Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A.
Compliance
1. Each owner or operator subject
to the provisions of this Subchapter shall comply with the recordkeeping
requirements of this Section.
2. An
owner or operator of more than one hazardous waste management unit subject to
the provisions of this Subchapter may comply with the recordkeeping
requirements for these hazardous waste management units in one recordkeeping
system if the system identifies each record by each hazardous waste management
unit.
B. Implementation
Schedule and Documentation. Owners and operators must record the following
information in the facility operating record:
1. for facilities that comply with the
provisions of LAC 33:V.1709.A.2, an implementation schedule that includes dates
by which the closed-vent system and control device will be installed and in
operation. The schedule must also include a rationale of why the installation
cannot be completed at an earlier date. The implementation schedule must be in
the facility operating record by the effective date that the facility becomes
subject to the provisions of this Subchapter;
2. up-to-date documentation of compliance
with the process vent standards in LAC 33:V.1707, including:
a. information and data identifying all
affected process vents, annual throughput and operating hours of each affected
unit, estimated emission rates for each affected vent and for the overall
facility (i.e., the total emissions for all affected vents at the facility),
and the approximate location within the facility of each affected unit (e.g.,
identify the hazardous waste management units on a facility plot
plan);
b. information and data
supporting determinations of vent emissions and emission reductions achieved by
add-on control devices based on engineering calculations or source tests. For
the purpose of determining compliance, determinations of vent emissions and
emission reductions must be made using operating parameter values (i.e.,
temperatures, flow rates, or vent stream organic compounds and concentrations)
that represent the conditions that result in maximum organic emissions, such as
when the waste management unit is operating at the highest load or capacity
level reasonably expected to occur. If the owner or operator takes any action
(e.g., managing a waste of different composition or increasing operating hours
of affected waste management units) that would result in an increase in total
organic emissions from affected process vents at the facility, then a new
determination is required;
3. where an owner or operator chooses to use
test data to determine the organic removal efficiency or total organic compound
concentration achieved by the control device, a performance test plan. The test
plan must include:
a. a description of how it
is determined that the planned test is going to be conducted when the hazardous
waste management unit is operating at the highest load or capacity level
reasonably expected to occur. This shall include the estimated or design flow
rate and organic content of each vent stream and define the acceptable
operating ranges of key process and control device parameters during the test
program;
b. a detailed engineering
description of the closed-vent system and control device including:
i. manufacturer's name and model number of
control device;
ii. type of control
device;
iii. dimensions of the
control device;
iv. capacity;
and
v. construction
materials;
c. a detailed
description of sampling and monitoring procedures, including sampling and
monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and
monitoring frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample
analysis;
4.
documentation of compliance with LAC 33:V.1709 shall include the following
information:
a. a list of all information
references and sources used in preparing the documentation;
b. records, including the dates, of each
compliance test required by LAC 33:V.1709.K;
c. if engineering calculations are used, a
design analysis, specifications, drawings, schematics, and piping and
instrumentation diagrams based on the appropriate sections of "APTI Course 415:
Control of Gaseous Emissions," as incorporated by reference at LAC 33:V.110, or
other engineering texts acceptable to the administrative authority that present
basic control device design information. Documentation provided by the control
device manufacturer or vendor that describes the control device design in
accordance with LAC 33:V.1713.B.4.c.i-vii may be used to comply with this
requirement. The design analysis shall address the vent stream characteristics
and control device operation parameters as specified below:
i. for a thermal vapor incinerator, the
design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the
design minimum and average temperature in the combustion zone and the
combustion zone residence time;
ii.
