Current through Register Vol. 51, No. 3, March 20, 2025
A. All treatment plans begin with shared
decision making with the patient. Before initiation of any therapeutic
procedure, an authorized treating healthcare provider, employer, and insurer
should consider these important issues in the care of the injured
worker.
B. First, patients
undergoing therapeutic procedure(s) should be released or returned to modified
or restricted duty during their rehabilitation at the earliest appropriate
time. Refer to "Return-to-Work" in this section for detailed
information.
C. Second, cessation
and/or review of treatment modalities should be undertaken when no further
significant subjective or objective improvement in the patient's condition is
noted.
1. Reassessment of the patient's
status in terms of functional improvement should be documented after each
treatment. If patients are not responding within the recommended time periods,
alternative treatment interventions, further diagnostic studies or specialist
and/or surgeon consultations should be pursued. Continued treatment should be
monitored using objective measures such as:
a. return-to-work or maintaining work
status;
b. fewer restrictions at
work or performing activities of daily living (ADL);
c. decrease in usage of medications; related
to the work injury; and
d.
measurable functional gains, such as increased range of motion, documented
increase in strength;, increased ability to stand, sit or lift, or patient
completed functional evaluations.
D. Third, providers should provide and
document education to the patient. No treatment plan is complete without
addressing issues of individual and/or group patient education as a means of
facilitating self-management of symptoms.
E. Lastly, formal psychological or
psychosocial evaluation should be performed on patients not making expected
progress within 6 to 12 weeks following injury and whose subjective symptoms do
not correlate with objective signs and tests.
F. Home therapy is an important component of
therapy and may include active and passive therapeutic procedures, as well as,
other modalities to assist in alleviating pain, swelling, and abnormal muscle
tone.
G. Non-operative treatment
procedures for low back pain can be divided into two groups: conservative care
and rehabilitation. Conservative care is treatment applied to a problem in
which spontaneous improvement is expected in 90 percent of the cases within
three months. It is usually provided during the tissue-healing phase and lasts
no more than six months, and often considerably less. Rehabilitation is
treatment applied to a more chronic and complex problem in a patient with
de-conditioning and disability. It is provided during the period after tissue
healing to obtain maximal medical recovery. Treatment modalities may be
utilized sequentially or concomitantly depending on chronicity and complexity
of the problem, and anticipated therapeutic effect. Treatment plans should
always be based on a diagnosis utilizing appropriate diagnostic
procedures.
H. The following
procedures are listed in alphabetical order.
1. Acupuncture
a. Acupuncture: the insertion and removal of
filiform needles to stimulate acupoints (acupuncture points). Needles may be
inserted, manipulated, and retained for a period of time. Acupuncture can be
used to reduce pain, reduce inflammation, increase blood flow, increase range
of motion, decrease the side effect of medication-induced nausea, promote
relaxation in an anxious patient, and reduce muscle spasm.
i. Indications include joint pain, joint
stiffness, soft tissue pain and inflammation, paresthesia, post-surgical pain
relief, muscle spasm, and scar tissue pain.
b. Acupuncture with Electrical Stimulation:
is the use of electrical current (micro-amperage or milli-amperage) on the
needles at the acupuncture site. It is used to increase effectiveness of the
needles by continuous stimulation of the acupoint. Physiological effects
(depending on location and settings) can include endorphin release for pain
relief, reduction of inflammation, increased blood circulation, analgesia
through interruption of pain stimulus, and muscle relaxation.
i. It is indicated to treat chronic pain
conditions, radiating pain along a nerve pathway, muscle spasm, inflammation,
scar tissue pain, and pain located in multiple sites.
c. Total Time Frames for Acupuncture and
Acupuncture with Electrical Stimulation: Time frames are not meant to be
applied to each of the above sections separately. The time frames are to be
applied to all acupuncture treatments regardless of the type or combination of
therapies being provided.
i. time to produce
effect: three to six treatments;
ii.
frequency: one to three times per week;
iii. optimum duration: one to two
months;
iv maximum duration: 14
treatments within six months.
(a). Any of the
above acupuncture treatments may extend longer if objective functional gains
can be documented or when symptomatic benefits facilitate progression in the
patient's treatment program. Treatment beyond 14 treatments must be documented
with respect to need and ability to facilitate positive symptomatic or
functional gains. Such care should be re-evaluated and documented with each
series of treatments.
d. Other Acupuncture Modalities. Acupuncture
treatment is based on individual patient needs and therefore treatment may
include a combination of procedures to enhance treatment effect. Other
procedures may include the use of heat, soft tissue manipulation/massage, and
exercise. Refer to Active Therapy (Therapeutic Exercise) and Passive Therapy
sections (Massage and Superficial Heat and Cold Therapy) for a description of
these adjunctive acupuncture modalities and time frames.
2. Biofeedback. A form of behavioral medicine
that helps patients learn self-awareness and self-regulation skills for the
purpose of gaining greater control of their physiology, such as muscle
activity, brain waves, and measures of autonomic nervous system activity.
Electronic instrumentation is used to monitor the targeted physiology and then
displayed or fed back to the patient visually, auditorially, or tactilely, with
coaching by a biofeedback specialist. Biofeedback is provided by clinicians
certified in biofeedback and/or who have documented specialized education,
advanced training, or direct or supervised experience qualifying them to
provide the specialized treatment needed (e.g., surface EMG, EEG, or other).
There is good evidence that biofeedback or relaxation therapy is equal in
effect to cognitive behavioral therapy for low back pain. There is good
evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy, but not behavioral therapy (e.g.,
biofeedback), shows weak to small effects in reducing pain and small effects on
improving disability, mood, and catastrophizing in patients.
a. Treatment is individualized to the
patient's work-related diagnosis and needs. Home practice of skills is required
for mastery and may be facilitated by the use of home training tapes. The
ultimate goal of biofeedback treatment is to normalize physiology to the
pre-injury status to the extent possible, and involves transfer of learned
skills to the workplace and daily life. Candidates for biofeedback therapy or
training must be motivated to learn and practice biofeedback and
self-regulation techniques.
b.
Indications for biofeedback include individuals who are suffering from
musculoskeletal injury in which muscle dysfunction or other physiological
indicators of excessive or prolonged stress response affects and/or delays
recovery. Other applications include training to improve self-management of
emotional stress/pain responses such as anxiety, depression, anger, sleep
disturbance, and other central and autonomic nervous system imbalances.
Biofeedback is often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities.
i. time to produce effect: three to four
sessions;
ii. frequency: one to two
times per week;
iii. optimum
duration: five to six sessions;
iv.
maximum duration: 10 to 12 sessions. Treatment beyond 12 sessions must be
documented with respect to need, expectation, and ability to facilitate
functional gains.
3. Injections-Therapeutic
a. Therapeutic Spinal Injections. Description
- Therapeutic spinal injections may be used after initial conservative
treatments, such as physical and occupational therapy, medication, manual
therapy, exercise, acupuncture, etc., have been undertaken. Therapeutic
injections should be used only after imaging studies and diagnostic injections
have established pathology. Injections are invasive procedures that can cause
serious complications; thus clinical indications and contraindications should
be closely adhered to. The purpose of spinal injections is to facilitate active
therapy by providing short-term relief through reduction of pain and
inflammation. All patients should continue appropriate exercise with
functionally directed rehabilitation. Active treatment, which patients should
have had prior to injections, will frequently require a repeat of the sessions
previously ordered (Refer to Active Therapy). Injections, by themselves, are
not likely to provide long-term relief. Rather, active rehabilitation with
modified work achieves long-term relief by increasing active ROM, strength, and
stability. Subjective reports of pain response (via a recognized pain scale)
and function should be considered and given relative weight when the pain has
anatomic and physiologic correlation. Anatomic correlation must be based on
objective findings.
i. Special Considerations.
For all injections (excluding trigger point), multi-planar fluoroscopic
guidance during procedures is required to document technique and needle
placement, and should be performed by a physician experienced in the procedure.
