Louisiana Administrative Code
Title 22 - CORRECTIONS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Part XV - Public Defender Board
Chapter 9 - Capital Defense Guidelines
Section XV-925 - Funding and Compensation
Universal Citation: LA Admin Code XV-925
Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. Responsibility for Funding Capital Defense
1.
Except as otherwise provided in these guidelines, the district public defender
shall be responsible for funding capital defense services in each case for
which he or she has responsibility under
§905 The state public defender shall be
responsible for funding capital defense services as provided for in these
guidelines and in each case for which he or she has responsibility under
§905
2. Where a district public
defender or the state public defender has insufficient funds to provide for
capital defense services for which it has responsibility, the Board shall have
responsibility for making available sufficient funds to permit the funding of
capital defense services consistent with these guidelines and associated
performance standards.
3. Where the
board is unable to provide sufficient funds to permit representation consistent
with these guidelines and associated performance standards it shall be the
obligation of defense counsel in each case so affected to take all necessary
steps to preserve and protect the defendant's rights until adequate funding is
provided, including, in a trial level case, move for a halt of
prosecution.
B. Allocation of Funds
1. Within the constraints
of available funds, the board, the state public defender and each district
public defender responsible for capital representation shall endeavor to make
adequate budgetary allowance for the funding of capital defense services
consistent with these guidelines and associated performance standards and in a
cost-effective and fiscally responsible manner.
2. The board, the state public defender and
each district public defender responsible for capital representation must
balance the responsibility to fund capital representation with the obligation
to fund representation in other cases and within the constraints provided by
available funds, must endeavor to provide adequate funds for all required
indigent defense services and make budget allocations accordingly.
3. Similarly, the board, the state public
defender and each district public defender responsible for capital
representation must balance the responsibility to fund capital representation
across all of the districts in the state and at each stage of capital
representation and must endeavor to provide adequate funds for all required
capital defense services and make budget allocations accordingly.
4. Where the demand for capital defense
services exceeds the available funds, the board, the state public defender and
each district public defender shall ensure that funds are allocated consistent
with the following principles:
a. funds
allocated for and necessary for services other than capital defense services
shall not be re-allocated to capital defense services, provided that the budget
has reasonably sought to balance funding for the capital and non-capital
funding responsibilities of the board, state public defender and district
public defender;
b. funds allocated
for different districts, regions or stages of representation in capital cases
shall not be re-allocated to another district, region or stage of
representation provided that the budget has reasonably sought to balance
funding for all required capital defense services;
c. funds should be made available to capital
cases only to the extent that each case can be funded at a level that can
provide for representation consistent with these guidelines and associated
performance standards. Capital cases should not be partially funded at a level
below that necessary to achieve compliance with these guidelines and associated
performance standards;
d.
notwithstanding the above, where a capital case cannot be adequately funded,
funds may be used for the limited purposes of:
i. preserving the rights of the defendant,
including the right to a halt of prosecution; and
ii. minimizing any irremediable prejudice
arising from the lack of adequate funds, for example, by preserving available
evidence;
e. within each
stage of representation (trial, appeal, post-conviction, clemency), funds are
to be allocated and expended on cases in the order in which the obligation to
provide representation began, or the order in which the need for particular
funds has been presented; and
f.
decisions regarding the allocation of funds are to be made free from political
or judicial interference.
C. Compensation of Capital Defense Counsel
1. Counsel in death penalty cases should be
fully compensated at a rate that is commensurate with the provision of high
quality legal representation and reflects the extraordinary responsibilities
inherent in death penalty representation. Salary and other compensation should
be comparable to other positions of similar stature throughout the
state.
2. Flat fees, caps on
compensation, and lump-sum contracts with attorneys are improper in death
penalty cases.
3. No distinction
between rates for services performed in or out of court should be
maintained.
4. Periodic billing and
payment should be available to capital defense counsel.
D. Compensation of Non-attorney Team Members
1. Non-attorney members of the defense team
should be fully compensated at a rate that is commensurate with the provision
of high quality legal representation and reflects the specialized skills needed
by those who assist counsel with the litigation of death penalty cases. Salary
and other compensation should be comparable to other positions of similar
stature throughout the state.
2. No
distinction between rates for services performed in or out of court should be
maintained.
3. Periodic billing and
payment should be available to non-attorney team members and experts.
E. Roster of Presumptively Reasonable Compensation
1. The state defender
shall draft and publish a roster of presumptively reasonable rates of
compensation for defense counsel, investigators, mitigation specialists and
experts across the state, making provision for different rates for different
regions of the state where necessary.
F. Funding in Unusually Protracted or Extraordinary Cases
1. Additional compensation
should be available in unusually protracted or extraordinary cases.
G. Reasonable Incidental Expenses
1. Counsel and members of the defense team
should be fully reimbursed for reasonable incidental expenses.
H. Documentation of Resource and Funding Allocation
1. It shall be the
responsibility of counsel to request all resources and funds necessary to
provide representation consistent with these guidelines and the performance
standards. Counsel must ensure that all requests for and decisions regarding
the allocation of resources and funds are clearly documented in the client
file.
2. The board, the state
public defender and each district public defender shall also ensure that all
requests for and decisions regarding the allocation of resources and funds are
clearly documented and preserved.
3. The requirement to clearly document
decisions regarding resource and funding allocations operates even where
counsel is also the person responsible for making the decision, for example,
where the district public defender is lead counsel. Where counsel's obligation
to the client creates a conflict with the obligation to make a decision
regarding resource and funding allocations, the decision may be referred to the
state public defender.
AUTHORITY NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 15:148.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Louisiana may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.