Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A.
The principles summarized in this Section are key to the intended
implementation of all Office of Workers' Compensation medical treatment
guidelines and critical to the reader's application of the guidelines in this
document.
1. Application of Guidelines. The
OWCA provides procedures to implement medical treatment guidelines and to
foster communication to resolve disputes among the provider, payer, and patient
through the Workers Compensation Act.
2. Education. Education of the patient and
family, as well as the employer, insurer, policy makers and the community
should be the primary emphasis in the treatment of chronic pain and disability.
Currently, practitioners often think of education last, after medications,
manual therapy, and surgery. Practitioners must implement strategies to educate
patients, employers, insurance systems, policy makers, and the community as a
whole. An education-based paradigm should always start with inexpensive
communication providing reassuring and evidence-based information to the
patient. More in-depth education is currently a component of treatment regimens
which employing functional, restorative, preventive and rehabilitative
programs. No treatment plan is complete without addressing issues of individual
and/or group patient education as a means of facilitating self-management of
symptoms and prevention. Facilitation through language interpretation, when
necessary, is a priority and part of the medical care treatment
protocol.
3. Informed Decision
Making. Providers should implement informed decision making as a crucial
element of a successful treatment plan. Patients, with the assistance of their
health care practitioner, should identify their personal and professional
functional goals of treatment at the first visit when a chronic pain condition
allows functional improvement. Progress towards the individuals identified
functional goals should be addressed by all members of the health care team at
subsequent visits and throughout the established treatment plan when a chronic
pain condition allows attainment of functional goals. Injured workers may not
reach functional goals to return to work and therefore they will require a
significantly different plan. Nurse case managers, physical therapists, and
other members of the health care team play an integral role in informed
decision-making and achievement of functional goals. Patient education and
informed decision-making should facilitate self-management of symptoms and
prevention of further injury.
4.
Treatment Parameter Duration. Time frames for specific interventions commence
once treatments have been initiated, not on the date of injury. Obviously,
duration will be impacted by patient adherence, as well as availability of
services. Clinical judgment may substantiate the need to accelerate or
decelerate the time frames discussed in this document. Such deviation shall be
in accordance with
R.S.
23:1203.1.
5. Active Interventions. Active interventions
emphasizing patient responsibility, such as therapeutic exercise and/or
functional treatment, are generally emphasized over passive modalities,
especially as treatment progresses. Generally, passive interventions are viewed
as a means to facilitate progress in an active rehabilitation program with
concomitant attainment of objective functional gains when chronic pain
conditions allow attainment of functional goals because some chronic pain
patients require active interventions as well maintenance procedures and
medications.
6. Active Therapeutic
Exercise Program. Exercise program goals should incorporate patient strength,
endurance, flexibility, coordination, and education. This includes functional
application in vocational or community settings.
7. Positive Patient Response. Positive
results are defined primarily as functional gains that can be objectively
measured.
a. Objective functional gains
include, but are not limited to, positional tolerances, range-of-motion (ROM),
strength, and endurance, activities of daily living, ability to function at
work, cognition, psychological behavior, and efficiency/velocity measures that
can be quantified. Not all chronic pain patients will reach any functional
goals and may only improve ADL's and or pain complaints due to severity of the
injury. Subjective reports of pain and function should be considered and given
relative weight when the pain has anatomic and physiologic correlation.
Anatomic correlation must be based on objective findings.
8. Re-Evaluation of Treatment Every Three to
Four Weeks. If a given treatment or modality is not producing positive results
within three to four weeks or within the time to produce effect in the
non-chronic pain guidelines, the physical therapist must consult with the
treating physician for consideration for a referral to a pain specialist or
surgeon or other appropriate specialist for other treatment options.
Reconsideration of diagnosis should also occur in the event of poor response to
a seemingly rational intervention.
9. Surgical Interventions. Surgery should be
contemplated within the context of expected functional outcome and not purely
for the purpose of pain relief. The concept of "cure" with respect to surgical
treatment by itself is generally a misnomer. All operative interventions must
be based upon positive correlation of clinical findings, clinical course, and
diagnostic tests. A comprehensive assimilation of these factors must lead to a
specific diagnosis with positive identification of pathologic
conditions.