Permanent images are required to verify needle replacement,
ii. Complications. General complications of
spinal injections may include transient neurapraxia, local pain, nerve injury,
infection, headache, urinary retention, and vasovagal effects. Epidural
hematoma, permanent neurologic damage, dural perforation and CSF leakage;
and/or spinal meningeal abscess may also occur. Permanent paresis, anaphylaxis,
and arachnoiditis have been rarely reported with the use of epidural steroids.
With steroid injections, there may be a dose-dependent suppression of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis lasting between one and three
months.
iii. Contraindications.
Absolute contraindications to therapeutic injections include: bacterial
infectionsystemic or localized to region of injection; bleeding diatheses;
hematological conditions, and possible pregnancy.
(a). Relative contraindications to diagnostic
injections may include: allergy to contrast, poorly controlled Diabetes
Mellitus, and hypertension. Drugs affecting coagulation may require restriction
from use. Anti-platelet therapy and anti-coagulations should be addressed
individually by a knowledgeable specialist. It is recommended to refer to Am
Society of Regional Anesthesia for anticoagulation guidelines.
b. Epidural Steroid
Injection (ESI)
i. Description. Epidural
steroid injections are injections of corticosteroid into the epidural space.
The purpose of ESI is to reduce pain and inflammation in the acute or sub-acute
phases of injury, restoring range of motion and, thereby, facilitating progress
in more active treatment programs. ESI uses three approaches:
transforaminal/Spinal Selective Nerve Block (SNRB), interlaminar (midline), and
caudal. The transforaminal/ Spinal Selective Nerve Root Block approach is the
preferred method for unilateral, single-level pathology and for post-surgical
patients. There is good evidence that the transforaminal/ Spinal Selective
Nerve Root Block approach can deliver medication to the target tissue with few
complications and can be used to identify the specific site of pathology. The
interlaminar approach is the preferred approach for multi-level pathology or
spinal stenosis. Caudal therapeutic injections may be used, but it is difficult
to target the exact treatment area, due to diffuse distribution.
ii. Needle Placement. Multi-planar
fluoroscopic imaging is required for all epidural steroid injections. Contrast
epidurograms allow one to verify the flow of medication into the epidural
space. Permanent images are required to verify needle replacement.
iii. Indications
(a). There is some evidence that epidural
steroid injections are effective for patients with radicular pain or
radiculopathy (sensory or motor loss in a specific dermatome or myotome). Up to
80 percent of patients with radicular pain may have initial relief. However,
only 25-57 percent are likely to have excellent long-term relief.
(b). Although there is no evidence regarding
the effectiveness of ESI for non-radicular disc herniation, it is an accepted
intervention. Only patients who have pain affected by activity and annular
tears verified by appropriate imaging may have injections for axial
pain.
(c). There is some evidence
that ESI injections are not effective for spinal stenosis without radicular
findings. Additionally, there is some evidence that patients who smoke or who
have pain unaffected by rest or activity are less likely to have a successful
outcome from ESIs.
iv.
Timing/Frequency/Duration
(a). Epidural
injections may be used for radicular pain or radiculopathy. If an injection
provides at least 50 percent relief, a repeat of the same pain relieving
injection may be given at least two weeks apart with fluoroscopic guidance. No
more than two levels may be injected in one session. If there is not a minimum
of 50 percent pain reduction as measured by a numerical pain index scale and
documented functional improvement, similar injections should not be repeated,
although the practitioner may want to consider a different approach or
different level depending on the pathology. Maximum of two series (six months
apart) of three effective pain relieving injections may be done in one year
based upon the patient's response to pain and function.
(b). Spinal Stenosis Patients
(i). Patients with claudication: The patient
has documented spinal stenosis, has attempted active therapy, has persistent
claudication symptoms and difficulty with some activities, thus meeting
criteria for surgical intervention. The patient may have diagnostic injection
as indicated. Patients who have any objective neurologic findings should
proceed as the above patient with radicular findings for whom an early surgical
consultation is recommended including indirect or direct decompression. Refer
to C.1. Those who have mild claudication, or moderate or severe claudication
and who do not desire surgery, may continue to receive additional injections if
the original diagnostic intervention was successful per guideline standards.
(c). Optimum duration:
usually one to three injection(s) over a period of six months depending upon
each patient's response and functional gain.
(d). Maximum duration: two sessions
(consisting of up to three injections each) may be done in one year, as per the
patient's response to pain and function. Patients should be reassessed after
each injection for an 50 percent improvement in pain (as measured by accepted
pain scales) and evidence of functional improvement.
c. Zygapophyseal (Facet) Injection
i. Description-an accepted intra-articular or
pericapsular injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid with very limited
uses. Up to three joints. Either unilaterally or bilaterally. Injections may be
repeated only, when there is 50 percent initial improvement in pain scales as
measured by accepted pain scales (such as VAS), and a functional documented
response lasts for three months. An example of a positive result would include
a return to baseline function as established at MMI, return to increased work
duties, or a measurable improvement in physical activity goals including retrun
to baseline after an exacerbation. Injections may only be repeated when these
functional and time goals are met and verified. May be repeated up to two times
a year. There is no justification for a combined facet and medial branch block.
Monitored Anesthesia Care is accepted for diagnostic and therapeutic
procedures.
ii.
Indications-patients with pain suspected to be facet in origin based on exam
findings and affecting activity; or, patients who have refused a rhizotomy; or,
patients who have facet findings with a thoracic component. In these patients,
facet injections may be occasionally useful in facilitating a
functionally-directed rehabilitation program and to aid in identifying pain
generators. Patients with recurrent pain should be evaluated with more
definitive diagnostic injections, such as medial nerve branch injections, to
determine the need for a rhizotomy. Facet injections are not likely to produce
long-term benefit by themselves and are not the most accurate diagnostic
tool.
iii.
Timing/Frequency/Duration
(a). Time to
produce effect: up to 30 minutes for local anesthetic; corticosteroid up to 72
hours.
(b). Frequency: one
injection per level with a diagnostic response. If the first injection does not
provide a diagnostic response of temporary and sustained pain relief
substantiated by accepted pain scales, (i.e., 50 percent pain reduction
substantiated by tools such as VAS), and improvement in function, similar
injections should not be repeated. At least four to six weeks of functional
benefit should be obtained with each therapeutic injection.
(c). Optimum duration: two to three
injections for each applicable joint per year. Not to exceed two joint
levels.
(d). Maximum Duration: four
per level per year. Prior authorization must be obtained for injections beyond
two levels.
(e). Facet injections
may be repeated if they result in increased documented functional benefit for
at least four to six weeks and at least an 50 percent initial improvement in
pain scales as measured by accepted pain scales (such as VAS).
d. Sacroiliac Joint
Injection
i. Description-a generally accepted
injection of local anesthetic in an intra-articular fashion into the sacroiliac
joint under fluoroscopic guidance. May include the use of corticosteroids.
Sacroiliac joint injections may be considered either unilaterally or
bilaterally. The injection may only be repeated with 50 percent improvement in
Visual Analog Scale with documented functional improvement. For Sacroiliac
Joint (lateral Branch Neurotomy), the diagnostic SI-S3 lateral branch blocks
would need to be documented with 80 percent to 100 percent improvement in
symptoms for the duration of the local anesthetic. Should the diagnostic
lateral branch nerve blocks only result in 50 percent to 80 percent improvement
in symptoms then the confirmatory nerve blocks are recommended. In the event
that the diagnostic lateral nerve blocks result in less than 50 percent
improvement, then the lateral branch neurotomy is not recommended. SI Joint
fusion can be considered if multiple SI joint injections or RF Sacral Lateral
Branches are ineffective to maintain function. Monitored Anesthesia Care is
accepted for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures,
ii. Indications-primarily diagnostic to rule
out sacroiliac joint dysfunction vs. other pain generators. Intra-articular
injection can be of value in diagnosing the pain generator. There should be
documented relief from previously painful maneuvers (e.g., Patrick's test) on
post-injection physical exam. These injections may be repeated if they result
in increased documented functional benefit for at least 6 weeks and at least a
50 percent initial improvement in pain scales as measured by accepted pain
scales (such as VAS). Sacroiliac joint blocks should facilitate a functionally
directed rehabilitation program.
iii. Timing/Frequency/Duration
(a). Frequency and optimum duration: two to
three injections per year. If the first injection does not provide a diagnostic
response of temporary and sustained pain relief substantiated by accepted pain
scales, (i.e.,50 percent pain reduction substantiated by tools such as VAS),
and improvement in function, similar injections should not be repeated. At
least six weeks of functional benefit should be obtained with each therapeutic
injection. If there is a 50 percent reduction in pain that lasts less than six
weeks, the injection can be considered as part of the series of two injections
used for the purpose of confirming the sacroiliac pain generator prior to
sacroiliac fusion.
