Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
(a) After the end
of the evidentiary hearings, the presiding member, in consultation with the
other committee members, shall prepare and file a proposed decision on the
application that meets the requirements of section
1748.
(b) The presiding member's proposed decision
shall be based on a consideration of the entire hearing record and contain the
following:
(1) Environmental Factors:
(A) a description of potential significant
environmental effects;
(B) an
assessment of the feasibility of mitigation measures and a reasonable range of
alternatives that could lessen or avoid the adverse effects; and
(C) if any significant effects are likely to
remain even after the application of all feasible mitigation measures and
alternatives, whether economic, legal, social, technological or other
environmental benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
effects;
(2) Laws,
Ordinances, Regulations, and Standards:
(A) a
description of all applicable federal laws, ordinances, regulations and
standards and an assessment of the project's compliance with them;
(B) a description of all applicable state,
regional, and local laws, ordinances, regulations and standards, and the
project's compliance with them;
(i) if the
commission finds that there is noncompliance with a state, local, or regional
ordinance or regulation, a description of all staff communications with the
agencies responsible for enforcing the laws, ordinances, regulations and
standards for which there is noncompliance, in an attempt to correct or
eliminate the noncompliance;
(ii)
if the noncompliance with a state, local, or regional ordinance or regulation
cannot be corrected or eliminated, the proposed decision shall discuss whether
the proposed project is required for public convenience and necessity and
whether there are more prudent and feasible means of achieving such public
convenience and necessity. In making the determination, the commission shall
consider the entire record of the proceeding, including, but not limited to,
the impacts of the facility on the environment, consumer benefits, and electric
system reliability; and
(iii) if
the noncompliance with a state, local, or regional ordinance or regulation
cannot be corrected or eliminated, the proposed decision shall satisfy the
commission's obligation to inform the state, local, or regional governmental
agency if it makes the findings required by Public Resources Code section
25525;
(C) to the extent not already covered under
subdivisions (1) or (2), and for applications for certification, as defined in
Public Resources Code section
25102,
concerning sites in the Coastal Zones, as defined in Public Resources Code
section
30103,
or the Suisun Marsh, as defined in Public Resources Code section
29101,
a discussion of the issues raised by the California Coastal Commission, if any,
pursuant to section
30413(e)
of the California Public Resources Code; or issues raised by the San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission, if any, pursuant to section
66630 of
the Government Code;
(D) to the
extent not already covered under subdivisions (1) or (2), and for sites in the
Coastal Zones or Suisun Marsh for which a notice of intent as defined in Public
Resources Code section
25113
has been filed:
(i) a discussion of provisions
to meet the objectives of the California Coastal Act, as may be specified in
the applicable report submitted by the California Coastal Commission under
section 30413(d); or to meet the requirements of objectives of the Bay
Conservation and Development Act, as may be specified in the applicable report
submitted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission
under section
66645 of
the Government Code;
(ii) if the
provisions described in paragraph (i) would result in greater adverse effect on
the environment or would be infeasible, an explanation of why; and
(iii) a statement of whether the approval of
the public agency having ownership or control of the land has been obtained,
whether or not such approval is subject to preemption under Public Resources
Code section
25500;
(3) a description of land use, as necessary,
consistent with Public Resources Code section
25528;
(4) for new sites proposed for location in
the coastal zone or any other area with recreational, scenic, or historic
value, proposed conditions relating to land that should be acquired,
established, and maintained by the applicant for public use and access
consistent with Public Resources Code section
25529;
(5) for new sites proposed along the coast or
shoreline of any major body of water, proposed conditions on the extent to
which the proposed facilities should be set back from the coast or shoreline to
permit reasonable public use and to protect scenic and aesthetic values
consistent with Public Resources Code section
25529;
(6) for sites in areas specified in section
25527
of the Public Resources Code: an analysis of whether:
(A) the facilities will be consistent with
the primary land use of the area,
(B) there will be any substantial adverse
environmental effects, and
(C) the
approval of the public agency having ownership or control of the land has been
obtained, whether or not such approval is subject to preemption under Public
Resources Code section
25500;
(7) where a nuclear powered facility is
proposed, an analysis of the factors in Public Resources Code sections
25524.1
and
25524.2;
(8) an analysis of the extent to which the
applicant has complied with the recommended minimum standards of efficiency
adopted under Public Resources Code section
25402(d);
(9) if the application is for a facility to
be located on a potential multiple facility site, as determined under of the
Public Resources Code section
25516.5,
an analysis of the factors listed in Public Resources Code section
25524.5;
(10) a discussion of any public benefits from
the project, including, but not limited to, economic benefits, environmental
benefits, and electricity reliability benefits;
(11) provisions for restoring the site as
necessary to protect the environment, if the commission does not certify the
project;
(12) a recommendation as
to whether the proposed site and related facilities should be certified, and if
so, under what conditions;
(13) an
engineering assessment relating to facility efficiency, health and
safety;
(14) a reliability
assessment;
(15) any other relevant
matter identified by the presiding member;
(16) responses to all comments on significant
environmental issues raised during the evidentiary hearing; and
(17) the reasons supporting the decision and
reference to the bases for each of the findings and conclusions in the
decision.
(c) Any person
may file written comments on the presiding member's proposed decision. The
presiding member shall set a comment period of at least 30 days from the date
of filing.
1.
Renumbering of former section
1749 to new section 1745.5,
including amendment of section heading, section and NOTE, filed 12-21-2015;
operative 1-1-2016 pursuant to Government Code section
11343.4(b)(3)
(Register 2015, No. 52).
2. Amendment of section heading and section
filed 12-5-2018; operative 1-1-2019 pursuant to Government Code section
11343.4(b)(3)
(Register 2018, No. 49).
Note: Authority cited: Sections
25218(e)
and
25541.5,
Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections
25519(c),
25522,
25523
and
25525-
25529,
Public Resources Code.