for a catalytic vapor incinerator, the design analysis shall consider the vent
stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design
analysis shall also establish the design minimum and average temperatures
across the catalyst bed inlet and outlet;
iii. for a boiler or process heater, the
design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the
design minimum and average flame zone temperatures, combustion zone residence
time, and description of method and location where the vent stream is
introduced into the combustion zone;
iv. for a flare, the design analysis shall
consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow
rate. The design analysis shall also consider the requirements specified in LAC
33:V.1709.D;
v. for a condenser,
the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design
analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic compound concentration
level, design average temperature of the condenser exhaust vent stream, and
design average temperatures of the coolant fluid at the condenser inlet and
outlet;
vi. for a carbon adsorption
system such as a fixed-bed absorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly
on-site in the control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent
stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity,
and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design exhaust
vent stream organic compound concentration level, number and capacity of carbon
beds, type and working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon beds,
design total steam flow over the period of each complete carbon bed
regeneration cycle, duration of the carbon bed steaming and cooling/drying
cycles, design carbon bed temperature after regeneration, design carbon bed
regeneration time, and design service life of carbon;
vii. for a carbon adsorption system such as a
carbon canister that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on-site in the
control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The
design analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic concentration
level, capacity of carbon bed, type and working capacity of activated carbon
used for the carbon bed, and design carbon replacement interval based on the
total carbon working capacity of the control device and source operating
schedule;
d. a statement
signed and dated by the owner or operator certifying that the operating
parameters used in the design analysis reasonably represent the conditions that
exist when the hazardous waste management unit is or would be operating at the
highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur;
e. a statement signed and dated by the owner
or operator certifying that the control device is designed to operate at an
efficiency of 95 percent or greater unless the total organic concentration
limit of LAC 33:V.1707.A is achieved at an efficiency less than 95 weight
percent, or the total organic emission limits of LAC 33:V.1707.A for all
affected process vents at the facility can be attained by a control device
involving vapor recovery at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent. A
statement provided by the control device manufacturer or vendor certifying that
the control equipment meets the design specifications may be used to comply
with this requirement;
f. if
performance tests are used to demonstrate compliance, all test
results.
C.
Design: Documentation, Monitoring, Operating, and Inspection. Design
documentation and monitoring, operating, and inspection information for each
closed-vent system and control device required to comply with the provisions of
LAC 33:V.Chapters 10, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 35,
and 37 shall be recorded and kept up-to-date in the facility operating record.
The information shall include:
1. a
description and the date of each modification made to the closed-vent system or
control device design;
2.
identification of operating parameter, description of monitoring device, and
diagram of monitoring sensor location or locations used to comply with LAC
33:V.1709.F.1 and 2;
3. monitoring,
operating, and inspection information required by LAC 33:V.1709.F-K;
4. date, time, and duration of each period
that occurs while the control device is operating when any monitored parameter
exceeds the value established in the control device design analysis as
specified below:
a. for a thermal vapor
incinerator designed to operate with a minimum residence time of 0.50 second at
a minimum temperature of 760°C, each period when the combustion temperature is
below 760°C;
b. for a thermal vapor
incinerator designed to operate with an organic emission reduction efficiency
of 95 weight percent or greater, each period when the combustion zone
temperature is more than 28°C below the design average combustion zone
temperature established as a requirement of LAC 33:V.1713.B.4.c.i;
c. for a catalytic vapor incinerator, each
period when:
i. temperature of the vent
stream at the catalyst bed inlet is more than 28°C below the average
temperature of the inlet vent stream established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.ii; or
ii.
temperature difference across the catalyst bed is less than 80 percent of the
design average temperature difference established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.ii;
d.
for a boiler or process heater, each period when:
i. flame zone temperature is more than 28°C
below the design average flame zone temperature established as a requirement of
LAC 33:V.1713.B.4.c.iii; or
ii.
position changes where the vent stream is introduced to the combustion zone
from the location established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.iii;
e.
