Current through Rules and
Regulations filed through March 20, 2024
(1)
General: Pursuant to
O.C.G.A. §
12-8-31.1, the Minimum Planning
Standards and Procedures outline the steps required to prepare and implement a
local, multi-jurisdictional, or regional solid waste management plan. Since the
initial implementation of the minimum planning standards, solid waste planning
efforts have resulted in
- the diversion of recyclable materials from the waste stream
and provided them as valuable resources for industries,
- created jobs,
- reduced dependency on precious natural resources,
- enhanced environmental stewardship, and
- contributed to the reduction of pollution in many areas
across the state.
To maintain the momentum established through past planning
efforts, the updated standards provide a framework for plan preparation that
requires local governments to: assess the current status of solid waste
management within a planning area, determine their solid waste planning needs
and goals, and determine how an effective and comprehensive solid waste
management program will be implemented within their jurisdiction.
(a) All solid waste management plans must
include the following planning elements: waste disposal stream analysis; waste
reduction; collection; disposal; land limitation; education and public
involvement; and an implementation schedule. Each plan as stated in O.C.G.A. §
12-8-31.1(b)
shall, at a minimum, provide for the
assurance of adequate solid waste handling capability and capacity within the
planning area for at least ten years from the date of completion of the
plan.
(b) The plan shall
specifically address
1. an adequate
collection and disposal capability;
2. enumerate the solid waste handling
facilities as to size and type; and
3. identify those sites which are not
suitable for solid waste handling facilities based on environmental and land
use factors.
(c) All
local governments developing solid waste management plans are required to
provide adequate opportunity for public participation in the planning
process.
(d) As communities
re-evaluate their planning process, they may find that there is a need to join
with neighboring communities to ensure the efficient and successful
implementation of their solid waste management programs. Where applicable, the
plan must focus on inter-jurisdictional relations or considerations within each
planning element. Multi-jurisdictional plans shall state specific relationships
and management responsibilities for each planning element. Regional plans shall
state the specific relationships and management responsibilities for each
planning element in the plan, clearly identifying those elements which will be
managed on a regional basis.
(2)
Minimum Planning Requirements:
Pursuant to O.C.G.A. §
12-8-31.1, the Department is
authorized to establish minimum planning standards and procedures to be
addressed by local governments in the solid waste management planning process.
(a) When preparing a solid waste management
plan and after determining and declaring the planning area as either a local,
multijurisdictional, or regional solid waste management plan, each plan must
address the following five core planning elements which shall be preceded by a
waste stream analysis and followed by an implementation schedule. Each of the
five core elements shall be addressed under routine operating conditions:
· waste disposal stream analysis,
· waste reduction,
· collection,
· disposal,
· land limitation,
· education and public involvement, and
· an implementation schedule.
Under special conditions resulting from any type of disaster
which generates significant volumes of waste and/or special wastes the plan
shall identify procedures for the collection, waste reduction (recycling),
disposal, and public notification of alternative programs for the commercial
and residential waste generated from the disaster.
(b) Multi-jurisdictional plans shall state
specific relationships and management responsibilities among the participating
governments for each planning element. Regional plans shall identify planning
elements that are managed on a regional basis and state the specific
relationships and management responsibilities among the participating
governments for each element. Nothing in these rules, however, shall be
construed to prohibit a community from preparing and submitting a solid waste
management plan that exceeds these minimum planning standards and procedures.
The minimum requirements for a successful solid waste management plan are
specified below:
(3)
Defining the Planning Jurisdiction/Unit.
(a) Jurisdictions that agree to plan together
shall identify all local governments that are included in the solid waste
management plan.
1. Jurisdictions that agree
to plan together will maintain the planning relationships established in the
approved and adopted plan throughout the planning period, including the
five-year Short-Term Work Program update.
2. All participating local governments must
adopt the Solid Waste Plan, the Short-Term Work Program, Plan Amendments,
and/or Plan Updates before the Department will make an eligibility
determination for any of the local governments participating in the
plan.
