Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
Notwithstanding any other provision of these regulations,
mandate redetermination process hearings and decisions shall be subject to
article 7 of these regulations. There shall be a two-step hearing process for
requests to adopt a new test claim decision as follows:
(a) The First Hearing:
(1) The first hearing shall be limited to the
issue of whether the requester has made an adequate showing that identifies a
subsequent change in law as defined by Government Code section
17570,
material to the prior test claim decision, which may modify the state's
liability pursuant to article XIII B, section
6(a) of the
California Constitution. The Commission shall find that the requester has made
an adequate showing if it finds that the request, when considered in light of
all of the written comments and supporting documentation in the record of this
request, has a substantial possibility of prevailing at the second
hearing.
(2) At least eight weeks
before the hearing or at another time required by the executive director or
stipulated to by the parties, Commission staff shall prepare a draft proposed
decision and issue it to the parties, interested parties, and any person who
requests a copy, and shall post it on the Commission's website. A request for
mandate redetermination is set for the first hearing when Commission staff
issues its draft proposed decision. A written notice of the date, time, and
place of the first hearing shall be served on everyone on the mailing list
described in section
1181.4 of these regulations and
posted on the Commission's website.
(3) Written comments concerning the draft
proposed decision may be filed with the Commission. Written comments shall be
certified, filed, and served in accordance with section
1181.3 of these regulations, by the
date determined and noticed by the executive director. A three-week period for
comments shall be given, subject to the executive director's authority to
expedite all matters pursuant to Government Code section
17530. If
representations of fact are made, they shall be supported by documentary or
testimonial evidence in accordance with section
1187.5 of these regulations. All
written comments timely filed shall be reviewed by Commission staff and may be
incorporated into the proposed decision of the request to adopt a new test
claim decision.
(A) It is the Commission's
policy to discourage the introduction of late comments, exhibits, or other
evidence filed after the three-week comment period described in subdivision
(a)(3) of this section. The Commission need not rely on, and staff need not
respond to, late comments, exhibits, or other evidence filed in response to a
draft proposed decision.
(4) Before the first hearing on the request
for mandate redetermination, Commission staff shall prepare a proposed decision
limited to the issue of whether the requester has made a showing that
identifies a subsequent change in law, material to the prior test claim
decision, which may modify the state's liability pursuant to article XIII B,
section 6(a) of the
California Constitution. This proposed decision shall consider the request,
written comment, rebuttals and supporting documentation filed by the parties
and interested parties. The proposed decision for the first hearing shall find
that the requester has made an adequate showing if staff finds that the
request, when considered in light of all of the written comments and supporting
documentation in the record of this request, has a substantial possibility of
prevailing at the second hearing.
(5) If, at the first hearing, the Commission
finds that:
(A) The requester has not made an
adequate showing, when considered in light of all of the written comments,
rebuttals and supporting documentation in the record and testimony at the
hearing, that the request for mandate redetermination has a substantial
possibility of prevailing at the second hearing, the Commission shall issue a
decision denying the request for mandate redetermination.
(B) The requester has made an adequate
showing, when considered in light of all of the written comments, rebuttals,
and supporting documentation in the record and testimony at the hearing, the
Commission shall issue a decision finding that an adequate showing has been
made and setting the second hearing on whether the Commission shall adopt a new
test claim decision to supersede the previously adopted test claim
decision.
(6) Everyone on
the mailing list described in section
1181.4 of these regulations shall
be issued written notice that the Commission's decision has been posted on the
Commission's website and, if applicable, that the date, time, and place of the
second hearing have also been posted on the Commission's
website.
(b) The Second
Hearing:
(1) If the Commission proceeds to
the second hearing, it shall consider whether the state's liability pursuant to
article XIII B, section
6(a) of the
California Constitution has been modified based on the subsequent change in law
alleged by the requester, thus requiring adoption of a new test claim decision
to supersede the previously adopted test claim decision. If the Commission
finds that the state's liability pursuant to article XIII B, section
6(a) of the
California Constitution has been modified based on the subsequent change in law
alleged by the requester, it shall adopt a new decision that reflects the
modified liability of the state.
