Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. The principles summarized in this section
are key to the intended implementation of all Office of Workers' Compensation
medical treatment guidelines and critical to the reader's application of the
guidelines in this document.
1. Application
of Guidelines. The OWCA provides procedures to implement medical treatment
guidelines and to foster communication to resolve disputes among the provider,
payer, and patient through the Office of Worker's' Compensation Act.
2. Education. Education of the patient and
family, as well as the employer, insurer, policy makers and the community
should be the primary emphasis in the treatment of workers' compensation
injuries. Currently, practitioners often think of education last, after
medications, manual therapy, and surgery. Practitioners must implement
strategies to educate patients, employers, insurance systems, policy makers,
and the community as a whole. An education-based paradigm should always start
with inexpensive communication providing reassuring and evidence-based
information to the patient. More in-depth education is currently a component of
treatment regimens which employ functional restorative, preventive and
rehabilitative programs. No treatment plan is complete without addressing
issues of individual and/or group patient education as a means of facilitating
self-management of symptoms and prevention. Facilitation through language
interpretation, when necessary, is a priority and part of the medical care
treatment protocol.
3. Informed
Decision Making. Providers should implement informed decision making as a
crucial element of a successful treatment plan. Patients, with the assistance
of their health care practitioner, should identify their personal and
professional functional goals of treatment at the first visit when a chronic
pain condition allows functional improvement. Progress towards the individual's
identified functional goals should be addressed by all members of the health
care team at subsequent visits and throughout the established treatment plan
when a chronic pain condition allows attainment of functional goals. Injured
workers may not reach functional goals to return to work and therefore they
will require a significantly different plan. Nurse case managers, physical
therapists, and other members of the health care team play an integral role in
informed decision-making and achievement of functional goals. Patient education
and informed decision-making should facilitate self-management of symptoms and
prevention of further injury.
4.
Treatment Parameter Duration. Time frames for specific interventions commence
once treatments have been initiated, not on the date of injury. Obviously,
duration will be impacted by patient adherence, as well as availability of
services. Clinical judgment may substantiate the need to accelerate or
decelerate the time frames discussed in this document. Such deviation shall be
in accordance with La.
R.S.
23:1203.1.
5. Active interventions emphasizing patient
responsibility, such as therapeutic exercise and/or functional treatment, are
generally emphasized over passive modalities, especially as treatment
progresses. Generally, passive interventions are viewed as a means to
facilitate progress in an active rehabilitation program with concomitant
attainment of objective functional gains.
6. Active Therapeutic Exercise Program.
Exercise program goals should incorporate patient strength, endurance,
flexibility, coordination, and education. This includes functional application
in vocational or community settings.
7. Positive Patient Response. Positive
results are defined primarily as functional gains that can be objectively
measured.
a. Objective functional gains
include, but are not limited to, positional tolerances, range-of-motion (ROM),
strength, and endurance, activities of daily living, ability to function at
work, cognition, psychological behavior, and efficiency/velocity measures that
can be quantified. Subjective reports of pain and function should be considered
and given relative weight when the pain has anatomic and physiologic
correlation. Anatomic correlation must be based on objective
findings.
8.
Re-Evaluation of Treatment Every Three to Four Weeks. If a given treatment or
modality is not producing positive results within three to four weeks, the
treatment should be either modified or discontinued. Reconsideration of
diagnosis should also occur in the event of poor response to a seemingly
rational intervention.
9. Surgical
Interventions. Surgery should be contemplated within the context of expected
functional outcome and not purely for the purpose of pain relief. The concept
of "cure" with respect to surgical treatment by itself is generally a misnomer.
All operative interventions must be based upon positive correlation of clinical
findings, clinical course, and diagnostic tests. A comprehensive assimilation
of these factors must lead to a specific diagnosis with positive identification
of pathologic conditions.
10.
