Connecticut Administrative Code
Title 12 - Taxation
740(a) - INCOME TAX
Part IX - Withholding
Section 12-705(a)-2 - Determining Connecticut income tax to be deducted and withheld from wages paid to resident employees
Current through September 9, 2024
(a) Every employer maintaining an office or transacting business in Connecticut and making payments of wages shall, as provided in this section, deduct and withhold from such wages an amount of Connecticut income tax as determined in accordance with the current edition of the Connecticut Circular CT (Employer Tax Guide and Withholding Tables), except that if the department issues income tax withholding tables subsequent to the publication of the current edition of the Connecticut Circular CT, then the employer shall use those income tax withholding tables to determine how much Connecticut income tax to deduct and withhold from wages.
(b)
Example 1: A resident individual is employed in Rhode Island by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business both in Connecticut and in Rhode Island. Assuming that the Rhode Island income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's wages is $100 and that the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from such wages is $160. The amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld is $60.
Example 2: A resident individual is employed in Massachusetts by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business both in Connecticut and in Massachusetts. Assuming that the Massachusetts income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's wages is $200 and that the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from such wages is $200, no Connecticut income tax would be required to be deducted and withheld from such wages.
Example 3: A resident individual is employed in New York by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business both in Connecticut and in New York. Assuming that the New York income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's wages is $300 and that the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from such wages is $250, no Connecticut income tax would be required to be deducted and withheld from such wages.
Example 4: A resident individual is employed in New York and New Jersey by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business in Connecticut, New York and New Jersey. Assume that the Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages for work performed in New York and New Jersey is $500, and that half of the employee's wages are for work performed in New York and the other half are for work performed in New Jersey. Therefore, the prorated tax amount for New York in $250, and the prorated tax amount for New Jersey is $250. Assuming that the New York income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New York wages is $300, no Connecticut income tax would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New York wages, because the New York income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's wages exceeds the prorated tax amount for New York. Assuming that the New Jersey income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New Jersey wages is $210, the amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New Jersey wages is $40. (This is the amount by which the prorated tax amount for New Jersey ($250) exceeds the New Jersey income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's wages. Therefore, the amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages is $40.
Example 5: A resident individual is employed in Connecticut and New York by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business in Connecticut and New York. Assume that the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages for work performed in Connecticut and New York is $450, and that two-thirds of the employee's wages are for work performed in Connecticut and the other one-third are for work performed in New York.
Therefore, the prorated tax amount for New York is $150. The prorated tax amount for New York ($150) is subtracted from the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages ($450) to calculate the prorated tax amount for Connecticut ($450-$150 = $300).
Assuming that the New York income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New York wages is $210, no Connecticut income tax would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New York wages, because the New York income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's New York wages exceeds the prorated tax amount for New York. The amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Connecticut wages is $300 (the prorated tax amount for Connecticut). Therefore, the amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages is $300.
Example 6: A resident individual is employed in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts by an employer maintaining an office or transacting business in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Assume that the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages for work performed in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts is $800, and that one-fifth of the employee's wages are for work performed in Connecticut, one-fifth of the employee's wages are for work performed in Massachusetts, and the other three-fifths of the employee's wages are for work performed in Rhode Island. Therefore, the prorated tax amount for Massachusetts is $160, and the prorated tax amount for Rhode Island is $480. The prorated tax amount for Massachusetts ($160) and the prorated tax amount for Rhode Island ($480) are subtracted from the Connecticut income tax that would otherwise be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages ($800) to calculate the prorated tax amount for Connecticut ($800 - ($160 + $480) = $160). Assuming that the Massachusetts income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's massachusetts wages is $200, no Connecticut income tax would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Massachusetts wages, because the Massachusetts income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Massachusetts wages exceeds the prorated tax amount for Massachusetts. Assuming that the Rhode Island income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Rhode Island wages is $450, the amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Rhode Island wages is $30. (This is the amount by which the prorated tax amount for Rhode Island ($480) exceeds the Rhode Island income tax required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's Rhode Island wages. Therefore, the amount of Connecticut income tax that would be required to be deducted and withheld from the employee's total wages is $190 ($160 + $30).
(c) To determine the amount required to be deducted and withheld from wages paid to employees who are nonresident individuals, see § 12-705(a)-6.
Full section history for 2002 amendment reads as follows: "Amended February 28, 2002, applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2002." Abbreviated note in section history inserted 11/4/2014 as a result of automated publishing restrictions. (November 4, 2014)