Arkansas Administrative Code
Agency 016 - DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Division 20 - Division of County Operations
Rule 016.20.10-003 - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Weatherization Assistance Program State Plan 2009-2012

Universal Citation: AR Admin Rules 016.20.10-003

Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 9, September, 2024

PART I ANNUAL FILE OVERVIEW

A. Background

Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of County Operations, Office of Community Services (DHS) will administer the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program in compliance with public law 111-5. DHS will administer the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009-2012 Weatherization Program, in compliance with the applicable law, including regulations contained in 10 CFR Part 440 (issued February 1, 2002), and other procedures applicable to this regulation as the United States Department of Energy may prescribe for the administration of financial assistance. The plan is for a three-year period, fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2012.

DHS will monitor subgrantee performance in an effort to increase production of weatherized units. Quarterly production reports will be submitted to DOE on time.

All units weatherized using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds from DOE will comply with all requirements for a completed unit and will be reported to DOE.

The purpose of the Weatherization Assistance program is to increase energy efficiency of dwellings owned or occupied by low-income persons, reduce their total residential expenditures, and improve their health and safety.

The priority population for the Weatherization Assistance Program is persons who are particularly vulnerable such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, families with children, high residential energy users, and households with high energy burden. The ARRA weatherization program was enacted to preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery. The only health and safety measures installed with ARRA funds will be ―energy-related‖ health and safety measures. The state ensures that it will comply with the DOE prudent use‖ policy for health and safety funds.

B. General Funding

The federally appropriated ARRA funds are included in the plan for DOE approval. The DOE allocation is $48,114,415.

C. Adjusted Average

The adjusted average of $6,500 will be in use for the program.

D. Funds for Administrative Purposes

The state will use less than 5% for administration; the balance up to the 5% allowable will be passed to subgrantees. Subgrantees will receive 5% for administration since all will be allocated more than $350,000 for the program period.

E. Leveraged Resources

The local agencies will use DOE resources to leverage with the Arkansas Weatherization Program.

F. Training and Technical Assistance

The state will use the ARRA T/TA funds to provide training and technical assistance to subgrantees. As a part of its technical assistance plan the state will develop a certification program for subgrantees. As a part of this process, the state proposes to develop a model weatherization program by restructuring the program at Pine Bluff Jefferson County Economic Opportunity Commission, Inc. The new program model developed for PBJCEOC will innerface with the Weatherization Training Center as a pathway to certification of all subgrantee staff in the state.

G. Application Package

* The state will comply with Fed Connect and other requirements as prescribed by DOE.

* The Master file has been eliminated from the plan. The state, however, will keep relevant information on file.

* The state does not use funds for Low-Cost/No-Cost. The state will use the MHEA and NEAT energy audits. These plans are kept on file but are not included in this plan.

* The plan is for a three-year period, fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2012.

* The source of labor is no longer required to be reported.

* The Congressional Districts served by the various subgrantees are included in this plan. However, a breakdown of the percentage of funds going to the various districts is no longer required.

* The production, as required by DOE, is included in this plan. There are no downsizing efforts this program period.

* The potential energy savings are included in this plan.

* The Training and Technical Assistance Plan and the Monitoring Plan are combined into one plan. A house may be re-weatherized if it was previously weatherized prior to September 30, 1994.

* The annual application includes ARRA DOE funds. All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors on projects funded directly by or assisted in whole or in part by and through the Federal Government pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111.5, will be paid, wages at rates not less than those prevailing on projects of a character similar in locality as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 title 40, United States Code.

* Subgrantees use DOE funds for leveraging purposes with the Arkansas Weatherization Program. Electric base load measures are included in the NEAT/MHEA Audits.

* A list of PAC members is included in this plan.

* A transcript is included in this plan. The state requires subgrantees and contractors to maintain adequate liability insurance and pollution occurrence insurance.

H. Public Hearing

The state conducted a public hearing January 29, 2010 in compliance with ARRA DOE requirements. During the Public Hearing, information pertaining to the operation of the WAP was shared including that subgrantees are selected in compliance with 10 CFR 440.14 and 10 CFR 440.15. Additionally, information was shared as to the what action the state would take if production falls substantially below the projection rate for a subgrantee, as prescribed by the Office of Community Services, the Office of Community Services reserved the right to transfer all or a part of the responsibility for administration of the program from one subgrantee to another. The Pine Bluff Economic Opportunity Commission, Inc. (PBJCEOC) encountered problems during the ramp up phase of the ARRA program and subsequently suffered the loss of its Executive Director and Weatherization Director. Interim leadership attempted to operate the program; however, it became obvious that a total restructuring of the program would be necessary. In order to meet the production goals established by DOE for ARRA, the state made the decision to transfer both the regular DOE and ARRA program to the Central Arkansas

Development Council (CADC). Simultaneously the state will restructure the program at PBJCEOC with the goal of transferring the regular DOE program back March 31, 2011. Due to the limited time remaining under the ARRA program the state decided that CADC will retain the ARRA program through completion March 31, 2012.

The low Income Weatherization Assistance Program staff of the Arkansas Department of Human Services/Office of Community Services conducted a Public Hearing on July 30, 2010 at the Willie Hinton Neighborhood Resource Center in Little Rock, Arkansas. The Public Hearing provided the public with an opportunity to comment on the proposed use and distribution of Weatherization Assistance Program funds for FY 2010-2011.

July 30, 2010 - Little Rock, Arkansas

Public Hearing was conducted by Mark Whitmer, Chairperson of the Arkansas Weatherization Policy Advisory Council.

There were (34) thirty-four people in attendance at the Public Hearing. Each person was provided with a copy of the State Plan Summary of Changes. Upon completion of the oral presentation by Doris Wright, Program Manager, from the Office of Community Services, those attending were invited to ask questions and make comments.

There were two comments from the floor regarding the summary of changes, the first being the wording of the transfer of Pine Bluff Jefferson County Economic Opportunity Commission, Inc. (PBJCEOC) program to Central Arkansas Development Council, Inc. (CADC).

The second comment pertained to the Implementation of the Weatherization Assistance Program Subgrantee Operations Manual. The question raised pertained to the rating scale of the revised ARRA Monitoring Plan had been worked out and if the implementation of the Operations Manual was in progress and not in final revision.

The public hearing notice was published in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for three consecutive days, beginning July 23, 2010. The State Plan was also made available for public inspection and comment from July 31, 2010 - August 31, 2010. Those who wished to comment could submit written comments through their local weatherization provider, or submit comments directly to the Office of Community Services.

I. Training and Technical Assistance Plan

DHS has developed two training centers to address the training needs of the WAP network. All subgrantee staff engaged in weatherization work will be required to obtain certification through one of the state training centers by March 31, 2012 in order to continue working in the Weatherization Assistance Program. Subgrantees using contractors will be required to use only WAP Certified contractors. No staff will be grandfathered‖ into certification. Once all program staff is certified, additional training needs will be assessed through a review of monitoring reports and agency requests for training. The state has a full time Weatherization Training Coordinator who assesses training needs and will coordinate training on a continuous basis. The training centers will have a curriculum based upon the Weatherization Core Competencies. Additionally, training will be designed for each staff role, energy auditor, inspector, crew chief, weatherization technician.

In addition to training at state training centers, the Weatherization Directors will be required to attend the state annual training conference and fall skills training. No certification is required prior to hire date; however, new hires must obtain certification within six months from the date of hire.

J. Client Education

The state provides client information and material at the time of weatherization.

K. Program Evaluation

DOE published a national evaluation of weatherization in 1993. Implementation of the new national evaluation has been suspended by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). EERE has commissioned a strategic evaluation of the program to access a variety of program structures and options for program development.

L. Grantee Program Oversight

The state will monitor each subgrantee at least two times annually and monitor at least 10% of the units and files.

M. Energy Audit Criteria

The state will use the MHEA and the NEAT energy audits.

N. Health and Safety

The Health and Safety Plan is included in the Master File and is not included in this Annual File. The plan has been amended to include DOE requirements regarding mold and mildew.

O. Vehicle Purchases

The state will allow vehicle purchases with an acquisition price of $5,000 or more to be spread over the entire life of the vehicle and the number of homes served during that period.

P. Policy Advisory Council

The state will maintain the Policy Advisory Council instead of using a State Council.

Q. Reporting Requirements

The state will comply with the financial and program reporting requirements of ARRA DOE.

R. Reporting DOE Completed Units

The state will report all units that contain ARRA DOE funds. All units weatherized with DOE funds will comply with the DOE definition of a completed unit.

S. Financial Audits

Subgrantees may budget financial audit cost as a separate budget category.

T. Newly Legalized Aliens

The Immigration and Nationality Act made certain aliens legalized under the Immigration and Control Act of 1986 temporarily ineligible for weatherization assistance. The provisions of this law have expired. The only potential implications are those cases that were open while this law was in effect. Local agencies that are charitable and nonprofit are exempt from implementing new status verification requirements for nonqualified aliens. However, local government agencies must conduct status verification when serving nonqualified aliens.

U. Multi-Family Eligibility

A multifamily building may be weatherized if two-thirds of the units are eligible. Certain multifamily buildings with significant energy efficiency improvements or leverage resources require only one-half of the units to be eligible. A building containing two or four units may be weatherized if one-half of the units are eligible. A nonqualified alien could be the recipient of weatherization services as part of the two-thirds or one-half rule.

V. Recovered Materials

Each subgrantee has a policy and procedure for using insulation composed of the highest percentage of recovered materials practical.

W. Rental Requirements

There are no changes in rental procedures.

X. Income Eligibility

The state will use 200 percent of poverty as the income eligibility level.

Y. Fuel Switching

DOE does not permit the general practice of fuel switching when replacing furnaces and appliances.

Z. Protection of Whistleblowers

Any employee of any non-Federal employer receiving covered funds under the Recovery Act may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing information the employee believes is evidence of: gross management of an agency contract or grant relating to covered funds; a gross waste of covered funds, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety related to the implementation or use of covered funds; an abuse of authority related to the implementation or use of covered funds; or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant, awarded or issued relating to recovered funds.

AA. False Claims Act

The state and subgrantees will promptly refer to the DOE or other appropriate Inspector General any credible evidence that a principle, employee, agency, contractor, subcontractor or other person has submitted a false claim under the False Claims Act or has committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, gratuity or similar misconduct involving those funds.

BB. Information in Support of Recovery Act Reporting

The state or subgrantees may be required to submit backup documentation for expenditures of funds under the Recovery Act including such items as timecards and invoices. The state or subgrantees shall provide copies of backup documentation at the request of the Contracting Officer or designee.

CC. Access to Records

Any representative of an appropriate inspector general appointed under section 3 or 8G of the Inspector General Act of 1988 (5 U.S.C. App.) or of the Comptroller General is authorized to (1) examine any records of the state, any of its contractors or subgrantees, or any State or local agency administering such contract that pertain to, and involve transactions in relation to, the subcontract, grant, or subgrant; and (2) interview any officer or employee of the contractor, grantee, or subgrantee, or agency regarding such transactions.

GRANT APPLICATION STANDARD FORM 424

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

BUDGET

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

2009-2012 DOE ARRA ALLOCATIONS

AGENCY

UNITS

PS & M

ADMINISTRATION

TOTAL

BRAD

178

$ 1,155,521

$ 76,780

$ 1,232,301

CADC

1,053

6,843,553

454,727

7,298,280

CAPCA

263

1,706,580

113,396

1,819,976

CRDC

654

4,247,206

282,210

4,529,416

C-SCDC

233

1,511,754

100,451

1,612,205

CSO

121

785,240

52,177

837,417

MCAEOC

119

769,962

51,161

821,123

M-DCS

257

1,667,245

110,759

1,778,004

NADC

289

1,873,794

124,483

1,998,277

OHC

455

2,951,421

196,111

3,147,532

OOI

354

2,299,565

152,797

2,452,362

PB-JCEOC

350

2,270,817

150,887

2,421,704

SEACAC

301

1,950,863

129,628

2,080,491

SWADC

407

2,642,547

175,587

2,818,134

UHDC

544

3,530,178

234,567

3,764,745

TOTAL

5,578

36,206,246

2,405,721

38,611,967

Client Education $100,000

*This formula incorporates $6,500 maximum average.

2009-2012 ARRA T&TA ALLOCATIONS

AGENCY

TOTAL FUNDING

BRAD

$21,022

CADC

124,502

CAPCA

31,048

CRDC

77,268

CSCDC

27,503

CSO

14,286

MCAEOC

14,008

MDCS

30,332

NADC

34,083

OHC

53,694

001

41,835

PBJCEOC

41,312

SEACAC

35,492

SWADC

48,075

UHDC

64,223

TOTAL

$658,683

ALLOCATION FORMULA

AGENCY

HDD+CDD

PERCENT HDD+CDD

POVERTY%

AVERAGE

HDD+CDD

AND POVERTY

BRAD

16168

4.2122

2.1709

3.1915

CADC

59459

15.4906

22.3127

18.9016

CAPCA

15365

4.003

5.4241

4.7135

CRDC

41971

10.9345

12.5268

11.7306

CSCDC

10699

2.7873

5.5636

4.1754

CSO

4934

1.2849

3.0514

2.1688

MCAEOC

5368

1.3997

2.854

2.1266

MDCS

20438

5.3246

3.885

4.6048

NADC

27098

7.0597

3.291

5.1753

OHC

21753

5.6672

10.6363

8.1517

001

32274

8.4082

4.2944

6.3513

PBJCEOC

24872

6.4798

6.064

6.2719

SEACAC

23727

6.1815

4.5949

5.3882

SWADC

33904

8.8329

5.7643

7.2986

UHDC

45807

11.9339

7.5666

9.7502

TOTAL

383837

100

100

100

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

(10/01)

BUDGET EXPLANATION FOR FORMULA GRANTS

Provide detailed information to support each Cost Category using this form. Cost breakdown estimates may be entered on this form or attach a breakdown of costs using your own format as Attachment A.

1. PERSONNEL - Prime Applicant only (all other participant costs must be listed on 6. below and form DOE F 4600.4, Section B. Line 6.f. Contracts and Sub Grants.

a. Identify, by title, each position to be supported under the proposed award. Grants Analyst (two positions)

b. Briefly specify the duties of professionals to be compensated under this project.