3. If any of the participants
decide to break from the planning arrangement and pursue solid waste management
planning independent of the original group, the approved and adopted plan must
be amended, submitted for approval, and adopted by the remaining local
governments.
4. Any local
government opting out of a multi-jurisdictional or regional plan will
immediately become an ineligible government and will remain so until it adopts
a full Solid Waste Management Plan that encompasses all the planning elements
and covers their jurisdiction.
(b) The introduction to the plan will
include, but is not limited to, an overview of the area covered by the plan:
location in the state, topographic information, population, seasonal population
variation if appropriate, number of households, and types of commercial,
manufacturing, and industrial businesses in the planning area.
(4)
Waste Disposal Stream
Analysis.
(a) The Waste Disposal
Stream Analysis shall provide an inventory of waste stream generators (e.g.,
residential, commercial, industrial, C&D, etc.), the types of waste they
contribute to the waste disposal stream (e.g., paper, plastic, metal, etc.) and
an estimate for these various components as a percentage of the total waste
stream. It is not anticipated that each local government will conduct its own
waste stream characterization study, but may rely upon the waste
characterization study conducted by the state or on other comparable
information. If another information source is used, it must be identified. If
wastes such as inert materials, construction/demolition debris, yard trimmings,
tires, industrial sludge, and others are being collected, stored, or disposed
of at a solid waste landfill, then the waste stream characterization will
include these wastes. Local governments shall also account for fluctuations in
quantities disposed due to known events such as seasonal variations in
population, public events (e.g., fairs, festivals, concerts), shifts in
manufacturing or production processes, landfill bans, etc., and any type of
waste generating disaster(s).
(b)
Using the information gathered in the inventory phase, extrapolate anticipated
waste amounts for the ten-year planning period that is reasonably consistent
with population trends and population projections. The waste stream analysis
and extrapolation shall begin with the current planning year and extend ten
years beyond the year of plan completion. Projections shall be annual
projections, unless otherwise noted and shall be reasonably consistent. Methods
and assumptions used in calculating daily and annual tonnage, as well as the
percentage of composition by source must be documented.
(c) This information will guide local
government decisions regarding current and future solid waste management
service and facility needs. In addition, this information will provide the
basis for creating, implementing, and sustaining programs to help the State
achieve a statewide per capita municipal solid waste disposal reduction goal of
25 percent. All decisions in subsequent elements shall relate back to the
information presented in this inventory.
(5)
Five Core Planning Elements.
Each of the five core planning elements must relate back to the
information provided in the Waste Disposal Stream Analysis and shall include
the following steps:
· Inventory and Assessment, and
· Needs and Goals.
Inventory and Assessment: The inventory will
provide local governments with basic information about existing programs and
infrastructures in order to assess the usefulness of current programs. It must
include the following activities:
· Preparation of an inventory of current programs,
capacities, and facilities for the five core planning elements including
routine operations. Under special conditions resulting from any type of
disaster which generates significant volumes of waste and/or special wastes the
plan shall identify procedures for the collection, waste reduction (recycling),
disposal, and public notification of alternative programs for the commercial
and residential waste generated from the disaster.
· Assessment of current programs, capacities and facilities
for the five core planning elements shall relate directly to the information
provided in the Waste Disposal Stream Analysis and shall include consideration
of the implications of current conditions. The assessment should encompass
input from the public.
Statement of Needs and Goals: Following the
inventory and assessment portion for each of the five core planning elements
the plan shall include a statement of current and future needs and goals which
reflect the information gathered in the inventory and assessment phase.
(a) Waste Reduction Element.
1. Provide an inventory of current Waste
Reduction and Recycling programs, both public and private. Questions that may
be considered include:
- Who (which segment(s)) does the program target, how many
are served?
- What types of recyclables are collected?
