California Code of Regulations
Title 15 - Crime Prevention and Corrections
Division 3 - Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole
Chapter 1 - Rules and Regulations of Adult Operations and Programs
Subchapter 4 - General Institution Regulations
Article 10 - Classification
Section 3375.1 - Incarcerated Person Placement

Universal Citation: 15 CA Code of Regs 3375.1

Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024

(a) Except as provided in section 3375.2, each incarcerated person shall be assigned to a facility with a security level which corresponds to the following placement score ranges:

(1) An incarcerated person with a placement score of 0 through 18 shall be placed in a Level I facility.

(2) An incarcerated person with a placement score of 19 through 35 shall be placed in a Level II facility.

(3) An incarcerated person with a placement score of 36 through 59 shall be placed in a Level III facility.

(4) An incarcerated person with a placement score of 60 and above shall be placed in a Level IV facility.
(A) Level IV facilities, as described in subsection 3377(d), include 180-design and 270-design housing. The department recognizes the security differences between a 180-design and 270-design facility. A 180-design facility provides more direct supervision and controlled movement.

(B) Determination of placement of an inmate into a 180-design or a 270-design facility shall be made by the following:
1. A Correctional Counselor assigned to the reception center during intake processing in accordance with section 3075.1.

2. The Departmental Review Board (DRB) for incarcerated persons released from Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) after serving an Administrative RHU Term, or upon referral in accordance with subsection 3376.1(d).

3. For all other determinations of placement not specified in subsections 3375.1(a)(4)(B)1. and 3375.1(a)(4)(B)2., a Classification Committee shall make the placement determination in accordance with section 3376.

(C) When making a determination for Level IV 180-design or 270-design facility incarcerated person placement, Correctional Counselors assigned to the reception center and any subsequent reviews conducted by a Classification Committee, or by the DRB for incarcerated persons who are released from RHU after serving an administrative RHU term, shall evaluate factors pursuant to subsection 3375(b). Additionally, the following factors shall be evaluated and considered:
1. Any Security Threat Group (STG) behavior.

2. A guilty finding or pending adjudication of a Rules Violation for act(s) of violence.

3. Departmental and institutional facility program or security needs.

(D) Determinations for placement of incarcerated persons into a 180-design or 270-design facility housing and the rationale and justification for these decisions shall be clearly articulated and documented pursuant to subsection 3375(g).

(b) An incarcerated person approved for transfer to a subfacility of a complex may be received and processed through a facility with a security level higher than that which is consistent with the incarcerated person's placement score. Such cases shall be transferred to the subfacility when bed space allows or, when appropriate, recommended for an administrative determinant which prohibits movement to the lower security level facility.

(1) The case shall be presented to a classification staff representative (CSR) for evaluation within 30 days of receipt at the facility unless the incarcerated person is on an approved waiting list maintained by the complex for placement of incarcerated persons at the approved subfacility.

(2) The transfer of an incarcerated person for more than 30 days from one subfacility of a complex to another subfacility which has a different security level, shall require a CSR endorsement. When the subfacility's security level is consistent with the inmate's placement score, the classification and parole representative (C&PR) or designated CC III acting as the CSR may endorse a case to the current institution, when appropriate for that subfacility.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 5058 and 5058.3, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 3020, 5054 and 5068, Penal Code; Wright v. Enomoto (1976) 462 F.Supp. 397; and Stoneham v. Rushen (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 302.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 5058 and 5058.3, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 3020, 5054 and 5068, Penal Code; Wright v. Enomoto (1976) 462 F.Supp. 397; and Stoneham v. Rushen (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 302.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. California may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.