Louisiana Administrative Code
Title 22 - CORRECTIONS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Part XV - Public Defender Board
Chapter 9 - Capital Defense Guidelines
Section XV-921 - Monitoring of Certified Counsel; Removal

Universal Citation: LA Admin Code XV-921

Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 3, March 20, 2024

A. Monitoring Performance of Defense Counsel

1. The state public defender is responsible for monitoring the performance of all capital defense counsel to ensure that each client is receiving high quality legal representation.

2. The district public defender is responsible for monitoring the performance of all capital defense counsel in his or her jurisdiction, when not precluded from doing so by a conflict of interest.

3. Where there is evidence that an attorney is not providing high quality legal representation consistent with these guidelines and associated performance standards, the state public defender and district public defender, as appropriate, should take necessary action to protect the interests of the attorney's current and potential clients.

B. Complaints Procedure

1. The state public defender shall establish and publicize a complaints procedure.

C. Capital Case Review

1. Whenever a capital case has been closed at trial, appellate, state post-conviction, federal post-conviction or clemency level the state public defender shall receive a briefing from counsel regarding the course of the representation. The state public defender may publish a form for the provision of case briefings.

2. At the discretion of the state public defender and in every case in which a death sentence is imposed or affirmed, post-conviction relief is denied or a defendant is executed, a case review committee shall be convened by the state public defender to review the course of the representation. The purpose of the review is to gather information to assist in the ongoing provision of high quality representation in capital cases.

D. Periodic Review of Certification and Service Provision

1. The state public defender shall review the roster of attorneys certified on an annual basis to ensure that attorneys listed remain capable of providing high quality legal representation.

2. The state public defender shall review the service delivery of each district public defender and defender organization each year to ensure that each remains capable of providing high quality legal representation.

E. Decertification

1. The state public defender may decertify, reduce the role for which counsel is certified or reduce to provisional certification any attorney who has: failed, without good cause, to meet the requirements of these guidelines and associated performance standards; has failed, without good cause, to satisfy the obligations of certified counsel under §915. I; has become unsuitable for capital certification under §915; has failed to continue to demonstrate that he or she has the required legal knowledge and skill necessary for capital defense representation; or has failed to continue to demonstrate that he or she is willing to apply that knowledge and skill with appropriate thoroughness and preparation.

2. The state public defender may also remove an attorney from the roster if, as part of a periodic review of the roster, the state public defender determines that a smaller roster of attorneys will better serve the goals of ensuring the best possible representation of indigent capital defendants and of delivering quality services in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.

3. Where counsel is decertified the state public defender shall ensure that each court in which the attorney represents a capital defendant is advised of this fact. The responsible agency under §905 will assign new counsel to represent the defendant in order to ensure that the defendant receives representation in compliance with these guidelines and the associated performance standards. Counsel who are decertified shall not be paid for work performed after decertification except for such work as is necessary to provide for an effective transition of case responsibility to successor counsel.

4. Where there is substantial evidence that an attorney has failed to provide high quality legal representation, the attorney shall be reduced by the state public defender to provisional certification and the state public defender shall promptly investigate the circumstances of the representation.

5. Following the investigation, the state public defender may restore the attorney's original level of certification, reduce the role for which the attorney is certified, confirm the provisional certification or decertify the attorney.

6. Where there is substantial evidence that a systemic defect in a defender organization has caused the office to fail to provide high quality legal representation, the state public defender and district public defender shall ensure that the organization does not receive additional assignments of cases. The state public defender shall promptly investigate the existence of a systemic defect.

7. Following the investigation the state public defender may direct that the defender organization continue to receive case assignments, require that remedial action be taken or take action to ensure that the defender organization does not receive any further assignments and that existing clients receive representation consistent with these guidelines and associated performance standards.

8. Any attorney or defender organization that may be the subject of an adverse decision under §921. E shall be provided written notice of any action being contemplated and an opportunity to respond in writing before any final action is taken.

9. Any attorney or defender organization adversely affected by a decision under §921. E may appeal that decision in the manner described in §915. H.

F. Protection of Zealous Advocacy

1. The state public defender must ensure that this Section is implemented consistently with §903, so that an attorney's zealous representation of a client cannot be cause for the imposition or threatened imposition of sanctions pursuant to this Section.

G. Inherent Regulatory Authority of Louisiana Supreme Court

1. Nothing in this Section is intended to derogate from the inherent regulatory authority of the Louisiana Supreme Court provided for in Article V, Section 5 of the Constitution of Louisiana regarding the regulation of the practice of law.

AUTHORITY NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 15:148.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Louisiana may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.