Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. Introduction
1. On October 18, 1972, the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments became Public Law 92-500. PL 92-500 was
amended by PL 95-217, the Clean Water Act of 1977, PL 97-117, the Municipal
Wastewater Treatment Construction Grant Amendments of 1981, and by PL 100-4
(Water Quality Act of 1987).
2. The
primary aim of the federal act as defined in LAC 33:IX.2105 is
to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of
the nation's water." The federal act states the goal of suitable water quality
for recreational contact, and for protection and propagation of fish and
wildlife. In addition, the federal act emphasizes the need for controlling or
eliminating discharges of toxic pollutants through the control of point and
nonpoint sources of pollution as defined in LAC 33:IX.2105. A
permit program has been established to restrict pollutant discharges from
factories, municipalities, and large agricultural operations. The permit
program has been expanded to include pollutants entering the nation's water
through nonpoint sources, including stormwater runoff from municipalities,
factories, agricultural operations, and other sources that do not require NPDES
permits.
3. The Water Quality Act
of 1987 added title VI to the Clean Water Act, which provided for a program of
low interest loans. Section 603(c) of the federal act states that the amounts
of funds available to each state water pollution control revolving fund shall
be used only for providing financial assistance:
a. to any municipality as
defined in the LAC 33:IX.2105, intermunicipal, interstate, or state agency for
construction as defined in the LAC 33:IX.2105 of publicly
owned treatment works as defined in section 212 of the Clean Water
Act;
b. for the implementation of a
management program established under
section
319 of the Clean Water Act;
and
c. for development and
implementation of a conservation and management plan under section 320 of the
Clean Water Act.
4.Section 603(g) of the federal act states
that the state may provide financial assistance with the state revolving loan
fund only if a construction project as described in subsection (c)(1) is on the
state's priority list under section 216 of the federal act. Assistance may be
provided regardless of the rank of a project on the list. Section 603(g) of the
federal act does not require that a project for the implementation of a
management program established under
section
319 of the federal act, and for
development and implementation of a conservation and management plan under
section 320 of the federal act shall be on the state's priority list to receive
financial assistance. These projects shall be included on the priority list and
assigned priority ratings in accordance with LAC 33:IX.2123.C.7.
5.Section 603(c) of the federal act states
that after public comment and review, each state shall prepare an annual plan
identifying the intended uses of the money to its revolving loan
fund.
6. The department has
established the state of Louisiana CWSRF priority system due to the federal
requirements of the program.
7.
This system provides a priority list of publicly owned treatment works projects
that meet the definition in section 212 of the federal act, and provides for
the selection of eligible projects to be included on the annual intended use
plan (IUP) for each year.
B. List of Stream Subsegments and Subsegment
Priority Numbers
1. The priority of the
program's management is to give more importance to the areas where significant
problems occur.
2. The state of
Louisiana is divided into 12 water quality management basins which exhibit
distinct hydrologic characteristics. Each designated basin is divided into
stream segments and subsegments which exhibit common reactions to stresses
(e.g., pollutants). The stream segmentation for Louisiana is contained in the
area-wide water quality management plans as defined in LAC
33:IX.2105 and submitted under section 303(e) of the federal act.
3. In order to direct the water quality
management effort, each stream subsegment is ranked according to its designated
uses and the degree to which they are supported. The values from each of the
category classifications, from Table B-l of this Section, are multiplied
together to produce a stream subsegment priority number. If a subsegment has
multiple designated uses, the single highest product of a designated use and
degree of support shall be utilized as the stream subsegment priority
number.
4. Information on
designated uses and degree of support is taken from the latest approved
Louisiana water quality inventory integrated report, which may be found on the
department's website.
5. The stream
priority list is used as the base for the later determination of the project
priority ratings.
