Florida Administrative Code
62 - DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
62S - Office of the Secretary
Chapter 62S-2 - RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM
Section 62S-2.072 - Application Requirements and Processing
Current through Reg. 50, No. 187; September 24, 2024
The Department shall approve applications for program grants in order of priority until all program funds are depleted under the following standards and criteria:
(1) Eligible Applicants. All local governmental entities and state or federal agencies, federally or state recognized Indian tribal governments which have the legal responsibility for the provision of outdoor recreational sites and facilities for the use and benefit of the public, and organizations registered as active Florida nonprofit corporations which have an agreement with a governmental agency to develop public lands, are eligible to submit RTP applications.
(2) Project Eligibility.
(3) Permissible Uses of Funds.
(4) Prohibited Uses.
(5) Eligibility Determination. Following closure of the application submission period, Department staff shall review and determine the eligibility of each applicant based on the following:
(6) Application Evaluation. Each eligible application shall be evaluated on the basis of the information provided in the application in accordance with this part. Each application shall be assigned a total point score pursuant to subsection 62S-2.072(7), F.A.C. A project site or facility would not be considered viable if the project does not receive a minimum number of 55 points for motorized projects, 55 points for nonmotorized projects, 61 points for mixed-use projects, and 61 points for education projects, as awarded under Section 62S-2.073, F.A.C. An application with fewer than the required minimum points will not be recommended for funding.
(7) Priority Lists. A total point score shall be assigned to each application upon evaluation of each project under Section 62S-2.073, F.A.C. The RTP Advisory Committee shall prepare one priority list for each category. Applications shall be ranked on the priority list according to assigned point scores. The application with the highest score will receive the highest rank. The funds used for the project shall reduce that particular category's allocation accordingly. The remaining applications will be arranged in descending order according to their assigned point scores. Applications scoring below the minimum, established pursuant to subsection 62S-2.072(6), F.A.C., shall not be placed on the priority list. The priority list shall include recommendations for distribution of available program funds. In the event there are insufficient applications to account for all program funds assigned to motorized or nonmotorized category, the RTP Advisory Committee may vote to move funds from one category to another. In order to determine whether or not to move funds between motorized and nonmotorized categories, the RTP Advisory Committee shall meet and shall make a determination that there are insufficient applications to use all funds available in that category for that year, and that there is a likelihood that there will be an insufficient amount of applications expected for the next submission cycle.
(8) Tie-Breaker System. If two or more applications receive the same score, the following tie-breaker system will be used to decide the priority ranking among them. Tied applications will be evaluated according to the tie-breaker system in order and will be assigned their priority accordingly. Funding History. An order of priority among those applications with equal scores shall be established based on the amount of funds previously received by the applicant through RTP during the previous five fiscal years. This includes funds received under the program's previous name of National Recreational Trails Funding Program. The application from the applicant which received the lowest amount of program funds receives the highest priority. Other tied applications will be arranged in descending order related inversely to the amount of program funds each has received.
(9) Unsettled Claims. The Department shall deny or suspend program eligibility to any applicant or grantee against which the Department has an unsettled financial claim related to noncompliance with terms or conditions of an RTP or other DEP outdoor recreation grant.
(10) Unfunded and Ineligible Applications. Any unfunded or ineligible applications shall be returned to the applicant upon written request from the applicant. If no such request is made within 30 days after notification of grant awards, unfunded applications shall be discarded by staff.
(11) Application Form. The Recreational Trails Program Application Form, OGT-10, effective date May 1, 2001, which shall be used for all applications, is hereby incorporated by reference and is available from the Department's Office of Greenways and Trails, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station #795, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, (850)488-3701.
Rulemaking Authority 260.016(1)(h) FS. Law Implemented 260.016(1)(d), (f), (h), (2)(a)2. FS.
New 5-1-01.