(b). Maximum
duration: three injections per year.
e. Intradiscal Steroid Therapy
i. Intradiscal Steroid Therapy consists of
injection of a steroid preparation into the intervertebral disc under
fluoroscopic guidance at the time of discography. There is good evidence that
it is not effective in the treatment of suspected discogenic back pain and its
use is not recommended.
f. Radio Frequency (RF)-Medial Branch
Neurotomy/Facet Denervation
i. Description-a
procedure designed to denervate the facet joint (Thoracic and Lumbar) by
ablating the corresponding sensory medial branches. Percutaneous radiofrequency
is the method generally used. Pulsed radiofrequency at 42 degrees C should not
be used as it may result in incomplete denervation. Cooled radiofrequency is
generally not recommended due to current lack of evidence.
(a). If the medial branch blocks provide 80
percent or more pain reduction as measured by a numerical pain index scale
within one hour of the medial branch blocks, then rhizotomy of the medial
branch nerves, up to four nerves per side, may be done. If the first medial
branch block provides less than 80 percent but at least 50 percent pain
reduction as measured by a numerical pain index scale or documented functional
improvement, the medial branch block should be repeated before a rhizotomy is
performed. If 50 percent or greater pain reduction is achieved with two sets of
medial branch blocks for facet joint pain, then rhizotomy may be
performed.
(b). Generally, RF pain
relief lasts at least six months and repeat radiofrequency neurotomy can be
successful and last longer. RF neurotomy is the procedure of choice over
alcohol, phenol, or cryoablation. Permanent images should be recorded to verify
placement of the needles.
ii. Needle placement: multi-planar
fluoroscopic imaging is required for all injections.
iii. Indications-those patients with proven,
significant, facetogenic pain by medial branch block (as defined previously).
This procedure is not recommended for patients with multiple pain generators
except in those cases where the facet pain is deemed to be greater than 50
percent of the total pain in the given area.
iv. All patients should continue appropriate
exercise with functionally directed rehabilitation. Active treatment, which
patients will have had prior to the procedure, will frequently require a repeat
of the sessions that may have been previously ordered prior to the facet
treatment (Refer to Therapy-Active).
v. Complications-bleeding, infection, or
neural injury. The clinician must be aware of the risk of developing a
localized neuritis, or rarely, a deafferentation centralized pain syndrome as a
complication of this and other neuroablative procedures.
vi. Post-Procedure Therapy-active therapy.
Implementation of a gentle aerobic reconditioning program (e.g., walking) and
back education within the first postprocedure week, barring complications.
Instruction and participation in a long-term home-based program of ROM, core
strengthening, postural or neuromuscular re-education, endurance, and stability
exercises should be accomplished over a period of four to ten visits
post-procedure.
vii. Requirements
for Repeat Radiofrequency Medial Branch Neurotomy (or other peripheral nerve
ablation). In some cases pain may recur. Successful RF neurotomy usually
provides from six to eighteen months of relief.
(a). Before a repeat RF neurotomy is done, a
confirmatory medial branch injection or diagnostic nerve block should be
performed if the patient's pain pattern presents differently than the initial
evaluation. In occasional patients, additional levels of medial branch blocks
and RF neurotomy may be necessary. The same indications and limitations apply.
g. Radio
Frequency Denervation-Sacro-iliac (SI) joint. This procedure requires neurotomy
of multiple nerves, such as L5 dorsal ramus, and/or lateral branches of SI-S3
under C-arm fluoroscopy.
i. Needle Placement:
Multi-planar fluoroscopic imaging is required. Permanent images are suggested
to verify needle placement,
ii.
Indications
(a). The patient has physical
exam findings of at least three positive physical exam maneuvers (e.g.,
Patrick's sign, Faber's test, Gaenslen distraction or gapping, or compression
test). Insufficient functional progress during an appropriate program that
includes active therapy and/or manual therapy.
(b). For sacroiliac joint (lateral branch
neurotomy), the diagnostic SI-S3 lateral branch blocks would need to be
documented with 80 percent to 100 percent improvement in symptoms for the
duration of the local anesthetic. Should the diagnostic lateral branch nerve
blocks only result in 50 percent to 80 percent improvement in symptoms then the
confirmatory nerve blocks are recommended. In the event that the diagnostic
lateral nerve blocks result in less than 50 percent improvement, then the
lateral branch neurotomy is not recommended. SI Joint fusion can be considered
for those unable to return to function due to with SI injections or RF sacral
lateral branches.
iii.
Complications: damage to sacral nerve roots- issues with bladder dysfunction
etc. Bleeding, infection, or neural injury. The clinician must be aware of the
risk of developing a localized neuritis, or rarely, a deafferentation
centralized pain syndrome as a complication of this and other neuroablative
procedures.
iv. Post-Procedure
Therapy-active therapy: implementation of a gentle aerobic reconditioning
program (e.g., walking) and back education within the first postprocedure week,
barring complications. Instruction and participation in a long-term home-based
program of ROM, core strengthening, postural or neuromuscular re-education,
endurance, and stability exercises should be accomplished over a period of 4 to
10 visits post-procedure.
v.
Requirements for Repeat Radiofrequency SI Joint Neurotomy. In some cases, pain
may recur. Successful RF neurotomy usually provides from 6 to 18 months of
relief. Repeat neurotomy should only be performed if the initial procedure
resulted in improved function for six months. There is no need for repeat
Sacroiliac joint or lateral branch injection before RF. SI Joint fusion can be
considered for those unable to return to function due to RF Sacral Lateral
Branches that no longer last for six months.
h. Trigger Point Injections
i. Description. Trigger point injections are
generally accepted treatment. Trigger point treatment can consist of injection
of local anesthetic, with or without corticosteroid, into highly localized,
extremely sensitive bands of skeletal muscle fibers. These muscle fibers
produce local and referred pain when activated. Medication is injected in a
four-quadrant manner in the area of maximum tenderness. Injection can be
enhanced if treatments are immediately followed by myofascial therapeutic
interventions, such as vapo-coolant spray and stretch, ischemic pressure
massage (myotherapy), specific soft tissue mobilization and physical
modalities. There is conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of trigger
point injections. There is no evidence that injection of medications improves
the results of trigger-point injections. Needling alone may account for some of
the therapeutic response of injections. Needling must be performed by
practitioners with the appropriate credentials in accordance with state and
other applicable regulations.
(a). Conscious
sedation for patients receiving trigger point injections may be considered.
However, the patient must be alert to help identify the site of the
injection,
ii.
Indications. Trigger point injections may be used to relieve myofascial pain
and facilitate active therapy and stretching of the affected areas. They are to
be used as an adjunctive treatment in combination with other treatment
modalities such as active therapy programs. Trigger point injections should be
utilized primarily for the purpose of facilitating functional progress.
Patients should continue in an aggressive aerobic and stretching therapeutic
exercise program, as tolerated, while undergoing intensive myofascial
interventions. Myofascial pain is often associated with other underlying
structural problems. Any abnormalities need to be ruled out prior to
injection.
iii. Trigger point
injections are indicated in patients with consistently observed, well
circumscribed trigger points. This demonstrates a local twitch response,
characteristic radiation of pain pattern and local autonomic reaction, such as
persistent hyperemia following palpation. Generally, trigger point injections
are not necessary unless consistently observed trigger points are not
responding to specific, noninvasive, myofascial interventions within
approximately a six-week time frame. However, trigger point injections may be
occasionally effective when utilized in the patient with immediate, acute onset
of pain or in a post-operative patient with persistent muscle spasm or
myofascial pain.
iv. Complications.