for a flare, each period when the pilot flame is not ignited;
f. for a condenser that complies with LAC
33:V.1709.F.2.f.i, each period when the organic compound concentration level or
readings of organic compounds in the exhaust vent stream from the condenser are
more than 20 percent greater than the design outlet organic compound
concentration level established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.v;
g. for a
condenser that complies with LAC 33:V.1709.F.2.f.ii, each period when:
i. temperature of the exhaust vent stream
from the condenser is more than 6°C above the design average exhaust vent
stream temperature established as a requirement of LAC 33:V.1713.B.4.c.v;
or
ii. temperature of the coolant
fluid exiting the condenser is more than 6°C above the design average coolant
fluid temperature at the condenser outlet established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.v;
h.
for a carbon adsorption system such as a fixed-bed carbon adsorber that
regenerates the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device and complies
with LAC 33:V.1709.F.2.g.i, each period when the organic compound concentration
level or readings of organic compounds in the exhaust vent stream from the
carbon bed are more than 20 percent greater than the design exhaust vent stream
organic compound concentration level established as a requirement of LAC
33:V.1713.B.4.c.v;
i. for a carbon
adsorption system such as a fixed-bed carbon adsorber that regenerates the
carbon bed directly on-site in the control device and complies with LAC
33:V.1709.F.2.g.ii, each period when the vent stream continues to flow through
the control device beyond the predetermined carbon bed regeneration time
established as a requirement of LAC 33:V.1713.B.4.c.vi;
5. explanation for each period recorded under
LAC 33:V.1713.C.4 of the cause for the control device operating parameter
exceeding the design value and the measures implemented to correct the control
device operation;
6. for a carbon
adsorption system operated subject to requirements specified in LAC 33:V.1709.G
or H.2, the date when existing carbon in the control device is replaced with
fresh carbon;
7. for a carbon
adsorption system operated subject to requirements specified in LAC
33:V.1709.H.1, a log that records:
a. date
and time when the control device is monitored for carbon breakthrough and the
monitoring device reading; and
b.
date when existing carbon in the control device is replaced with fresh
carbon;
8. date of each
control device start-up and shutdown;
9. an owner or operator designating any
components of a closed-vent system as unsafe to monitor pursuant to LAC
33:V.1709.O shall record in a log that is kept in the facility operating
record, the identification of closed-vent system components that are designated
as unsafe to monitor in accordance with the requirements of LAC 33:V.1709.O, an
explanation for each closed-vent system component stating why the closed-vent
system component is unsafe to monitor, and the plan for monitoring each
closed-vent system component;
10.
when each leak is detected as specified in LAC 33:V.1709.L, the following
information shall be recorded:
a. the
instrument identification number, the closed-vent system component
identification number, and the operator name, initials, or identification
number;
b. the date the leak was
detected and the date of first attempt to repair the leak;
c. the date of successful repair of the leak;
and
d. maximum instrument reading
measured by Method 21 of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A after it is successfully
repaired or determined to be nonrepairable;
e. "repair delayed" and the reason for the
delay if a leak is not repaired within 15 calendar days after discovery of the
leak:
i. the owner or operator may develop a
written procedure that identifies the conditions that justify a delay of
repair. In such cases, reasons for delay of repair may be documented by citing
the relevant sections of the written procedure;
ii. if delay of repair was caused by
depletion of stocked parts, there must be documentation that the spare parts
were sufficiently stocked on-site before depletion and the reason for
depletion.
D. Record Retention. Records of the
monitoring, operating, and inspection information required by Paragraphs C.3-10
of this Section must be kept on site for three years following the date of each
occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, or record.
E. Alternative Control Devices. For a control
device other than a thermal vapor incinerator, catalytic vapor incinerator,
flare, boiler, process heater, condenser, or carbon adsorption system, the
administrative authority will specify the appropriate recordkeeping
requirements.
F. Log. Up-to-date
information and data used to determine whether or not a process vent is subject
to the requirements in LAC 33:V.1707 including supporting documentation as
required by LAC 33:V.1711.D.2 when application of the knowledge of the nature
of the hazardous waste stream or the process by which it was produced is used,
shall be recorded in a log that is kept in the facility operating
record.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
30:2180 et
seq.