Position

__________________________

Description of Duties of Professionals

____________________________________________________

WAP Program Manager

Performs DOE management functions, supervises WAP program staff, formulates program policy, develops and tracks budgets, develops program policy, provides policy guidance and provides oversight of WAP program.

Administrative Specialist I

Provides administrative support for the WAP unit and all related functions; and conducts review of Davis-Bacon Act submissions by subgrantees.

Administrative Specialist II

Prepares purchase orders, process invoices, monitors contract expenditures.

Training Coordinator

Provides training and technical assistance oversees IT applications for subgrantees; provides oversight for all training and technical assistance activities.

Program Monitor

Provides training and technical assistance monitors all aspects of subgrantee operations. Each will handle a caseload of 4 agencies per year; monitor 25% of completed units and conduct diagnostic testing on at least 10% of the units monitored. Conducts financial management reviews in conjunction with onsite visits.

Program Monitor

Provides training and technical assistance and monitors all aspects of subgrantee operations. Each will handle a caseload of 4 agencies per year; monitor 25% of completed units and conduct diagnostic testing on at least 10% of the

units monitored. Conducts financial management reviews in conjunction with onsite visits.

Program Monitor

Provides training and technical assistance and monitors all aspects of subgrantee operations. Each will handle a caseload of 4 agencies per year; monitor 25% of completed units and conduct diagnostic testing on at least 10% of the units monitored. Conducts financial management reviews in conjunction with onsite visits.

Program Monitor

Provides training and technical assistance and monitors all aspects of subgrantee operations. Each will handle a caseload of 4 agencies per year; monitor 25% of completed units and conduct diagnostic testing on at least 10% of the units monitored. Conducts financial management reviews in conjunction with onsite visits.

Grants Analyst

Provides training and technical assistance; conducts research and analysis; develops grant applications; conducts procurement training; monitors contract expenditures, process invoices; prepares and submits production reports.

Grants Analyst

Provides training and technical assistance; prepares and submits reports to DOE in PAGE System; coordinates Davis-Bacon Act compliance; process invoices, monitor contract expenditures.

Direct Personnel Compensation:

Position

Salary/Rate __________________

Time ____________

Direct Pay ________________

WAP Program Manager

$153,556

50%

$76,778

Administrative Specialist I

$44,200

100%

$44,200

Administrative Specialist II

$21,827

100%

$21,827

Training Coordinator

$195,544

50%

$97,772

Program Monitor

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Program Monitor

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Program Monitor

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Program Monitor

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Grants Analyst

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Grants Analyst

$57,241

100%

$57,241

Direct Pay Total

$447,712

2. F RINGE BENEFITS.-

a. Are the fringe cost rates approved by a Federal agency? If so, identify the agency and date of latest rate agreement or audit below, and include a copy of the rate agreement.

N/A

b. If above does not apply, indicate the basis for computation of rates, including the types of benefits to be provided, the rate(s) used, and the cost base for each rate. You may provide the information below or provide the calculations as an attachment.

FICA match 7.650%; Retirement 12.46%; Unemployment Tax .049%; Workers Comp. 082%; Insurance $390 per employee x 12 (months).

Position

Direct Pay

Rate

Benefits

WAP Program Manager

$76,778

34.00%

$25,459

Administrative Specialist I

$44,200

34.00%

$6,807

Administrative Specialist II

$21,827

34.00%

$7,421

Training Coordinator

$97,772

34.00%

$23,805

Program Monitor

$57,241

34.00%

$19,462

Program Monitor

$57,241

34.00%

$19,462

Program Monitor

$57,241

34.00%

$19,462

Program Monitor

$57,241

34.00%

$19,462

Grants Analyst

$57,241

34.00%

$19,462

Grants Analyst

$57,241

34.00% Direct Pay Total

$19,462 $141,340

3. Travel - Identify total foreign and domestic travel as separate items.

a. Purpose of Travel Nun

iber of Trips

Cost of trips

Total

Sub grantee Monitoring visits

1020

$ 150.00

$153,000.00

Subgrantee T&TA Visits

34

$ 245.00

$ 8,330.00

Lead Based Paint Training

6

$2,000.00

$12,000.00

DOE National Training Conference

8

$2,150.00

$17,200.00

NASCSP Fall and Winter Meeting/Training

1

$2,150.00

$ 2,150.00

Travel Total

$192,680.00

b. Specify the basis for computation of travel expenses (e.g., current airline ticket quotes, past trips of a similar nature, federal government or organization travel policy, etc.).

Past trips of a similar nature.

4. EQUIMENT - as defined in 10 CFR 600.202. Definitions can be found at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/10cfr600_00.html

a. Provide the basis for the materials and supplies cost estimates (e.g., vendor quotes, prior purchases of similar or like items, etc.).

Prior purchases ..............................................

$1,800 x 4 = $7,200

Prior purchases....................................

$2,625 x5 = 13,125

Vendor Quote.....................................

.$22,819x2 = $45,638

Vendor quote ..................................................

$675 x 4 = $2,700

Vendor quote ..................................................

$950 x 5 = $4,750

Vendor quote ..................................................

$11,000 x 2 = $22,000

Vendor quote ..................................................

$5,500 x 2 = $11,000

Vendor quotes & prior purchases ..................

$71,087

Total equipment

$177,500

a. Briefly justify the need for items of material to be purchased.

Weatherization staff needs new computers. (Admin.)

Weatherization staff needs digital cameras. (Admin.)

Weatherization staff needs carbon monoxide detectors. (Admin.)

Weatherization staff needs infrared cameras (Admin). Weatherization staff needs Niton analyzer. (Admin.)

Weatherization staff needs blower doors. (Admin)

Additional weatherization equipment purchases. (Admin.)

Additional vehicles for staff. (T&TA)

5. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES - as defined in 10 CFR 600.202. Definitions at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/10cfr600_00.html.

a. Provide the basis for the materials and supplies cost estimates (e.g., vendor quotes, prior purchases of similar or like items, etc.).

b. Briefly justify the need for items of material to be purchased. Admin - $841,160 Central Office operating expenses.

6. CONTRACTS AND SUBGRANTS - All other participant costs including subcontractor, sub-grants, and consultants.

Provide the information below for new proposed sub recipients and subcontractors. For ongoing subcontractors and sub recipients, if this information is provided elsewhere in the application, it does not have to be restated here, but please indicate the document and page numbers where it can be found.

Name of Proposed Sub

Total Cost

Basis of Cost*

Subgrantee Listing

$ 39,370,650

Install Energy Conservation measures Allocation formula

Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers Grant

$2,213,500

Two subgrant agencies have been awarded these funds.

Incentive Pool

Additional funds for installation of energy conservation measures based upon production goals.

Training Centers (2)

$ 4,052,017

Price quote.

Total Contracts and Subgrants

$46,966,167

* For example-Competitive, Historical, Quote, Catalog

7. OTHER DIRECT COSTS - Include all direct costs not included in above categories.

a. Provide the basis for the cost estimates (e.g., vendor quotes, prior purchases of similar or like items, etc.).

Admin - Costs are for telephone service charge, credit card purchases and subscriptions, publications and books and for audit costs - $952,274.

Evaluation cost - T & TA funds will be used to help gather the information that will be reuested for the National Evaluation of the Weatherization Assistance Program - $25,000.

b. Briefly justify the need for items to be purchased.

These expenses are based on prior year experience in the regular Weatherization Assistance Program and projected program requirements based upon DOE guidance.

8. INDIRECT COSTS -

a. Are the indirect cost rates approved by a Federal Agency? If so, identify the agency and date of latest rate agreement or audit below, and include a copy of the rate agreement.

A cost allocation plan is used and it is updated annually.

$1,302,744

Community Services Administration 420509 HG1X00XX

Code

Program

Quarter

Ending

06/30/10

Quarter

Ending

09/30/10

Quarter

Ending

12/31/10

Quarter

Ending

03/31/11

FK

Lead Based Paint

F5

HEAP

27.27

27.27

33.34

33.33

F8

Weatherization

36.36

36.37

33.33

33.33

F9

CSBG

36.37

36.36

33.33

33.34

TOTAL

100

100

100

100

b. If "a" above does not apply, indicate the basis for computation of rates, including the types of benefits to be provided, the rate(s) used, and the cost base for each rate. You may provide the information below or provide the calculations as an attachment.

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ARKANSAS WEATHERIZATION SUBGRANTEES

Agency

Contact Information

Counties Served

BRAD

Mr. Jim Jansen, Executive Director Black River Area Development Corp. 1403 Hospital Drive Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 Telephone: (870) 892-5219 FAX: (870) 892-0707 E-mail: jjansen@bradcorp.org

Mr. Kris Rose, Weatherization Director (870) 892-4547 Ext. 234 krose@bradcorp.org

Clay

Lawrence

Randolph

CADC

Mr. Larry Cogburn, Executive Director

Calhoun

Central Arkansas Development Council

Clark

722 Gaunt Street \

Columbia

Post Office Box 580

Dallas

Benton, Arkansas 72018

Hot Spring

Telephone: (501) 315-1121

Lonoke

FAX: (501) 778-9120

Montgomery

E-mail: lcogburn@cadc.cc

Ouachita

Also E-mail: lblair@cadc.cc

Pike Pulaski

Ms. Beverly Palmer, Weatherization Coordinator

Saline

E-mail: bpalmer@cadc.cc

Union Cleveland

Financial: Ms. Debbie Kirk, Finance Support

Arkansas

Telephone: (501) 315-1122

Lincoln

E-Mail: dkirk@cadc.cc

Grant Jefferson

CAPCA

Ms. Phyliss Fry, Executive Director

Cleburne

Community Action Program for Central Arkansas, Inc. 707 Robins

Faulkner

Street, Suite 118

Conway, Arkansas 72034

Telephone: (501) 329-3891 Ext. 127

FAX: (501) 329-8642

E-mail: phyliss@capcainc.org

White

Ms. Amy Bryant, Weatherization Director Telephone: (501) 329-3891 Ext. 135 E-mail: amy.bryant@capcainc.org

Agency

Contact Information

Counties Served

CRDC

Mr. Loyd Price Executive Dir.

Craighead

Crowley's Ridge Development Council

Crittenden

2401 Fox Meadow Lane

Cross

Post Office Box 16720

Greene

Jonesboro, Arkansas 72403-1497

Jackson

Telephone: (870) 802-7100

Poinsett

FAX: (870) 935-0291

St. Francis

E-mail: lprice@crdcnea.com

Mr. Kenny Gunn, Weatherization Director Telephone: (870) 802-7100 ext. 120 E-mail: kennygunn@crdcnea.com

Woodruff

C-SCDC

Mr. Mark Whitmer, Executive Director

Crawford

Crawford-Sebastian Community Development Council, Inc.

4831 Armour Street

Post Office Box 4069

Fort Smith, Arkansas 72914

Telephone: (479) 785-2303

FAX: (479) 785-2341

E-mail: mwhitmer@cscdccaa.org

Ms. Debbie Biggs, Weatherization Director Telephone: (479) 785-2303 Ext. 111 E-Mail: debbiebiggs@cscdccaa.org

Financial: Ms. Sally Fisher Telephone: (479) 785-2303 Ext. 104 E-mail: sfisher@cscdccaa.org

Sebastian

CSO

Mr. Leon Massey, Executive Director

Community Services Office, Inc.

600 West Grand

Post Office Box 1175

Hot Springs, Arkansas 71901

Telephone: (501) 624-5724

FAX: (501) 624-1645

E-mail: lemass@csohs.org

Joe Bob Garner, Weatherization Director

Garland

MCAEOC

Mr. Sam Scruggs, Executive Director

Mississippi

Mississippi County, Arkansas Economic

Opportunity Commission, Inc.

1400 North Division

Post Office Drawer 1289

Blytheville, Arkansas 72316-1289

Telephone: (870) 776-1054

FAX: (870) 776-1875 or 776-1567

E-mail: Sam.Scruggs@sbcglobal.net

Clark Phillips, Weatherization Director

M-DCS

Ms. Margaret Staub, Executive Director

Lee

Mid-Delta Community Services, Inc.

Monroe

Post Office Box 745

Phillips

Helena, Arkansas 72342

Prairie

Telephone: (870) 338-6406

FAX: (870) 338-3629

E-mail: mmstaub@cox-internet.com

Mr. Jacob Bright, Weatherization Director

610 S. Biscoe

P.O. Box 745

Helena, Arkansas 72342

Telephone: (870) 295-3697

FAX: (870) 295-2036

E-mail: j.bright@suddenlinkmail.com

Financial: Ms. Linda Ford

E-mail: lsford@suddenlinkmail.com

NADC

Mr. Larry Goodwin, Executive Director

Fulton

Northcentral Arkansas Development Council, Inc.

Independence

550 9th Street

Izard

Post Office Box 3349

Sharp

Batesville, Arkansas 72503

Stone

Telephone: (870) 793-5765

FAX: (870) 793-2167

E-mail: nadc_larry@yahoo.com

Mr. Tim Reeves, Weatherization Director

Telephone: (870) 793-5765 Ext. 231

E-mail: (Does not use e-mail; use Larry Goodwin's)

Financial: Ms. Nancy Phillips, Finance Officer

E-mail: nadc_nancy@yahoo.com

Ms. Sharon Miller, Assistant

E-mail: nadc_sharon@yahoo.com

OHC

Mr. Al West, Executive Director

Benton

Office of Human Concern, Inc.

Carroll

506 East Spruce Street

Madison

Post Office Box 778 (mail address only)

Washington

Rogers, Arkansas 72757

Telephone: (479) 636-7301

FAX: (479) 636-7312

E-mail: alwest@eohc.org

Jerrie Dutton, Weatherization Director

E-ail: jdutton@e hc.org

OOI

Mr. Roger Ratchford, Executive Director

Baxter

Ozark Opportunities, Inc.

Boone

701 East Prospect 72601

Marion

Post Office Box 1400

Newton

Harrison, Arkansas 72601

Searcy

Telephone: (870) 741-9406

Van Buren

FAX: (870) 741-0924

E-mail: ooi@alltel.net

Mr. Peter Thomas, Weatherization Supervisor

Telephone: (870) 448-2010

FAX: (870) 448-2018

PB-JCEOC

Mr. Charles Cunningham, Interim Executive Director

Arkansas*

Pine Bluff-Jefferson County Economic Opportunities Commission, Inc.