Potential but rare complications of trigger point injections include infection,
pneumothorax, anaphylaxis, penetration of viscera, neurapraxia, and neuropathy.
If corticosteroids are injected in addition to local anesthetic, there is a
risk of local myopathy. Severe pain on injection suggests the possibility of an
intraneural injection, and the needle should be immediately repositioned.
v. Timing/Frequency/Duration
(a). Time to produce effect: Local anesthetic
30 minutes; 24 to 48 hours for no anesthesia;
(b). Frequency: no more than four injection
sites per session per week for acute exacerbations only to avoid significant
post-injection soreness;
(c).
Optimum duration/Maximum duration: four sessions per year. Injections may only
be repeated when the above functional and time goals are met.
i.
Prolotherapy. Also known as sclerotherapy consists of a series of injections of
hypertonic dextrose, with or without glycerine and phenol, into the ligamentous
structures of the low back. Its proponents claim that the inflammatory response
to the injections will recruit cytokine growth factors involved in the
proliferation of connective tissue, stabilizing the ligaments of the low back
when these structures have been damaged by mechanical insults.
i. There are conflicting studies concerning
the effectiveness of Prolotherapy in the low back. Lasting functional
improvement has not been shown. The injections are invasive, may be painful to
the patient, and are not generally accepted or widely used. Therefore, the use
of Prolotherapy for low back pain is not recommended.
j. Basivertebral Nerve Ablation (BVN). This
procedure is approved for a subgroup of chronic low back pain patients who have
vertebrogenic-related symptomology.
i.
Procedure is indicated if all of the following are met:
(a). Main symptom is low back pain, has had
chronic low back pain for a minimum of 6 months, and patient is mature
skeletally;
(b). Despite attempts
at nonsurgical management, the patient has failed to satisfactorily improve;
and
(c). Type 1 (hypointensity) or
Type 2 (hyperintensity) Modic changes are reported at the endplates that are
the suspected pain generators by the reading radiologist and/or treating
physician. If MRI is contra-indicated in the patient, a CT/SPET merge with
increased uptake at the suspected endplate is acceptable.
ii. Procedure is not indicated if any of the
following occurs:
(a). Patients has
implantable pulse generators (pacemakers, defibrillators) or other electronic
implants unless specific precautions are taken to maintain safety;
(b). Active systemic infection or spine
infection;
(c). Severe cardiac or
pulmonary compromise;
(d). Lumbar
radiculopathy or radicular pain due to neurocompression (for example, HNP,
stenosis), neurogenic claudication, as primary symptoms;
(e). Metabolic bone disease (for example,
osteoporosis), trauma/compression fracture or spinal cancer, treatment of spine
fragility fracture; or
(f).
Evidence on imaging implies another cause for the patient's low back pain
symptoms, including but not limited to degenerative scoliosis or facet
arthropathy or effusion with clinically suspected facet joint pain, disc
herniation, segmental instability, lumbar stenosis.
(g). Prior basivertebral denervation at the
suspected level.
4. Epiduroscopy and Epidural Lysis of
Adhesions: An investigational treatment of low back pain. It involves the
introduction of a fiberoptic endoscope into the epidural space via the sacral
hiatus. With cephalad advancement of the endoscope under direct visualization,
the epidural space is irrigated with saline. Adhesiolysis may be done
mechanically with a fiberoptic endoscope. The saline irrigation is performed
with or without epiduroscopy and is intended to distend the epidural space in
order to obtain an adequate visual field. It is designed to produce lysis of
adhesions, which are conjectured to produce symptoms due to traction on painful
nerve roots. Saline irrigation is associated with risks of elevated pressures
which may impede blood flow and venous return, possibly causing ischemia of the
cauda equina and retinal hemorrhage.
a. Other
complications associated with instrumented lysis include catheter shearing,
need for catheter surgical removal, infection (including meningitis), hematoma,
and possible severe hemodynamic instability during application. Although
epidural adhesions have been postulated to cause chronic low back pain, studies
have failed to find a significant correlation between the level of fibrosis and
pain or difficulty functioning. Studies of epidural lysis demonstrate no
transient pain relief from the procedure. Given the low likelihood of a
positive response, the additional costs and time requirement, and the possible
complications from the procedure, epidural injection, or mechanical lysis, is
not recommended.
b. Epiduroscopy -
directed steroid injections are also not recommended as there is no evidence to
support an advantage for using an epiduroscope with steroid
injections.
5.
Medications/Pharmacy. Medication use in the treatment of low back injuries is
appropriate for controlling acute and chronic pain and inflammation. Use of
medications will vary widely due to the spectrum of injuries from simple
strains to post-surgical healing. All drugs should be used according to patient
needs. A thorough medication history, including use of alternative and over the
counter medications, should be performed at the time of the initial visit and
updated periodically. Treatment for pain control is initially accomplished with
acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs. The patient should be educated regarding the
interaction with prescription and over-the-counter medications as well as the
contents of over-the-counter herbal products. The following are listed in
alphabetical order:
a. Acetaminophen: is an
effective analgesic with antipyretic but not anti-inflammatory activity.
Acetaminophen is generally well tolerated, causes little or no gastrointestinal
irritation, and is not associated with ulcer formation. Acetaminophen has been
associated with liver toxicity in overdose situations or in chronic alcohol
use. Patients may not realize that many over-the-counter preparations may
contain acetaminophen. The total daily dose of acetaminophen is recommended not
to exceed 2250 mg per 24-hour period, from all sources, including
narcotic-acetaminophen combination preparations:
i. optimum duration: 7 to 10 days;
ii. maximum duration: chronic use as
indicated on a case-by-case basis. Use of this substance long-term for 3 days
per week or greater may be associated with rebound pain upon
cessation.
b. Muscle
Relaxants: are appropriate for muscle spasm with pain. There is strong evidence
that muscle relaxants are more effective than placebo for providing short-term
pain relief in acute low back pain. When prescribing these agents, physicians
must seriously consider side effects of drowsiness or dizziness and the fact
that benzodiazepines may be habit-forming.
i.
optimum duration: one week;
ii.
maximum duration: two weeks (or longer if used only at night).
c. Narcotics: should be primarily
reserved for the treatment of severe low back pain. In mild to moderate cases
of low back pain, narcotic medication should be used cautiously on a
case-by-case basis. Adverse effects include respiratory depression, the
development of physical and psychological dependence, and impaired alertness.
i. Narcotic medications should be prescribed
with strict time, quantity, and duration guidelines, and with definitive
cessation parameters. Pain is subjective in nature and should be evaluated
using a scale to rate effectiveness of the narcotic prescribed. Any use beyond
the maximum should be documented and justified based on the diagnosis and/or
invasive procedures:
(a). optimum duration:
three to seven days;
(b). maximum
duration: two weeks. Use beyond two weeks is acceptable in appropriate cases.
Refer to Chronic Pain Guidelines which gives a detailed discussion regarding
medication use in chronic pain management.
(c). Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
(NSAIDs) are useful for pain and inflammation. In mild cases, they may be the
only drugs required for analgesia. There are several classes of NSAIDs, and the
response of the individual injured worker to a specific medication is
unpredictable. For this reason, a range of NSAIDs may be tried in each case
with the most effective preparation being continued. Patients should be closely
monitored for adverse reactions. The US Food and Drug Administration advise
that many NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular
thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal.
Naproxen sodium does not appear to be associated with increased risk of
vascular events. Administration of proton pump inhibitors, Histamine 2 Blockers
or prostaglandin analog misoprostol along with these NSAIDs may reduce the risk
of duodenal and gastric ulceration but do not impact possible cardiovascular
complications. Due to the cross-reactivity between aspirin and NSAIDs, NSAIDs
should not be used in aspirin-sensitive patients, and should be used with
caution in all asthma patients. NSAIDs are associated with abnormal renal
function, including renal failure, as well as, abnormal liver function. Certain
NSAIDs may have interactions with various other medications. Individuals may
have adverse events not listed above. Intervals for metabolic screening are
dependent upon the patient's age, general health status and should be within
parameters listed for each specific medication. Complete Blood Count (CBC), and
liver and renal function should be monitored at least every six months in
patients on chronic NSAIDs and initially when indicated.