Table B-1: Subsegment Priority Ranking
Multipliers
|
Designated Uses
|
Multiplier
|
Shellfish Propagation
|
20
|
Sole Source Drinking Water Supply
|
15
|
Outstanding Natural Resource
|
10
|
Primary Contact Recreation
|
5
|
Secondary Contact Recreation
|
5
|
Fish and Wildlife Propagation
|
5
|
Agriculture
|
5
|
Limited Aquatic Wildlife Use
|
2
|
Degree of Support
|
Multiplier
|
Not Supported
|
5
|
Partially Supported
|
4
|
Fully Supported but Threatened
|
3
|
Fully Supported
|
2
|
Formula:
|
Designated Uses X Degree of Support = Stream
Subsegment Priority Number
|
C. List by Priority Rank
1. In conjunction with the priority of the
stream subsegments of the state of Louisiana, each municipality that requests
consideration for funding is rated by its ability to comply with the federal
act.
2. The priority rating for
each municipality being considered for a loan is composed of the stream
subsegment priority rating and the municipality factor. These numbers are added
together to form the basic project priority rating.
3. The municipality factor is the summation
of the category factor and the pollution reduction factor. The category factor
depends on the age of a particular treatment or collection system within a
project area.
a. The category factor value for
treatment system only projects shall be obtained from Table C-1 of this
Section.
b. The category factor
value for collection system projects shall be obtained from Table C-2 of this
Section.
c. The category factor
value for treatment and collection system projects shall be the higher values
from Table C-1 or C-2 of this Section and shall be used to calculate the
municipality factor.
d. The
pollution reduction factor value is an indication of the ability to reduce the
pollution discharged into the receiving waters, and shall be obtained from
Table C-3 of this Section.
Table C-1 Treatment System Category Factor
|
Age of Treatment Plant
|
Type of Treatment Plant
|
Mechanical Plant
|
Aerated Lagoon
|
Stabilization Pond
|
Other
|
0 - 5 years
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6 - 10 years
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
11 - 15 years
|
6
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
16 - 20 years
|
8
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
Over 20 years
|
10
|
7
|
4
|
2
|
Table C-2 Collection System Category
Factor
|
Age of Collection System
|
Points
|
0 - 10 years
|
2
|
11 - 20 years
|
4
|
21 - 30 years
|
6
|
31 - 40 years
|
8
|
Over 40 years
|
10
|
Table C-3
Pollution Reduction Factor
|
Present Treatment Level
|
Future Level of Treatment
|
Secondary
|
Advanced
(BOD>20)
|
Advanced
(20>BOD>10)
|
Advanced (BOD<10)
|
Raw (from existing outfall)
|
80
|
90
|
90
|
100
|
Less than Secondary
|
60
|
70
|
80
|
90
|
Secondary
|
20*
|
60
|
70
|
80
|
Advanced (BOD>20)
|
N/A
|
20*
|
60
|
70
|
Advanced (20>
BOD>10)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
20*
|
60
|
Advanced (BOD<10)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
20*
|
Unsewered (no outfall)
|
30
|
40
|
50
|
60
|
N/A- No reduction in pollution discharge
anticipated
|
20
|
*If no change to treatment, but increase in
capacity, change 20 to 40 Formula: Category Factor +Pollution Reduction
Factor=Municipality Factor
|
4. A separate municipality factor shall be
determined for each treatment facility and the collection system within its
service area. When two or more treatment facilities are included in a single
project, the municipality factor for the project will be the weighted average,
according to population served for all treatment facilities included in the
project regardless of whether they are in the same or different municipalities.
Basic Project Priority Rating = Stream
Subsegment Priority Rating + Municipality Factor
|
5. The priority rating for a municipality may
be reconsidered and adjusted when new information is made available.
Information may result from water quality analysis, facility planning,
etc.
6. Any municipality may
request a reconsideration of its priority rating. Such a request shall include
the reason(s) the municipality believes the priority rating is
incorrect.
