Hawaii Administrative Rules
Title 16 - DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Chapter 133 - REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS BY THE CABLE TELEVISION DIVISION
Subchapter 2 - PROCEDURES FOR NEW AND TRANSFER APPLICATIONS
Section 16-133-15 - Presumptive disqualifiers of approval of application
Universal Citation: HI Admin Rules 16-133-15
Current through August, 2024
(a) The following factors shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that an applicant fails to meet the character criterion of section 440G-8(b), HRS, for issuance or transfer of a cable franchise:
(1) During the ten-year period immediately
preceding filing of the application, criminal, civil, or administrative
judgments, consents or orders, and any indictments, formal investigations,
examinations, or civil or administrative proceedings, excluding routine or
customary audits, inspections, and investigations that terminated in any
agreements, undertakings, consents or orders, resolutions, ordinances, or
revocation, suspension or alteration of a cable franchise involving the
applicant or affiliates of the applicant by any federal or state court, any
department, agency, or commission of the United States government, any state or
municipality, any cable franchising authority, any self-regulatory trade or
professional organization, or any foreign government or governmental entity,
which involve:
(A) Unfair or deceptive trade
practices, perjury, fraud, dishonesty, organized crime or
racketeering;
(B) Violation of
applicable federal, state, or local cable communications laws or
rules;
(C) Violation of cable
franchise provisions; or
(D)
Violation of the rules, regulations, codes of conduct, or ethics of a
self-regulatory trade or professional organization;
(2) Denial, or withdrawal after receipt of
formal or informal notice of an intent to deny, by the applicant or affiliates
of the applicant, of:
(A) Any application
relating to the issuance of a cable franchise;
(B) Any application relating to a change in
ownership of a cable operator;
(C)
Any application relating to the transfer of a cable franchise; or
(D) Any application relating to the renewal
of a cable franchise;
(3) Felony conviction of the applicant, an
affiliate of the applicant, or a management official of the applicant or
affiliate of the applicant;
(4)
Knowingly making any written or oral statement in connection with an
application or other filing that is false or misleading with respect to a
material fact or omits to state a material fact with respect to information
furnished or requested in connection with such an application or other filing;
or
(5) Failure to provide
information required by law or rule to be submitted or information requested by
the director.
(b) The following factors shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that an applicant fails to meet the financial responsibility criterion of section 440G-8(b), HRS:
(1) The inability to obtain a bond in
connection with the construction or operation of a cable system;
(2) Failure to demonstrate adequate cash flow
to support proposed debt and operating expenses;
(3) Liability or proposed liability for
amounts of debt which, in the opinion of the director or division, creates
excessive risks of default or pressure on the applicant to be acquired, or
significantly impairs the ability of the applicant to borrow needed additional
funds; or
(4) Transactions between
affiliates which in the director's or division's opinion are detrimental to the
cable operator.
(c) The following factors shall give rise to a rebuttal presumption that an applicant fails to meet the reasonable cost criterion of section 440G-8(b), HRS:
(1) Failure to demonstrate adequate cash
flow to meet debt service and operating expenses;
(2) Failure to demonstrate adequate funding
proposed or necessary for capital or operational expenditures;
(3) Liabilities which, in the opinion of the
director, create excessive risks of default, significantly impair the ability
of the applicant to make further necessary borrowings, or otherwise create
unwarranted upward pressure on rates; or
(4) Transactions between affiliates which in
the director's opinion are detrimental to the cable operator.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Hawaii may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.