Cleveland*

Post Office Box 7228 (Mail Address Only)

Jefferson*

817 Cherry Street

Lincoln*

Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603

Grant*

Telephone: (870) 536-0046

FAX: (870) 535-7558

*Transferred to CADC

E-mail: pbjceoc@sbcglobal.net

SEACAC

Mr. Larry Henderson, Executive Director

Ashley

Southeast Arkansas Community Action Corporation

Bradley

1208 Myrtle

Chicot

Post Office Box 312

Desha

Warren, Arkansas 71671

Drew

Telephone: (870) 226-2668

FAX: (870) 226-5637

E-mail: larry.henderson@seacac.com

Ms. Betty Forrest, Weatherization Director

E:mail: betty.forrest@seacac.com

SWADC

Mr. Ricky Pondexter, Executive Director

Hempstead

Southwest Arkansas Development Council, Inc.

Howard

3902 Sanderson Lane

Lafayette

Texarkana, Arkansas 71854

Little River

Telephone: (870) 773-5504

Miller

FAX: (870) 772-2974

Nevada

E-mail: swadc@cableone.net

Sevier

Mr. Taft Wilson, Weatherization Director

Telephone: (870) 774-1664 Ext. 103

E-mail: taftwilson@cableone.net

Mr. Buddy Foster

E-mail: buddyfoster@cableone.net

Financial: Mr. Ricky Pondexter (Executive Director)

E-mail: rpondexter@cableone.net

UHDC

Ms. Patricia Atkinson, Executive Director

Conway

Universal Housing Development Corporation

Franklin

301 East Third Street

Johnson

Post Office Box 846

Logan

Russellville, Arkansas 72801

Perry

Telephone: (479) 968-5001

Polk

FAX: (479) 968-5002

Pope

E-mail: pat@uhdc.net

Scott

Yell

Mr. Loyd Collins, Weatherization Director E-mail: loyd@uhdc.net

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

Black River Area Development Corporation (BRAD)

Clay

1403 Hospital Drive

Lawrence

Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455

Randolph

Jim Jansen, Executive Director

(870) 892-5219

Central Arkansas Development Council (CADC)

Lonoke

722 Gaunt Street

Post Office Box 580

Benton, Arkansas 72018

Larry Cogburn, Executive Director

(501) 315-1121

Community Action Program For

Cleburne

Central Arkansas, Inc. (CAPCA)

707 Robins Street, Suite 118

Conway, Arkansas 72034

Phyliss Fry, Executive Director

(501) 329-3891

Crowley's Ridge Development Council (CRDC)

Craighead

2801 Fox Meadow Lane

Crittenden

Post Office Box 1497

Cross

Jonesboro, Arkansas 72403

Greene

Loyd Price

Jackson

Executive Director

Poinsett

(870) 802-7100

St. Francis

Woodruff

Mid-Delta Community Services, Inc. (M-DCS)

Lee

Post Office Drawer 745

Monroe

Helena, Arkansas 72342

Phillips

Margaret Staub, Executive Director

Prairie

Telephone: (870) 338-6406

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 1

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

Mississippi County, Arkansas Economic Opportunity

Mississippi

Commission, Inc. (MCAEOC)

1400 North Division

Post Office Drawer 1289

Blytheville, Arkansas 72316-1289

Sam Scruggs, Executive Director

Telephone: (870) 776-1054

Northcentral Arkansas Development Council, Inc. (NADC)

Fulton

550 9th Street

Independence

Post Office Box 3349

Izard

Batesville, Arkansas 72503

Sharp

Larry Goodwin, Executive Director

Stone

(870) 793-5765

Ozark Opportunities, Inc. (OOI)

Searcy

701 East Prospect

Post Office Box 1400

Harrison, Arkansas 72601

Roger Ratchford, Executive Director

(870) 741-9406

Pine Bluff-Jefferson County Economic Opportunities

Arkansas

Commission, Inc. (PB-JCEOC)

817 Cherry Street

Post Office Box 7228

Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71611

Iry Rice, Executive Director

(870) 536-0046

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

Central Arkansas Development Council (CADC)

722 Gaunt Street

Post Office Box 580

Benton, Arkansas 72018

Larry Cogburn, Executive Director

(501) 315-1121

Saline

Community Action Program For Central Arkansas, Inc. (CAPCA) 707 Robins Street, Suite 118 Phyliss Fry, Executive Director Conway, Arkanas 72034 (501) 329-3891

Faulkner White

Central Arkansas Development Council (CADC) 5620 West 12th Street Ste 9 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Larry Cogburn, Executive Director (501) 603-0909

Pulaski

Ozark Opportunities, Inc. (OOI)

701 East Prospect

Post Office Box 1400

Harrison, Arkansas 72602

Roger Ratchford, Executive Director

(870) 741-9406

Van Buren

Universal Housing Development Corporation (UHDC)

301 East Third Street

Post Office Box 846

Russellville, Arkansas 72801

Patricia Atkinson, Executive Director

(501) 968-5001

Conway

Yell

Perry

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 3

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

Crawford-Sebastian Community Development

Crawford

Council, Inc. (C-SCDC)

Sebastian

4831 Armour Street

Post Office Box 4069

Fort Smith, Arkansas 72914

Mark Whitmer, Executive Director

(501) 785-2303

Office Of Human Concern, Inc. (OHC)

Benton

506 East Spruce Street

Carroll

Post Office Box 778

Madison

Rogers, Arkansas 72757

Washington

Al West, Executive Director

(501) 636-7301

Ozark Opportunities, Inc. (OOI)

Baxter

701 East Prospect

Boone

Post Office Box 1400

Marion

Harrison, Arkansas 72602

Newton

Roger Ratchford, Executive Director

(501) 741-9406

Universal Housing Development Corporation (UHDC)

Franklin

301 East Third Street

Johnson

Post Office Box 846

Logan

Russellville, Arkansas 72601

Polk

Patricia Atkinson, Executive Director

Pope

(501) 968-5001

Scott

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 4

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

Central Arkansas Development Council (CADC)

Calhoun

722 Gaunt Street

Clark

Post Office Box 580

Columbia

Benton, Arkansas 72018

Dallas

Larry Cogburn, Executive Director

Hot Spring

(501) 315-1121

Ouachita

Montgomery

Pike

Union

Community Services Office, Inc. (CSO)

Garland

600 West Grand

Post Office Box 1175

Hot Springs, Arkansas 71902

Leon Massey, Executive Director

(501) 624-5724

Pine Bluff-Jefferson County Economic Opportunities

Cleveland

Commission, Inc. (PB-JCEOC)

Jefferson

817 Cherry Street

Lincoln

Post Office Box 7228

Grant

Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71611

Iry Rice, Executive Director

(870) 536-0046

Southeast Arkansas Community Action Corporation

Ashley

(SEACAC)

Bradley

1208 Myrtle Street

Chicot

Post Office Box 312

Desha

Warren, Arkansas 71671

Drew

Larry Henderson, Executive Director

(870) 226-2668

Southwest Arkansas Development Council (SWADC)

Hempstead

3902 Sanderson Lane

Howard

Texarkana, Arkansas

Lafayette

Ricky Pondexter, Executive Director

Little River

(870) 773-5504

Miller

Nevada

Sevier

PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

ENERGY SAVINGS

Energy Savings

An estimate of the amount of energy to be conserved.

The fuel analysis is representative of the typical unit weatherized by each of the subgrantee The analysis provides the data regarding energy conservation.

DOE PROGRAM

AMOUNT

LINE

Total DOE State Weatherization Allocation

$48,114,415

(a)

Total Cost associated with Administration, T&TA, Financial and Energy Audits or 15% of allocation

$7,217,163

(b)

Subtract the amount entered in line (b) from Line (a), for total Federal (DOE) funds available to weatherize homes

$40,897,252

(c)

State Average Cost per Home or National WAP Program Year Average Cost per Home (i.e., PY2009-$6,500*)

$6,500

(d)

Total Estimated Homes to be Weatherized

5,578

(e)

Multiply (e) by 30.5 MBTU** for total Annual Estimated Energy Savings resulting from DOE appropriated funds

$32,482

(f)

ALL FUNDING SOURCES

Total funds (e.g., DOE-WAP, State, Leveraged, LIHEAP, and other non-Federal sources of funds used by the State to weatherize homes

(g)

Total cost associated with the administration of Weatherization funds or 15% of total funds available to weatherize homes

(h)

Subtract the amount entered in line (h) from line (g), for total funds available to weatherize homes

(i)

State Average Cost per Home or Nation WAP Program Year Average Cost per Home (i.e., PY2007 - $2885*)

(j)

Total Estimated Homes to be Weatherized

(k)

Multiply (k) by 30.5 MBTU** for total Annual Estimated Energy Savings resulting from all funding sources

(l)

TRAINING, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES

TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Milestones and training guidance is based on information received from submissions by each subgrantee

1. GRANT GUIDANCE

May 21, 2009

State weatherization manager and training coordinator will provide guidance based on ARRA Program regulations and program policies.

2. WAP ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

August 13-14, 2009

Various new subject matter, as well as updated information will be taught that are directly related to new requirements from DOE (i.e. regional, national conferences & other related sources).

July 13-16, 2010

Implementation of a new conference format designed to allow attendees to select the breakout sessions that they desire to attend. In addition, the conference will unveil major new initiatives including a competitive incentive pool for agencies that achieve their ARRA production goals early; a monitoring rating scale tied to the severity and frequency of findings, a new state WAP logo designed to re-position the state WAP as a leader in residential energy conservation and stepped up public relations efforts.

3. LEAD BASED PAINT TRAINING

March & April 2010

Guidance will be provided regarding treatment of pre-1978 homes that may have lead hazards and various other subject matter pertaining to EPA Lead regulations.

July 13, 2010

The Office of Community Services Training staff will conduct a EPA Lead Renovator Certification class for new hires at the state and local level.

4. WAP SKILLS TRAININNG

October 1 & 2, 2009

Weatherization personnel come together in state wide hands on training. This allows everyone to participate in a wide array of skilled demonstrations needed to professionally show how to‖ perform the different tasks needed on each unit. In addition, two or three units will be selected in advance to perform weatherization installed activities. Similar trainings will be conducted each fiscal year of the grant period.

October 7-8, 2010

Using one of the state training centers, OCS training staff will conduct a statewide hands on training. This year the training will also be used to acquaint the WAP network with the state training centers and to reinforce the new certification requirements.

Monitoring Activities

1. An analysis of the existence and effectiveness of any weatherization project being carried out by a subgrantee.

The Office of Community Services (OCS) receives funding from the Department of Energy (DOE) to implement the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). The program is designed to increase the energy efficiency of dwellings owned or occupied by low-moderate income persons, reduce their total residential expenditures, and improve their health and safety, especially low-income persons who are particularly vulnerable such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, families with children, high residential energy users, and households with high energy burden. OCS subcontracts with Community Action Agencies (CAA's) to implement the program at the local level. The WAP has been in existence for over 30 years. The American Recovery and reinvestment Act (ARRA) provided additional funding for WAP. In order to address the high degree of accountability required by ARRA, OCS has hired four (4) additional Program Monitors (PM).

Each Program Monitor will be assigned 4 agencies and will follow the protocol outlined below. The attached organization chart will serve to illustrate the flow of operations within OCS. All staff report to the Program Manager; however, for training purposes, the new Program Monitors will report to their Team Leader.

Each Program Monitor will follow the monitoring protocol listed below which in addition to desk reviews will require a visit to the agency each month.

Subgrantee Desktop Reviews

Subgrantees will be monitored via standardized, periodic desktop monitoring. Desktop program evaluations examine subgrantee reports to assess progress and determine compliance with Federal rules and regulations, goals and objectives of the grant as stipulated in the approved plan, and the reporting and fiscal oversight of subgrantee expenditures. After conducting the desk review, the PM will then schedule a monitoring visit to the agency.

Subgrantees must comply with all reporting requirements mandated by the Recovery Act. To facilitate compliance, subgrantees are required to submit monthly reports on activities and expenditures. Program Monitor desktop reviews will:

* Identify any deficiencies in reporting such as delinquent reports. Where discrepancies exist between planned activities and actual accomplishments reported, the Monitor will follow-up with the subgrantee to determine causes and propose solutions that will correct the discrepancy. These findings will be reported to the Program Manager.

* Be used to report both maj or and minor problems that require resolution, such as significant staffing changes or excessive employee turnover. This information will be provided to the Program Manager and WAP Trainer. Together they will also identify and implement corrective actions.

Onsite Monitoring

Onsite monitoring visits will occur at subgrantee agencies and work sites. Monitors will review a representative sampling of customer files at the agency to determine that proper documentation of service delivery is maintained and that quality control inspections are being performed on each home. In addition, Monitors will:

* Review prior findings to determine existing deficiencies or areas of concern and determine whether those issues have been resolved.

* Inspect of up to 25 percent of homes at various stages of weatherization to ensure compliance with DOE rules and consistency between reported activities and actual measures.

* Conduct quality control inspection of at least 10 percent of completed homes to determine the quality of workmanship and appropriateness of service delivered by each sub-grantee.

* Interview WAP sub-grantee staff and clients to determine whether all tests were performed and appropriate measures installed on each unit.

* Verify that each home/client met program eligibility guidelines.

* Verify that each home received a Final Inspection conducted by the sub-grantee before the home was reported to the OCS as complete.

* Track expenditures from purchase to inventory to installation on the unit.

* Submit a written report to the Team Leader who will review it and submit it to the Program Manager. After review by the Program Manager, the report will be finalized and submitted to the Assistant Director for signature.

Fiscal Review

During each field visit, Program Monitors will examine previous subgrantee invoices and expenditure reports and verify that they match the agency general ledger. A sample of payments will be examined to verify the existence of documentation that supports the charges, that payments were made to vendors and that payments are allowable under program rules and regulations.

The books and records for any program activities allocated to or charged back to the WAP funds are also subject to review by the Program Monitor. If the Program Monitor notes a problem with allocations or charge backs, the findings will be noted in the report. If training and technical assistance is warranted, it will be provided to the subgrantee. Subsequent visits by the Program Monitor will verify that the problem has been corrected or that additional action is necessary.