10. Pharmacy-Louisiana
Law and Regulation. All prescribing will be done in accordance with the laws of
the state of Louisiana as they pertain respectively to each individual
licensee, including, but not limited to: Louisiana State Board of Medical
Examiners regulations governing medications used in the treatment of
non-cancer-related chronic or intractable pain; Louisiana Board of Pharmacy
Prescription Monitoring Program; Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
licensing and certification standards for pain management clinics; other laws
and regulations affecting the prescribing and dispensing of medications in the
state of Louisiana.
11. Six
Month-Time Frame. Injuries resulting in temporary total disability require
maintenance treatment and may not attain return to work in six
months.
12. Return to Work.
Return-to-work is therapeutic, assuming the work is not likely to aggravate the
basic problem or increase long-term pain. An injured workers return-to-work
status shall not be the sole cause to deny reasonable and medically necessary
treatment under these guidelines. Two good practices are: early contact with
injured workers and provide modified work positions for short-term injuries.
The practitioner may provide specific physical limitations and the patient
should never be released to non-specific and vague descriptions such as
"sedentary" or "light duty." The following physical limitations should be
considered and modified as recommended: lifting, pushing, pulling, crouching,
walking, using stairs, bending at the waist, awkward and/or sustained postures,
tolerance for sitting or standing, hot and cold environments, data entry and
other repetitive motion tasks, sustained grip, tool usage and vibration
factors. Even if there is residual chronic pain, return-to-work is not
necessarily contraindicated. The practitioner should understand all of the
physical demands of the patients job position before returning the patient to
full duty and should request clarification of the patients job duties.
Clarification should be obtained from the employer or, if necessary, from
including, but not limited to, occupational health nurse, physical therapist,
occupational therapist, vocational rehabilitation specialist, or an industrial
hygienist, chiropractor or another professional. American Medical Association
clarifies "disability" as "activity limitations and/or participation
restrictions in an individual with a health condition, disorder or disease"
versus "impairment" as "a significant deviation, loss, or loss of use of any
body structure or body function in an individual with a health condition,
disorder or disease".
13. Delayed
Recovery. Within the discretion of the treating physician, strongly consider a
psychological evaluation, if not previously provided, as well as initiating
interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment and vocational goal setting, for
those patients who are failing to make expected progress 6 to 12 weeks after
initiation of treatment of an injury. The OWCA recognizes that 3 to 10 percent
of all industrially injured patients will not recover within the timelines
outlined in this document despite optimal care. Such individuals may require
treatments beyond the limits discussed within this document, but such treatment
requires clear documentation by the authorized treating practitioner focusing
on objective functional gains afforded by further treatment and impact upon
prognosis.
14. Guideline
Recommendations and Inclusion of Medical Evidence. All recommendations are
based on available evidence and/or consensus judgment. It is generally
recognized that early reports of a positive treatment effect are frequently
weakened or overturned by subsequent research. Per R.S. 1203.1, when
interpreting medical evidence statements in the guideline, the following apply
to the strength of recommendation.
Strong
|
Level 1 Evidence
|
We Recommend
|
Moderate
|
Level 2 and Level 3 Evidence
|
We Suggest
|
Weak
|
Level 4 Evidence
|
Treatment is an Option
|
Inconclusive
|
Evidence is Either Insufficient of
Conflicting
|
a. Consensus
guidelines are generated by a professional organization that the guidelines are
intended to serve. A committee of specialists and experts are selected by the
organization to create an unbiased, vetted recommendation for the treatment of
specific issues within the realm of their expertise. All recommendations in the
guideline are considered to represent reasonable care in appropriately selected
cases, regardless of the level of evidence or consensus statement attached to
it. Those procedures considered inappropriate, unreasonable, or unnecessary are
designated in the guideline as "not recommended."
15. Treatment of Pre-Existing Conditions The
conditions that preexisted the work injury/disease will need to be managed
under two circumstances:
(a) A pre-existing
condition exacerbated by a work injury/disease should be treated until the
patient has returned to their objectively verified prior level of functioning
or Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI); and
(b) A pre-existing condition not directly
caused by a work injury/disease but which may prevent recovery from that injury
should be treated until its objectively verified negative impact has been
controlled. The focus of treatment should remain on the work
injury/disease.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
23:1203.1.