2. Specific items to be addressed, where
applicable to a community, are as follows:
(i)
Source reduction: Inventory
of source reduction programs for residential, commercial, and industrial
sectors, such as reuse programs, financial incentives, waste audits, waste
exchanges, or industrial process changes.
(ii)
Recycling: Inventory of
public and private recycling facilities and programs (e.g., drop-off centers,
buy-back centers, recovered materials processing facilities, curbside
collection programs, and commercial and industrial programs, including those
implemented in-house and those operated in cooperation with a local government
program).
3.
Yard
Trimming Mulching/Composting: Georgia law specifies: "Effective
September 1, 1996, each city, county, or solid waste management authority shall
impose restrictions on yard trimmings which are generated in or may ultimately
be disposed of in its area of jurisdiction. These restrictions shall include
but are not limited to:
(i) A requirement
that yard trimmings not be placed in or mixed with municipal solid
waste;
(ii) A ban on the disposal
of yard trimmings at municipal solid waste disposal facilities having liners
and leachate collection systems or requiring vertical expansion within its
jurisdiction;
(iii) A requirement
that yard trimmings be sorted and stored for collection in such a manner as to
facilitate collection, composting, or other handling; and
(iv) A requirement that yard trimmings be
sorted and stockpiled or chipped, composted, used as mulch, or otherwise
beneficially reused or recycled to the maximum extent feasible.
Inventory any and all types of composting and mulching
programs (e.g., home composting, municipal composting, or limb and stump
grinding) or other methods (e.g., inert landfilling, WTE) that keep yard
trimmings out of lined landfills. If either or both programs are operated by a
public entity, include the processing capacity of the facility(ies) or
programs. Also, describe what happens to the yard trimmings after collection
(e.g., composted, ground up for mulch, sent to inert landfill, etc.), and how
the end product, if any, is distributed.
4.
Special Management Items:
Inventory of public and private facilities and programs that address
items requiring special management procedures such as, but not limited to,
electronics, household hazardous waste, lead acid batteries, tires, and white
goods.
5. Based on the information
reported in the Waste Disposal Stream Analysis, assess if the current waste
reduction and recycling program(s) target the appropriate waste generating
sector(s) and/or waste stream(s) to achieve the State's 25% per capita waste
disposal reduction goal.
6. The
needs and goals section provides the opportunity to examine the adequacy of
current programs and explore other programmatic options, including costs.
Provide a statement of needs and goals based on the assessment of current
programs as they relate to targets identified in the Waste Stream Element and
the State's 25% per capita waste disposal reduction goal.
(b) Collection Element.
1. Provide information on the types of
collection arrangements, contracts, agreements, ordinances etc., established to
ensure adequate public or private collection capability:
(i) Inventory current solid waste and
recyclable collection programs: name(s) and addresses of hauler(s) operating in
the jurisdiction - both residential and commercial;
(ii) Types of collection programs (e.g.,
curbside collection, staffed convenience centers, unstaffed green box system,
etc.); and
(iii) Who manages them
(e.g., municipally managed, local government contracts with hauler(s), citizens
- residential and/or business - contract directly with the hauler,
etc.)?
2. If yard
trimmings are collected, include a description of the collection method(s) -
who collects it and how (curbside or drop off).
3. Address the adequacy of the collection
programs as they relate to the overall population in the planning area,
population density in specific regions within the planning area and topographic
factors that influence collection decisions. If type of service is not 100%
over the whole planning area, identify each population segment and the
collection method for each segment.
4. If appropriate, identify the frequency of
illegal dumping in the planning area and methods for correcting the
problem.
5. Are current collection
programs adequate for serving present and future community needs and to
facilitate progress towards the waste reduction goals? Provide a statement of
needs and goals for current and future collection programs which outline a
strategy for providing an effective, affordable collection system for the
ten-year planning period.
6. The
Plan must also include a contingency strategy for the interim collection of
solid waste generated within the local government's jurisdiction in the event
the primary collection option becomes interrupted. At a minimum, such a
contingency strategy must identify:
(i) What
alternative collection option(s) the local government will use on an interim
basis; and
(ii) The estimated
length of time it will take the local government to bring the contingency
collection option(s) on line, if that becomes necessary.