OCS WAP MONITORING PROCEDURE -

Using the Monitoring Instrument, review the following areas:

D File documentation, including income verification

D Compliance with state & federal regulations

D Compliance with state weatherization assistance program specifications

D Completed project inspection

D Performance testing of homes

D Inventory control

D Health & safety inspection

n Audit results

D Resource accountability

D Work quality

D Fiscal controls

Who to meet with:

D Agency Coordinator D Fiscal Officer D Crew members D Participants

Routine Program Evaluation Outline:

1. Review prior program evaluations.

2. Set up dates for the on site visit and request that agency have completed files from the prior month ready for review.

3. Travel to agency.

4. Meet and greet.

5. Discuss agency operations.

6. Discuss community partners.

7. Discuss other resources.

8. Review participant files with staff

9. Based upon the monthly production goals, choose 25% of the completed jobs for field inspection. Of this number, conduct a performance test on 10%.

10. Perform field inspection.

11. Performance test homes.

12. Program Monitor and agency representative will discuss any opportunities identified during the inspection and performance testing of the homes.

13. Interview participants.

14. Prepare exit interview report.

15. Discuss findings.

16. Incorporate mutually agreed upon comments into the final review.

17. Discuss new techniques, approaches or protocols.

18. Discuss training needs.

19. Schedule additional follow up(s) on technical assistance topics identified.

20. Review corrective action from prior review.

21. Draft final review.

22. Send copy to executive director and agency coordinator.

Field Test Detail

Inspection of completed houses, with the accompaniment of the local agency auditor/inspector, provides an opportunity to provide on-site technical assistance. Various installation techniques, quality control issues, or test procedures may be discussed during the course of performing the inspection.

Diagnostic testing is performed, including blower-door tests, combustion safety tests, and duct leakage tests. The test results are compared with those noted in the participant file.

Set-up values of the NEAT/MHEA audit are checked to ensure they are current and accurate, that staff is proficient in the use of the NEAT/MHEA audit, and that it is used as directed by OCS.

**Exemplary practices, successful approaches, or creative ideas in the operation of the local program will be identified and noted.**

Crew Health and Safety procedures will be checked for compliance with OCS Health and Safety Plan as contained in the DOE State Plan.

At the conclusion of the monitor's visit, an exit conference will be conducted with the Program Coordinator and the Executive Director. If there are deficiencies, a recommended course of action will be agreed upon.

Every effort will be made to complete and mail a final report to the Executive Director and Program Coordinator within one week of the monitor visit. The agency will submit a written response providing assurance that identified problems are resolved in a timely manner and documented.

Reference Material

1. Weatherization Program Operations Manual.

2. Southeast Field Guide State Weatherization Assistance Program Specification and requirements.

3. US Department of Energy 10CFR Part 440 Weatherization.

Technical procedures adopted for the weatherization program, include:

* Blower Door and Air Sealing Procedures, which are used to determine a baseline goal for directing air-sealing work of the building envelope.

* Duct Pressure Test Procedures are the standards by which to measure the effectiveness of the HVAC system. The pre- and post weatherization test information is required to be collected and recorded in each client file.

* The Combustion Safety Test Procedures establish worst-case depressurization, spillage, flue draft, carbon monoxide, as well as a visual inspection. This procedure also contains safety thresholds. These tests must be performed and recorded, at a minimum, at the time of audit and final inspection. The test report form is to be completed on all homes that contain combustion appliances and maintained in the participant file.

Evaluation Tools and Equipment

The following tools and equipment will be used by Program Monitor to help determine satisfactory work performance:

1. Blower-door tests on a sample of completed jobs to verify the extent of air-sealing work and to assess the risk of indoor air quality problems.

2. A carbon monoxide detector and manometer on a sample of completed jobs that have combustion appliances to verify compliance with combustion safety test procedures.

3. An infrared scanner on a sample of completed jobs to verify uniform insulation coverage in closed cavities and inaccessible areas, as well as adequate air sealing work.

4. Digital cameras to take photos of houses inspected and to record extraordinary circumstances or work performance.

Levels of Agency Performance

As a result of the monitoring process, the Program Monitor will assess the subgrantee an assign a level of performance based upon the categories listed below:

Exemplary: Exceeds program expectations. Program is visionary, excels in all program aspects, highly responsive and innovative. Files are complete, organized and accurate. Administrative systems are good models for the entire network. Service delivery routinely exceeds targets and goals. Material installation consistently meets standards. Workmanship is good quality.

Stable: Meets program expectations. Activities are generally accurate, effective, organized, sound, proficient, and proactive. Good administration systems. Files are generally complete, organized and accurate. Overall program delivery is effective and sound. Staff is proficient in diagnostics. Material installation consistently meets standards. Workmanship is good quality.

Vulnerable: Noncompliance issues. Sometimes meets program expectations. Marginal administrative systems exist. File information inconsistent. Overall program delivery has gaps. Diagnostics are inadequate. Material installation sometimes meets standards. Workmanship is inconsistent.

At-Risk: Frequently does not meet program expectations. Inadequate, poor, substandard, incomplete, or deficient documentation exist. There is poor communication between state and agency staff Inadequate administrative systems exist. Files are incomplete or inaccurate. Overall program delivery is substandard. Diagnostic work is deficient. Material installation and/or workmanship do not meet program standards.

Levels of Agency Performance and Program Evaluation (PE) Frequency High Performance or Exemplary Agencies

By way of monitoring review, an exemplary agency demonstrates performance that meets or exceeds expectations in the following areas:

1. Program operations:

* No Health and Safety finding as identified in previous monitoring report.

* No procedural findings related to program rules, and policies and procedures

2. Fiscal:

* No findings related to weatherization in the annual agency audit.

3. Technical:

* Provides comprehensive services utilizing the latest building science and renewable technology, in a cost-effective manner in accordance with State of Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program guidelines.

4. Production:

* Agency unit production is high relative to funding.

* Agency routinely exceeds monthly production goals.

* Few incomplete or pending units at month end.

5. Qualified staff:

* Agency staff routinely attends OCS trainings and obtain required certifications in a timely way.

6. Risk:

* No "at-risk" elements are found in any major category.

The Program Monitor will determine whether this standard is met during the final visit.

Stable Agency Performance

OCS expects every agency to meet this standard of performance:

1. Well-established systems for program administration and operations, with no more than one finding in the following areas:

* Compliance with maj or program requirements, such as, lead-based paint procedures, cost allocation plan/indirect rate, required contractor information.

* No more than one program specific finding in the annual audit.

* No more than one fiscal specific finding in the annual audit.

* Staff well trained in performance of specific job duties.

* Complete and organized files.

2. Evidence of prudent decision making as to the use of program resources:

* Sufficiently detailed scopes of work.

* NEAT/MHEA documentation is current and consistent with billing.

* Staff proficient in use NEAT/MHEA software.

* Evidence NEAT/MHEA is run with actual and true pre-post data (including costs).

3. Staff and contractors have demonstrated proficiency in technical applications, including diagnostics.

4. Agency has a minimal number of minor procedural findings (as related to programs rules, policies and procedures) and health and safety findings from previous monitoring report and no major findings.

5. Agency complies with OSHA/DHS/OCS safety rules, as applicable.

6. The agency maintains a professional working relationship with OCS.

7. Past corrections made and reported in a timely manner.

8. No at-risk‖ elements are found in major categories for an agency.

Vulnerable Agency Performance

Agency's performance is deficient in some or all of the following levels of performance:

1. Agency has a well-established system for program administration and operations, with no more than one finding in the following areas:

* Compliance with maj or program requirements, such as, lead-based paint procedures, cost allocation plan/indirect rate, required contractor information.

* No more than one program specific finding in the annual audit.

* No more than one fiscal specific finding in the annual audit.

* Staff well trained in performance of specific job duties.

* Complete and organized files.

2. No evidence of prudent decision making as to use of program resources:

* Complete scopes of work

* NEAT/MHEA documentation is current and consistent with billing.

* Staff proficient in its use

* Evidence NEAT/MHEA is used with actual and true pre-post data (including costs).

3. Staff and contractors have not demonstrated proficiency in technical applications, including diagnostics.

4. Agency has a number of and severity of procedural findings (as related to programs rules, policies and procedures) and health and safety findings from previous monitoring report.

5. Agency does not comply with OSHA/DHS/OCS safety rules, as applicable.

6. The agency does not maintain a professional working relationship with OCS.

7. Past corrections were not made and reported in a timely manner.

8. Several at-risk‖ elements are found in major categories for an agency.

At-Risk Agency Elements At-risk agencies may be identified as a result of a variety of factors that may include:

1. The agency's probation, i.e. new agency / program.

2. There is evidence of significant administrative or program sub-standard performance; for example, repetitive pattern of findings, failure to have copies of permits on file or lack of compliance with historical preservation rules.

3. The agency is not in compliance with program policies, procedures and specifications.

4. The agency has repeated health and safety findings.

5. Agency staff members/crew has deficient technical skills.

6. There has been a change in key staff

7. There has been a change in key weatherization contractors.

8. The agency has deficient scopes of work (work plan is insufficient).

9. The agency has program specific audit findings.

10. The agency has fiscal specific audit findings

11. The agency files are incomplete or disorganized.

12. The agency staff is unresponsive to OCS requests and deadlines. For example, the agency consistently fails to provide monthly reports and contract closeouts in a timely manner.

13. Agency production is low relative to funding.

14. Other OCS programs (CSBG, LIEAP, Homeless) have indicated problems with or concerns about the agency.

15. At-risk agencies will be monitored no less than twice monthly. Other factors in the frequency of monitoring visits may be based upon the requirements of specific funding sources.

Performance Findings Correction Process

1. Each sub grantee shall be advised within 10 days after the conclusion of the monthly review process of any findings with a rating below stable‖ resulting from the monitoring of its program. If the agencies performance rating is deficient in any category and the program is out of compliance with contract provisions or that the program is out of compliance with state or federal regulations, OCS shall issue preliminary findings which provide specific examples of each such issue, request corrective action on each deficiency rated below stable‖ and offer assistance to the sub grantee in developing a corrective action plan.

2. Subgrantee shall respond to preliminary finding corrective action request within 5 days from receipt of the request. The response either shall include a corrective action plan which specifically addresses identified deficiencies or explain why the preliminary findings were in error.

3. OCS shall notify the sub grantee within ten days of the acceptance or rejection of all or parts of the sub grantee's response. The sub grantee shall be given an additional 10 days from the receipt of the Monitors notification to provide an acceptable corrective action plan for any remaining, unresolved deficiencies.

4. If after additional monitoring, unresolved deficiencies remain, OCS shall transmit to the sub grantee a finding of facts detailing the specific deficiencies, required corrective actions and establishing a 5 day time period for corrective action to take place.

5. If at the end of that 5-day period, specific corrective actions have not been effected, OCS shall inform the sub grantee of the sanctions which shall be applied due to noncompliance. Such sanctions may include but not be limited to withholding of funds, disallowance of costs, suspension of contract, or termination of contract. OCS shall inform the sub grantee of any appeal rites and procedures to state and federal authorities in the sanction transmittal.

Milestones

1. Fifteen subgrantees will be monitored on a monthly throughout the remainder of the program year.

2. At least 25% of the units weatherized will be inspected during the program year.

3. At least 25% of the client files will be inspected for compliance with state and federal regulations.

4. Fiscal and production desk reviews will be conducted monthly.

LEVERAGING ACTIVITIES

Leveraging Activities - Other Sources None.

DOE Funded Leveraging

The state will leverage utility funds and other non-federal funds where possible. However, DOE funds will not be expended in this process.

Subgrantees will administer the Arkansas Weatherization Program, which is contracted through the largest Community Action Agency in the state. The program will allow subgrantees to use DOE vehicles/equipment for use in the Arkansas Weatherization Program for non-DOE houses. Subgrantees will use a cost allocation plan to determine the amount of funds to be reimbursed by the DOE program for use of its vehicles/equipment.

POLICY ADVISORY COUNCIL

Arkansas Policy Advisory Council Meetings

The PAC will meet on July 30, 2010, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on amendments to the 2009-2012 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Weatherization Plan.

PAC members are involved in weatherization activities such as training and Weatherization Day activities and leveraging funds. Entergy is represented on the PAC and funds some weatherization activities of subgrantees each year. The State Energy Office is represented on the PAC and provides client education material for weatherization clients. Rural Development is represented on the PAC and provides funding to some weatherization subgrantees for housing rehabilitation.

WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM POLICY ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBERS

TERM OF SERVICE

NAME/ADDRESS/PHONE

GROUP/ORGANIZATION REPRESENTED

EXPIR. DATE

Thomas E. Green P.O. Box 1437/S330 Little Rock, AR 72203 Phone: (501) 682-8715

Office of Community Services Ex-Officio

N/A

Rita Byers

Main Stream

300 South Rodney Parham Rd., Ste. 5

Little Rock, AR 72205-4774

Phone: (501) 280-0012

FAX: (501) 280-9267

E-mail: ritabyers@yahoo.com

Elderly and Handicapped

1/11

Al West, Vice President Office of Human Concern P.O. Box 778 Rogers, AR 72757 Phone: (479) 636-7301 FAX: (479) 636-7312 E-mail: alwest@ohc.org

Weatherization Subgrantee CAA Executive Director

1/11

Beverly Palmer

Central Arkansas Development Council

P.O. Box 580

Benton, AR 72018

Phone: (501) 315-1121

FAX: (501) 778-9120

E-mail: bpalmer@cadc.cc

Weatherization Director

1/11

Mark Whitmer, Chair

Crawford-Sebastian Community Development

Council, Inc.

4831 Armour Street

P.O. Box 4069

Fort Smith, AR 72914

Phone: (479) 785-2303

FAX: (479) 785-2341

E-mail: mwhitmer@cscdccaa.org

Weatherization Director At Large Position

1/11

Susan Recken

AR Department of Economic Development

#1 Capitol Mall

Little Rock, AR 72201

Phone: (501) 682-7334

FAX: (501) 682-2703

E-mail: srecken@1800ARKANSAS.com

At Large Position

1/11

Martie North, V.P., and

Director of Community Development

7500 Cantrell Road

Little Rock, AR 72207

Phone: (501) 978-2234

E-mail: mnorth@bankozarks.com

At Large Position

1/11

Kenny Gunn, Weatherization Dir.