(i). Non-Selective Nonsteroidal
Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
[a]. Includes NSAIDs
and acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin). Serious GI toxicity, such as bleeding,
perforation, and ulceration can occur at any time, with or without warning
symptoms in patients treated with traditional NSAIDs. Physicians should inform
patients about the signs and/or symptoms of serious gastrointestinal toxicity
and what steps to take if they occur. Anaphylactoid reactions may occur in
patients taking NSAIDs. NSAIDs may interfere with platelet function. Fluid
retention and edema have been observed in some patients taking NSAIDs.
[i]. optimal duration: one week;
[ii]. maximum duration: one year. Use of
these substances long-term (three days per week or greater) is associated with
rebound pain upon cessation.
[iii].
Selective Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) Inhibitors
[b]. COX-2 inhibitors are more recent NSAIDs
and differ in adverse side effect profiles from the traditional NSAIDs. The
major advantages of selective COX-2 inhibitors over traditional NSAIDs are that
they have less gastrointestinal toxicity and no platelet effects. COX-2
inhibitors can worsen renal function in patients with renal insufficiency, thus
renal function may need monitoring.
[c]. COX-2 inhibitors should not be
first-line for low risk patients who will be using an NSAID short term but are
indicated in select patients for whom traditional NSAIDs are not tolerated.
Serious upper GI adverse events can occur even in asymptomatic patients.
Patients at high risk for GI bleed include those who use alcohol, smoke, are
older than 65, take corticosteroids or anti-coagulants, or have a longer
duration of therapy. Celecoxib is contraindicated in sulfonamide allergic
patients.
[i]. Optimal Duration: 7 to 10
days.
[ii]. Maximum Duration:
Chronic use is appropriate in individual cases. Use of these substances
long-term (three days per week or greater) is associated with rebound pain upon
cessation.
d. Oral Steroids: have limited use but are
accepted in cases requiring potent anti-inflammatory drug effect. There is no
evidence supporting oral steroids for patients with low back pain with or
without radiculopathy and are not recommended.
e. Intravenous Steroids: the risks of
permanent neurological damage from acute spinal cord compression generally
outweigh the risks of pharmacologic side effects of steroids in an emergent
situation.
f.
Psychotropic/anti-anxiety/hypnotic agents may be useful for treatment of mild
and chronic pain, dysesthesias, sleep disorders, and depression. Antidepressant
medications, such as tricyclics and, Selective Serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIs) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSNRIs) are useful for
affective disorder and chronic pain management. Tricyclic antidepressant
agents, in low dose, are useful for chronic pain but have more frequent side
effects. Anti-anxiety medications should generally be limited to short-term
use. Combinations of the above agents may be useful. As a general rule,
providers (i.e., physician or medical psychologist) should access the patient's
prior history of substance abuse or depression prior to prescribing any of
these agents. Due to the habit-forming potential of the benzodiazepines and
other drugs found in this class, they are not routinely recommended. Refer to
the Chronic Pain Guidelines which give a detailed discussion regarding
medication use in chronic pain management:
i.
optimum duration: one to six months;
ii. maximum duration: 6 to 12 months, with
monitoring.
g. Tramadol
is useful in relief of low back pain and has been shown to provide pain relief
equivalent to that of commonly prescribed NSAIDs. Although Tramadol may cause
impaired alertness, it is generally well tolerated, does not cause
gastrointestinal ulceration, or exacerbate hypertension or congestive heart
failure. Tramadol should be used cautiously in patients who have a history of
seizures or who are taking medication that may lower the seizure threshold,
such as monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, SSRIs, and tricyclic
antidepressants. This medication has physically addictive properties and
withdrawal may follow abrupt discontinuation and is not recommended for those
with prior opioid addiction.
i. optimum
duration: three to seven days;
ii.
maximum duration: two weeks. Use beyond two weeks is acceptable in appropriate
cases.
h. Lofexidine
(Lucemyra)
i. Description: Central Alpha 2
Agonist,
ii. Indications:
mitigation of opioid withdrawal symptoms to facilitate abrupt opioid
discontinuation in adults.
iii.
Major Contraindications: severe coronary insufficiency, recent myocardial
infarction, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, marked bradycardia, or
prolonged QT Syndrome.
iv. Dosing
and Time to Therapeutic Effect: three 0.18mg tablets 4 times a day for 7
days.
v. Major Side Effects:
insomnia, orthostatic hypotension, bradycardia, hypotension, dizziness,
somnolence, sedation, dry mouth.
vi. Drug Interactions. Any medications that
decrease pulse or blood pressure to avoid the risk of excessive bradycardia and
hypotension.
vii. Laboratory
Monitoring. Monitor ECG in patients with congestive heart failure,
bradyarrythmis, hepatic impairment, renal impairment, or patients taking
othermedicinal products that lead to QT Prolongation.
6.
Occupational Rehabilitation Programs
a.
Non-Interdisciplinary. These generally accepted programs are work-related,
outcome-focused, individualized treatment programs. Objectives of the program
include, but are not limited to, improvement of cardiopulmonary and
neuromusculo skeletal functions (strength, endurance, movement, flexibility,
stability, and motor control functions), patient education, and symptom relief.
The goal is for patients to gain full or optimal function and return to work.
The service may include the time-limited use of passive modalities with
progression to active treatment and/or simulated/real work.
i. Work Conditioning
(a). These programs are usually initiated
once reconditioning has been completed but may be offered at any time
throughout the recovery phase. Work conditioning should be initiated when
imminent return of a patient to modified or full duty is not an option, but the
prognosis for returning the patient to work at completion of the program is at
least fair to good:
(i). length of visit: one
to two hours per day;
(ii).
frequency: two to five visits per week;
(iii). optimum duration: two to four
weeks
(iv). maximum duration: six
weeks. Participation in a program beyond six weeks must be documented with
respect to need and the ability to facilitate positive symptomatic or
functional gains.
ii. Work Simulation
(a). Work simulation is a program where an
individual completes specific work-related tasks for a particular job and
return to work. Use of this program is appropriate when modified duty can only
be partially accommodated in the work place, when modified duty in the work
place is unavailable, or when the patient requires more structured supervision.
The need for work place simulation should be based upon the results of a
Functional Capacity Evaluation and/or Jobsite Analysis.
(i). length of visit: two to six hours per
day;
(ii). frequency: two to five
visits per week;
(iii). optimum
duration: two to four weeks;
(iv).
maximum duration: six weeks. Participation in a program beyond six weeks must
be documented with respect to need and the ability to facilitate positive
symptomatic or functional gains.
(b). Interdisciplinary: programs are
well-established treatment for patients with sub-acute and functionally
impairing low back pain. They are characterized by a variety of disciplines
that participate in the assessment, planning, and/or implementation of an
injured worker's program with the goal for patients to gain full or optimal
function and return to work. There should be close interaction and integration
among the disciplines to ensure that all members of the team interact to
achieve team goals. Programs should include cognitive-behavioral therapy as
there is good evidence for its effectiveness in patients with chronic low back
pain. These programs are for patients with greater levels of disability,
dysfunction, de-conditioning and psychological involvement. For patients with
chronic pain, refer to the OWCA's Chronic Pain Disorder Medical Treatment
Guidelines.
(i). Work Hardening
[a]. Work Hardening is an interdisciplinary
program addressing a patient's employability and return to work. It includes a
progressive increase in the number of hours per day that a patient completes
work simulation tasks until the patient can tolerate a full workday. This is
accomplished by addressing the medical, psychological, behavioral, physical,
functional, and vocational components of employability and
return-to-work.
