1) A multiple award may be made for an
indefinite quantity solicitation when award to two or more bidders or offerors
for similar products or services is necessary for adequate delivery or
service.
2) If a multiple award is
anticipated, the solicitation shall state this fact as well as the criteria for
award.
3) In a multiple award
situation, one vendor shall be designated as the primary recipient of orders,
unless otherwise provided in this Section. The other awardees may receive
orders in the event the primary vendor is unable to deliver or for other
reasons as determined by the SPO.
4) The State agency shall reserve the right
to take bids separately if a particular quantity requirement arises that
exceeds its normal requirement or an amount specified in the
contract.
5) Multiple Award with
Set Rate
A) Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Part, the CPO-GS but not a designee, may, on a case-by-case
basis, authorize an appropriate purchasing agency to issue a competitive
solicitation and to enter into contracts with multiple vendors under a process
that provides for prequalification, agreement to perform at a set rate, and
final selection based on random and equitable distribution of work among
qualified vendors.
B) The CPO-GS
may authorize use of this source selection procedure upon a determination in
writing that use of the methods of source selection set forth in Article 20 of
the Code is either not practicable or advantageous because, for example, the
program needs of State agencies cannot reasonably be met within the normal
procurement timeframes, or that the type and variety of State agency needs are
such that a single award will not assure the needed availability or diversity
of vendors.
C) Vendors shall be
prequalified once per fiscal year, or as often as necessary, through use of a
competitive sealed proposal. The minimum qualifications (including performance
standards and agreement to provide services at a set rate determined by the
State), any desirable additional qualifications, and the method of obtaining
and setting rates shall be stated in the solicitation advertised in the
Bulletin. Those vendors meeting minimum qualifications shall be offered
non-exclusive indefinite quantity master contracts against which a procuring
agency may later place one or more orders on an as needed basis in accordance
with the vendor selection procedure set forth in subsection (b)(5)(F).
Implementing Section 45-45 of the Code and subsection (b)(5)(F) of this
Section, the solicitation shall contain a provision alerting vendors that the
random selection process used to meet a specific using agency's needs may be
limited to those master contract holders who qualify as small
businesses.
D) The purchasing
agency shall establish the set rate by one of the following methods. The lowest
rate identified will not necessarily be the set rate, but will be a
consideration in determining the set rate.
i)
Set in the solicitation the rate that vendors must agree to bill. In general,
this rate shall be the lowest rate at which a sufficient number of vendors are
ready, willing and able to meet the State's needs. The solicitation shall show
the selected purchasing agency has conducted sufficient research (such as
reviewing past State contract rates, reference to GSA or other governmental
contract rates, or private sector rates determined by internal or industry
expert surveys) that the public can have confidence the rate provides overall
advantage to the State.
ii) Require
as part of the solicitation that vendors submit rates (prices), including
disclosable rates, and inform them the selected purchasing agency will use this
rate information and additional rate information received through use of the
best and final process, from other contracts and from research to establish the
set rate that vendors must bill.
E) Vendors not willing to agree to bill at
the set rate may be rejected or may have their contracts restricted to use in
special circumstances approved by the CPO-GS.
F) Using agency needs will be met by the
selected purchasing agency selecting a master contract holder on a random
basis. If the using agency determines that it has specific programmatic needs
that require additional qualifications (e.g., specialized programming knowledge
or specific educational requirements) or conditions (e.g., geographic
limitations) or State policy considerations (e.g., promotion of small
business), such that random vendor selection from among all master contract
holders would not meet its needs, the using agency may submit an alternate
selection request to the CPO-GS. This request shall set forth all reasons,
including the additional qualifications or conditions, why a random vendor
selection would not reasonably meet the needs of the agency, or the policy of
the State. If at least 3 of the master contract holders meet those additional
qualifications or conditions, the selected purchasing agency shall conduct a
random selection limited to that subset of the master contract holders. If the
using agency's request does not show a need for additional qualifications or if
there are not 3 master contract holders with the needed qualifications, the
using agency may not utilize the method of source selection set forth in this
Section.
G) In order to ensure the
continued availability of the set of master contract holders, all potential
orders shall be monitored by the selected purchasing agency to ensure the
equitable distribution of work and that no single vendor has an unwarranted
disproportionate share of the available work. The selected purchasing agency
shall, to avoid a disproportionate distribution of work, remove a vendor from
consideration for a period of time sufficient to minimize dollar value
discrepancies among vendors. In addition, any vendor so removed may be
reinstated for consideration to meet a particular using agency's need if only 3
or fewer otherwise eligible vendors are available to meet the using agency's
need.
H) The selected purchasing
agency shall conduct the random selection using a drawing, mechanical device or
software driven selection. The specific process used shall ensure that final
selection is influenced only by chance, after taking into consideration, as
applicable and as allowed in this Part, the policy of equitable distribution,
use of small businesses, and specific requests from agencies to meet special
needs.
I) It shall be the
affirmative obligation of each vendor with a master contract to update
information provided to the State regarding its continued ability to provide
the contracted service. Master contracts may provide that vendors who cannot
perform the required services when contacted and who have not provided the
updated information may be taken out of consideration for orders for a period
of time, including until the next prequalification.
J) The procurement file shall contain
justification for the selection of the master contract vendors and each
selection to meet the particular need of a using agency including the
determination in subsection (b)(5)(B); the research papers, reports, contract
rates and internal or industry expert surveys, "additional rate information"
and identification of "other contracts and research" in subsections
(b)(5)(D)(i) and (ii); the alternate selection documents required by subsection
(b)(5)(F), the 3 or more master contract holders for the alternate random
selection in subsection (b)(5)(F) and updated information required of
contractors pursuant to subsection (b)(5)(I). The selected purchasing agency
shall publish the names of the vendors selected to receive master contracts and
the name of each vendor selected to receive an order to meet the using agency's
particular need.
6)
Geographical
A multiple award may be made to a vendor based on
geographical locations in the State. A vendor may be granted multiple awards
for a particular geographical location, based on a determination, in writing,
that:
A) use of the methods of source
selection set forth in Article 20 of the Code is not practicable or
advantageous because, for example, the program needs of State agencies cannot
reasonably be met within the normal procurement timeframes; or
B) the type and variety of State agency needs
are such that a single award will not assure the needed availability or
diversity of vendors.