California Code of Regulations
Title 15 - Crime Prevention and Corrections
Division 3 - Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole
Chapter 1 - Rules and Regulations of Adult Operations and Programs
Subchapter 2 - Incarcerated Person Resources
Article 4 - Mail
Section 3139 - Correspondence Between Incarcerated Persons, Supervised Persons, and Persons on Probation
Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
(a) Incarcerated persons shall obtain written authorization from the Warden/Regional Parole Administrator or their designee/assigned probation officer, person in charge of the County Jail and/or other State Correctional Systems, at a level not less than Captain or Parole Agent III, to correspond with any of the following:
(b) Incarcerated persons may initiate requests to correspond with the above by contacting their Correctional Counselor I (CCI). Supervised persons may initiate request by contacting their Parole Agent (PA).
Incarcerated persons may be allowed to correspond with the persons described in subsections 3139(a)(1) through (4) provided those persons meet the criteria of approval of no known STG affiliation, or involvement with a known terrorist group or racketeering enterprise.
(c) The CCI/PA shall interview the incarcerated/supervised person and/or review their C-file/Field File to obtain the information required to process an incarcerated person's Request for Correspondence Approval, CDC Form 1074 (Rev. 08/87). If an incarcerated person's request to correspond with another incarcerated/supervised person is denied, the CCI/PA shall advise the incarcerated person in writing.
(d) There shall be no limits set on the number of times approved incarcerated persons/supervised persons/persons on probation can correspond with one another unless revoked. The approval to correspond may be revoked due to disciplinary violations involving correspondence between the incarcerated/supervised persons or as a result of a classification action based on safety and security. Any such restriction, or revocation of approval, shall be communicated to incarcerated/supervised person(s), and to the warden(s)/parole administrator(s) of the institution/facility where the incarcerated/supervised person(s) are housed.
(e) Wardens at institutions where there are Restricted Housing Units (RHU) shall outline in their local procedure any further restrictions on correspondence due to safety and security concerns, limited to those specific housing units.
(f) The most restrictive a facility can be with respect to incarcerated person mail privileges is to limit correspondence between incarcerated persons to only the following:
A facility may not restrict mail privileges between an incarcerated person and any of the above three types of correspondents, unless the incarcerated person or the correspondent violates section 3006 or other CCR section.
(g) Approval to correspond shall remain in effect upon transfer to another departmental facility or another parole office.
(h) If an incarcerated person's transfer is based on case factors that create security concerns, such as, but not limited to, placement in a RHU, a reexamination by committee of all approved correspondence shall be conducted. The CCI shall review and recommend to committee whether to continue approval of the correspondence.
(i) If an institution/parole office receives mail from an unapproved incarcerated/supervised person correspondent, staff shall mark the envelope with "Not an Approved Correspondent" or equivalent language and return it to the sender.
(j) Incarcerated persons confined in departmental facilities may correspond with former incarcerated persons. Prior approval of the warden, superintendent, or person in charge of the correctional facility is required if the person was discharged from a facility within the past twelve months.
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 2601 and 4570, Penal Code; Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396; and Bell v. Wolffish, 99 S. Ct 1861.
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 2601 and 4570, Penal Code; Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396; and Bell v. Wolffish, 99 S. Ct 1861.