Pharmacy-Louisiana Law and Regulation. All prescribing will be done in
accordance with the laws of the state of Louisiana as they pertain respectively
to each individual licensee, including, but not limited to: Louisiana State
Board of Medical Examiners regulations governing medications used in the
treatment of non-cancer-related chronic or intractable pain; Louisiana Board of
Pharmacy Prescription Monitoring Program; Louisiana Department of Health and
Hospitals licensing and certification standards for pain management clinics;
other laws and regulations affecting the prescribing and dispensing of
medications in the state of Louisiana.
11. Six Month-Time Frame. Injuries resulting
in temporary total disability require maintenance treatment and may not attain
return to work in six months.
12.
Return to Work. Return to work is therapeutic, assuming the work is not likely
to aggravate the basic problem or increase long-term pain. An injured worker's
return-to-work status shall not be the sole cause to deny reasonable and
medically necessary treatment under these guidelines. Two good practices are:
early contact with injured workers and provide modified work positions for
short-term injuries. The practitioner may provide specific physical limitations
and the patient should never be released to non-specific and vague descriptions
such as sedentary or light duty. The following physical limitations should be
considered and modified as recommended: lifting, pushing, pulling, crouching,
walking, using stairs, bending at the waist, awkward and/or sustained postures,
tolerance for sitting or standing, hot and cold environments, data entry and
other repetitive motion tasks, sustained grip, tool usage and vibration
factors. Even if there is residual chronic pain, return-to-work is not
necessarily contraindicated. The practitioner should understand all of the
physical demands of the patient's job position before returning the patient to
full duty and should request clarification of the patient's job duties.
Clarification should be obtained from the employer or, if necessary, from
including, but not limited to, occupational health nurse, physical therapist,
occupational therapist, vocational rehabilitation specialist, an industrial
hygienist, chiropractor or another professional. American Medical Association
clarifies "disability" as "activity limitations and/or participation
restrictions in an individual with a health condition, disorder or disease"
versus "impairment" as "a significant deviation, loss, or loss of use of any
body structure or body function in an individual with a health condition,
disorder or disease".
13. Delayed
Recovery. Within the discretion of the treating physician, strongly consider a
psychological evaluation, if not previously provided, as well as initiating
interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment and vocational goal setting, for
those patients who are failing to make expected progress 6 to 12 weeks after
initiation of treatment of an injury. The OWCA recognizes that 3 to 10 percent
of all industrially injured patients will not recover within the timelines
outlined in this document despite optimal care. Such individuals may require
treatments beyond the limits discussed within this document, but such treatment
requires clear documentation by the authorized treating practitioner focusing
on objective functional gains afforded by further treatment and impact upon
prognosis.
14. Guideline
Recommendations and Inclusion of Medical Evidence. Guidelines are
recommendations based on available evidence and/or consensus recommendations.
When possible, guideline recommendations will note the level of evidence
supporting the treatment recommendation. When interpreting medical evidence
statements in the guideline, the following apply to the strength of
recommendation.
Strong
|
Level 1 Evidence
|
We Recommend
|
Moderate
|
Level 2 and Level 3
Evidence
|
We Suggest
|
Weak
|
Level 4 Evidence
|
Treatment is an Option
|
Inconclusive
|
Evidence is Either Insufficient of
Conflicting
|
a. Consensus
guidelines are generated by a professional organization that the guidelines are
intended to serve. A committee of specialists and experts are selected by the
organization to create an unbiased, vetted recommendation for the treatment of
specific issues within the realm of their expertise. All recommendations in the
guideline are considered to represent reasonable care in appropriately selected
cases, regardless of the level of evidence or consensus statement attached to
it. Those procedures considered inappropriate, unreasonable, or unnecessary are
designated in the guideline as not recommended.
15. Treatment of Pre-Existing Conditions The
conditions that preexisted the work injury/disease will need to be managed
under two circumstances:
a. A pre-existing
condition exacerbated by a work injury/disease should be treated until the
patient has returned to their objectively verified prior level of functioning
or Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI); and
b. A pre-existing condition not directly
caused by a work injury/disease but which may prevent recovery from that injury
should be treated until its objectively verified negative impact has been
controlled. The focus of treatment should remain on the work
injury/disease.
AUTHORITY
NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
23:1203.1.