(c) Disposal Element.
1. Provide a detailed inventory of current
disposal practices.
(i)
Disposal:
Identify and include the type (e.g., solid waste landfill, tire
monofill, inert landfill, construction and demolition landfill), capacity (size
and projected remaining life), ownership (public or private), location, and the
types of wastes accepted for each disposal facility used or planned to be used
during the planning period.
(ii)
Thermal Treatment Technologies: Identify and include the type
(e.g., waste-to-energy, refuse-derived fuel, wood waste incinerator,
tire-derived fuel, co-firing industrial boiler), general facility description,
location, ownership (public or private), capacity, types of wastes accepted,
and disposal method of residual materials for each facility used or planned to
be used during the planning period.
2. Once the inventory is complete, assess if
existing facilities and current practices will be adequate throughout the
ten-year planning period.
3. Based
upon the inventory and assessment provide a statement of needs and goals as
they relate to current and future disposal options.
4.
Assurance of ten-year disposal
capacity: Under the Georgia Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Act of
1990, each local government must provide ten-year capacity assurance whether
that local government relies on its own landfill, another local government,
regional authority, private entity or any combination thereof for disposal of
the solid waste generated within the planning jurisdiction. In this element,
local governments must identify current disposal practices, the party or
parties involved in current disposal practice agreements, the length of time
covered by current disposal agreements, and describe the process used to
identify and secure future landfill capacity adequate to serve the
jurisdiction's disposal needs so that ten full years of disposal capacity is
covered by the plan. Capacity assurance agreements can be from one or more
facilities as long as the ten-year requirement is met. All disposal agreements
shall identify the jurisdiction(s) covered by the agreement and an estimation,
based on current disposal information, of waste to be disposed at the facility
or facilities. As documentation, local governments shall include
one
of the following as an appendix to the plan:
(i) Some form of formal, written agreement
between two or more parties (e.g., an interlocal agreement) which describes a
process by which the local government(s) has negotiated waste disposal options
with a landfill or landfills covering the ten year planning time
frame;
(ii) A written commitment
from the owner of a disposal facility certifying sufficient capacity;
(iii) A written commitment of capacity
assurance, which identifies the landfill(s) where the waste is disposed, from a
commercial or contract solid waste hauler serving a local government.
5. The Plan must also include a
contingency strategy for the interim disposal of the solid waste generated
within the local government's jurisdiction in the event the primary disposal
option becomes interrupted. At a minimum, such a contingency strategy must
identify:
(i) What alternative disposal
option(s) the local government will use on an interim basis; and
(ii) The estimated length of time it will
take the local government to bring the contingency disposal option(s) on line,
if that becomes necessary.
(d) Land Limitation Element.
1. Provide an assessment of land areas which,
due to natural environmental limitations or land use factors, are considered
unsuitable for development for recycling, recovery, composting or solid waste
disposal facilities. Include a map identifying the areas determined to be
unsuitable for the location of such facilities. Based on the inventory and
assessment, communities should develop and include in the plan a strategy to:
1) discourage the location of such facilities
in areas identified as unsuitable; and
2) identify a decision making process for the
selection of sites for new solid waste handling facilities. Specific items to
be considered are as follows:
(i) Natural
Environmental Limitations:
(I)
Water
supply watersheds: DNR Rule
391-3-16-.01(7)(c)1
requires that at any location within a small water supply watershed, new solid
waste landfills must have synthetic liners and leachate collection
systems.
(II)
Groundwater
recharge areas: DNR Rule
391-3-16-.02(3)(a)
requires that in significant groundwater recharge areas, DNR shall not issue
permits for new solid waste landfills not having synthetic liners and leachate
collection systems.
(III)
Wetlands: DNR Rule
391-3-16-.03(3)(e)
establishes that solid waste landfills may constitute an unacceptable use of a
wetland.
