California Code of Regulations
Title 15 - Crime Prevention and Corrections
Division 3 - Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole
Chapter 1 - Rules and Regulations of Adult Operations and Programs
Subchapter 2 - Incarcerated Person Resources
Article 3 - Confidentiality and Privacy
Section 3122 - Incarcerated Person Law Library
Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
(a) Each facility shall provide legal materials through its law library to provide incarcerated persons with meaningful access to the courts.
(b) Incarcerated persons who have established court deadlines may apply for Priority Legal User (PLU) status to the prison law libraries. Incarcerated persons who are granted PLU status based on their application shall receive higher priority to prison law library resources than other incarcerated persons. All incarcerated persons who are not on PLU status are on General Legal User (GLU) status.
(c) Following initial classification and custody designation, condemned incarcerated persons shall automatically be granted PLU status until the automatic appeal of the conviction resulting in the sentence of death is exhausted or the incarcerated person is resentenced by a court to a term other than a death sentence. After exhaustion of the appeal or resentencing, section 3122(b) shall apply.
(d) Incarcerated persons may not in any way trade, transfer, or delegate their PLU status to other incarcerated persons. An incarcerated person who assists another incarcerated person in the preparation of legal documents, as described in section 3163, may not use the PLU status of the incarcerated person being assisted.
(e) An incarcerated person in a facility without a law library and requesting access to such resources shall be transferred to a facility with a law library of departmental choosing for the period of time needed to complete legal work.
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Section 5054, Penal Code; Gilmore v. Lynch, 319 F.Supp. 105 (N.D. Cal. 1970); Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986); Toussaint v. McCarthy, USDC N.D. Cal. No. C 73-1422 SAW, First Special Report of the Monitor, August 19, 1987; and Toussaint v. Rowland, USDC N.D. Cal. No. C 73-1422 SAW, Second Special Report of the Monitor, June 30, 1988: Zatko v. Rowland, 835 F.Supp. 1174 (N.D. Cal. 1993); and Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996).
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Section 5054, Penal Code; Gilmore v. Lynch, 319 F.Supp. 105 (N.D. Cal. 1970); Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986); Toussaint v. McCarthy, USDC N.D. Cal. No. C 73-1422 SAW, First Special Report of the Monitor, August 19, 1987; and Toussaint v. Rowland, USDC N.D. Cal. No. C 73-1422 SAW, Second Special Report of the Monitor, June 30, 1988: Zatko v. Rowland, 835 F.Supp. 1174 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996).