4)
Documentation of compliance with Section
725.933
must include the following information:
A) A
list of all information references and sources used in preparing the
documentation;
B) Records,
including the dates of each compliance test required by Section
725.933(j);
C) If engineering calculations are used, a
design analysis, specifications, drawings, schematics, and piping and
instrumentation diagrams based on the appropriate sections of "APTI Course 415:
Control of Gaseous Emissions", USEPA publication number EPA-450/2-81-005,
incorporated by reference in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.111(a),
or other engineering texts, approved by the Agency, that present basic control
device design information. Documentation provided by the control device
manufacturer or vendor that describes the control device design in accordance
with subsections (b)(4)(C)(i) through (b)(4)(C)(vii) may be used to comply with
this requirement. The design analysis must address the vent stream
characteristics and control device operation parameters as specified below.
i) For a thermal vapor incinerator, the
design analysis must consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis must also establish the
design minimum and average temperature in the combustion zone and the
combustion zone residence time.
ii)
For a catalytic vapor incinerator, the design analysis must consider the vent
stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design
analysis must also establish the design minimum and average temperatures across
the catalyst bed inlet and outlet.
iii) For a boiler or process heater, the
design analysis must consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis must also establish the
design minimum and average flame zone temperatures, combustion zone residence
time and description of method and location where the vent stream is introduced
into the combustion zone.
iv) For a
flare, the design analysis must consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis must also
consider the requirements specified in Section
725.933(d).
v) For a condenser, the design
analysis must consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations,
flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design analysis must also
establish the design outlet organic compound concentration level, design
average temperature of the condenser exhaust vent stream and design average
temperatures of the coolant fluid at the condenser inlet and outlet.
vi) For a carbon adsorption system, such as a
fixed-bed adsorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly onsite in the
control device, the design analysis must consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity and temperature. The
design analysis must also establish the design exhaust vent stream organic
compound concentration level, number and capacity of carbon beds, type and
working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon beds, design total steam
flow over the period of each complete carbon bed regeneration cycle, duration
of the carbon bed steaming and cooling/drying cycles, design carbon bed
temperature after regeneration, design carbon bed regeneration time and design
service life of carbon.
vii) For a
carbon adsorption system, such as a carbon canister that does not regenerate
the carbon bed directly onsite in the control device, the design analysis must
consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate,
relative humidity and temperature. The design analysis must also establish the
design outlet organic concentration level, capacity of carbon bed, type and
working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon bed and design carbon
replacement interval based on the total carbon working capacity of the control
device and source operating schedule;
D) A statement signed and dated by the owner
or operator certifying that the operating parameters used in the design
analysis reasonably represent the conditions that exist when the hazardous
waste management unit is or would be operating at the highest load or capacity
level reasonably expected to occur;
E) A statement signed and dated by the owner
or operator certifying that the control device is designed to operate at an
efficiency of 95 percent or greater unless the total organic concentration
limit of Section
725.932(a)
is achieved at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent or the total organic
emission limits of Section
725.932(a)
for affected process vents at the facility are attained by a control device
involving vapor recovery at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent. A
statement provided by the control device manufacturer or vendor certifying that
the control equipment meets the design specifications may be used to comply
with this requirement; and
F) If
performance tests are used to demonstrate compliance, all test
results.