3. Is the Student Eligible For
ESYP?
a. Critical Point 1
i. The teacher/instructional personnel
reviews all relevant data and determines whether there is a possibility that
the student may be in danger of the loss of general education class time
because of lack of academic or social skill development. In other words, any
increase in special education service time must be examined.
(a). Is there any reason to suspect that the
student is in danger of losing general education time for either academic or
social reasons? Example 1: the student may not be keeping up with work in the
general education class and there may be the need for more special education
support in the general education class. Example 2: the student may be
exhibiting behavior(s) that interfere with class participation; removing
him/her because of the disruptive behaviors is being considered.
ii. Review Student Performance,
Progress
(a). What do the data indicate? The
teacher/instructional personnel should look at whether the student demonstrates
adequate performance, is able to perform at grade level, is able to perform in
reading related areas, or is exhibiting behavior that interferes with class
participation, etc.
(b). Do other
team members see the same performance pattern?
iii. Decision Making
(a). Is it possible that the ESYP could
prevent the loss of time in general education class(es) or the increase in
special education support/service(s) time?
(b). Why does the teacher/instructional
personnel think the ESYP could prevent this loss of time? Why does the
teacher/instructional personnel think the ESYP could not prevent this loss of
time? Example 1: could intensive work in specific need areas (drill in math,
study and organization skills, phonics skill building, social skills training,
etc.) make the difference? Example 2: the ESYP may not make a difference
because of the fact that the student is three grade levels below in reading, or
the student has a lack of interest/motivation.
b. Critical Point 2
i. The teacher/instructional personnel
reviews all relevant data and determines whether there is a possibility that
the student may be in danger of losing significant progress made toward
acquisition and/or maintenance of a critical self-help, community access, or
social/behavioral skill.
(a). Are there any
objective(s) on the student's IEP in the area of self-help skills (e.g., taking
care of self and personal needs such as, toileting, dressing, body
care/hygiene), community access (e.g., skills necessary for independent
functioning in community situations such as, crossing streets, buying items at
a store, using the telephone for information/emergency service),
social/behavioral skills (e.g., communicating with others for needs/wants,
controlling unacceptable behavior, such as hitting others or screaming in
social/educational situations)?
(b). Has the student almost achieved any of
the objectives/skills in these areas?
ii. Review Student Performance, Progress
(a). What do the data indicate? The student
is about at criterion, or almost has it, or
the student is not close to criterion.
(b). Do other team members have data on these
skill areas? Are the skill(s) considered critical?
iii. Decision Making
(a). Is the skill critical? Does the student
need to acquire or maintain the skill now?
(b). Is the skill crucial because of the
student's age?
(c). Is the skill
important because it limits future program options?
(d). Is the skill significant because it
limits future living/community integration opportunities?
(e). Based upon his or her past performance
(rate) could the student acquire or maintain the self-help, community access,
or social/behavioral skill(s) during the ESYP? Would the ESYP make a
difference?