(2) Before the second hearing, Commission
staff shall prepare a proposed decision. At least eight weeks before the
hearing or at another time required by the executive director or stipulated to
by the parties, Commission staff shall prepare a draft proposed decision and
issue it to everyone on the mailing list described in section
1181.4 of these regulations and
post it on the Commission's website. The proposed decision shall consider the
request, and any written comments and rebuttals and supporting documentation
filed.
(3) Any party or interested
party may file written comments concerning the draft proposed decision with the
Commission. Written comments shall be certified, filed, and served in
accordance with section
1181.3 of these regulations, by the
date determined and noticed by the executive director. A three-week period for
comments shall be given, subject to the executive director's authority to
expedite all matters pursuant to Government Code section
17530. If
representations of fact are made, they shall be supported by documentary or
testimonial evidence in accordance with section
1187.5 of these regulations. All
written comments timely filed shall be reviewed by Commission staff and may be
incorporated into the proposed decision.
(A)
It is the Commission's policy to discourage the introduction of late comments,
exhibits, or other evidence filed after the three-week comment period described
in subdivision (b)(3) of this section. The Commission need not rely on, and
staff need not respond to, late comments, exhibits, or other evidence filed in
response to a draft proposed decision.
(4) If, at the second hearing, the Commission
finds that the state's liability pursuant to article XIII B, section
6(a) of the
California Constitution:
(A) has not been
modified based on a subsequent change in law as defined by Government Code
section
17570
(a)(2), the Commission shall issue a decision
denying the request.
(B) has been
modified based on a subsequent change in law, as defined by Government Code
section
17570
(a)(2) the Commission shall adopt a new
decision to supersede the prior decision. The new decision shall be prepared in
writing, based on the record, and shall include a statement of reasons for the
decision, findings, and conclusions.
(5) Everyone on the mailing list described in
section 1181.4 of these regulations shall
be issued written notice that a copy of the decision has been posted on the
Commission's website.
(6) After a
decision or proposed decision has been served or posted on the Commission's
website, it shall not be changed except to correct clerical errors, in which
case a corrected decision or proposed decision shall be prepared and posted on
the Commission's website. Everyone on the mailing list described in section
1181.4 of these regulations shall
be issued written notice that a copy of the revised decision has been posted on
the Commission's website.
(7) If a
new decision is adopted that finds that the State's liability under article
XIII B, section
6(a) of the
California Constitution has been modified, the amount and method of
reimbursement shall be determined in accordance with article 3 of these
regulations.
1. New
section filed 5-19-2014; operative 7-1-2014 pursuant to Government Code section
11343.4(a)(3).
Exempt from OAL review and submitted to OAL for printing only pursuant to
Government Code section
17527
(Register 2014, No. 21).
2. Amendment subsections (a)(2), (a)(3) and
(b)(7) and amendment of NOTE filed 9-24-2015; operative 10-1-2015 pursuant to
Government Code section
11343.4(b)(3).
Exempt from OAL review and submitted to OAL for filing and printing only
pursuant to Government Code section
17527(g)
(Register 2015, No. 39).
3. Amendment of subsections (a)(1),
(a)(5)(A) and (b)(7) filed 9-13-2016; operative 10-1-2016 pursuant to
Government Code section
17527(g)
(Register 2016, No. 38).
4. Amendment of subsections (a)(3) and
(b)(3) filed 2-27-2018; operative 4-1-2018 pursuant to Government Code section
11343.4(a).
Exempt from OAL review and submitted to OAL for filing and printing only
pursuant to Government Code section
17527(g)
(Register 2018, No. 9).
5. Editorial correction of HISTORY 4
(Register 2018, No. 18).
6. Amendment of subsections
(a)(1)-(a)(3)(A), (a)(5)(A)-(6), (b)(2)-(b)(3)(A), (b)(4)(A) and (b)(5)-(6)
filed 1-23-2020; operative 4-1-2020 (Register 2020, No.
4).
Note: Authority cited: Sections
17527(g),
17553(a)
and
17570(d),
Government Code. Reference: Sections
17530 and
17570,
Government Code.