Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 38, September 20, 2024
a)
Definition. Multi-step sealed bidding is a two-phase process consisting of a
technical first phase composed of one or more steps in which bidders submit
unpriced technical offers to be evaluated by the OAG, and a second phase in
which those bidders whose technical offers are determined to be acceptable
during the first phase, have their price bids considered.
b) Conditions for Use. The multi-step sealed
bidding method may be used when it is not practical to prepare initially a
definitive purchase description which will be suitable to permit an award based
on price. Multi-step sealed bidding may be used when it is considered
desirable:
1) to invite and evaluate possible
diverse technical offers to determine their acceptability to fulfill the
purchase description requirements; and
2) to conduct discussions for the purposes of
facilitating understanding of the technical offer and purchase description
requirements and, where appropriate, obtain supplemental information, permit
amendments of technical offers, or amend the purchase description.
c) Pre-Bid Conferences in
Multi-Step Sealed Bidding
Prior to the submission or evaluation of unpriced technical
offers, a pre-bid conference as contemplated by Section
1300.2010
(Competitive Sealed Bidding) and Section
1300.2012
(Multi-Step Sealed Bidding) may be conducted by the Procurement Officer.
d) Procedure for Phase One of
Multi-Step Sealed Bidding
1) Form. Multi-step
sealed bidding shall be initiated by the issuance of an IFB in the form
required by Section
1300.2010
(Competitive Sealed Bidding), except as hereinafter provided. In addition to
the requirements set forth in Section 1300.2010, the multi-step IFB shall
state:
A) that unpriced technical offers are
requested;
B) whether priced bids
are to be submitted at the same time as unpriced technical offers and, if they
are, that such priced bids shall be submitted in a separate sealed
envelope;
C) that it is a
multi-step sealed bid procurement, and priced bids will be considered only in
the second phase and only from those bidders whose unpriced technical offers
are found acceptable in the first phase;
D) the criteria to be used in the evaluation
of the unpriced technical offers;
E) that the OAG, to the extent the
Procurement Officer finds necessary, may conduct oral or written discussions of
the unpriced technical offers; and
F) that the item being procured shall be
furnished generally in accordance with the bidder's technical offer as found to
be finally acceptable and shall meet the requirements of the IFB.
2) Amendments to the IFB. After
receipt of unpriced technical offers, amendments to the IFB shall be
distributed only to bidders who submitted unpriced technical offers, and they
shall be permitted to submit new unpriced technical offers or to amend those
submitted. If, in the opinion of the Procurement Officer, a contemplated
amendment will significantly change the nature of the procurement, the IFB
shall be cancelled in accordance with Section
1300.2040
(Cancellation of Solicitation; Rejection of Bids or Proposals) of this Part and
a new IFB issued.
3) Receipt and
Handling of Unpriced Technical Offers. Unpriced technical offers submitted by
bidders shall be opened in the presence of at least one witness. Such offers
shall not be disclosed to unauthorized persons. Bidders may request
nondisclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary data identified in
writing.
4) Evaluation of Unpriced
Technical Offers. The unpriced technical offers submitted by bidders shall be
evaluated solely in accordance with the criteria set forth in the IFB. The
unpriced technical offers shall be categorized as:
A) acceptable;
B) potentially acceptable, that is,
reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable; or
C) unacceptable, in which case the
Procurement Officer shall record in writing the basis for finding an offer
unacceptable and make it part of the procurement file.
5) The Procurement Officer may initiate Phase
Two of the procedure if, in the Procurement Officer's opinion, there are
sufficient acceptable unpriced technical offers to assure effective price
competition in the second phase without technical discussions. If the
Procurement Officer finds that such is not the case, the Procurement Officer
may commence discussions of the unpriced technical proposals.
6) Discussion of Unpriced Technical Offers.
The Procurement Officer may conduct discussions with any vendor who submits an
acceptable or potentially acceptable technical offer. During the course of such
discussions, the Procurement Officer shall not disclose any information derived
from one unpriced technical offer to any other bidder. Any such bidder may
submit supplemental information amending its technical offer at any time until
the closing date established by the Procurement Officer. Such submission may be
made at the request of the Procurement Officer or upon the bidder's own
initiative.
7) Unacceptable
Unpriced Technical Offer. When the Procurement Officer determines a bidder's
unpriced technical offer to be unacceptable, such offeror shall not be afforded
an additional opportunity to supplement its technical offer.
e) Procedure for Phase Two
1) Initiation. Upon the completion of Phase
One, the Procurement Officer shall either:
A)
open priced bids submitted in Phase One (if priced bids were required to be
submitted) from bidders whose unpriced technical offers were found to be
acceptable; or
B) if priced bids
have not been submitted, invite each acceptable bidder to submit a priced
bid.
2) Conduct. Phase
Two shall be conducted as any other competitive sealed bid procurement except:
A) no public notice need be given of this
invitation to submit priced bids because such notice was previously
given;
B) after award, the unpriced
technical offer of the successful bidder shall be disclosed as follows: The
Procurement Officer shall examine written requests of confidentiality for trade
secrets and proprietary data in the technical offer of such bidder to determine
the validity of any such requests. If the parties do not agree as to the
disclosure of data, the Procurement Officer shall reject the offer. Such
technical offer shall be open to public inspection subject to any continuing
prohibition on the disclosure of confidential data; and
C) unpriced technical offers of bidders who
are not awarded the contract shall not be open to public inspection.