Louisiana Administrative Code
Title 22 - CORRECTIONS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Part XV - Public Defender Board
Chapter 9 - Capital Defense Guidelines
Section XV-921 - Monitoring of Certified Counsel; Removal
Universal Citation: LA Admin Code XV-921
Current through Register Vol. 50, No. 9, September 20, 2024
A. Monitoring Performance of Defense Counsel
1. The state public defender is responsible
for monitoring the performance of all capital defense counsel to ensure that
each client is receiving high quality legal representation.
2. The district public defender is
responsible for monitoring the performance of all capital defense counsel in
his or her jurisdiction, when not precluded from doing so by a conflict of
interest.
3. Where there is
evidence that an attorney is not providing high quality legal representation
consistent with these guidelines and associated performance standards, the
state public defender and district public defender, as appropriate, should take
necessary action to protect the interests of the attorney's current and
potential clients.
B. Complaints Procedure
1. The state public
defender shall establish and publicize a complaints procedure.
C. Capital Case Review
1. Whenever a capital case has been closed at
trial, appellate, state post-conviction, federal post-conviction or clemency
level the state public defender shall receive a briefing from counsel regarding
the course of the representation. The state public defender may publish a form
for the provision of case briefings.
2. At the discretion of the state public
defender and in every case in which a death sentence is imposed or affirmed,
post-conviction relief is denied or a defendant is executed, a case review
committee shall be convened by the state public defender to review the course
of the representation. The purpose of the review is to gather information to
assist in the ongoing provision of high quality representation in capital
cases.
D. Periodic Review of Certification and Service Provision
1. The state public defender shall review the
roster of attorneys certified on an annual basis to ensure that attorneys
listed remain capable of providing high quality legal representation.
2. The state public defender shall review the
service delivery of each district public defender and defender organization
each year to ensure that each remains capable of providing high quality legal
representation.
E. Decertification
1. The state public defender
may decertify, reduce the role for which counsel is certified or reduce to
provisional certification any attorney who has: failed, without good cause, to
meet the requirements of these guidelines and associated performance standards;
has failed, without good cause, to satisfy the obligations of certified counsel
under §915 I; has become
unsuitable for capital certification under §915; has failed to continue to
demonstrate that he or she has the required legal knowledge and skill necessary
for capital defense representation; or has failed to continue to demonstrate
that he or she is willing to apply that knowledge and skill with appropriate
thoroughness and preparation.
2.
The state public defender may also remove an attorney from the roster if, as
part of a periodic review of the roster, the state public defender determines
that a smaller roster of attorneys will better serve the goals of ensuring the
best possible representation of indigent capital defendants and of delivering
quality services in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.
3. Where counsel is decertified the state
public defender shall ensure that each court in which the attorney represents a
capital defendant is advised of this fact. The responsible agency under
§905 will assign new counsel to represent
the defendant in order to ensure that the defendant receives representation in
compliance with these guidelines and the associated performance standards.
Counsel who are decertified shall not be paid for work performed after
decertification except for such work as is necessary to provide for an
effective transition of case responsibility to successor counsel.
4. Where there is substantial evidence that
an attorney has failed to provide high quality legal representation, the
attorney shall be reduced by the state public defender to provisional
certification and the state public defender shall promptly investigate the
circumstances of the representation.
5. Following the investigation, the state
public defender may restore the attorney's original level of certification,
reduce the role for which the attorney is certified, confirm the provisional
certification or decertify the attorney.
6. Where there is substantial evidence that a
systemic defect in a defender organization has caused the office to fail to
provide high quality legal representation, the state public defender and
district public defender shall ensure that the organization does not receive
additional assignments of cases. The state public defender shall promptly
investigate the existence of a systemic defect.
7. Following the investigation the state
public defender may direct that the defender organization continue to receive
case assignments, require that remedial action be taken or take action to
ensure that the defender organization does not receive any further assignments
and that existing clients receive representation consistent with these
guidelines and associated performance standards.
8. Any attorney or defender organization that
may be the subject of an adverse decision under
§921. E shall be provided
written notice of any action being contemplated and an opportunity to respond
in writing before any final action is taken.
9. Any attorney or defender organization
adversely affected by a decision under
§921. E may appeal that
decision in the manner described in
§915 H
F. Protection of Zealous Advocacy
1. The state public defender must ensure that
this Section is implemented consistently with §903, so that an attorney's
zealous representation of a client cannot be cause for the imposition or
threatened imposition of sanctions pursuant to this Section.
G. Inherent Regulatory Authority of Louisiana Supreme Court
1. Nothing in this
Section is intended to derogate from the inherent regulatory authority of the
Louisiana Supreme Court provided for in Article V, Section 5 of the
Constitution of Louisiana regarding the regulation of the practice of
law.
AUTHORITY NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 15:148.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Louisiana may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.