[b]. This can
include a highly structured program involving a team approach or can involve
any of the components thereof. The interdisciplinary team should, at a minimum,
be comprised of a qualified medical director who is board certified with
documented training in occupational rehabilitation; team physicians having
experience in occupational rehabilitation; occupational therapist; physical
therapist; case manager; and psychologist. As appropriate, the team may also
include: chiropractor, RN, vocational specialist or Certified Biofeedback
Therapist:
[i]. length of visit: Up to 8
hours/day;
[ii]. frequency: two to
five visits per week;
[iii].
optimum duration: two to four weeks;
[iv]. maximum duration: six weeks.
Participation in a program beyond six weeks must be documented with respect to
need and the ability to facilitate positive symptomatic or functional gains.
(ii). Spinal
Cord Programs
[a]. Spinal Cord Systems of
Care provide coordinated, case-managed, and integrated service for people with
spinal cord dysfunction, whether due to trauma or disease. The system includes
an inpatient component in an organization licensed as a hospital and an
outpatient component. Each component endorses the active participation and
choice of the persons served throughout the entire program. The Spinal Cord
System of Care also provides or formally links with key components of care that
address the lifelong needs of the persons served.
[b]. This can include a highly structured
program involving a team approach or can involve any of the components thereof.
The interdisciplinary team should, at a minimum, be comprised of a qualified
medical director who is board certified and trained in rehabilitation, a case
manager, occupational therapist, physical therapist, psychologist,
rehabilitation RN and MD, and therapeutic recreation specialist. As
appropriate, the team may also include: rehabilitation counselor, respiratory
therapist, social worker, or speech-language pathologist,
[c]. Timeframe durations for any spinal cord
program should be determined based upon the extent of the patient's injury and
at the discretion of the rehabilitation physician in
charge.
7. Orthotics
a. Foot Orthoses and Inserts are accepted
interventions for spinal disorders that are due to aggravated mechanical
abnormalities, such as leg length discrepancy, scoliosis, or lower extremity
misalignment. Shoe insoles or inserts may be effective for patients with acute
low back problems who stand for prolonged periods of time.
b. Lumbar support devices include backrests
for chairs and car seats. Lumbar supports may provide symptomatic relief of
pain and movement reduction in cases of chronic low back problems.
c. Lumbar Corsets and Back Belts. There is
insufficient evidence to support their use.
d. Lumbosacral Bracing. Rigid bracing devices
are well accepted and commonly used for post-fusion, scoliosis, and vertebral
fractures.
8. Patient
Education. No treatment plan is complete without addressing issues of
individual and/or group patient education as a means of prolonging the
beneficial effects of treatment, as well as facilitating self-management of
symptoms and injury prevention. The patient should be encouraged to take an
active role in the establishment of functional outcome goals. They should be
educated on their specific injury, assessment findings, and plan of treatment.
Instruction on proper body mechanics and posture, positions to avoid, self-care
for exacerbation of symptoms, and home exercise should also be addressed:
a. time to produce effect: varies with
individual patient;
b. frequency:
should occur at every visit.
9. Personality/Psychological/Psychiatric/
Psychosocial Intervention. Psychosocial treatment is generally accepted, widely
used, and well-established Intervention. This group of therapeutic and
diagnostic modalities includes, but is not limited to, individual counseling,
group therapy, stress management, psychosocial crises intervention, hypnosis,
and meditation. Any evaluation or diagnostic workup should clarify and
distinguish between pre-existing versus aggravated versus purely causative
psychological conditions. Psychosocial intervention is recommended as an
important component in the total management program that should be implemented
as soon as the problem is identified. There is some evidence that early
cognitive-behavioral treatment reduces health care use in comparison to written
information alone. This can be used alone, or in conjunction with other
treatment modalities. Providers treating patients with chronic pain should
refer to the OWCA's Chronic Pain Disorder Medical Treatment Guidelines:
a. time to produce effect: two to four
weeks;
b. frequency: one to three
times weekly for the first four weeks (excluding hospitalization, if required),
decreasing to one to two times per week for the second month. Thereafter, two
to four times monthly;
c. optimum
duration: six weeks to three months;
d. maximum duration: 3 to 12 months.
Counseling is not intended to delay but to enhance functional recovery. For
select patients, longer supervised treatment may be required and if further
counseling beyond three months is indicated, extensive documentation addressing
which pertinent issues are pre-existing versus aggravated versus causative, as
well as projecting a realistic functional prognosis, should be provided by the
authorized treating provider every four to six weeks during
treatment.
10.
Restriction of Activities. Continuation of normal daily activities is the
recommendation for acute and chronic low back pain without neurologic symptoms.
There is good evidence against the use of bed rest in cases without neurologic
symptoms. Bed rest may lead to de-conditioning and impair rehabilitation.
Complete work cessation should be avoided, if possible, since it often further
aggravates the pain presentation. Modified return-to-work is almost always more
efficacious and rarely contraindicated in the vast majority of injured workers
with low back pain.
11.
Return-to-Work. Early return-to-work should be a prime goal in treating
occupational injuries given the poor return-to-work prognosis for an injured
worker who has been out of work for more than six months. It is imperative that
the patient be educated regarding the benefits of return-to-work, work
restrictions, and follow-up if problems arise. When attempting to return a
patient to work after a specific injury, clear objective restrictions of
activity level should be made. An accurate job description with detailed
physical duty restrictions is often necessary to assist the physician in making
return-to-work recommendations. This may require a jobsite evaluation.
a. Employers should be prepared to offer
transitional work. This may consist of temporary work in a less demanding
position, return to the regular job with restrictions, or gradual return to the
regular job. Company policies which encourage return-to-work with positive
communication are most likely to have decreased worker disability.
b. Return-to-work is defined as any work or
duty that the patient is able to perform safely. It may not be the patient's
regular work. Due to the large spectrum of injuries of varying severity and
varying physical demands in the work place, it is not possible to make specific
return-to-work guidelines for each injury. Therefore, the OWCA recommends the
following.
c. Establishment of a
Return-To-Work Status: Ascertaining a return-to-work status is part of medical
care, should be included in the treatment and rehabilitation plan, and
addressed at every visit. A description of daily activity limitations is part
of any treatment plan and should be the basis for restriction of work
activities. In most non-surgical cases, the patient should be able to
return-to-work in some capacity or in an alternate position consistent with
medical treatment within several days unless there are extenuating
circumstances. Injuries requiring more than two weeks off work should be
thoroughly documented.
d.
Establishment of Activity Level Restrictions. Communication is essential
between the patient, employer, and provider to determine appropriate
restrictions and return-to-work dates. It is the responsibility of the
physician to provide clear concise restrictions, and it is the employer's
responsibility to determine if temporary duties can be provided within the
restrictions. For low back pain injuries, the following should be addressed
when describing the patient's activity level:
i. lifting limits with the maximum amount of
weight to be lifted. This may vary depending on the frequency of the lifting
and/or the object height level. Pushing, pulling, as well as bending and
twisting at the waist should be considered as well;
ii. lower body postures such as squatting,
kneeling, crawling, stooping, awkward or static positions, and climbing ladders
or stairs should include duration and frequency;
iii. ambulatory level for distance,
frequency, and terrain should be specified;
iv. duration and frequency of sitting,
standing, and walking should be delineated. Balance issues should also be
considered in these determinations;
v. use of adaptive devices or equipment for
proper office ergonomics to enhance capacities can be included;
vi. the effect of any medications that may
pose a safety risk to the patient, co-workers or the general public should be
considered with regard to the workplace and home.
e. Compliance with Activity Restrictions: In
some cases, compliance with restriction of activity levels may require a
complete jobsite evaluation, a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) or other
special testing. Refer to the "Special Tests" section of this
guideline.
12.
Therapy-Active. The following active therapies are widely used and accepted
methods of care for a variety of work-related injuries. They are based on the
philosophy that therapeutic exercise and/or activity are beneficial for
restoring flexibility, strength, endurance, function, range of motion, and can
alleviate discomfort. Active therapy requires an internal effort by the
individual to complete a specific exercise or task. This form of therapy
requires supervision from a therapist or medical provider such as verbal,
visual, and/or tactile instruction(s). At times, the provider may help
stabilize the patient or guide the movement pattern but the energy required to
complete the task is predominately executed by the patient.
a. On occasion, specific diagnoses and
post-surgical conditions may warrant durations of treatment beyond those listed
as "maximum". Factors such as exacerbation of symptoms, re-injury, interrupted
continuity of care and co-morbidities may also extend durations of care.
