Illinois Administrative Code
Title 23 - EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Part 265 - GRANTS FOR ARTS EDUCATION AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION
Subpart C - IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS
Section 265.220 - Criteria for the Review of Initial Proposals
Universal Citation: 23 IL Admin Code ยง 265.220
Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 12, March 22, 2024
a) Applications for implementation grants shall be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria:
1) Quality of the Plan (40 points)
A) The proposal demonstrates that the program
to be implemented is based on information derived from the planning
process.
B) The proposal identifies
the aspects of the program that cannot currently be implemented in the absence
of grant funding and demonstrates that plans exist to ensure the availability
or redeployment of resources to sustain the program with declining reliance on
State funding.
C) The proposal
demonstrates that teachers with the appropriate educator licensure are
available to deliver instruction in the program and that their specific needs
are reflected in the professional development that has been chosen.
D) The proposal demonstrates that the
affected students will have systematic access to relevant linguistic, artistic,
or cultural resources as an integral part of their participation in the
instructional program.
2) Sustainability (30 points)
The proposal presents a portfolio of available local resources for which commitments have been secured so that the program can be sustained in future years when no further State funding will be provided.
3) Need (20
points)
A) The proposal describes the status
of the applicant's instructional programs in the arts or foreign languages, as
applicable, and demonstrates that students' access to educational opportunities
in this curricular area is limited to an undesirable degree.
B) The proposal demonstrates that other
sources of funding are limited to such an extent that the applicant is unable
to conduct or expand the program as proposed without funding under this
Part.
4)
Cost-Effectiveness (10 points)
The scope of the proposed activities is reasonable in light of the amount of funding to be provided, and the project will be cost-effective considering the number of students to be served.
b) The rankings of all implementation proposals will form one distribution.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Illinois may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
