Current through Register Vol. 43, No. 39, September 26, 2024
(a) For the
purpose of this regulation, "base acreage" means:
(1) the maximum number of acres actually
legally irrigated in any one calendar year on or before December 31, 1994 if
the perfection period expired on or before December 31, 1994 or the water right
is a vested right; or
(2) if the
perfection period expires after December 31, 1994, and the perfection period
has not expired at the time the change application has been filed, the base
acreage shall be the number of acres authorized by the permit; or
(3) if the perfection period expires after
December 31, 1994, and the perfection period has expired at the time the change
application was filed, the base acreage shall be the maximum acreage legally
irrigated in any one calendar year during the perfection period.
(4) Any year in which any of the terms,
conditions and limitations of the water right or permit were violated shall not
be used to determine base acreage.
(b) An application to change the authorized
place of use for irrigation purposes which would permit the applicant to exceed
the base acreage by 10 acres or 10 percent, whichever is less, shall not be
approved by the chief engineer because it would result in a substantial
increase in net consumptive use in violation of K.A.R. 5-5-3 except when one of
the six following criteria are met.
(1)
Identical places of use.
(A) The change
application shall be filed only for the purpose of creating an identical place
of use with another water right or rights;
(B) there shall not be a net increase in
authorized acres;
(C) each water
right involved in the proposed identical overlap in place of use shall be
certified by the chief engineer prior to processing the change application if
approval of the change application would authorize an increase in base acreage;
and
(D) the total quantity
authorized by all existing water rights and all permits involved shall be
reasonable to irrigate the land authorized after the change in place of use is
approved.
(2) Necessity
to install more efficient irrigation system; limited acres and quantity.
(A) The change applicant shall submit
information demonstrating to the satisfaction of the chief engineer that it is
necessary to increase the base acreage so that a significantly more efficient
irrigation delivery system may be installed. Types of crops to be grown or
tillage practices used shall not be considered in deciding whether the proposed
system is more efficient.
(B) If
the chief engineer approves the application for a change in place of use
pursuant to this subsection, the following limitations shall apply.
(i) The authorized quantity of water under
the water right shall be limited to a 5 year fixed allocation, computed by
dividing the net irrigation requirement (NIR), as set forth in K.A.R. 5-5-12,
for the 50% chance rainfall for the county where the place of use is located,
by an efficiency factor of 0.85, multiplying by the base acreage as determined
in subsection (a) of this regulation, and then multiplying by 5. In any given
year, the water right owner shall still be authorized to divert the maximum
annual quantity authorized, provided that the 5 year allocation is not
exceeded.
(ii) The maximum number
of irrigated acres that shall be allowed under the proposed change in place of
use shall be computed by multiplying the currently authorized annual quantity
by 0.85 and dividing by the NIR, as set forth in K.A.R. 5-5-12, for the 80%
chance rainfall for the county where the place of use is located.
(iii) The approval of the change shall be
conditioned so that the use of water in excess of the five year allocation
shall result in a two year suspension of all water use under that water right
and a subsequent restriction of the authorized place of use to the base acreage
at a location specifically set forth in the change approval.
(3) Necessity to
install a more efficient irrigation system; limited quantity.
(A) The groundwater management district in
which the point of diversion is located shall agree to assume monitoring
responsibility to ensure compliance with the conditions of the change approval;
(B) the applicant shall submit
information demonstrating to the satisfaction of the chief engineer that it is
necessary to increase the base acreage so that a significantly more efficient
irrigation delivery system may be installed;
(C) the applicant shall submit a feasible
operation plan demonstrating to the satisfaction of the chief engineer that the
amount of water available for appropriation under that water right is
reasonable to irrigate the number of acres requested to be irrigated; and
(D) the water right owner shall
have no recent pattern of water use significantly in excess of the maximum
annual quantity of water authorized.
(E) If the chief engineer approves the
application for a change in place of use pursuant to this subsection, the
following limitations shall apply.