Specific goals with objectively measured functional improvement during
treatment must be cited to justify extended durations of care. It is
recommended that, if no functional gain is observed after the number of
treatments under "time to produce effect" has been completed alternative
treatment interventions, further diagnostic studies or further consultations
should be pursued.
b. Patients
should be instructed to continue active therapies at home as an extension of
the treatment process in order to maintain improvement levels. Follow-up visits
to reinforce and monitor progress and proper technique are recommended. Home
exercise can include exercise with or without mechanical assistance or
resistance and functional activities with assistive devices. The following
active therapies are listed in alphabetical order:
c. Activities of daily living (ADL) are
well-established interventions which involve instruction, active-assisted
training, and/or adaptation of activities or equipment to improve a person's
capacity in normal daily activities such as self-care, work re-integration
training, homemaking, and driving.
i. time to
produce effect: four to five treatments;
ii. frequency: three to five times per
week;
iii. optimum duration: four
to six weeks;
iv. maximum duration:
six weeks.
d. Aquatic
Therapy is a well-accepted treatment which consists of the therapeutic use of
aquatic immersion for therapeutic exercise to promote strengthening, core
stabilization, endurance, range of motion, flexibility, body mechanics, and
pain management. Aquatic therapy includes the implementation of active
therapeutic procedures in a swimming or therapeutic pool. The water provides a
buoyancy force that lessens the amount of force gravity applies to the body.
The decreased gravity effect allows the patient to have a mechanical advantage
and more likely have a successful trial of therapeutic exercise. The therapy
may be indicated for individuals who:
i.
cannot tolerate active land-based or full-weight bearing therapeutic
procedures;
ii. require increased
support in the presence of proprioceptive deficit;
iii. are at risk of compression fracture due
to decreased bone density;
iv. have
symptoms that are exacerbated in a dry environment;
v. would have a higher probability of meeting
active therapeutic goals than in a dry environment.
(a). The pool should be large enough to allow
full extremity range of motion and fully erect posture. Aquatic vests, belts
and other devices can be used to provide stability, balance, buoyancy, and
resistance:
(i). time to produce effect: four
to five treatments;
(ii).
frequency: three to five times per week;
(iii). optimum duration: four to six
weeks;
(iv). maximum duration:
eight weeks;
(b). A
self-directed program is recommended after the supervised aquatics program has
been established, or, alternatively a transition to a self-directed dry
environment exercise program.
e. Functional activities are well-established
interventions which involve the use of therapeutic activity to enhance
mobility, body mechanics, employability, coordination, balance, and sensory
motor integration.
i. time to produce effect:
four to five treatments;
ii.
frequency: three to five times per week;
iii. optimum duration: four to six
weeks;
iv. maximum duration: six
weeks.
f. Functional
electrical stimulation is an accepted treatment in which the application of
electrical current to elicit involuntary or assisted contractions of atrophied
and/or impaired muscles. It may be indicated for muscle atrophy due to
radiculopathy:
i. time to produce effect: two
to six treatments;
ii. frequency:
three times per week;
iii. optimum
duration: eight weeks;
iv. maximum
duration: eight weeks. If beneficial, provide with home unit.
g. Neuromuscular re-education is a
generally accepted treatment. It is the skilled application of exercise with
manual, mechanical, or electrical facilitation to enhance strength; movement
patterns; neuromuscular response; proprioception, kinesthetic sense,
coordination; education of movement, balance, and posture. Indications include
the need to promote neuromuscular responses through carefully timed
proprioceptive stimuli, to elicit and improve motor activity in patterns
similar to normal neurologically developed sequences, and improve neuromotor
response with independent control:
i. time to
produce effect: two to six treatments;
ii. frequency: three times per
week;
iii. optimum duration: four
to eight weeks;
iv. maximum
duration: eight weeks.
h.
Spinal stabilization is a generally well-accepted treatment. The goal of this
therapeutic program is to strengthen the spine in its neural and anatomic
position. The stabilization is dynamic which allows whole body movements while
maintaining a stabilized spine. It is the ability to move and function normally
through postures and activities without creating undue vertebral stress:
i. time to produce effect: four to eight
treatments;
ii. frequency: three to
five times per week;
iii. optimum
duration: four to eight weeks;
iv.
maximum duration: eight weeks.
i. Therapeutic exercise is a generally
well-accepted treatment. There is some evidence to support the effectiveness of
yoga therapy in alleviating symptoms and decreasing medication use in
uncomplicated low back pain. Therapeutic exercise, with or without mechanical
assistance or resistance, may include isoinertial, isotonic, isometric and
isokinetic types of exercises. Indications include the need for cardiovascular
fitness, reduced edema, improved muscle strength, improved connective tissue
strength and integrity, increased bone density, promotion of circulation to
enhance soft tissue healing, improvement of muscle recruitment, improved
proprioception, and coordination, increased range of motion. Therapeutic
exercises are used to promote normal movement patterns, and can also include
complementary/alternative exercise movement therapy (with oversight of a
physician or appropriate healthcare professional):
i. time to produce effect: two to six
treatments;
ii. frequency: three to
five times per week;
iii. optimum
duration: four to eight weeks;
iv.
maximum duration: eight weeks.
13. Therapy-passive. Most of the following
passive therapies and modalities are generally accepted methods of care for a
variety of work-related injuries. Passive therapy includes those treatment
modalities that do not require energy expenditure on the part of the patient.
They are principally effective during the early phases of treatment and are
directed at controlling symptoms such as pain, inflammation and swelling and to
improve the rate of healing soft tissue injuries. They should be used
adjunctively with active therapies such as postural stabilization and exercise
programs to help control swelling, pain, and inflammation during the active
rehabilitation process. Please refer to General Guideline Principles, Active
Interventions. Passive therapies may be used intermittently as a therapist
deems appropriate or regularly if there are specific goals with objectively
measured functional improvements during treatment,
a. On occasion, specific diagnoses and
post-surgical conditions may warrant durations of treatment beyond those listed
as "maximum." factors such as exacerbation of symptoms, re-injury, interrupted
continuity of care, and comorbidities may also extend durations of care.
Specific goals with objectively measured functional improvement during
treatment must be cited to justify extended durations of care. It is
recommended that, if no functional gain is observed after the number of
treatments under "time to produce effect" have been completed, alternative
treatment interventions, further diagnostic studies, or further consultations
should be pursued.
b. The following
passive therapies are listed in alphabetical order.
i. Electrical stimulation (unattended) is an
accepted treatment. Once applied, unattended electrical stimulation requires
minimal on-site supervision by the physical therapist, occupational therapist,
or other provider. Indications include pain, inflammation, muscle spasm,
atrophy, decreased circulation, and the need for osteogenic stimulation. A home
unit should be purchased if treatment is effective and frequent use is
recommended:
(a). time to produce effect: two
to four treatments;
(b). frequency:
Varies, depending upon indication, between two to three times/day to one
time/week. Home unit should be purchased if treatment is effective and frequent
use is recommended;
(c). optimum
duration: four treatments for clinic use;
(d). maximum duration: eight treatments for
clinic use.
ii.
Iontophoresis is an accepted treatment which consists of the transfer of
medication, including, but not limited to, steroidal anti-inflammatories and
anesthetics, through the use of electrical stimulation. Indications include
pain (Lidocaine), inflammation (hydrocortisone, salicylate), edema (mecholyl,
hyaluronidase, salicylate), ischemia (magnesium, mecholyl, iodine), muscle
spasm (magnesium, calcium), calcific deposits (acetate), scars, and keloids
(sodium chloride, iodine, acetate). There is no proven benefit for this therapy
in the low back:
(a). time to produce effect:
one to four treatments;
(b).
frequency: three times per week with at least 48 hours between
treatments;
(c). optimum duration:
four to six weeks;
(d). maximum
duration: six weeks.
iii.
