California Code of Regulations
Title 10 - Investment
Chapter 5 - Insurance Commissioner
Subchapter 3 - Insurers
Article 11.3 - Mutual Fund Investments in Variable Products
Section 2534.44 - Factors Determining the Existence of Hazardous Operations
Current through Register 2024 Notice Reg. No. 38, September 20, 2024
(a) When a variable annuity is utilized for retirement purposes, it shall be deemed that the prospective purchaser or contract holder holds the viewpoints and expectations of a reasonably prudent investor. The reasonably prudent investor generally does not participate in highly speculative investments, but does have expectations of a reasonable rate of return on his or her investment. Over the long term, such an investor expects to see moderate growth in his or her investment, over a time frame consistent with his or her retirement plans and taking into account his or her ability to make appropriate investment strategy changes as conditions and expectations change over time.
(b) However, the types of investments and degrees of investment risks appropriate for a reasonably prudent investor should be determined in light of the specific situation and characteristics of a given individual. Factors to be considered include the individual's age, wealth, other investments, dependents and financial obligations, long term financial prospects, lifestyle preferences, and tolerance of risk.
(c) In addition, brokers and agents selling variable products must comply with suitability standards. Such standards obligate the broker or agent to make certain that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a variable contract recommended to a customer is suitable for that customer. It is expected that due diligence will be given to the consideration of suitability by brokers and agents licensed to sell variable contracts in California.
(d) A variable annuity shall be considered to have hazardous operations when the variable annuity contract, viewed as a whole, and from the viewpoint of a reasonably prudent investor, is so risky an investment that it seriously jeopardizes the retirement expectations of the investor. If the investor's reasonable retirement expectations are in jeopardy of remaining substantially unfulfilled, the presumption could arise that the contact is hazardous.
(e) A variable life insurance contract shall be considered to have hazardous operations when the variable life insurance contract, viewed as a whole, and from the viewpoint of a reasonably prudent investor, contains risky investment options which the Commissioner deems excessive. In addition, such options jeopardize the realization of a fair, investment return, over a long period of time. Where the insurer informs the investor of a significant number of risks and uses an unusually large number of caveats in its explanation of the policy and its investment options, a presumption shall arise that the policy is hazardous.
(f) To the extent that an insurer's financial condition, or methods of operation, places the reasonable prudent investor in jeopardy of having his or her investment expectations substantially unfulfilled, that financial condition or business operation shall be presumed to involve hazardous operations.
(g) The presence of the following factors may raise a presumption that hazardous operations are involved in a variable product, fund or subaccount.
Concerning International and Global Portfolios or Subaccounts:
(h) Notwithstanding the above presumptive factors, the Commissioner reserves the right to review for possible hazardous conditions any variable contract if there is good cause to believe that the issuance of such contract may pose a hazard to California policyholders or the public. The Commissioner may also review any variable contract if there is good cause to find that any material risk is not being adequately disclosed.
1. New section filed 12-13-2006; operative 1-12-2007 (Register 2006, No. 50).
Note: Authority cited: Section 10506(h), Insurance Code. Reference: Section 10506(h), Insurance Code.