California Code of Regulations
Title 15 - Crime Prevention and Corrections
Division 3 - Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole
Chapter 1 - Rules and Regulations of Adult Operations and Programs
Subchapter 4 - General Institution Regulations
Article 10 - Classification
Section 3378.5 - Debriefing Process
Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
Debriefing is the process by which a STG coordinator/investigator determines whether an offender (subject) has dropped out of a STG. A subject shall be debriefed only upon his or her request, although staff may ask a subject if he or she wants to debrief. The Debrief Process may include a two-step process that consists of an interview phase (Phase I) and an observation phase (Phase II).
(a) CDCR has established a Debrief Processing Unit (DPU) to house incarcerated persons who are assigned to Phase I of the Debrief Process. A DPU may be established at any institution or facility the Department deems appropriate. An evaluation of the need for the observation phase will be based upon individual case factors including the STG affiliate's housing prior to beginning the debrief process. The observation phase of the Debrief Process shall begin when the incarcerated person's autobiography is accepted and ICC changes his status to Post-Debrief Intake Panel (DIP). Time served in the observation phase may overlap with time spent in the interview phase. Time spent in the observation phase should be up to six months, as long as the incarcerated person is actively participating in assigned program activities.
(b) The purpose of the debrief interview is to provide staff with information about the STG's structure, activities, and affiliates. The debrief process is not for the purpose of acquiring incriminating evidence against the subject. The object of the debrief process is to learn enough about the subject and the subject's current STG to:
(c) Incarcerated persons undergoing the debrief process may be subject to a period of observation (Phase II) with other incarcerated persons who are also undergoing the debrief process. The period of observation shall be up to 6 months in duration and may occur in the DPU or the Transitional Housing Unit (THU).
(d) Upon completion of the debrief process, the incarcerated person shall be housed in a facility commensurate with the incarcerated person's safety needs, placement score and other case factors.
(e) A waiver of the right against self-incrimination is not a precondition of an offender (subject) undergoing the debrief process since the information is provided for administrative purposes. A subject shall not be required to complete the debrief process and the subject is free to terminate the debrief process at any time. If, during the debrief interviews, a subject makes a statement that tends to incriminate the subject in a crime, the STG coordinator/investigator may stop any discussion about the matter and continue on with another topic. Prior to questioning the subject about the incriminating matter, the subject must waive the right against self-incrimination (Miranda). The decision by the subject to exercise the right against self-incrimination shall not affect the determination of whether the subject successfully participated in the debrief process.
(f) Incarcerated persons will be afforded expanded program opportunities as they progress through the DPU. Detailed information about the operation of the DPU is located in section 3378.7.
Upon receipt of notification of an incarcerated person's intent to disassociate from an STG, the institutional STG investigator shall ensure the incarcerated person has been placed in appropriate housing to address the incarcerated person's safety in accordance with sections 3335 through 3336, 3340, and 3342.
The STG investigator shall contact the validated incarcerated person within five (5) business days of receipt of the notification to conduct an Initial Debrief Intake Interview.
The Initial Debrief Intake Interview document must be finalized and available at the initial ICC. During the initial ICC, the incarcerated person will be notified of ICC's actions and will be referred for transfer to the DPU in accordance with subsection 3378.7(b). Exceptions to transfer by ICC will be for:
(g) Upon an incarcerated person's arrival at the DPU, an OCS investigator shall meet with the incarcerated person and collect the completed autobiography. If extenuating circumstances have prevented the incarcerated person from completing the autobiography, the incarcerated person may be issued an extension to complete their autobiography at the discretion of the OCS GIO Senior Special Agent. If the extension extends beyond 45 days (from the original date of assignment), the case shall be scheduled for a case conference to include the Captain, responsible for DPU, and the Senior Special Agent, Special Services Unit (SSU), OCS.
(h) The completed autobiography, including those received from incarcerated persons who are not currently housed at DPU, will be presented by OCS staff to the DIP. The DIP is a committee comprised of DAI and OCS representatives who have a primary role to evaluate debrief cases and delegate case responsibilities based upon the complexities of each case. The DIP is comprised of four members including one SSU Senior Special Agent, one representative from DAI at the level of Correctional Administrator, and two OCS GIO Lieutenants. A quorum will exist with the SSU Senior Special Agent, DAI representative, and one OCS GIO Lieutenant.
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 5054 and 5068, Penal Code; Sandin v. Connor (1995) 515 U.S. 472; Madrid v. Gomez (N.D. Cal. 1995) 889 F.Supp. 1146; and Toussaint v. McCarthy (9th Cir. 1990) 926 F.2d 800.
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 5054 and 5068, Penal Code; Sandin v. Connor (1995) 515 U.S. 472; Madrid v. Gomez (N.D. Cal. 1995) 889 F.Supp. 1146; and Toussaint v. McCarthy (9th Cir. 1990) 926 F.2d 800.