Crowley's Ridge Development Council, Inc.

P.O. Box 16720

Jonesboro, Arkansas 72403-1497

Phone: (870) 802-7100 ext. 120

E-Mail: kennygunn@crdcnea.com

At Large Position

1/11

William Taft Wilson

Weatherization Director

Southwest Arkansas Development Council, Inc.

3902 Sanderson Lane

Texarkana, Arkansas 71854

Phone: (870) 773-5504

E-Mail: taftwilson@cableone.net

At Large Position

1/11

Kelly Lassiter, Manager

Customer & Employee Relations

CenterPoint

P.O. Box 751

Little Rock, AR 72203

Phone: (501) 377-4746

FAX: (501) 377-4725

E-mail: kelly.lassiter@centerpointenergy.com

Public Utilities

1/11

Patricia Atkinson

Universal Housing Development Council

P.O. Box 847

301 Third Street

Russellville, AR 72801

Phone: (479) 968-5001

FAX: (479) 968-5002

Housing

1/11

Jamie Stringfellow

ENTERGY

1405 Hwy. 62 SW

Mountain Home, AR 72653

Cell: (870) 866-6005

Home: (870) 425-5178

E-mail: jstring@entergy.com

Public Utilities

1/11

Jane Todd

Public Service Commission

P.O. Box C-400

Little Rock, AR 72203

Phone: (501) 682-5988

FAX: (501) 682-5882

E-mail: janie_gray@psc.state.ar.us

Public Service Commission

1/11

Lawrence McCullough

Rural Development

USDA Service Center

Federal Building, Room 3416

700 W. Capitol Avenue

Little Rock, AR 72201-3225

Phone: (501) 301-3237

FAX: (501) 301-3290

E-mail: Lawrence.mccullough@ar.usda.gov

Housing

1/11

ARKANSAS WEATHERIZATION POLICY ADVISORY COUNCIL BY-LAWS

ARTICLE I THE COUNCIL

Section 1 - Name

The name of the Council shall be the Arkansas Weatherization Policy Advisory Council (PAC).

Section 2 - Purpose

The purpose of the PAC shall be to promote the full development and utilization of the State's weatherization resources.

Section 3 - Membership

The PAC shall be appointed by the Office of Community Services' Assistant Director in consultation with the State Weatherization Directors and PAC, consistent with federal regulations. Membership shall consist of no more than fifteen members representing the following groups or organizations:

a. Office of Community Services (ex-officio)

b. Elderly and Handicapped c. Weatherization Subgrantees

CAA Executive Director Weatherization Directors (2)

d. Local Government e. Civic Group f. Public Utilities (2)

g. At-large Positions (4) Choose from the following: -Financial Institutions -Liquid Petroleum Gas Board -Health Department Plumbing Inspector -Fire Marshall

-Other h. Public Service Commission i. Housing (2)

The term of office of PAC members shall be for three years and may be appointed to serve consecutive terms. Appointments shall be made during the regular meeting of the first quarter of the calendar year.

Members missing three consecutive regular meetings without cause, as determined by the total PAC membership, will be replaced at the next regular meeting of the PAC.

Section 4 - Authority

The PAC shall serve in an advisory capacity and will function as follows:

a. approve the state plan;

b. serve as a resource to secure additional funds for the State's Weatherization Assistance

Program;

c. make recommendations on the appropriate use of funds obtained from sources other than the Department of Energy;

d. make policy recommendations;

e. conduct the Public Hearings on the state plan; and f. network with other Weatherization PACs in the country. ARTICLE II

ARTICLE II OFFICERS

Section 1 - Officers

The officers of the PAC shall be the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson.

Section 2 - Nomination of Officers

The Nominating Committee shall present a slate of officers in advance of the voting meeting. Additional nominations may be made from the floor. From this slate, the nominee receiving the majority vote shall be the officer.

Section 3 - Election and Term of Office
A. The officers shall be elected at the first regular meeting of the calendar year and assume their duties at the next meeting. They shall serve for one year or until their successors are elected.

B. Voting for officers shall be by written ballot unless the candidate has no opposition and then it may be by unanimous motion.

Section 4 - Duties

Chairperson: The Chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the PAC and perform all such services as are usually performed by the Chairperson of an organization and shall perform such duties as may be requested by the PAC and shall be ex-officio member of all committees except the Nominating Committee.

Vice Chairperson: The Vice Chairperson shall discharge the duties of the Chairperson in the absence of the Chairperson or in the event of his inability to act.

ARTICLE III PAC MEETINGS

Section 1 - Regular Meetings

The PAC shall meet on the fourth Tuesday of the third month of each quarter or at other times as specified by the Chairperson.

Section 2 - Special or Called Meeting

The Chairperson may call special meetings of the PAC as required. Upon receipt of written request from a majority of members of the PAC, the Chairperson shall call a special meeting of the PAC to convene within ten days.

Section 3 - Quorum

Five members of the PAC shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

Section 4 - Voting

All actions of the PAC shall be determined by a majority vote of the members present and voting, except the adoption and amendment of the By-laws which shall be by a two-thirds vote of the members present. Proxy voting shall be allowed by persons authorized to attend and represent a member of the PAC.

Section 5 - Order of Business

The Chairperson and the Assistant Director of the Office of Community Services or designee shall be responsible for ordering the business of the PAC.

Section 6 - Rules

Robert Rules of Order shall govern the procedures of the PAC.

ARTICLE IV COMMITTEES

Section 1 - Committees may be established by the PAC as requested, to deal with specific issues. Members shall be designated by the Chairperson.

ARTICLE V BY-LAWS AMENDMENT PROCEDURES

Section 1 - By-Laws Amendment Procedures

The By-laws may be amended at any regular meeting of the PAC by a two-thirds vote of the members present, provided that the proposed amendment has been submitted in writing and made available to all members at least two weeks prior to the meeting at which a vote is taken.

HEARINGS AND TRANSCRIPTS

Click here to view image

ADJUSTMENTS

TO

ON-LINE INFORMATION

ADJUSTMENTS TO ONLINE INFORMATION

The maximum average for FY 2009-2012 is $6,500 per unit.

The expenditure limit for Health and Safety Measures is 20% of the average per dwelling unit cost limitation.

The State will use 200% of the poverty guidelines as the eligibility criteria.

The Department of Energy definition of income will be used.

MISCELLANEOUS

MISCELLANEOUS

ENERGY AUDIT:

Arkansas uses NEAT and will use the mobile home energy audit developed by DOE contract.

SUCCESS STORIES:

Arkansas will report success stories using the DOE prescribed format.

FINANCIAL AUDITS:

The State office and each subgrantee has a Single Agency Audit in compliance with Circular A-133.

The State will use Training and Technical Assistance funding to conduct a Special Audit of the Pine Bluff Jefferson County Economic Opportunity Commission, Inc. as a final close out of the old program prior to implementing the restructured program.

REPORTING:

Arkansas will comply with all of DOE's ARRA reporting requirements.

The State will work with a local educational institution to comply with request for information related to the National Weatherization Assistance Program Evaluation.

ASSURANCES

AND

CERTIFICATIONS

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING, DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER

RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS

Applications should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 34 CFR Part 82, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," and 34 CFR Pad 85, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Government-wide Requirements or Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Energy determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.

F1. LOBBYING

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that:

(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract the making of any Federal grant the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract grant loan, or cooperative agreement.

(2) If any funds other than an Federal appropriated fund have been paid or will be Paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all - subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 3 1, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

____________________________________________________

2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS
(1) The prospective Primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;

(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal State, or local) transaction under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement theft forgery, bribery,

falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving go,- property,

(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (i)(b) of this certification; and

(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

(2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

____________________________________________________

3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

This certification is required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 ( Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D) and is implemented through additions to the Debarment and Suspension regulations, published in the Federal Register on January 31, 1989, and May 25, 1990.

ALTERNATE I

(GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS)

(1) The grantee certified that it will or will continue to provide a drug free workplace by:
(a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantees workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;

(b) Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:
(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,

(2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace,

(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and

(4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace;

(c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a);

(d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a)

that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will:

(1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and

(2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the work-place not later than five calendar days after such conviction.

(e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to energy grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant;

(f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consisted with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, amended; or

(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal State, or local health law enforcement, or other appropriate agency,

(g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a),(b), (c) (d), (e), and (f).

(2) The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant:

Place of Performance.

(Street address, city, county, state. zip code)

Office of Community Services____________

7th & Main Streets, Pulaski County___________

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201_____________

Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here

4. Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, Simpson-Craig Amendment

Applicant organizations which am described in section 501(cX4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and engage in lobbying activities after December 31, 1995, shall not be eligible for the receipt of Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan. Section 501(cX4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 covers:

Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees, the membership of which is limited to the employees of a designated person or persons in a particular municipality and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to charitable, educational or recreational purposes.

As set forth in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 ( Public Law 10465, December 19, 1995), as amended ["Simpson-Craig Amendment,‖ see Section 129 of The Balanced Budget Down-payment Art I (Public Law 104-99, January 26, 1996)], lobbyinq activities is defined broadly. (See section 3 of the Act.)

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and better that: it IS NOT an organization described in section 50 1 (cX4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; OR that it IS an organization described in section 50 1 (cX4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, whid4 after December 31, 1995, HAS NOT engaged in any lobbying activities as defined in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended.

ALTERNATE II (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS)

(1) The grantee certifies that as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant.

(2) If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to every grant officer or other designee unless the Federal agency designates a central point for the receipt of such notices. When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification

___________number(s) of each affected grant.________________________________

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY GOLDEN FIELD OFFICE

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PRE-AWARD INFORMATION SHEET

Grantee: Arkansas Office of Community Services__________________

Grant No.: DEFG44-02R410841__________________ Amendment No.: ________________

A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

() A university or other institution of higher education or an organization of the type described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 USC 501(c)) and exempt from taxation under Section 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC 501(a)); or

() An organization of the type described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal

Revenue Code of 1954 (26 USC 501(c)) and exempt from taxation under Section 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC 501(a)); or

() A nonprofit scientific or educational organization qualified under a State nonprofit organization statute. Please identify the statute.

() A small business concern as defined at Section 2 of Public Law 85-536 (15 USC 632) and implementing regulations of the administrator of the Small Business Administration.

(X) None of the above.

Recipients who have checked NONE OF THE ABOVE have the right to request, in advance or within 30 days after execution of the grant, in accordance with applicable statutes and DOE Procurement Regulation (9.9109-6) a waiver of all or any part of the rights of the United States in Subject Inventions. If the grantee intends to request a waiver to such invention rights pursuant to DOE PR 99.109-6, please indicate:

() I intend to request an advance waiver in accordance with DOE PR 9-9.109-6.

(X) I do not intend to request an advance waiver.

A.2. RIGHTS IN PROPOSAL DATA

It is DOE policy for a grant award based on a proposal that, in consideration of the award, the Government shall obtain unlimited rights in the technical data contained in the proposal unless the grantee marks those portions of the technical information which he asserts as "proprietary data" or specifies those portions of such technical data which are not directly related to or will not be utilized in the work to be funded under the grant. Accordingly, please indicate:

(X) No restrictions on Government rights in the proposal technical data; or

() The following identified technical data is proprietary or is not directly related to or will not be utilized in the work to be funded under the grant:

A.3 IDENTIFICATION OF TECHNICAL DATA WHICH IS PROPRIETARY

The Rights in Technical Data clause proposed to be used for this grant may not permit the utilization of proprietary data in the grant work or, if the use of proprietary data is permitted, may not be adequate to meet programmatic requirements. Use of data which is proprietary may, prevent you from meeting, the data requirements of the grant (including delivery of data). Your attention is particularly drawn to the use of LICENSED COMPUTER SOFTWARE.

Please indicate that you have reviewed the requirements in the technical scope of work and to the best of your knowledge:

(X) No proprietary data will be utilized in the grant work.

() Proprietary data as follows will be utilized in the grant work:

() No LICENSED COMPUTER SOFTWARE will be utilized in the grant work.

(X) LICENSED COMPUTER SOFTWARE as follows will be utilized in the grant work:

Microsoft Word for Windows, Windows XP, Microsoft Office 2003, Excel, and Word Perfect___________________________________________

B. TYPE OF BUSINESS (IF NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN SECTION A. L OF THIS PRE-AWARD INFORMATION SHEET)

The Recipient is a:

() Individual

() Partnership

(X) State or Local Government

() Joint Venture

C. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER (SSN)

If the Recipient does not have an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assigned Employer

Identification. Number (EIN), Grantee SSN is _________________________ . (See block 5 of Grant Application, Standard Form 424.)

D. DATA UNIVERSAL NUMBERING SYSTEM (DUNS NUMBER)

Grantee DUNS Number is 26-07NT43109 . For assistance in obtaining a DUNS Number, call DUNN & Bradstreet at 1-800-333 -0505. The offeror should be prepared to provide the following information to DUNN & Bradstreet:

(1) Company name.

(2) Company address.

(3) Company telephone number

(4) Line of business.

(5) Chief executive officer/key manager.

(6) Date the company was started.

(7) Number of people employed by the company.

(8) Company affiliation.

E. CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS

In accordance with 10 CFR 1040, the recipient is required to appoint a person as the Affirmative Action Officer to be responsible for Civil Rights matters. The person you appoint should be knowledgeable of 10CFR 1040, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs. You are also responsible for prominently displaying reasonable numbers of Civil Rights posters at your facility. A copy of 10 CFR 1040 can be found at www.pr.doe.gov/1f040 toc.html and the poster at www.eren.doe.gov/golden/paf.html. Copies can also be obtained from your awarding DOE office.

Doris Wright has been appointed as the Affirmative Action Officer and has familiarized himself/herself with 10 CFR 1040 . DOE Civil Rights posters have been displayed prominently and in reasonable numbers at our facility.

