Arkansas Administrative Code
Agency 133 - Arkansas Science & Technology Authority
Rule 133.00.08-001 - Research & Development Tax Credit Program Rules; and Technology Development Program Rules
Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 9, September, 2024
1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
Act 759 of 1985 provides several tax credit incentives to Arkansas taxpayers to support research and educational program efforts at Arkansas colleges and universities. Act 1607 of 2007 amends the tax credit incentives.
Act 759 of 1985 allows the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority and the Arkansas Department of Higher Education to adopt certain rules specifically governing claims for tax credits for contributions to qualified research programs at qualified educational institutions.
These statutory provisions are codified as Arkansas Code sections 26-51-1101 through 26-51-1105.
1.1 PROGRAM NAME
These rules will govern the Arkansas Department of Higher Education and the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority's Research & Development Tax Credit Program.
1.2 PURPOSE
The purpose of the Research & Development Tax Credit Program is to provide incentive to Arkansas industry to participate in the Science & Technology Authority's Applied Research Grant Program, Basic Research Grant Program or similar research programs.
1.3 AUTHORIZATION
The Research & Development Tax Credit Program for qualified research programs is authorized by Sections 2 and 3 of Act 759 of 1985, the same being Arkansas Code section 11-51-1102. The power to establish rules governing this program is granted by Section 6 of Act 759 of 1985, the same being Arkansas Code section 26-51-1105.
2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Research & Development Tax Credit Program allows credits against a taxpayer's Arkansas state income tax for making certain qualified research expenditures, as well as certain donations or sales below cost of new machinery and equipment to a qualified research program.
2.1 LIMITS ON CREDIT
2.2 DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of the Authority's Research and Development Tax Credit Program, the following words and phrases have the following definitions.
"Cost" shall mean, in the case of a donation or sale below cost by a manufacturer of machinery or equipment, the enhanced value of the materials used to produce the machinery or equipment, which shall be deemed to be the lowest price at which the manufacturer sells the machinery or equipment.
3.0 ELIGIBILITY
Industries and individuals that qualify for a Research & Development Tax Credit under this program will be those which satisfy the following criteria:
3.1 Expenditures or donations and sales below cost of machinery and equipment must be made to a qualified educational institution for a qualified research program as defined by these rules.
3.2 The taxpayer must provide the following for each piece of machinery or equipment donated or sold below cost:
3.3 In order to claim a tax credit for qualified research expenditures, the taxpayer must provide a statement from the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority that the Arkansas Department of Higher Education and the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority have approved the expenditure as part of a qualified research program.
4.0 APPLICATION PROCESS
Application for an Arkansas Income Tax Credit under this program shall be submitted to the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority. The following three documents must be submitted as part of this application:
4.1 An application form provided by the Authority must be completed with the following information included:
4.2 A copy of the statement from the receiving educational institution (as described in Section 3.2.1). A copy of the check or receipt for the donation must be included with this statement.
4.3 A copy of the proposal for the research program receiving the donation.
5.0 EVALUATION
Proposals for tax credit treatment for expenditures, donations, or sales below cost to qualified research programs will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria.
5.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
5.2 TAX CREDITS GRANTED
Final decisions on granting tax credits will be made by the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority.
6.0 NOTIFICATION LETTER
The Board shall notify all taxpayers applying for tax credit treatment under this program of its final decision by letter.
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RULES
1.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Arkansas Science & Technology Authority supports cash awards for technology development. The goal of the Technology Development Program is to assist in commercializing new technology-based products and processes through technology development activities. This means that applications for award must have a well-defined project plan showing progression from idea, to prototype, to production.
Because technology development occurs in more or less sequential steps along the technology development spectrum, the program is intentionally flexible and broad in scope. The program is intended to provide "bridge" financing between other programs of the Authority, but is not intended to duplicate any existing program. Therefore, proposed projects that would, in the opinion of the Authority, qualify for other programs of the Authority will not be considered for support under the Technology Development Program.
Both solicited and unsolicited applications will be accepted when officially submitted by a qualified applicant.
2.1 TYPE OF AWARD
The Board of Directors awards grants to qualified applicants for technology development projects.
The total maximum award for the development of a given technology is $100,000.
No match is required for an award under the Technology Development Program. However, the Authority is authorized to collect royalties from sales generated from the developed technology. The execution of a royalty agreement will be a condition for the disbursement of funds from the Authority to the qualified applicant. The royalty agreement will be required in lieu of any other matching resources.
In addition, the Authority is required, by statute, to impose a reasonable, nonrefundable fee for the evaluation of the technological and economic potential of emerging technologies from nonpublic sources of innovation.
2.2 DEFINITIONS
The laboratory/workshop stage of development, usually before a working prototype is developed, during which evaluation and protection of the idea are paramount and a market application is identified;
The workshop/early startup stage of development during which the production and testing of a working prototype are paramount; and
The late startup/scaleup stage of development during which limited production and market testing of products are paramount.
3.0 ELIGIBILITY
Eligible applications will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria. It is the intention of the Authority that eligibility be broadly defined, and that criteria be interpreted liberally so as to include applications to the greatest extent possible.
3.1 CRITERIA
3.2 CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No Director, officer or employee of the Authority for purpose of personal gain, shall have or attempt to have, directly or indirectly, any interest in any contract or agreement of the Authority in connection with the Technology Development Program.
It shall not be a conflict of interest for the Authority to permit any college or university with which a Director of the Authority is affiliated to participate in any program of the Authority provided that such Director shall promptly disclose the nature of the affiliation to the Board of Directors.
4.0 APPLICATION PROCESS
Application for a technology development award shall be submitted in a format prescribed by the Authority.
4.1 APPLICATION FORMAT
5.0 EVALUATION
Projects will be evaluated by the Authority which may request the assistance of appropriate representatives from academia, private industry, and/or the public sector. The evaluation will indicate the level of potential of the project based on the following factors.
5.1 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
Is there a sufficient description of the proposed product, process, or innovation provided for a sound technical evaluation? Is the invention not based upon principles that contradict the laws of science? Is there previous research or development efforts that substantiate the technical feasibility? Does it require redesign, rebuilding, and/or further testing? How is it technically innovative?
5.2 PRODUCTION FEASIBILITY
Can it be produced economically and in sufficient quantities using existing production technology? Can it be produced safely meeting legal, liability, product infringement, and pollution guidelines? How many sources are willing to produce it?
5.3 COMMERCIAL FEASIBILITY
What specific customer needs does the product satisfy? Will the market support the product? Who is the competition? Does the product, process, or innovation provide a competitive edge? Is there adequate financial support? Does the budget support the implementation plan? Is the commercialization plan valid? Can key personnel support the project?
5.4 ECONOMIC POTENTIAL
Will the product impact Arkansas economy? Does it have job creation potential? Does it add value to existing products? Can it be exported?
5.5 PATENTABILITY
Has a patent been applied for? Are there similar patents granted? Can the concept be protected by a patent?
6.0 INVESTMENT AWARD
Funds will be disbursed by the Authority only after the Board of Directors adopts a resolution authorizing an award to the applicant.
7.0 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
All information submitted in proposals is subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Therefore, if proprietary information is submitted by the applicant, it should be clearly marked as "confidential proprietary information." The Authority assumes no liability for disclosure or use of unmarked information, and may use or disclose such information for any purpose. Arbitrary and unwarranted use of this restriction by applicants is discouraged.