7. Projects for the
implementation of a management program established under
section
319 of the Federal Act, and for
development and implementation of a conservation and management plan under
section 320 of the Federal Act, shall be assigned a stream subsegment priority
number based on the most impacted by the project. These projects shall also be
assigned an additional factor based on the ability of the project to reduce
pollution in receiving waters. This factor shall be assigned by the department
based on evaluation of individual project applications and shall not exceed 100
points. The basic priority rating for projects under
sections
319 of the Federal Act are
detailed in the equation below.
Basic Project Priority Rating = Stream
Subsegment Priority Rating + Additional Assigned Factor
|
D. CWSRF Priority List
1. Upon receipt of a request by the
authorized representative of an applicant, the basic priority rating will be
determined and the proposed project shall be placed on the CWSRF priority
list.
2. For public entities only,
requests for inclusion on the CWSRF priority list shall include:
a. a resolution from the governing authority
designating a project representative and authorizing him/her to submit
preapplication material;
b. a
completed preapplication; and
c. a
map of the proposed planning area.
3. It is the responsibility of each
authorized project representative to maintain current and accurate information
for his/her project, and to submit any revised or updated project information
to the department each year. The information will be used to prepare the CWSRF
priority list.
4. The loan amount
shown on the list shall be the estimated amount of the items eligible for loan
assistance. Eligibility of specific items shall be based on the latest federal
requirements in effect at the time the list is prepared. Should these
requirements be changed subsequent to preparation of the list, all projects on
the list shall be adjusted accordingly. The monetary amount of each item shall
be based on the latest information supplied by the authorized project
representative in accordance with Paragraph D.2 of this Section.
5. Projects normally proceed by facility
planning, design, and construction. Projects that have completed facility
planning and design, and are ready to begin construction may be considered for
funding. Projects shall be awarded points in addition to the basic priority
rating based on the readiness to proceed to construction in accordance with the
Table D.1 of this Section.
Table D.1.
|
Milestone
|
Points
|
Project has completed facility planning and
planning documents have been approved
|
1000
|
The plan and design for the project has been
completed, and the specifications have been approved
|
2000
|
6. Assistance may be offered in several
phases to large projects upon request by the authorized project representative.
Assistance is based on a comparison of project cost and funds available, or
other factors that may require delayed funding for portions of a project. Each
phase of a project shall be listed separately on the CWSRF priority list. All
phases shall have the same basic priority rating, but each phase will have its
own points awarded based on readiness to proceed.
7. The CWSRF priority list shall include all
projects that have requested funding assistance, ranked in priority order,
regardless of the amount of funds available. The priority list shall be used
for the later preparation of the CWSRF intended use plan.
8. Projects on the CWSRF priority list shall
be selected to receive funds from the amount expected to be available in
accordance with Paragraph E.2 of this Section, less any reserves established in
accordance with Subsection F of this Section.
9. The department shall provide public notice
of the CWSRF priority list by publishing the availability of the list in the
official state journal and by placing the notice on the DEQ website. The public
shall have 30 days from the publication date of the notice to provide written
comments to the department. After the end of the 30 day comment period, the
department shall hold a public hearing on the CWSRF priority list. The
department shall consider all comments received and make any changes deemed
necessary. Afterwards, the department shall submit the CWSRF priority list to
the EPA.
10. Any project or project
phase shall be removed from the CWSRF priority list once funding for the
project or project phase has been provided through the CWSRF. The project or
project phase shall be removed after it been constructed using another source
of funds.
11. Any project request
without written communication with the department and no presentation of
progress toward prerequisites to funding for a period of five years shall be
deemed to be an inactive project and may be removed from the CWSRF priority
list. Prior to removal of an inactive project from the CWSRF priority list, the
department shall contact the project representative in writing to inform
him/her of the impending removal.
12. The CWSRF priority list is divided into
the fundable portion and the future funding portion. The fundable portion
includes those projects expected to be awarded assistance during the fiscal
year in which the list was prepared. The future funding portion includes those
projects expected to receive funding in future fiscal years.