Organization Name Office of Community Services Phone: _(501) 682-8729 _ and address P.O. Box 1437/Slot S330__ Fax: _(501) 682-6736__

Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 E-mail: Doris.Wright@arkansas.gov

I certify that the above information is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

__________________________________________ __________________

Signature Date

Thomas E. Green, Assistant Director

Name and Title of Authorized Representative

ENERGY AUDIT PLAN

ENERGY AUDIT PLAN

RE: Weatherization Program Notice

WAIVER AUDIT APPROVAL PROCEDURES (REVISED)

The Arkansas Weatherization Program uses the National Energy Audit (NEAT) and Mobile Home Energy Audit (MHEA).

1. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

2. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-WAP monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

3. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

4. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

5. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been submitted previously.

6. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

7. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

8. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is a SEER 13. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

9. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be used and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower door test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

10. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

11. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

12. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

13. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one.

14. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan.

15. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

16. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

17. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

18. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been submitted previously.

19. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

20. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

21. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-ARRA monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

22. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

23. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

24. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

25. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

26. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

27. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

28. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be use and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower door test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

29. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

30. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

31. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

32. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater to or equal to one.

33. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is approved by DOE.

34. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

35. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

36. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

37. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have a SIR greater than or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

38. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

39. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

40. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-WAP monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

41. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

42. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

43. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

44. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

45. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

46. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

47. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be use and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

48. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

49. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater than or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

50. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

51. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one.

52. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is updated annually and approved by DOE.

53. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system are considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

54. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater to or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

55. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

56. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

57. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-ARRA monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

58. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

59. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

60. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

61. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

62. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

63. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

64. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be used and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower door test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

65. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

66. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater than or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

67. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater than to or equal to one.

68. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is updated annually and approved by DOE.

69. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

70. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

71. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

72. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), is used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater to or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

73. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

74. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

75. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-WAP monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

76. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

77. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

78. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

79. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

80. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

81. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

82. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be use and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

83. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

84. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

85. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

86. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater to or equal to one.

87. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is approved by DOE.

88. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

89. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

90. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

91. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater than to or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

92. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

93. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

94. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-ARRA monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

95. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

96. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

97. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

98. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

99. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

100. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

101. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be use and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower door test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

102. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

103. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

104. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than a SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

105. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one.

106. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is approved by DOE.

107. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

108. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

109. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

110. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

111. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

112. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

113. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-ARRA monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

114. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

115. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

116. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

117. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

118. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

119. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

120. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower door doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be use and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower door test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

121. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

122. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater than or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

123. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

124. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one.

125. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is updated annually and approved by DOE.

126. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

127. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

128. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

129. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater to or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

130. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

131. Approval Criterion: Energy audit procedures must comply with §440.21(b),(d),(e), and (h).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the items listed below, the submittal package must include the energy audit procedures. This could include: a copy of the auditors' manual, a description of how energy audits are conducted and how different audit findings affect the auditor's actions and recommendations; and/or the detailed instructions for the data collections forms.

Submittal: The instruction manuals provided by DOE for use of NEAT and MHEA will be used.

132. Approval Criterion: DOE-funded weatherization materials/measures considered by audit must be included in Appendix A.

Submittal Requirement: The submittal package must include a list of all the weatherization materials/measures that the audit considers. Those weatherization materials/measures to be funded with DOE-ARRA monies should be noted. The submittal package must also include a statement that the requirements of Appendix A will be followed.

Submittal: Material costs will depend on solicited cost in each area. The subgrantee actual costs will be verified during monitoring visits by comparing contracts, invoices, and other cost data to NEAT and MHEA program files. General Heat Waste materials used will be coupled with Blower Door testing to determine the point at which the measures are not cost effective. All materials will conform to standards that apply from Appendix A.

133. Approval Criterion: The energy savings calculations must take into account local heating or cooling degree days. Alternatively, the audit algorithms may use bin or hourly weather data in its energy savings calculations.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package should state the type of weather data used, the published source of the weather data, the geographic locations for which the weather data will be used, and how the energy savings calculations use the weather data.

Submittal: The subgrantees will use the weather data from the NEAT and MHEA file most appropriate for local conditions, e.g., Little Rock, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Joplin, MO; Springfield, MO; Memphis, TN; Jackson, MS; Shreveport, LA.

134. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions.

Submittal Requirement: The narrative portion of the submittal package must describe the energy savings calculation algorithms (methods) and assumptions. Assumptions include a range of variables such as treatment of buffered envelope surfaces, treatment of solar insulation, wind, humidity, CD factor, if applicable, etc. It does not include default values which can be changed by the auditor.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA are the energy audits used. The energy savings methods and assumptions are contained in the audits.

135. Approval Criterion: The audit must use reasonable methods and assumptions (approval criteria #4 is intentionally repeated here as #5 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: In addition to the narrative description of the energy savings calculation methods and assumptions required by approval criterion #4, the submittal package should also include the input data, assumptions, and audit results (recommended measures) for two sample dwelling units typical of those weatherized by grantee's program.

Submittal: Audit results of two sample dwelling units of frame houses and audit results of two sample dwelling units of mobile homes have been previously submitted.

136. Approval Criterion: The figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation must be generally accepted in the relevant trade.

Submittal Requirement: Include the figures used for the lifetime of the materials and for the costs of materials and installation. State the sources of this information and how the values compare with current actual costs and lifetime values presently used.

Submittal: The number of years used for the lifetime of the materials to be considered by NEAT and MHEA is included in the software approved by the Department of Energy and will not be changed by Arkansas.

137. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must consider the rate of energy use.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures consider the rate of energy use. The energy audit procedures must consider energy efficiency as well as total energy savings. For example, replacing an existing space heater, currently heating one room, with a more energy efficient space heater, capable of heating several rooms, may not save any energy. However, the occupants would gain the use of more of their dwelling unit. If not handled as a health and safety measure, this measure would have to be cost justified by the audit. The only way to cost justify this measure would be to impute energy savings by calculating the amount of energy the inefficient space heater would have used to heat the several rooms now heated by the efficient space heater, and subtracting the estimated energy use of the new efficient space heater.

Other examples include instances where the occupant cannot afford to heat the dwelling to an adequate temperature or operate the furnace at all. Installing insulation and tuning up the furnace may now make the use of the furnace affordable. However, energy use is increased, not decreased. Again, if not handled as a health and safety measure, energy savings would have to be imputed to cost justify the insulation and/or the furnace tune-up through the audit. While not mandatory within the audit software, if used, the overall energy audit procedures must consider these types of circumstances.

Submittal: Arkansas will use all shell and equipment measures listed in the SETUP option of NEAT and MHEA. Emphasis on correct material and labor costs will ensure the SIR ranking is valid and can be applied until funds available for the dwelling are exhausted or the SIR becomes too small. Space heaters are justified as a health and safety measure. Heating system replacement will be a minimum of 85% Energy Efficiency Rating. The standard to replace constant burning pilot with electric ignition device on gas-fueled furnaces or boiler will conform to standards listed in Appendix A. All insulation will be installed at R-Values recommended by NEAT and MHEA.

138. Approval Criterion: Where cooling needs are significant, the energy audit must consider cooling measures.

Submittal Requirement: In States where cooling needs are significant, the list of weatherization materials/measures considered by the audit should include cooling measures. The narrative portion of the submittal package should describe how the energy audit considers cooling measures, including the algorithms and assumptions used. Internal gains, latent loads, and solar incidence must be considered.

DOE considers States with over 2,000 cooling degree days per year (65°F base) to have significant cooling needs and expect their audits to consider cooling measures. States with between 1,300 and 2,000 cooling degree days, whose audits do not consider cooling measures, must provide an adequate explanation why cooling measures are not considered.

Submittal: The only cooling measures installed will be those recommended by NEAT and MHEA. The standard for air conditioner replacement is an SEER 11. Materials for cooling measures will conform to standards listed in Appendix A.

139. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must make provision for use of advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques which DOE has determined are consistent with sound engineering practices.

Submittal Requirement: Describe the advanced diagnostic and assessment techniques that can be used as part of the energy audit. Such techniques may include blower doors, infrared cameras or detectors, various furnace testing procedures, health and safety testing, psychrometers, duct-leakage testing, bypass testing, etc. Describe how the results of this diagnostic work would be used and how the energy audit would consider the results of these techniques.

Submittal: An audit will be conducted on each house, as opposed to a priority list. Likewise, a blower test will be conducted on each house. The default contained in the audit will not be used except under circumstances where the house is in such state of repair that an initial blower test cannot be conducted. Diagnostic equipment will be used to determine carbon monoxide levels on houses containing gas appliances before and after weatherization. Health and safety hazard costs will be keyed into the audits and will not be considered in the SIR. However, health and safety costs will be included in the maximum averages allowed by the Department of Energy.

140. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine energy use from actual energy bills or by generally accepted engineering calculations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit determines energy use and how this value is verified.

Submittal: Fuel costs that will be used will be determined by each subgrantee by conducting yearly averages.

141. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must determine that each weatherization material is cost-effective by ensuring that the discounted savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is greater than or equal to one. The denominator in the SIR equation must include the costs of material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel (§440.18(c)(1),(2), and (7)).

Submittal Requirement: Show the SIR equation used by the audit and describe how future fuel cost savings are discounted to present value. If the State elects not to use the discount rate provided by DOE, show the discount rate to be used and its published source. Describe how fuel cost escalation is treated and show these factors, or refer to their source. (The discount and fuel cost escalation rates may be given here or under #16.) Show the costs included in the denominator of the SIR equation.

Submittal: The state assures that the discounted savings-to investment ratio will be greater or equal to one by using the discounted rate provided by DOE. Local subgrantees determine fuel cost escalation by contacting the local fuel supplier. State monitors verify this during their routine monitoring visits.

142. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must assign priorities among weatherization materials in descending order of SIR and must account for interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. After adjusting the estimated fuel cost savings for interaction between measures, the energy audit procedures must eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit accounts for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures. Describe how, when moving from an architectural to a mechanical measure (or vice versa), the energy audit procedures adjust the estimated fuel cost savings of measures with lower non-interacted SIRS. Show that the energy audit procedures eliminate any measure whose interaction-adjusted SIR is less than one.

Submittal: NEAT and MHEA approved energy audits eliminate measures with less than an SIR of one and provide for the interaction between architectural and mechanical measures.

143. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must ensure that the overall SIR for the entire package of measures is greater than or equal to one. In calculating the overall SIR, the energy audit procedures must add the cost of incidental repairs (§440.18(c)(9) to the costs of materials, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel in the denominator.

Submittal Requirement: Show the equation for the overall SIR used by the audit and describe how the energy audit ensures that the overall SIR is greater than or equal to one. List the costs included in the denominator of the overall SIR equation.

Submittal: The DOE approved audits provide for the inclusion of incidental repairs (including material, labor, and on-site supervisory personnel) in the overall SIR to assure that the overall SIR is greater to or equal to one.

144. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds in compliance with the State's DOE-approved health and safety procedures under §440.16(h).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures identify health and safety hazards to be abated with DOE funds and how the material and labor costs of health and safety abatement are determined on each home.

Submittal: Health and safety hazards to be abated are contained in the health and safety plan that is included in the state plan that is approved by DOE.

145. Approval Criterion: The energy audit procedures must treat the dwelling unit as a whole system by:
a) Examining its heating and cooling system;

b) Examining its air exchange system;

c) Examining its occupants' living habits and needs; and d) Making necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations.

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the energy audit procedures treat the dwelling unit as a whole system. Specifically, describe how the energy audit procedures examine the heating and cooling system, the air exchange system, and occupants' living habits and needs. Explain how the audit procedures make necessary adjustments to the priority of weatherization materials in response to these examinations and how these adjustments are documented.

Submittal: The energy efficiency rating of the heating system and the SEER of the cooling system is considered in calculation of the SIR. The air exchange system is determined by use of the blower door before and after weatherization. Carbon monoxide levels are determined by use of a detector. Occupant's living habits and needs are determined for use in installing digital thermostats. All of these factors are documented in the client file.

146. Approval Criterion: The energy audit must provide for use of an annually adjusted discount rate.

Submittal Requirement: If not specified under #11, state the discount and fuel cost escalation rates to be used and their published source (if the DOE-provided discount rate is not used).

Submittal: DOE provided discount rate is used, as stated in #11.

147. Approval Criterion: Priority lists, if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program. Priority lists must be revalidated by conducting a representative sample of site-specific energy audits every 5 years.

Submittal Requirement: Provide any priority lists to be used and explain how the priority lists were developed. State the energy audit on which the priority lists are based and how it complies with §440.21(H), if different than the audit being submitted. If seeking approval just for a revalidated priority list(s), give the name of waiver audit and when it was approved. Describe the circumstances that will require a site-specific audit rather than the use of the priority lists and the audit to be used in such circumstances (in compliance with §440.12(h)).

Submittal: Priority lists are not used.

148. Approval Criterion: Priority lists (and lists of general heat waste measures), if used, must be developed by conducting site-specific energy audits (that comply with the requirements in §440.21(h)) of a representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type covered by the State's weatherization program (approval criteria #17 is intentionally repeated here as #18 to specify an additional submittal requirement).

Submittal Requirement: Describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units for each major dwelling type was determined. Some States have indicated that fuel type and construction factors (assemblies) predict energy use (and weatherization energy savings) better than dwelling type. DOE will accept a representative sample determined on this basis, provided an adequate explanation is given to substantiate this method. Assuming the same representative sample was used for the priority lists and the GHW lists addressed in #19, only one discussion under #18 is required. If the samples for priority lists and GHW lists are different, a separate discussion of each is required, plus an explanation of why different samples were used.

Submittal: Priority lists are not used. General Heat Waste measures are required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one. Arkansas has only two typical dwelling units, the mobile home and the frame house. Two sample audits for each have been previously submitted.

149. Approval Criterion: Lists of presumptively cost-effective general heat waste (GHW) reduction weatherization materials are subject to DOE approval and must state the circumstance under which such materials may be presumed cost-effective. The list of GHW materials must be shown to be cost-effective in typical dwelling units for major dwelling units types in the State based on documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits (in compliance with §440.21(h).

