Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
(a) Any applicant requesting that the
commission reach a decision on an application for certification within six
months after acceptance of the application shall meet the requirements of this
section.
(b) To be eligible for a
decision within six months after acceptance of an application, the application
shall contain all of the information that is relevant to the project and
required in Appendix B to this Chapter. If an information requirement in
Appendix B is not relevant to a proposed project because of its design,
location, or other particular circumstance, the application need not provide
the information and, instead, shall provide an explanation with specific facts
as to why the requirement is not relevant to the project as proposed.
Applicants are encouraged to request a prefiling review pursuant to section
1709.5 to determine the extent to
which documentation relevant to a proposed application is sufficient to meet
the information requirements in Appendix B and to determine which information
requirements, if not all, are relevant to the proposed application. The
application shall also contain all of the following:
(1) Substantial evidence that the project as
proposed in the application will comply with all standards, ordinances, and
laws applicable at the time of certification, including:
(A) a list of all such standards, ordinances,
and laws;
(B) information
demonstrating that the project as proposed in the application will comply with
all such standards, ordinances, and laws;
(C) where a standard, ordinance, or law is
expected to change between the time of filing an application and certification,
information from the responsible jurisdiction documenting the impending change,
the schedule for enactment of the change, and whether the proposed project will
comply with the changed standard, ordinance, or law; and
(D) a list of the requirements for permitting
by each federal, state, regional, and local agency that has jurisdiction over
the proposed project or that would have jurisdiction, but for the exclusive
jurisdiction of the commission, and the information necessary to meet those
requirements;
(2)
substantial evidence that the project as proposed in the application will not
cause a significant adverse impact on the environment, including all the
following:
(A) a detailed modeling analysis
assessing whether the cumulative impacts of all inert criteria pollutants (NOx,
SO2, CO, and PM10) from the project's typical operating mode in combination
with all stationary emissions sources within a six-mile radius of the proposed
site that have received construction permits, but are not yet operational, and
all stationary emissions sources that are currently undergoing air district
permit application review will cause or contribute to a violation of any
ambient air quality standard;
(B) a
description of the project's planned initial commissioning phase, which is the
phase between the first firing of emissions sources and the consistent
production of electricity for sale to the market, including the types and
durations of equipment tests, criteria pollutant emissions, and monitoring
techniques to be used during such tests, and air dispersion modeling analyses
of the impacts of those emissions on state and federal ambient air quality
standards for NO2, SO2, CO, and PM10;
(C) a detailed description of the mitigation,
which an applicant shall propose, for all project impacts from criteria
pollutants that currently exceed state or federal ambient air quality
standards, but are not subject to offset requirements under the district's new
source review rule;
(D) a modeling
analysis that identifies the extent of potential public exposure to toxic
substances, as identified in subsection (g)(9)(A) of Appendix B, resulting from
normal facility operation;
(E) if
the project will result in a discharge of waste that could affect the water
quality of the state, a complete report of proposed waste discharge as required
by section
13260 of the
Water Code. This will allow for issuance of waste discharge requirements by the
appropriate regional water quality control board within 100 days after filing
of the application in accordance with Public Resources Code section
25550(d).
(F) a demonstration, based on appropriate
data including, but not limited to, scientific surveys taken at the appropriate
time of year, that the project will have no significant impact on wetlands,
plant or animal species that are endangered, threatened, or of concern under
state or federal law, or the areas listed in Public Resources Code section
25527;
(G) with respect to the handling of hazardous
materials, a demonstration that:
(i) the
project will not use or store any regulated substance defined in Section
25532(g)
of the California Health and Safety Code or
(ii) the project is eligible for Program 1
status pursuant to Section 68.10 of Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations or can demonstrate that no worst case accidental release would
result in a plausibility (risk greater than 1 in 1,000,000) of an impact at the
nearest public receptor above the maximum airborne concentration below which it
is believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without
experiencing or developing irreversible or other serious health effects or
symptoms that could impair an individual's ability to take protective action.
The Emergency Response Planning Guidelines, Level 2 (ERPG 2) reflect this
maximum airborne concentration standard.
(H) if the project will store or use a
regulated substance defined in Section
25532(g)
of the Health and Safety Code, a demonstration either that the boundary of the
powerplant site will not be within 1000 feet of any residential area, school,
general acute care hospital, long-term health care facility, or child day care
facility as such terms are defined in section
25534.1
of the Health and Safety Code or that the project will pose no plausible
potential for exposure at such facilities from an accidental release of the
regulated substance; and
(I) a
demonstration that the proposed facility will not require storage of gaseous
flammable or explosive materials in quantities greater than 25000 standard
cubic feet;
(3)
substantial evidence that the project will not cause a significant adverse
impact on the electrical system, including all of the following:
(A) an Interconnection Study identifying the
electrical system impacts and a discussion of the mitigation measures
considered and those proposed to maintain conformance with NERC, WSCC, Cal-ISO
or other applicable reliability or planning criteria based on load flow, post
transient, transient, and fault current studies performed by or for the
transmission owner in accordance with all applicable Cal-ISO or other
interconnection authority's tariffs, operating agreements, and scheduling
protocols and
(B) a full
description of the facilities, if any, that are required for interconnection,
including all such facilities beyond the point where the outlet line joins with
the interconnected system and a full description of the environmental setting,
environmental impacts, and any recommended mitigation measures proposed by the
applicant for any required facilities beyond the point where the outlet line
joins with the interconnected system;
(4) a discussion of the potential for
disproportionate impacts from the project on minority or low-income people;
such discussion shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(A) demographic information by census tract,
based on the most recent census data available, showing the number and
percentage of minority populations and people living below the poverty level
within six miles of the proposed site;
(B) one or more maps at a scale of 1:24,000
showing the distribution of minority populations and low-income populations and
significant pollution sources within six miles of the proposed site, such as
those permitted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Toxic Release
Inventory sites), the local air quality management district, or the California
Department of Toxic Substances Control; and
(C) identification of available health
studies concerning the potentially affected population(s) within a six-mile
radius of the proposed power plant site;
(5) the following information to demonstrate
that the project, if certified, is likely to be constructed and operated;
(A) information demonstrating the applicant's
control, by ownership, lease, option, or other legally binding agreement that
the Commission finds acceptable, of the proposed site and
(B) a will-serve letter or similar document
from each provider of water to the project, indicating each provider's
willingness to provide water to the project and describing all conditions under
which the water will be provided, and a discussion of all other contractual
agreements with the applicant pertaining to the provision of water to the
project.
1. New
section filed 11-27-2000 as an emergency; operative 11-27-2000 (Register 2000,
No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 3-27-2001 or
emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following
day.
2. Certificate of Compliance as to 11-27-2000 order, including
amendment of section, transmitted to OAL 3-21-2001 and filed 4-25-2001
(Register 2001, No. 17).
Note: Authority cited: Sections
25213
and
25218(e),
Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections
25216.5(a),
25520
and
25550(b),
Public Resources Code.