Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. Students to
be Considered. All students with disabilities who are enrolled in special
education and who exhibit self-injurious behavior(s).
B. Definitions
1. Self-injurious behavior(s) is
self-directed and negatively impacts the health and well-being of the student:
(e.g., banging one's head, severely scratching oneself, pinching oneself,
biting oneself, etc.) The behavior inflicts injury on self.
2. The self-injurious behavior(s) is
consistent in nature (i.e., persistent, regular, or continuous).
3. Self-injurious behavior(s) requires
intervention to ensure that there is a reduction in the behavior(s) or that
appropriate social behavior is achieved or maintained.
4. Students who exhibit a self-injurious
behavior(s) should have a goal(s) and objective(s) on the IEP to address the
reduction and/or elimination of the self-injurious behavior(s).
NOTE: There may be instances when a self-injurious behavior
is exhibited and no goal(s) and objective(s) are on the IEP to address the
behavior. Documentation should describe the behavior, the baseline data, the
intervention plan, results, and any revisions to the intervention, etc.
However, it must be emphasized that these needs should be addressed on the
student's IEP.
C. Steps to Applying Self-Injurious Behavior
Criterion
1. Annual IEP
a. The IEP team identifies
Self-Injurious Behavior Criterion as an area under which the
student may need ESYP. The IEP team and/or the teacher/instructional personnel
should use this criterion for the student who exhibits self-injurious behavior
that is persistent, regular, and continuous.
b. There is a plan for conducting a
functional behavioral assessment and developing a positive behavioral support
plan.
2. Ongoing Data
Collection/Screening
a. The behavior is
clearly defined or described.
b.
Baseline data are collected, including data pertaining to the frequency and/or
duration of the behavior.
c. A
positive behavioral support/intervention plan is designed and implemented by
the IEP team.
d. The
teacher/instructional personnel and/or parent(s) collect data to verify the
success or failure of the intervention plan (e.g., frequency count, duration
check).
e. Evaluate. If the data
collected indicate that the intervention plan is not working to reduce the
self-injurious behavior (usually about two weeks), the intervention plan should
be revised. The teacher should go back to steps 3 and 4.
3. Is the student eligible for ESYP?
a. By the ESYP screening date, the
teacher/instructional personnel reviews all of the data related to the behavior
and considers the following.
i. Questions
(a). Does the behavior result in
self-injury?
(b). Is continued
intervention necessary to reduce the self-injurious behavior(s)?
(c). Is continued intervention necessary to
ensure that appropriate behavior is achieved or maintained?
ii. Review Student Performance,
Progress
(a). What do the data indicate? Has
the self-injurious behavior decreased, or is the student in need of continued
intervention?
(b). Do other team
members see the same pattern of behavior?
b. Decision Making
i. If the data indicate the student is in
need of continued intervention to maintain appropriate behavior or reduce
self-injurious behavior, the student is eligible for the ESYP.
4. Required
documentation:
a. a description/definition of
the behavior;
b. baseline
data;
c. a description of the
intervention plan;
d. intervention
data;
e. if necessary, the revised
intervention plan(s);
f.
Self-Injurious Behavior Documentation Form found on file at the
department.
AUTHORITY NOTE:
Promulgated in accordance with
R.S.
17:1941 et
seq.