Social Services, Bureau of Licensing
and Certification, will be notified and action taken to remove the
threat.
4. Procedures
a. The OCDD monitor(s) will evaluate
compliance with Minimum Standards based on their reviews of agency policies and
procedures, observation of the overall program, staff and consumer interviews,
review of a predetermined sample of records based on the number of people
served and other review techniques identified by the OCDD.
b. Quality Indicators will be monitored only
upon the request of the contracted agency. The agency must identify specific
indicators to be measured and provide documentation of success. The monitor
will consider such evidence and make independent observations of program
practices to verify compliance.
c.
Immediately following completion of a monitoring survey the monitor/monitoring
team will conduct an exit interview with the provider agency. At the exit
interview an exit report will be issued which identifies deficiencies noted.
Should the provider agency and the monitor disagree about particular findings,
every attempt should be made to resolve the issues prior to the issuance of a
confirmation report. The confirmation report will describe overall impressions
of the program, particularly positive aspects, and will have the exit report
attached. It will be issued within five working days of the exit interview. The
agency monitored is responsible for submitting a Corrective Action Plan to the
OCDD Regional Office within 10 working days after the postmarked date of the
confirmation report.
5.
Criteria for Certification. Upon publication of the final rule establishing
these standards (July 20, 1995), provider agencies will be given one full year
to modify current practices or implement the new practices the minimum
standards demand. One monitoring visit will occur during this period, the
purpose of which will be to identify areas in need of change. Beginning on July
20, 1996, provider agencies will be expected to comply with all minimum
standards.
a. In order to achieve full
certification there must be evidence of compliance with all minimum standards.
Where a standard demands review of individual consumer records, 85 per cent
compliance must be demonstrated within each standard.
b. Contractors who achieve full certification
and who adopt practices consonant with the Quality Indicators will be awarded
full certification with "Stars of Excellence." The greater the number of
Quality Indicators which have been adopted, the greater the rating of the
program:
i. Rating System
Number of Quality
|
Indicators Adopted
|
Description
|
Rating
|
15 +
|
Three Star Program
|
Superior
|
14 - 6
|
Two Star Program
|
Outstanding
|
5 - 1
|
One Star Program
|
Exceeds Expectations
|
ii.
When an agency receives one of the above ratings, a certificate will be issued
noting such and monitoring against program standards will be waived for a
one-year period.
c.
Provisional Certification. Provisional certification will be awarded to
programs achieving 72 - 84 percent compliance. Such programs will be expected
to correct deficiencies within a specified time period (no longer than three
months) and achieve full certification.
d. Termination Notice
i. Programs that do not meet the criteria for
provisional certification or that have failed to achieve full certification
three months after receiving a provisional certificate will be issued a notice
of intent to terminate the contractual agreement between the provider agency
and the OCDD.
ii. The OCDD may
withdraw a termination notice, if within the 30 calendar days following receipt
of the notice the provider agency complies with or has taken significant steps
towards complying with the requirements.
iii. Payment for services provided will
continue during the 30 day period, except that they may be prorated depending
on the number of individuals receiving services.
iv. In the event that a violation poses an
immediate and serious threat to the health or safety of the consumers, the OCDD
will notify the Department of Social Services, Bureau of Licensing and
Certification and notify the Contractor of the intent to temporarily terminate
service provision and payments. The provider agency receiving such notice shall
not accept additional consumers for services during such a period.
e. Other conditions under which
certification may be denied, are as follows:
i. failure of an agency or an authorized
agent of the agency to comply with requests for information regarding these
standards;
ii. a knowing provision
of false or misleading information to the OCDD;
iii. refusal by on-premise personnel to admit
any duly authorized employee of the DHH for the purpose of inspection of the
program or its records; or,
iv. any
reported abuse or neglect of consumers involving program personnel which has
been substantiated by appropriate authorities, the circumstances of which have
not been corrected as determined by DHH.
6. Administrative Hearings
a. Findings may be grieved under two
circumstances:
i. when a provisional
certification has been issued and the monitor/monitoring team and provider
agency disagree as to whether the corrective actions taken are sufficient or
complete, and
ii. when a notice of
intent to terminate a contract has been issued and the provider disagrees with
the findings leading to such action.
b. All grievances must be submitted by the
provider agency in writing to the Community Services Regional Administrator
(CSRM) in the contracting region within 30 calendar days of receipt of the
written certification report.
c.
When a corrective action plan or its implementation is found to be inadequate,
the provider agency may grieve specific findings on specific standards to the
CSRM, who is ultimately responsible for resolving such issues. Such a grievance
must demonstrate that specific findings were made in error or provide positive
evidence that the deficiency was, in fact, corrected. The CSRM will issue
her/his decision within 20 working days of receipt of the written request for
an administrative hearing.
d. When
a provider agency receives a notice of intent to terminate a contract, and
wishes to grieve such, three levels within the grievance process are available.
i. The first level grievance must be made to
the CSRM. The CSRM will issue her/his decision within 20 working days of
receipt of the written request for an administrative hearing.
ii. Should the CSRM uphold the findings of
the monitoring team, a second level request for an administrative hearing may
be made to the Assistant Secretary of the OCDD. A hearing will be held within
20 working days of receipt of the request and a written ruling issued within 15
working days of the hearing. The contractor is responsible for providing
evidence to the Assistant Secretary that demonstrates the decision to terminate
was made in error.
iii. A final
request for an administrative hearing may be made to the Secretary of the DHH.
The same process used at the Assistant Secretary level applies in this case,
however, the Secretary's ruling is not due until 20 working days have elapsed,
and it is final.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 28.380 through
444.