Code of Colorado Regulations
400 - Department of Natural Resources
408 - Colorado Water Conservation Board
2 CCR 408-3 - RECREATIONAL IN-CHANNEL DIVERSION RULES
Section 7 - Required Findings

Universal Citation: 2 CO Code Regs 408-3 ยง 7

Current through Register Vol. 47, No. 17, September 10, 2024

The board is required to make certain factual findings relative to each RICD application. § 37-92-102(6), C.R.S. The statutory definition of RICD requires that the applicant claim only the minimum stream flow, that the flow would be used for a reasonable recreation experience in and on the water, and that the flow be diverted, captured, controlled, and placed to beneficial use. The required findings on factors are:

a. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICD, in the amounts claimed, would impair the ability of Colorado to fully develop and place to consumptive beneficial use its compact entitlements. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following:

i. The amount and location of remaining unappropriated compact entitlement waters in the basin in question and at the RICD point of diversion;

ii. The proximity of the RICD to the state line;

iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage which may be utilized by those who would place the water to consumptive beneficial use;

iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state;

v. Exchange opportunities within the state that may be adversely impacted by the existence of the RICD;

vi. Whether the basin is over-appropriated;

vii. The effect on other decreed, existing undecreed, or reasonably foreseeable uses of the amount of water claimed;

viii. Whether a RICD shields waters from a consumptive use that would otherwise be available under a particular compact;

ix. Whether beneficial consumptive water use opportunities upstream from the claimed RICD would further develop Colorado's compact entitlements and would be impaired by applicant's sought for stream flow amounts; and,

x. What provisions in the application are proposed for reducing or canceling the RICD?

b. Whether the RICD appropriation is for an appropriate reach of stream for the intended use. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following:

i. The nature of the identified reasonable recreational experience for which the RICD is sought;

ii. The length of the proposed RICD reach;

iii. Whether the RICD can be adequately measured and administered through the proposed reach;

iv. Whether the applicant has complied with all federal and state statutes and regulations regarding flooding, flood control, the one-hundred year flood elevations, and river channel manipulation, or whether the applicant agrees to include a term and condition in the decree that it will comply with all federal and state statutes and regulations regarding flooding, flood control, the one-hundred year flood elevations, and river channel manipulation;

v. Whether the RICD in its proposed location can adequately pass all flows up to and including the 100-year (1% probability) flood flow without causing adverse impacts to upstream, downstream, or adjacent property owners or whether the applicant agrees to include a term and condition in the decree that the RICD structures will be constructed in such a manner as to adequately pass all flows up to and including the 100-year (1% probability) flood flows without causing adverse impacts to upstream, downstream, or adjacent property owners;

vi. The environmental effects of the proposed RICD;

vii. Whether the water depth in the stream reach is at least the minimum depth needed for the identified reasonable recreation experience; and,

viii. Whether the RICD is located in a stream reach with an appropriate width for the identified reasonable recreation experience.

c. Whether there is access for recreational in-channel use. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following:

i. The nature and extent of the access required for the identified reasonable recreation experience for which a RICD is being sought;

ii. The ownership, leasehold, or other legal interest held by or available to the applicant for purposes of obtaining access; and,

iii. Any impediments to the applicant obtaining access necessary for the intended identified reasonable recreation experience.

d. Whether the exercise of the RICD would cause material injury to existing ISF water rights. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following:

i. The nature and extent of the ISF in the proposed reach or any affected downstream reach;

ii. The timing and duration of the RICD as such may relate to the specific natural environment for which the ISF was decreed;

iii. Whether the RICD, or administration of the RICD, would negatively impact the natural environment for which the ISF was decreed; and,

iv. Whether during the construction of the RICD structures, the construction may cause material injury to the ISF or the natural environment for which the ISF was decreed.

e. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICD, in the amounts claimed, would promote maximum utilization of the waters of the State. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following:

i. Whether there are any probable future upstream junior appropriations for direct diversion or storage;

ii. Whether there are any probable future changes, transfers, or exchanges of water rights from points of diversion downstream of the reach affected by the RICD to points upstream of or in the reach affected by the RICD;

iii. Whether existing federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected by the RICD;

iv. Whether a reasonable and efficient means is to be utilized to use, divert, capture and control the water for a RICD so as to minimize its call upon the river and avoid waste;

v. Whether a reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as determined by levels of current use and/or estimates of future use;

vi. Whether the application has appropriate limitations upon the time of day, days per month, or seasons during which the RICD would be exercised;

vii. The depth and flow rate of the proposed RICD;

viii. With what frequency and duration, and from what sources, the requested amounts of water for the RICD occur;

ix. The economic effects of the proposed RICD;

x. The environmental effects of the proposed RICD;

xi. The relationship of the requested RICD flow rates to the historic appropriated and unappropriated flow rates for each time period requested;

xii. The effect of the RICD on other potential uses of water;

xiii. Whether the application as a whole meets the elements of the definition of a RICD, as found in section 37-92-103 (10.3);

xiv. Whether the RICD would conserve and efficiently use the available stream flow, thereby promoting maximum utilization of Colorado's water resources;

xv. Whether the RICD will make the river basin water critical and describe the resulting impact on existing water rights and users;

xvi. Whether the RICD may work together with existing and/or future uses within the State of Colorado to promote maximum utilization;

xvii. Any provision in the application for reducing or canceling the RICD;

xviii. A description of each recreational opportunity sought by the applicant at each flow amount sought, and why the flow amount is the minimum amount for each reasonable recreation experience sought;

xix. The historic frequency and flow rates of imported water and reservoir releases through the proposed RICD reach, and whether such flows will be necessary to meet the flow rates claimed for the proposed RICD; and,

xx. Whether, and to what extent, unappropriated native flows exist in the proposed RICD stream reach during the periods claimed, and the percentage of unappropriated flows claimed by the RICD.

f. Pursuant to section 37-92-102(6)(b)(VI), an additional factor that is appropriate for evaluation of RICD applications is whether the application meets the elements of the definition of a RICD as found in section 37-92-103 (10.3). This requires the amount claimed to be the "minimum stream flow" and that it be for a "reasonable recreation experience." The board should consider whether the requested RICD physical control structures divert, capture, control and place to beneficial use the water claimed.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Colorado may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.