Louisiana Administrative Code
Title 22 - CORRECTIONS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Part XV - Public Defender Board
Chapter 9 - Capital Defense Guidelines
Section XV-919 - Workload

1. Workloads of defense team members shall be maintained at a level that enables counsel to provide each client with high quality legal representation in accordance with these guidelines and associated performance standards, including the ability of counsel to devote full time effort to the case as circumstances will require.

1. Attorneys shall maintain workloads in compliance with any policy or rule adopted by the board under R.S. 15:148(B)(l)(a).

2. Pending the adoption by the board of a policy or rule under R.S. 15:148(B)(l)(a), attorneys shall maintain caseloads in compliance with Chapter 12, Louisiana Standards on Indigent Defense.

1. The state public defender, regional director and district public defender shall be responsible for ensuring that the attorneys in each case for which they have responsibility under §905 are in compliance with this Section and shall assist the attorneys to achieve and maintain appropriate workloads.

2. Each supervisor of a capital attorney has a responsibility to ensure that the attorneys he or she supervises maintain compliance with this Section and assist the attorneys to achieve and maintain appropriate workloads.

3. Each attorney has an individual responsibility to ensure that he or she maintains compliance with this Section.

1. An attorney should not be assigned new case assignments that will result in his or her workload exceeding that allowed by §919. A after accepting a capital case.

2. Where an attorney believes that accepting a new case will result in a workload in violation of §919 A, the attorney must bring this to the attention of the case supervisor for reasonable resolution of the question of professional duty created. Where the question of whether the workload is excessive is reasonably arguable, the responsibility to ensure compliance with these guidelines rests with the case supervisor. Where the workload is excessive, this may include but is not limited to ensuring that no new assignment is made; reallocating other responsibilities; and providing additional personnel on new or existing cases.

3. Where the attorney believes that the resolution of the question has been inadequate he or she must raise the question progressively with the district public defender, regional director and state public defender, as appropriate, for reasonable resolution.

4. Where the question of whether the workload is excessive is not reasonably arguable or where the attorney has exhausted all available avenues for a reasonable resolution of the question and no reasonable resolution has been provided, the attorney should decline to accept any new cases.

5. An attorney should decline to accept new cases, rather than withdraw from existing cases, if the acceptance of a new case will result in his or her workload exceeding that allowed by §919 A

1. Where an attorney believes that his or her workload is in violation of §919 A, the attorney must bring this to the attention of the case supervisor for reasonable resolution of the question of professional duty created. Where the question of whether the workload is excessive is reasonably arguable, the responsibility to ensure compliance with these guidelines rests with the case supervisor.

2. Where a case supervisor becomes aware that an attorney's workload may exceed that allowed by §919 A, he or she shall immediately investigate the attorney's workload and take appropriate steps to bring the attorney's workload into compliance with this Section. Such action may include:

3. Where the attorney believes that the resolution of the question of excessive workload has been inadequate, he or she must raise the question progressively with the district public defender, regional director and state public defender, as appropriate, for reasonable resolution.

4. Where the question of whether the workload is excessive is not reasonably arguable and where the attorney has exhausted all available avenues for a reasonable resolution of the question and no reasonable resolution has been provided, the attorney should move to withdraw from the case or cases in which capital defense services in compliance with these guidelines and associated performance standards cannot be provided. The state public defender must be provided reasonable notice prior to the filing of any motion to withdraw under this Section.