(IV)
River
corridors: DNR Rule
391-3-16-.04(4)(h)
prohibits the development of new solid waste landfills within protected river
corridors.
(V)
Protected
mountains: DNR Rule
391-3-16-.05(4)(l)
prohibits the development of new solid waste landfills in areas designated as
protected mountains.
(ii)
Criteria for siting: The
following items are criteria for siting solid waste facilities under DNR Rules.
Local governments preparing plans should consult with DNR for the most current
applicable rules.
(I)
Zoning:
DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(a)
requires that the site must conform to all local zoning/land use ordinances,
and that written verification of such be submitted to EPD.
(II)
Airport safety: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(c)
requires that new solid waste landfill units or lateral expansions of existing
units shall not be within 10,000 feet of any public use or private use airport
runway end used by turbojet aircraft or within 5,000 feet of any public use or
private use airport runway end used by only piston type aircraft.
(III)
Flood plains: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(d)
stipulates that any solid waste landfill located in the 100-year flood plain
shall not restrict the flow of the 100-year flood, reduce the temporary water
storage capacity of the flood plain, or result in a washout of solid waste so
as to pose a threat to human health or the environment.
(IV)
Wetlands: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(e)
prohibits the development of solid waste landfills in wetlands, as defined by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, unless evidence is provided by the applicant
to EPD that use of such wetlands has been permitted or otherwise authorized
under all other applicable state and federal laws and rules.
(V)
Fault areas: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(f)
requires that new landfill units and lateral expansions of existing landfills
shall not be located within 200 feet of a fault that has had displacement in
the Holocene Epoch unless the owner or operator demonstrates to EPD that an
alternative setback distance of less than 200 feet will prevent damage to the
structural integrity of the landfill unit and will be protective of human
health and the environment.
(VI)
Seismic impact zones: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(g)
prohibits the development of new landfill units and lateral expansions in
seismic impact zones unless the owner or operator demonstrates to EPD that all
containment structures, including liners, leachate collection systems, and
surface water control systems are designed to resist the maximum horizontal
acceleration in lithified earth material for the site.
(VII)
Unstable areas: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(h)
requires owners or operators of new landfill units, existing landfill units,
and lateral expansions located in unstable areas to demonstrate that
engineering measures have been incorporated in the landfill unit's design to
ensure that the integrity of the structural components of the landfill unit
will not be disrupted.
(VIII)
Significant groundwater recharge areas: DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(j)
requires new solid waste landfills or expansions of existing facilities within
two miles of a significant groundwater recharge area to have liners and
leachate collection systems, with the exception of facilities accepting waste
generated from outside the county in which the facility is located. In that
case, the facility must be totally outside of any area designated as a
significant groundwater recharge area.
(iii) Required applicant actions relating to
landfill siting. Applicants should always check with DNR and the local planning
jurisdiction to verify procedures for siting solid waste management facilities
that include but are not limited to the following:
(I)
Disposal facility siting decision:
DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(b)
requires that whenever any applicant begins a process to select a site for a
solid waste disposal facility, documentation demonstrating compliance with
O.C.G.A. §
12-8-26(a) be
submitted to EPD; further, whenever any applicant takes action resulting in a
siting decision for a publicly or privately owned solid waste disposal
facility, documentation demonstrating compliance with O.C.G.A. §
12-8-26(b) be
submitted to EPD.
(II) Once a site
has been selected, the applicant must conduct a Hydrological Assessment in
accordance with the provisions of DNR Rule
391-3-4-.05(1)(k).
Preparation of the land limitation element of a solid waste management plan
should comply with the Solid Waste Management Act and the Rules of the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for Solid Waste Management (Chapter
391-3-4) relating to historic sites, airports, jurisdictional boundaries,
access, etc. These documents should be consulted for specifics on land
limitations and siting of solid waste management facilities.
