Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 38, September 20, 2024
The phrase "...has harmed the employing unit or other
employees" in the general definition of misconduct in Section 602A of the Act [
820 ILCS 405/602A ] includes, but is not limited to:
a) physical or quantitatively measurable
damage or injury;
b) other damage
or injury to other employees' well-being or morale or to the employer's
property, operations or goodwill;
1) EXAMPLE:
An individual is dissatisfied because he does not receive a raise. He confronts
his supervisor and threatens to injure him, if not immediately, at some time
soon. The threat itself, even in the absence of a physical assault resulting in
a tangible injury, constitutes harm.
2) EXAMPLE: Without authorization, an
individual enters the company president's office, opens a desk drawer and
removes and photocopies trade secrets. Even if the individual decides not to
pass along this information to others, the removal and photocopying of trade
secrets constitutes harm.
3)
EXAMPLE: An employer has a point system for evaluating tardiness and absence.
When the worker exceeds the allotted number of points in a particular period,
he is subject to discharge. Absences and tardiness always cause harm to the
employer, even if a worker is allowed to make up the time. This is because
absences and tardiness cause disruption to the general operations of any
business. However, even before reaching the question of harm, the worker's
reason for tardiness or absence must be reviewed in order to determine if the
worker's conduct was willful.
c) damage or injury that could be reasonably
foreseen to occur but for the individual being prevented from either carrying
out his or her act or continuing to work;
1)
EXAMPLE: At the end of her shift, a grocery store checker is stopped at the
exit by a security guard. The security guard removes from the checker's purse a
can of fruit cocktail and a package of sandwich cookies belonging to the
employer. Because the checker was caught, the employer was not deprived of its
property. Still, this constitutes harm.
2) EXAMPLE: An individual applies for a job
that requires that he have a valid driver's license. On his application, he
fails to disclose that his driver's license has been suspended. One year later,
the employer learns of the suspension. Although the individual has not yet been
involved in any accidents on the employer's premises, it is reasonable to
foresee that one may occur and that the employer's insurance company would deny
liability because of the individual's omission. The individual's omission on
his application constitutes harm.
3) EXAMPLE: Federal law provides that a
commercial carrier may not permit its vehicles to be operated by an individual
if there is, within the individual's system, the presence of unlawful,
controlled substances beyond a particular level. The presence of such a
substance during working hours within the system of a commercial driver
employed by the carrier constitutes harm to the carrier. To continue to employ
the individual as a driver would result in the carrier's violating federal
law.
4) EXAMPLE: The individual is
driving a forklift truck through the employer's warehouse at excessive speeds.
It is reasonably foreseeable that this conduct could result in both injuries
and property damage. Even if the conduct is stopped before injuries or damage
occur, there is still harm to the employer.
d) It should be noted that harm is only one
element of the definition of misconduct and that all of the elements set forth
in the Act must be analyzed before a finding of misconduct can be
made.