(i) The
authorized quantity of water under the water right shall be limited to a 5-year
fixed allocation, computed by dividing the net irrigation requirement (NIR), as
set forth in K.A.R. 5-5-12, for the 50% chance rainfall for the county where
the place of use is located by an efficiency factor of 0.85, multiplying by the
base acreage irrigated as determined in subsection (a) of this regulation, and
then multiplying by 5. In any given year, the water right owner shall still be
authorized to divert the maximum annual quantity authorized, provided that the
5-year allocation is not exceeded.
(ii) The approval of the change shall be
conditioned so that the use of water in excess of the five-year allocation
shall result in a two-year suspension of all water use under that water right
and a subsequent restriction of the authorized place of use to the base acreage
at a location specifically set forth in the change approval.
(4) Rotation of the
irrigated land within the authorized place of use.
(A) The point of diversion is located outside
a groundwater management district or the groundwater management district in
which the point of diversion is located shall agree to assume monitoring
responsibility to ensure compliance with the conditions of the change approval;
(B) the water right owner shall
have no recent pattern of water use significantly in excess of the maximum
annual quantity of water authorized; and
(C) approval of the change application shall
result in a net increase in the number of acres authorized for irrigation
purposes solely for the purpose of rotation of the irrigated land within the
authorized place of use.
(D) If
the chief engineer approves the application for a change in place of use
pursuant to this subsection, the following limitations shall apply.
(i) Approval of the change application shall
be limited by the chief engineer so that the net acres physically irrigated in
any one calendar year after the change approval shall not exceed the base
acreage; and
(ii) the approval
shall be conditioned so that the use of water on more than the maximum number
of acres authorized to be irrigated in any one calendar year shall result in a
two-year suspension of all water use under that water right and a subsequent
restriction of the authorized place of use to the base acreage at a location
specifically set forth in the change approval.
(5) Specific groundwater management district
regulation.
The application shall meet the criteria in a regulation adopted
by the chief engineer pursuant to
K.S.A.
82a-1028(o) and
K.S.A.
82a-706a specifically for changes in place of
use for irrigation purposes for the groundwater management district in which
the point of diversion is located.
(6) No increase in historic net consumptive
use.
The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
chief engineer, with an engineering report or similar type of hydrologic
analysis, that the historic net consumptive use will not be increased
substantially if the proposed change in place of use is approved.
(c) If the chief
engineer determines that the application cannot be approved as filed, the
applicant shall be notified in writing by the chief engineer prior to denial
that the change application requirements have not been met and the reason for
the proposed denial.
(1) In this written
notice the chief engineer shall allow the applicant 15 days to request time in
which to submit additional information to show why the application should be
approved.
(2) Upon written
request, the applicant shall be given a reasonable time specified by the chief
engineer to submit an engineering report or similar type of hydrologic analysis
to show that approval of the change application will not substantially increase
the historic net consumptive use.
(3) The applicant shall have the burden of
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the chief engineer that approval of the
change application will not cause the historic net consumptive use to be
increased substantially.
(d) Whether or not the time to perfect the
water right has expired, including any authorized extensions of time, the
application for a change in place of use to change the size of the authorized
place of use for irrigation purposes may be approved without the certificate of
appropriation being issued except as provided in subsection (b)(1)(C) of this
regulation.
(1) If a certificate of
appropriation has not been issued, the increase in base acreage shall be
determined based on reliable information.
(2) The types of acceptable information shall
include, but not be limited to, field inspection reports or U.S. department of
agriculture records.
(e) A flow meter meeting the specifications
adopted by the chief engineer, and installed and maintained in a manner
satisfactory to the chief engineer, shall be required by the chief engineer in
all cases where there is an increase in the base acreage authorized to be
irrigated by the approval of the change in the place of use, except when:
(1) the application for change in place of
use is filed solely to create an identical place of use with other water
rights; and
(2) the total quantity
authorized by all existing water rights and all permits to appropriate water
that are involved equals or exceeds the NIR, as set forth in K.A.R. 5-5-12, in
that county for a 50% chance rainfall divided by an irrigation efficiency of
0.85.