(2) when proposed changes have an effect on another local government.
(b)
Major Amendments. Major plan amendments that must be submitted to the Regional Development Center and Department for review include any changes that would alter the basic tenets of the plan or affect another local government. At a minimum, major plan amendments would include:
1. Changes that affect a local government(s) assurance of 10-year collection capability;
2. Changes that affect a local government(s) assurance of 10-year disposal capacity;
3. Changes that affect a local government(s) strategy for achieving the 25% waste reduction goal;
4. Changes that would alter the identification of land areas unsuitable for a solid waste handling facility; or
5. Changes in any solid waste facilities, such as new facilities or major modifications of existing facilities requiring EPD permits. The above list of potential items that may constitute a major plan amendment is not inclusive. Local governments should consult with their Regional Development Center or the Department if there is any question about whether a proposed amendment should be considered a major amendment.
(c) For major plan amendments the following procedure applies:
1. One local public hearing must be held by the local government(s) proposing the amendment to inform the public of the intended amendment to the plan and to receive suggestions and comments on the proposed amendment. A written copy of the proposed amendment(s) must be available at this public hearing so that the public will clearly know what changes are being proposed.
2. Local governments should follow the notification procedures normally used for announcing and conducting local public hearings.
3. For multi-jurisdictional and regional plans, one centrally-held public hearing by the jurisdiction(s) proposing the amendment will be considered adequate in meeting this requirement, provided that the individual local government(s) have followed their customary public hearing notice procedures and all local governments party to the plan have been notified.
4. The local government submitting the amendment is required to take official action, by resolution, authorizing the transmittal of the proposed amendment(s) to the Regional Development Center and Department for review. The resolution, at a minimum, should state that local public hearing requirements were met. For multi-jurisdictional or regional plan amendment(s), local governments must also send the Regional Development Center a statement identifying the local government(s) included in the plan that could potentially be affected by the proposed amendment.
5. The Regional Development Center and Department review procedures for major amendments are essentially the same as those review procedures established for new solid waste management plans.
6. In addition to the review procedures for major plan amendments, the Regional Development Center must include in any favorable report of Findings and Recommendations a statement for all local governments included in the plan that the proposed plan amendment does not negatively affect compliance with the following items: the 10-year collection capability; 10-year disposal capacity; the strategy for achieving a 25% reduction goal; the identification of land areas unsuitable for solid waste facilities; and any solid waste facilities requiring EPD permits.
7. In the event that a proposed amendment negatively affects another local government's compliance with the Minimum Planning Standards and Procedures, the affected local government must also take the appropriate action to amend its plan. The Regional Development Center shall inform the affected local government(s) of the solid waste management plan deficiencies that will exist if the proposed amendment is adopted and of the procedure for correcting those deficiencies.
8. Once the major amendment is approved by the Department and adopted locally, the Department will issue a letter to the local government(s) notifying each of its continued status of eligibility to apply for solid waste permits, grants and loans.
9. It is the Regional Development Center's responsibility to review any multi-jurisdictional and regional solid waste management plan amendment(s) for interjurisdictional effects and make recommendations for appropriate action to local governments, when needed.
10. Provided that all of these requirements have been met, local government(s) can proceed with adoption of the plan amendment.
11. If conflicts are identified during the plan amendment review process, the affected local governments should make every attempt to resolve the conflict(s) informally. If this does not prove to be effective, formal mediation, as provided for in the procedures for Mediation of Interjurisdictional Conflicts, may be initiated by any affected local government.