(III) If an applicant undertakes the
Facilities Issues Negotiation Process pursuant to a facility siting decision,
the process will be undertaken in accordance with O.C.G.A. §
12-8-32 and any guidelines issued
by the Department pursuant to State law.
2. Provide a statement of needs
and goals regarding land limitation issues for the planning area.
3. Plan Consistency: In order for EPD to
issue or renew a permit for a solid waste handling facility the facility or
facility expansion must be consistent with a local government solid waste
management plan. The plan shall specify a procedure the local government(s)
will follow to determine if a proposed facility, public or private, is
consistent with the plan. At a minimum, the procedure shall address
(i) how the public will be involved and
notified;
(ii) the anticipated
impact the proposed facility will have upon current solid waste management
facilities;
(iii) the anticipated
impact the proposed facility will have upon adequate collection and disposal
capability within the planning area; and
(iv) the effect the facility will have upon
waste generated within the state achieving the States 25% per capita waste
disposal reduction goal.
(c) Education and Public Involvement Element.
1. Inventory and assess current education
programs and public involvement opportunities.
2. Based on the information gathered in the
Waste Stream Element, the plan shall discuss the adequacy of the current
education programs to target the appropriate waste generating sector(s) and
waste stream(s).
3. Provide a
statement of needs and goals based on the assessment of current programs as
they relate to goals identified in the Waste Stream and Waste Reduction
Elements. Educational program(s) considered in this section must focus on
issues such as realistic and responsible solid waste management options, and
the individual's responsibility for reducing the amount of solid waste
generated, controlling litter, and supporting and participating in the
community's solid waste management program(s). All educational programs must
have source reduction (generate less waste) as a component.
(i) The establishment of local solid waste
citizen advisory councils is encouraged as an effective vehicle for public
involvement in local solid waste issues.
(ii) Specific programs to be considered in
the plan are as follows:
(I)
Local
Government Programs: Include any current or proposed municipal or county
education and public involvement programs, including Georgia's Keep America
Beautiful affiliate activities, government sponsored volunteer programs,
speaker's bureaus, media campaigns, public-private initiatives, and programs
provided or coordinated by local government to schools.
(II)
Solid Waste Advisory
Committee/Task Force: If such exists, include number and composition of
membership, the role or function of the group, how the group was established,
and other pertinent details.
(III)
School System Programs: Include current information on available
educational programs.
(IV)
Litter Control Programs: Include any local programs, ordinances,
or other means of enforcement.
(V)
Regional RDC programs: Include any current or proposed regional
programs.
(6)
Implementation Strategy. The
final section of the plan is the Implementation Strategy. The Implementation
Strategy represents a culmination of information gathered in the preceding
elements. After all elements have been inventoried and assessed, and needs and
goals have been identified, the plan must identify an implementation schedule
for relevant current programs and future planned programs for each element.
(a) Programs identified in the implementation
strategy must include specific actions which address the needs and goals
expressed in the planning elements and which will help the State reach the
statewide waste disposal reduction goal.
(b) Plans and programs presented in the
implementation strategy must demonstrate ten-year collection capability and
disposal capacity.
(c) The
implementation strategy shall identify specific administrative
responsibilities, contractual arrangements, and budgeting necessary to
implement the Plan.
(d) The
suggested presentation format for the Implementation Strategy is a table which
identifies the year-by-year schedule for implementing the identified
strategies. The table will include the five core elements and shall cover the
whole ten-year planning time frame. The title of the table will include the
names of all jurisdictions included in the plan. The column titles, across the
top of the table will include: "Activity","Years the plan is covering","The
party or parties responsible for managing the activity","Estimated cost of
proposed programs" (for appropriate elements), and "Funding source." The first
five years of the Implementation Strategy will serve as the first Short-Term
Work Program. The second half of the Implementation Strategy will be updated in
accordance with the planning schedule established and revised from time to time
by the Department.
O.C.G.A. Secs.
12-8-20et seq.,
12-8-31.1.