13. A project may be moved from the fundable
portion to the future funding portion of the list, if the department determines
that the project will not be ready to proceed during the funding year. The
department shall contact the project representative in writing to advise
him/her of the impending decision to move the project to the future funding
list. The applicant shall have 30 days to present updated information to avoid
being moved to the future funding list.
14. Projects from the future funding portion
of the list that have completed the priority list public participation
requirements may advance to the fundable portion of the list if program funding
allows, or if additional funds are available. Individual projects shall advance
in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph D.8 of this Section, until the
available federal funding is consumed if additional funds are
available.
15. If the actual amount
available during the year is less than the projected amount expected to be
available in accordance with Paragraph E.2 of this Section, and it is not
possible to fund all projects on the fundable portion of the priority list,
then those projects selected last for inclusion on the priority list will be
moved from the fundable portion of the list to the future funding portion until
the remaining projects can be funded with the available funds.
16. If granting the additional funds would
result in insufficient funds for the remaining projects on the fundable
portion, the additional funds shall not be granted. The project contact may
request that additional funds be added to the future funding portion of the
project.
E. Intended Use
Plan (IUP)
1. An is prepared for each state
fiscal year (SFY), and it details the intended use of amounts expected to be
available to the CWSRF during the SFY. These intended uses shall include loans
for projects and other allowable uses of the fund. This includes, but is not
limited to, repayment of bonds as defined in LAC 33:IX.2105
issued by the fund, loan guarantees, insurance for local obligations, and
payment of allowable costs of administering the fund. The priority list from
Subsection D of this Section is an integral component of the IUP.
2. On July 1 of each year the
administrative authority as defined in LAC 33:IX.2105, or
his/her designee, shall determine the loan amount expected to be available for
projects in the current SFY.
3. Of
the amount expected to be available in accordance with Paragraph E.2 of this
Section, certain amounts shall be reserved in accordance with Subsection F of
this Section.
4. Projects shall be
included on the current CWSRF priority list that have met public participation
requirements and have been submitted to the EPA in order to be selected for the
IUP. Projects on the proposed CWSRF priority list may be selected for the
proposed IUP, provided that both the proposed priority list and IUP meet public
participation requirements and are accepted by the EPA.
5. The department shall provide a CWSRF IUP
public notice by publishing it in the official state journal and by placing the
notice on the DEQ website. The public shall have 10 business days from the
publication of the notice to provide written comments to the department. After
the end of the 10 business-day comment period, the department may hold a public
hearing on the CWSRF IUP. The department shall consider all comments received
and make any changes deemed necessary.
6. The CWSRF IUP shall be submitted to the
EPA for review and approval after the public comment period has
expired.
F. Reserves
Related to the IUP
1. Reserves for State
Management Assistance
a. The state may set
aside a portion of the total funds available during each SFY for use by the
department in fulfilling its obligations to manage the CWSRF program.
b. The reserve shall be limited to the amount
authorized by federal law as a percentage of each federal capitalization
grant.
2. Reserve for
Loans for Facilities Planning and Design
a.
The state may set aside a portion of the total funds available during the SFY
for loans to applicants for facilities planning and design.
b. The reserve is limited to applicants who
meet all of the following conditions.
i. The
construction portion of the project shall appear within the five year planning
portion of the IUP.
ii. The loan
shall be used to perform facility planning or design work that has not been
previously funded.
iii. The
applicant certifies that it does not have the financial capability to complete
facility planning and design work without financial assistance.
c. The reserve shall be
implemented only to the extent that the department deems necessary to provide
assistance to applicants who are unable to complete facilities planning and
design work without assistance. Applicants are expected to receive assistance
for construction when facility planning and design work are completed. This
reserve shall not exceed 10 percent of the funds available, in accordance with
Paragraph E.2 of this Section.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
30:2011(D)(1).