Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 38, September 20, 2024
a)
Definition. Multi-step sealed bidding is a two-phase process consisting of a
technical first phase composed of one or more steps in which bidders submit
unpriced technical offers to be evaluated by the State, and a second phase in
which those bidders whose technical offers are determined to be acceptable
during the first phase have their price bids considered.
b) Conditions for Use. The multi-step sealed
bidding method may be used when it is not practical to prepare initially a
definitive purchase description that will be suitable to permit an award based
on price. Multi-step sealed bidding may be used when it is considered
desirable:
1) to invite and evaluate possible
diverse technical offers to determine their acceptability to fulfill the
purchase description requirements; and
2) to conduct discussions for the purposes of
facilitating understanding of the technical offer and purchase description
requirements and, where appropriate, obtain supplemental information, permit
amendments of technical offers, or amend the purchase description.
c) Pre-Bid Conference in
Multi-Step Sealed Bidding
Prior to the submission or evaluation of unpriced technical
offers, a pre-bid conference as contemplated by Section
1600.2010(f)
(Pre-Bid Conference) may be conducted by the
Procurement Officer.
d)
Procedure for Phase One of Multi-Step Sealed Bidding
1) Form. Multi-step sealed bidding shall be
initiated by the issuance of an Invitation for Bids in the form required by
Section
1600.2010
(Competitive Sealed Bidding), except as hereinafter provided. In addition to
the requirements set forth in Section 1600.2010, the multi-step Invitation for
Bids shall state:
A) that unpriced technical
offers are requested;
B) whether
priced bids are to be submitted at the same time as unpriced technical offers;
if they are, such priced bids shall be submitted in a separate sealed
envelope;
C) that it is a
multi-step sealed bid procurement, and priced bids will be considered only in
the second phase and only from those bidders whose unpriced technical offers
are found acceptable in the first phase;
D) the criteria to be used in the evaluation
of the unpriced technical offers;
E) that the Procurement Officer may conduct
oral or written discussions of the unpriced technical offers;
F) that the item being procured shall be
furnished generally in accordance with the bidder's technical offer as found to
be finally acceptable and shall meet the requirements of the Invitation for
Bids.
2) Amendments to
the Invitation for Bids. After receipt of unpriced technical offers, amendments
to the Invitation for Bids shall be distributed only to bidders who submitted
unpriced technical offers, and they shall be permitted to submit new unpriced
technical offers or to amend those submitted. If, in the opinion of the
Procurement Officer, a contemplated amendment will significantly change the
nature of the procurement, the Invitation for Bids may be canceled in
accordance with Section
1600.2040
(Cancellation of Solicitation; Rejection of Bids or Proposals) of this Part and
a new Invitation for Bids issued.
3) Receipt and Handling of Unpriced Technical
Offers. Unpriced technical offers submitted by bidders shall be opened in the
presence of at least one witness. Such offers shall not be disclosed to
unauthorized persons.
4) Evaluation
of Unpriced Technical Offers. The unpriced technical offers submitted by
bidders shall be evaluated solely in accordance with the criteria set forth in
the Invitation for Bids. The unpriced technical offers shall be categorized as:
A) acceptable;
B) potentially acceptable, that is,
reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable; or
C) unacceptable, in which case the
Procurement Officer shall record in writing the basis for finding an offer
unacceptable, notify the vendor and make it part of the procurement
file.
5) The Procurement
Officer may initiate phase two of the procedure if, in the Procurement
Officer's opinion, there are sufficient acceptable unpriced technical offers to
assure effective price competition in the second phase without technical
discussions. If the Procurement Officer finds discussion of the technical
offers is necessary, the Procurement Officer shall commence discussions of the
unpriced technical proposals.
6)
Discussion of Unpriced Technical Offers. The Procurement Officer may conduct
discussions with any vendor who submits an acceptable or potentially acceptable
technical offer. During the course of such discussions, the Procurement Officer
shall not disclose any information derived from one unpriced technical offer to
any other bidder. Any such bidder may submit supplemental information amending
its technical offer at any time until the closing date established by the
Procurement Officer. Such submission may be made at the request of the
Procurement Officer or upon the bidder's own initiative.
7) Unacceptable Unpriced Technical Offer.
When the Procurement Officer determines a bidder's unpriced technical offer to
be unacceptable, such offeror shall not be afforded an additional opportunity
to supplement its technical offer.
e) Procedure for Phase Two
1) Initiation. Upon the completion of phase
one, the Procurement Officer shall either:
A)
open priced bids submitted in phase one (if priced bids were required to be
submitted) from bidders whose unpriced technical offers were found to be
acceptable; or
B) if priced bids
have not been submitted, invite each acceptable bidder to submit a priced
bid.
2) Conduct. Phase
two shall be conducted as any other competitive sealed bid procurement except:
A) no public notice need be given of this
invitation to submit priced bids because such notice was previously
given;
B) after award, the unpriced
technical offer of the successful bidder shall be disclosed as follows: The
Procurement Officer shall examine written requests of confidentiality for trade
secrets and proprietary data in the technical offer of such bidder to determine
the validity of any such requests. If the parties do not agree as to the
disclosure of data, the Procurement Officer shall reject the offer. Such
technical offer shall be open to public inspection subject to any continuing
prohibition on the disclosure of confidential data; and
C) unpriced technical offers of bidders who
are not awarded the contract shall not be open to public inspection.