Manipulation is generally accepted, well-established and widely used
therapeutic intervention for low back pain. Manipulative Treatment (not
therapy) is defined as the therapeutic application of manually guided forces by
an operator to improve physiologic function and/or support homeostasis that has
been altered by the injury or occupational disease, and has associated clinical
significance.
(a). High velocity, low
amplitude (HVLA) technique, chiropractic manipulation, osteopathic
manipulation, muscle energy techniques, counter strain, and non-force
techniques are all types of manipulative treatment. This may be applied by
osteopathic physicians (D.O.), chiropractors (D.C.), properly trained physical
therapists (P.T.), properly trained occupational therapists (O.T.), or properly
trained medical physicians. Under these different types of manipulation exist
many subsets of different techniques that can be described as direct- a
forceful engagement of a restrictive/pathologic barrier; indirect- a
gentle/non-forceful disengagement of a restrictive/pathologic barrier; the
patient actively assists in the treatment; and the patient relaxing, allowing
the practitioner to move the body tissues. When the proper diagnosis is made
and coupled with the appropriate technique, manipulation has no
contraindications and can be applied to all tissues of the body. Pre-treatment
assessment should be performed as part of each manipulative treatment visit to
ensure that the correct diagnosis and correct treatment is employed.
(b). High velocity, low amplitude (HVLA)
manipulation is performed by taking a joint to its end range of motion and
moving the articulation into the zone of accessory joint movement, well within
the limits of anatomical integrity. There is good scientific evidence to
suggest that HVLA manipulation can be helpful for patients with acute low back
pain problems without radiculopathy when used within the first four to six
weeks of symptoms. Although the evidence for sub-acute and chronic low back
pain and low back pain with radiculopathy is less convincing, it is a generally
accepted and well-established intervention for these conditions. Indications
for manipulation include joint pain, decreased joint motion, and joint
adhesions. Contraindications to HVLA manipulation include joint instability,
fractures, severe osteoporosis, infection, metastatic cancer, active
inflammatory arthritides, aortic aneurysm, and signs of progressive neurologic
deficits.
(c). Manipulation/Grade I
- V:
(i). time to produce effect for all
types of manipulative treatment: one to six treatments;
(ii). frequency: Up to three times per week
for the first four weeks as indicated by the severity of involvement and the
desired effect, then up to two treatments per week for the next four weeks. For
further treatments, twice per week or less to maintain function;
(iii). optimum duration: 8 to 12
weeks;
(iv). maximum duration:
three months. Extended durations of care beyond what is considered "maximum"
may be necessary in cases of re-injury, interrupted continuity of care,
exacerbation of symptoms, and in those patients with comorbidities. Refer to
the Chronic Pain Guidelines for care beyond three months.
(d). Manipulation under general anesthesia
(MUA) refers to manual manipulation of the lumbar spine in combination with the
use of a general anesthetic or conscious sedation. It is intended to improve
the success of manipulation when pain, muscle spasm, guarding, and fibrosis
appear to be limiting its application in patients otherwise suitable for their
use. There have been no high quality studies to justify its benefits given the
risks of general anesthetic and conscious sedation. It is not
recommended.
(e). Manipulation
under joint anesthesia (MUJA) refers to manipulation of the lumbar spine in
combination with a fluoroscopically guided injection of anesthetic with or
without corticosteroid agents into the facet joint at the level being
manipulated. There are no controlled clinical trials to support its use. It is
not recommended.
iv.
Massage-Manual or Mechanical. Massage is manipulation of soft tissue with broad
ranging relaxation and circulatory benefits. This may include stimulation of
acupuncture points and acupuncture channels (acupressure), application of
suction cups and techniques that include pressing, lifting, rubbing, pinching
of soft tissues by, or with, the practitioner's hands. Indications include
edema (peripheral or hard and non-pliable edema), muscle spasm, adhesions, the
need to improve peripheral circulation and range of motion, or to increase
muscle relaxation and flexibility prior to exercise.
(a). In sub-acute low back pain populations
there is good evidence that massage can increase function when combined with
exercise and patient education. Some studies have demonstrated a decrease in
provider visits and pain medication use with combined therapy. One study
indicated improved results with acupressure massage. It is recommended that all
massage be performed by trained, experienced therapists and be accompanied by
an active exercise program and patient education. In contrast to the sub-acute
population, massage is a generally accepted treatment for the acute low back
pain population, although no studies have demonstrated its efficacy for this
set of patients:
(i). time to produce effect:
immediate;
(ii). frequency: one to
two times per week;
(iii). optimum
duration: six weeks;
(iv). maximum
duration: two months.
v. Mobilization (joint) is a generally
well-accepted treatment. Mobilization is passive movement involving oscillatory
motions to the vertebral segment(s). The passive mobility is performed in a
graded manner (I, II, III, IV, or V), which depicts the speed and depth of
joint motion during the maneuver. For further discussion on Level V joint
mobilization please see section on HVLA manipulation [Refer to Clause
12.c.ii.]. It may include skilled manual joint tissue stretching. Indications
include the need to improve joint play, segmental alignment, improve
intracapsular arthrokinematics, or reduce pain associated with tissue
impingement. Mobilization should be accompanied by active therapy. For Level V
mobilization contraindications include joint instability, fractures, severe
osteoporosis, infection, metastatic cancer, active inflammatory arthritides,
aortic aneurysm, and signs of progressive neurologic deficits:
(a). time to produce effect: six to nine
treatments;
(b). frequency: up to
three times per week;
(c). optimum
duration: four to six weeks;
(d).
maximum duration: six weeks.
vi. Mobilization (soft tissue): is a
generally well-accepted treatment. Mobilization of soft tissue is the skilled
application of muscle energy, strain/counter strain, myofascial release, manual
trigger point release, and manual therapy techniques designed to improve or
normalize movement patterns through the reduction of soft tissue pain and
restrictions. These can be interactive with the patient participating or can be
with the patient relaxing and letting the practitioner move the body tissues.
Indications include muscle spasm around a joint, trigger points, adhesions, and
neural compression. Mobilization should be accompanied by active therapy:
(a). time to produce effect: four to nine
treatments;
(b). frequency: up to
three times per week;
(c). optimum
duration: four to six weeks;
(d).
maximum duration: six weeks.
vii. Intramuscular Manual Therapy: Dry
Needling. IMT involves using filament needles to treat "trigger points" within
muscle. It may require multiple advances of a filament needle to achieve a
local twitch response to release muscle tension and pain. Dry needling is an
effective treatment for acute and chronic pain of neuropathic origin with very
few side effects. Dry needling is a technique to treat the
neuro-musculoskeletal system based on pain patterns, muscular dysfunction and
other orthopedic signs and symptoms:
(a).
time to produce effect: immediate
(b). frequency: one to two times a
week
(c). optimum duration: six
weeks
(d). maximum duration: two
months
ix. Superficial
Heat and Cold Therapy (excluding Infrared Therapy) is a generally accepted
treatment. Superficial heat and cold are thermal agents applied in various
manners that lower or raise the body tissue temperature for the reduction of
pain, inflammation, and/or effusion resulting from injury or induced by
exercise. It includes application of heat just above the surface of the skin at
acupuncture points. Indications include acute pain, edema and hemorrhage, need
to increase pain threshold, reduce muscle spasm, and promote
stretching/flexibility. Cold and heat packs can be used at home as an extension
of therapy in the clinic setting. Continuous cryotherapy units with compression
are allowable in post-surgical orthopedic patients.
(a). time to produce effect:
Immediate;
(b). frequency: two to
five times per week;
(c). maximum
duration: thirty days
14. Vocational rehabilitation is a generally
accepted intervention. Initiation of vocational rehabilitation requires
adequate evaluation of patients for quantification highest functional level,
motivation, and achievement of maximum medical improvement. Vocational
rehabilitation may be as simple as returning to the original job or as
complicated as being retrained for a new occupation.
a. It may also be beneficial for full
vocational rehabilitation to be started before MMI if it is evident that the
injured worker will be unable to return to his/her previous occupation. A
positive goal and direction may aid the patient in decreasing stress and
depression and promote optimum rehabilitation.
AUTHORITY
NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
23:1203.1.