Submittal Requirement: Provide any lists of general heat waste reduction weatherization materials to be used and state the circumstance under which such materials are presumed to be cost-effective. Describe how the lists were developed including the energy audit on which the lists are based. If different than the audit being submitted, describe how the audit on which the GHW list is based complies with §440.21(h). Provide documentation of a representative number of site-specific energy audits showing how these materials, in the circumstances and the amounts, were determined.

Under #18 above, describe how the representative sample of typical dwelling units was determined for the GHW list. See #18 for the discussion of representative samples.

Submittal: General Heat Waste measures will be required to have an SIR greater than or equal to one prior to installation on unit.

PART II MASTER FILE

ELIGIBLE POPULATION

Click here to view image

General Description

Low-Income means that income in relation to family, which: is at or below 200 percent of the poverty level determined in accordance with criteria established by the Director of the Office Management and Budget, except that the Secretary may establish a higher level if the Secretary, after consulting with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, determines that such a higher level is necessary to carry out the purposes of this part and is consistent with eligibility criteria established for the Weatherization Program under section 222 (a) (12) of the EOA of 1964.

Documentation of client income is kept in the client file.

Children means dependents not exceeding 19 years.

An estimate of the number of eligible dwelling units in which the elderly reside. There is an estimated 62,965 eligible dwelling units in which the elderly reside.

An estimat9e of the number of eligible dwelling units in which the handicapped reside.

There was no information in the census report that provided an estimate of the number of eligible dwelling units in which the handicapped reside. The Division of Rehabilitation Services stated that 16.8% of all dwelling units in the State are occupied by the handicapped. We can, therefore, assume that 16.8% of all eligible dwelling units are occupied by the handicapped.

The extent to which priority will be given to the weatherization of single family or other high energy consuming dwelling units.

The DOE Point System will be used to prioritize applications from the elderly and handicapped low income persons. Priority is given to the elderly and handicapped who live in single dwellings or other high energy consuming units. Children have been added to the priority system.

There are no Indian Tribes in Arkansas.

Selection of Area to be Served

An explanation of the method used to select each area to be served by a weatherization project.

The Office of Community Services implements the Weatherization Program through 15 subgrantees. All seventy-five counties in the State are served by a Weatherization project.

Priorities

The DOE Point System gives priority to the elderly and persons with disabilities.

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

CLIMATIC CONDITIONS

Climatic Conditions

Heating and Cooling Degree Days was obtained from the Arkansas Energy Office. The Department of Energy provided energy audit for single family frame and mobile homes is used. The weather data provided by DOE is used in these audits.

HEATING AND COOLING DEGREE DAYS

County

Reporting Station

Normal 30 Year Heating Degree Day

Normal 30 Year Cooling Degree Day

Heating & Cooling Degree Days

0.5 x

(LDD - SminDD) ___________________ x xo

(SmaxDD - SminDD)

Arkansas

St. Charles

3061

2025

5086

23.98

Ashley

Crossett

2488

2118

4606

00.00

Baxter

Mtn. Home

3852

1551

5403

39.81

Benton

Gravette

4034

1471

5505

44.90

Boone

Harrison

3884

1447

5331

36.21

Bradley

Warren

2577

2231

4808

10.09

Calhoun

*None

2639

2203

4842

11.79

Carroll

Eureka Springs

3787

1528

5315

35.41

Chicot

*None

2601

2156

4657

2.53

Clark

Arkadelphia

2838

2070

4908

15.08

Clay

Corning

3678

1773

5451

42.21

Cleburne

*None

3467

1768

5235

31.42

Cleveland

*None

2627

2190

4817

10.04

Columbia

Magnolia

2468

2179

4647

2.05

Conway

Morrilton

3131

2004

5135

26.42

Craighead

Jonesboro

3352

1938

5290

34.16

Crawford

*None

3587

1754

5341

36.71

Crittenden

*None

3337

1869

5206

29.97

Cross

*None

3354

1875

5229

31.12

Dallas

Fordyce

2627

2190

4817

10.54

Desha

Dumas

2713

2194

4907

15.03

Drew

Monticello

2694

2075

4749

7.14

Faulkner

Conway

3049

1985

5034

21.38

Franklin

Ozark

3199

1962

5161

27.72

Fulton

Mammoth Spring

3959

1512

5471

43.20

Garland

Hot Springs

2729

2205

4934

16.38

Grant

Sheridan

2968

1936

4904

14.88

Greene

Paragould

3538

1945

5483

43.80

Hempstead

Hope

2928

2011

4939

16.63

Hot Spring

*None

2954

1906

4860

12.68

Howard

Nashville

3025

1940

4965

17.93

Independence

Batesville

3780

1594

5374

38.36

Izard

*None

3816

1572

5388

39.06

Jackson

Newport

3242

1952

5194

29.52

Jefferson

Pine Bluff

2800

2314

5114

25.37

Johnson

*None

3281

1875

5156

27.47

Lafayette

*None

2564

2095

4659

2.64

Lawrence

*None

3507

1833

5340

36.66

Lee

Marianna

3165

1893

5058

22.57

Lincoln

*None

2757

2194

4951

17.23

Little River

*None

2782

2015

4797

9.54

Logan

Subiaco

3118

2005

5123

25.82

Lonoke

*None

3250

1934

5184

28.87

Madison

*None

3862

1745

5607

50.00

Marion

*None

3868

1508

5376

Miller

*None

2659

2042

4701

4.74

Mississippi

Blytheville

3386

1982

5368

38.06

Monroe

Brinkley

3200

1922

5122

25.77

Montgomery

Mt. Ida

3328

1696

5024

20.88

Nevada

Prescott

2749

2251

5000

19.68

Newton

*None

3877

1662

5539

46.60

Ouachita

Camden

2707

2187

4894

14.38

Perry

Perry

3137

1866

5003

19.82

Phillips

Helena

3037

2036

5073

23.32

Pike

*None

3177

1854

5031

21.23

Poinsett

Marked Tree

3508

1844

5352

37.26

Polk

Mena

3105

1777

4885

13.93

Pope

Russellville

3163

1966

5129

26.12

Prairie

Des Arc

3147

2038

5185

28.92

Pulaski

Little Rock

3354

1925

5279

33.61

Randolph

Pocahontas

3662

1715

5377

38.51

St. Francis

*None

3144

1915

5059

22.62

Saline

Benton

3281

1743

5124

20.88

Scott

Waldron

3166

1882

5048

22.08

Searcy

Gilbert

3914

1466

5380

38.66

Sebastian

Ft. Smith

3336

2022

5358

37.56

Sevier

DeQueen

2855

1988

4843

11.84

Sharp

*None

3800

1533

5333

36.31

Stone

*None

3847

1685

5532

46.25

Union

El Dorado

2645

2204

4849

12.14

Van Buren

*None

3523

1722

5245

31.92

Washington

Fayetteville

3839

1487

5326

35.96

White

Searcy

3154

1942

5096

24.47

Woodruff

*None

3221

1937

5158

27.57

Yell

Dardanelle

3128

2039

5167

28.02

State of Arkansas

3214

1892

5106

24.97

*Averages determined by the Arkansas Energy Office

WEATHERIZATION WORK

Click here to view image

HEALTH AND SAFETY

Click here to view image

SECTION I - HEALTH AND SAFETY

PREAMBLE

Recognizing that flexible expenditure authority requires sophisticated diagnostic and application techniques, the Health and Safety Plan is divided into "Policy" and "Procedures" sections. The policy section gives the general management philosophy while the procedures, published in the "Weatherization Installation Standards Manual," provides detailed guidance regarding inspection and testing in addition to safety considerations and requirements.

PURPOSE

To establish the plan under which health and safety concerns are addressed in the Weatherization Assistance Program.

GOAL

To ensure energy savings are the result of ARRA Weatherization Assistance Program actions while promoting a healthy and safe environment for clients and WAP workers and contractors.

SCOPE

The Health and Safety Plan is applicable to all ARRA-WAP actions and operates in conjunction with the Space Heater Policy.

DEFINITIONS

Health and Safety Measures: Measures necessary to eliminate hazards which result from Weatherization measures, cause damage to Weatherization materials, or are necessary to repair damage to a dwelling caused by Weatherization activities.

General Heat Waste Measures: Measures which reduce or regulate air infiltration.

Weatherization Measures: Shell and equipment measures determined to be cost effective (SIR [GREATER THAN] 1) and listed on page 47 of the NEAT Audit Manual and in the SETUP option of the NEAT software program.

Incidental Repairs: Repairs necessary for the effective performance or preservation of weatherization materials.

Weatherization Materials: Those materials listed in Appendix A of the DOE Weatherization Assistance Program for Low Income Persons Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 440. Materials for incidental repairs do not have to be listed in Appendix A but should be at least equal to the industry standard practices.

EXPENDITURE LIMITS AND REPORTING

Health and Safety Measures: Costs may not exceed 20 percent of the average per dwelling unit cost limitation of $6,500 adjusted average for the grant program. These measures and associated costs must be recorded as entries under "Other" on page 4 of the BCJOS. Health and Safety costs are not included in the calculation of the SIR, are included in the "Total Actual Cost" of the dwelling, and will be reported as "Health and Safety Costs" on the Monthly Progress Report. Subgrantees will not be reimbursed for costs which exceed the 10 percent budgeted line items (except for materials, on items A - F) of the weatherization budget.

Weatherization Measure Costs: These costs may not exceed the average per dwelling unit cost limitation of $6,500 adjusted average. The Weatherization measures and associated costs will be recorded in the BCJOS, included in the "Total Actual Cost" of the dwelling, and reported separately in the Monthly Progress Report.

Incidental Repairs: These repairs and associated costs will be recorded on page 3 of the BCJOS under "Additional Necessary Repairs", included in the SIR calculations, included in the "Total Actual Cost" of the dwelling, and reported in the Monthly Progress Report.

HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY

The two most common health and safety concerns are carbon monoxide resulting from the incomplete combustion in household appliances and excess moisture conditions. Detailed inspection and test procedures are found in the Installation Standards Manual. However, the following guidelines should be followed on each unit weatherized. If the unit has an ambient air reading that exceeds the acceptable level of 9, the agency is instructed to find out what gas appliance is causing the high CO and correct it. This could mean a simple cleaning of a stove or space heater or the replacement of the defective appliance. If the agency is unsure of how to proceed, they are advised to seek guidance from the Office of Community Services.

If the unit has a gas appliance that exceeds the acceptable level for CO, the agency must address the appliance by cleaning or replacing as needed.

All units weatherized must have a carbon monoxide detector installed. The CO detectors should be installed in all areas containing a gas appliance.

All weatherization clients should receive client education information about CO and the dangers associated with it. The clients should be made aware of how the CO detector works and what to do should the unit begin to beep‖. The Client Education Checklist should be documented to reflect that the client has been informed about carbon monoxide and the dangers associated with it. The client must sign this form indicating that they have been made aware of the dangers.

If the unit contains a space heater or the agency installs a new infrared space heater, the client must be advised that the manufacturer recommends that a window be left open at least 2 inches to allow any CO emitted from the appliance to dissipate. The Client Education Checklist must be documented to reflect that the client received these instructions.

Agencies are advised that state policy requires that if a unit has CO readings that are above acceptable levels, the agency should advise the client of the dangers and ask that the problem be corrected prior to any weatherization taking place. If the client cannot correct the problem and the agency is unable to address the problem and stay in compliance with the average cost per unit, the unit must be considered a Walk-A-Way and the application denied. The client must be sent a letter advising them of the reason for the denial of their application.

Agencies are advised that the CO Monoxide Detector must be used correctly and requires maintenance. The CO Detector has an inlet sensor) that must be clear at all times in order to get an accurate reading. Before each reading is taken, the CO Detector must be adjusted using the instrument provided by the manufacturer so that a zero is reflected in the display window. When using the probe to check appliances, the probe should not be inserted into a flame or allowed to touch the heat producing element.

The manufacturer should calibrate the CO Detector at regular intervals. This will require the unit to be sent to the nearest Bacharach Service Center. As a quick check to see if the instrument is functioning, the agency is advised to perform a response check by exposing the instrument to a source of CO (e.g., cigarette smoke, smoke from a recently snuffed-out match, bottled CO). If the instrument does not show the presence of CO, or if the reading is obviously in error, do not use the instrument until it has been serviced by an authorized Bacharach Service Center.

Agencies are advised that if unsure of how to proceed, to contact the Office of Community Services. Under no circumstances should a unit be weatherized and the above guidelines not be followed. If a unit is weatherized and the above procedures are not followed, the agency will be required to reimburse the Weatherization Assistance Program in non-federal dollars for the cost of weatherizing this unit.

The Space Heater Policy, which remains in effect, also complements the Health and Safety Policy with respect to elevated carbon monoxide levels and excess moisture problems.

Other potential hazards such as radon gas, contamination from deteriorating lead based paint, friable asbestos, biologicals, volatile organic compounds, and existing health problems must be considered during the "in-take" interviews and initial dwelling inspection. If these problems are found, they must be resolved by the owner and other appropriate state and federal agencies.

Individual worker safety is paramount. Compliance with OSHA regulations coupled with common-sense work practices are the basis of personal protection. Detailed inspection, testing, and safety procedures are published as part of the Installation Standards Manual.

To implement the Health and Safety Plan, the Office of Community Services will assist subgrantees in purchasing the equipment necessary for problem identification and provide the necessary training for the use and maintenance of the equipment. Individual protective and test equipment purchased by subgrantees is to be charged to the "Health and Safety" budget category. Proper accountability will be maintained by the subgrantees.

ACCEPTABLE HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES

The cost of remediation of any health and safety problem or hazard will vary greatly. Any measure listed below will have to be judged on the actual cost before the final decision can be made to install the measure. The measures shown are examples of acceptable measures for general guidance and not an exhaustive list. Reasonable activities under the definition of health and safety measures should be undertaken if they can be done under the financial limitations of the program or be paid for with leveraged funds.

Typical measures include:

Cleaning, tuning, and testing of gas or oil combustion appliances including gas cook stoves.

Venting of unvented water and space heaters.

Installation of required heating system safety equipment, including safety controls required by building codes.

Minor repairs or cleaning of heating system venting devices, including chimneys and flues.

Installation of ventilation equipment to assure adequate ventilation and moisture control.

Installation of moisture retarders in basements and crawlspaces to prevent the flow of moisture into the structure. Low cost measures installed to prevent bulk moisture from entering or remaining in the building.

Minor repairs to electrical wiring that will allow the installation of weatherization materials or the installation of properly sized fuses to prevent wiring overloads.

WALKAWAY STANDARDS

The decision to walkaway from a dwelling is difficult to make but, in some cases, the problems are beyond the scope of the Weatherization Assistance Program. Walkaway does not imply that the case is closed but that weatherization work must be postponed until the problems can be resolved. In all cases, proper procedures must be followed and the decision process well documented. Subgrantees must develop a standard

"WALKAWAY" form. It must include the client's name and address; dates of the audit and when the client was informed; a clear description of the problem or problems; conditions under which weatherization can continue; a clearly defined course of action showing the responsibilities of all parties involved; the client's signature indicating that they understand and that they have been informed of their rights and options.

Walkaway conditions include but are not limited to:

Elevated Carbon monoxide levels (see Installation Standards Manual for testing techniques and CO level limits).

Problems with heating system vents, including chimneys, that permit gases to leak into the dwelling or are in imminent danger of causing a fire.

Existing moisture problems that cannot be resolved under the health and safety limits.

A house that is "too tight" and the ventilation needs cannot be installed under the health and safety expenditure limits.

A house with sewage or other sanitary problems that not only endanger the clients but the workers who will perform the weatherization work.

The client's health conditions are so fragile that the effects on the indoor environment will cause distress to the client.

A house that has existing asbestos siding that will be disturbed if weatherization takes place.

The building structure or its mechanical systems including electrical and plumbing are in such a state of disrepair that failure is imminent and these conditions cannot be resolved in a cost effective manner.

A house that contains mold and mildew problems to the extent that weatherization of the house would disturb the mold and mildew and endanger the health of the clients and the workers.

Requirements for Houses with Mold and Mildew

The use of DOE funds for the removal of mold and other related biological substances is not an allowable weatherization expense. The checklist that subgrantees use to inspect houses has been amended to include mold and mildew. If a mold condition is discovered during the initial inspection of the home by the energy auditor that cannot be adequately addressed by the weatherization crew, then the unit should be referred to the appropriate public and non-profit agency for remediation. Notification shall be provided to the client that informs the client what specifically was done to the home that is expected to alleviate the condition and/or that the work performed should not promote new growth. This notification shall be discussed with and signed by the client and/or landlord. A training plan has been included in the Health and Safety Plan.

"NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAD HAZARD EDUCATION BEFORE RENVOATION. For immediate implementation - all Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program activities doing renovation work in pre-1978 housing are subject to the provision of a Federal regulation that requires them to give a notification to the occupants of the housing about the potential hazards of lead paint and lead paint dust. This notification applies to all entities who do renovation work the law requires that individuals receive certain information before renovating six square feet or more of painted surfaces in a room for interior projects or more than twenty square feet of painted surfaces for exterior projects in housing, child care facilities and schools built before 1978.

Renovators may mail a copy of the EPA booklet Renovate Right - Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools‖ at least seven days prior to start of work. There are several specific exclusions like emergency repairs. Also, there is a record keeping requirement.

EPA has a lead homepage that is a part of the EPA website where there is useful information about this notification requirement and other information. The website is located at www.epa.gov/pubs/leadinfo/htm or by calling 1-800-242 -5323. States and local agencies will have to bear the cost of copying the booklet. States and local agencies needing the booklet for upcoming weatherization work may download the booklet from the web site and reproduce it locally.

Please remember - under this regulation local agencies who do not give proper notification could incur hefty fines if found doing renovation work in pre-1978 housing stock where more than six or more of painted surfaces in a room for interior projects or more than twenty square feet of painted surfaces for exterior projects in housing built before 1978.

To meet the LSW minimum standards, staff, crews, or contractors must follow the general principles of working in a lead-safe manner. Procedures include these safety precautions: Wear personal protective gear specifically suited for the particular LSW measure. Use the National Institute for Occupational Safety approved respirators with HEPA filters, use disposable overalls, gloves, goggles, and disposable shoe/boot covers. Keep dust to a minimum and properly contain dust and paint chips to the work area, clean up area during and after work.

All agencies should aggressively pursue alternative funding to reduce the occurrences of walk-a-ways. It is considered to be a minimum requirement to establish an open line of communication with as many other funding sources so that the leveraging or referral process will be as efficient as possible. The following is a list of potential funding sources.

HUD - HOME program

CSBG/CDBG

Rural Economic Community Development

State Programs

Local Utilities

Cities

Landlords

Local Churches or Community Groups

Local Businesses

Non Profits

Home Builders Association

SPACE HEATER

APPLICABILITY

This policy applies to natural gas (NG) and Liquid Propane Gas (LPG) fueled space heaters only. This policy applies to NG and LPG fueled space heaters whether the appliance is the primary or secondary heat source.

INCIDENTAL REPAIRS

Incidental repairs under the Weatherization Assistance Program are not affected by the policy contained herein. Agencies may continue making incidental repairs necessary to allow weatherization work to proceed safely.

SPACE HEATER POLICY

The space heater replacement or repair procedure includes inspection to ensure that a working smoke detector is installed on the same floor as the space heater. In instances where a smoke detector is not present or is not operating properly, one may be purchased and installed with Weatherization Assistance Program funds. The cost of the purchase and installation of the smoke detector is a material cost.

Client education, including information on the proper operation of the equipment, shall be provided. Checks shall be made to insure that auxiliary considerations, such as electrical wiring or chimneys, are in good condition; and, that no obvious building code violations or other safety hazards related to the space heater are evident. Installation of space heaters requires knowledge of appropriate industry standards and adherence to all aspects of the applicable building code(s) in the municipality where installation is taking place. Building permits shall be secured, where required, (this is a materials cost as well). All space heaters will be installed to comply with all state and local codes and licensing requirements. The provided Client Education checklist must be reviewed with each client and placed in the client file. The Space Heater Replacement or Repair Final Inspection Sheet shall be completed and placed in the client file.

DEFECTIVE VENTED HEATERS

In cases where weatherization work takes place on homes with Defective Vented Space Heaters, local agencies shall determine if a replacement vented heater can be installed or consider not weatherizing the house with measures that decrease air infiltration. In cases where replacement is indicated, agencies shall carefully analyze existing conditions to best determine whether to require replacement with the same fuel type. The decision to change fuel types shall be on a limited, case-by-case basis.

UNVENTED HEATERS

In cases where weatherization work takes place on homes with defective unvented space heaters as primary sources, local agencies shall determine if a replacement infrared space heater can be installed to carry the major heating load. In cases where replacement is indicated, agencies shall carefully analyze existing conditions to best determine whether to require replacement with the same fuel items. The decision to change fuel types will be on a limited case-by-case basis.

ELECTRIC SPACE HEATERS

DOE funds cannot be used to work on electric space heaters. This is because of the high cost of electricity as compared to fossil fuels; the lower output ratings (size); the risk of fire hazards-especially in older homes; and, the inadequate electrical systems in older homes frequently cannot safely carry the power required to operate an electric heater. Work on such systems may make local agencies liable for inadequate electric wiring and damages that may result.

GAS SPACE HEATERS

Replacement of gas space heaters should occur only when the existing ones are in poor mechanical condition or pose health and safety risks. Such replacement should be with a vented gas space heater, where proper ventilation exists. Replacement of a vented space heater must be with a vented space heater. Replacement of a non-vented space heater must be with a vented space heater.

KEROSENE SPACE HEATERS

Because of the potential for serious indoor air quality and moisture problems, the potential fire hazards and that the user must select the proper grade of kerosene, local agencies shall replace the unvented kerosene space heaters with a NG or LPG vented space heater, or not weatherize the house.

IMPLEMENTATION

Funds to address these items will be an allowable Weatherization Assistance Program cost; however, the maximum average amount permitted per dwelling unit will not be increased as a result of the space heater measures. The subgrantee must develop and follow inspection and safety procedures. Adequate liability insurance is required. In all cases, an education component for clients shall be included in the space heater work. Testing for indoor air quality, especially carbon monoxide levels in all homes with vented or unvented space heaters, shall be performed.

HEATER REPLACEMENT CRITERIA

Any defective vented or unvented space heater:

*Bad burners

*Cross fueled (natural gas heater or LPG)

*Missing radiants

*Open faced

*Exceeds 25 PPM reading of Carbon Monoxide

DEFECTIVE HEATER DISPOSAL

All defective space heaters removed from client's home shall become the property of the agency and must be made inoperable beyond repair and disposed of by the agency.

ELIGIBILITY

Any client, homeowner or renter, who is eligible for assistance under the U. S. Department of Energy, ARRA Weatherization Assistance Program guidelines are eligible for space heater services. If the client is a renter, the client must sign a certification that the space heater will remain with the house if the client moves; furthermore, the landlord must certify that the house will continue to be rented to a renter who is eligible for the Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program for a minimum of three years.

SMOKE DETECTORS

*All dwellings, where the heating system is repaired or replaced must have smoke detectors installed before the completion of the work.

*Smoke detectors shall be installed outside of each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms and on each additional story of the dwelling.

*All detectors shall be connected to a sounding device or other detectors to provide, when activated, an alarm which will be audible in all sleeping areas.

*All detectors shall be approved and listed and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

*Smoke detectors may be battery powered when installed in existing buildings, if allowed by local codes.

CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS

*All dwellings, where the heating system is repaired or replaced must have a carbon monoxide detector installed before the completion of the work.

*Install the detectors in all sleeping areas.

*Do not install detectors within 15 feet of fuel burning appliances and do not install them in potentially humid areas like the bathroom or laundry room.

*Carbon monoxide detectors should be mounted on the wall at eye level.

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

SPACE HEATER REPLACEMENT SMOKE DETECTORS & CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS

STANDARDS

ı VENTED GAS FIRED Room Heater ANSI 221.11.1-1981

Smoke Detector Commercially Available

Carbon Monoxide Detector UL² 2034-9

__________________

¹ANSI indicates American National Standards Institute ²UL indicates Underwriters Laboratories

WEATHERIZATION LEAD PAINT STANDARDS PART 1: GENERAL COMPONENT REMOVAL

A. Care shall be taken to avoid damage to adjacent areas during the removal of components to be replaced. The Weatherization Contractor shall run a sharp utility knife around the edge of the substrate (of component to be removed) and the adjacent substrate (of the component not being removed) to cut any bonding between the substrates and, thereby; eliminating damage when component is removed.

B. If components to be removed contain gross areas of loose or peeling paint, these areas shall be wet scrapped or HEPA vacuumed prior to removal. The paint chips shall be contained either in the HEPA vacuum or in a separate six-mil polyethylene bag.

C. Using a garden sprayer or atomizer, lightly mist the component to be removed with water to help keep the dust down during the removal process.

D. Remove any screws or other fasteners. Using a flat pry instrument and a hammer, carefully pry the affected building component away from the surface to which it is attached. The pry bar should be carefully inserted into the seam at the nail (or other fastening device) at one end of the component and pressure applied. This process should be repeated at other fastening locations until the end of the component is reached. By prying in this manner, the component will be removed intact and chip and dust generation will be minimized. A pry point pad or softener may be required to minimize damaged to adjoining substrates. Carefully lower component to the ground, do not drop or throw component. Begin cleanup immediately after the individual component has been removed. Wider replacement trim may be used to cover adjacent area damage.

E. Carefully remove or bend back all nails or other fastening devices and wrap with six-mil plastic sheeting and seal with duct tape. Wrapping components in plastic may not be necessary if the dwelling is vacant and if the dumpster and the pathway to the dumpster are lined with six-mil plastic.

F. Use a HEPA vacuum and wet wash to remove any dust that may have accumulated behind the components as soon as they have been removed. Preparing the area for the new component (i.e., squaring, reducing, to enlarging openings) may also release accumulated dust that should be removed. Dispose of removed components properly.

Bring new lead-free components into the work area only after all dust-generating activity is completed and the dust is cleaned up by at least one HEPA vacuuming.

PART2: DOOR COMPONENT REMOVAL

A. The following procedures shall be performed.
1. Place visqueen on floor under door that is to be removed to catch all paint and wood particles.

2. Remove screws or nails from the doorjamb that is holding the door firmly in place.

3. Let door down gently on visqueen and wrap entire door with visqueen, tape the ends of visqueen whereas debris cannot escape from the wrapped door.

4. Take all debris to a local municipal solid waste landfill.

B. Carefully score paint and caulk lines at walls adjoining casings with razor knife. Removal of jambs and casings shall not damage existing plaster or gypsum board and paint.

C. Carefully pry jams and casings from wooden anchors and remove, using a wood block at the fulcrum point to protect the plaster.

D. Remove any protruding paint ridges. Wet scrape and HEPA vacuum all loose paint and debris.

E. Fill damaged spaces with plaster or equivalent materials to make walls smooth.

F. Conduct a thorough cleanup using the HEPA vacuum, wet wash sequence.

PART 3: WINDOW COMPONENT REMOVAL and REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING PRIMARY WINDOWS

A. For window removal from the exterior side, visqueen shall be taped to the interior walls prior to any window removal. For window removal from the interior side, tape visqueen to the exterior wall. These critical barriers shall remain in place until the windows are replaced. Children cannot be present in the house until the visqueen is removed due to the suffocation and lead hazards. Protect the soil/floor from contamination by installing visqueen at the perimeter of the work area and out at least five feet.

B. For window removals from the exterior side, visqueen shall be taped to the interior walls prior to any window removal. Using a HEPA vacuum equipped with a metal attachment, remove and vacuum all loose chips and flakes of paint from window trough components and remove any existing exterior storm windows and screens and dispose of as construction debris if not being reused.

C. Using a garden sprayer or atomizer, lightly mist the component to be removed with water to help keep the dust down during the removal process.

D. Using a utility knife or other sharp instrument, carefully score all affected painted seams.

E. Any damage to adjacent surfaces due to component removal shall be repaired and restored with similar or better materials.

F. The sequence of work for component removal shall follow the prescribed order:
1. Loosen exterior facings and remove;

2. Remove screen stop;

3. Remove top sash;

4. Remove parting beads with pry tool, or pliers;

5. Remove bottom sash;

6. Remove all loose dirt and debris, HEPA vacuuming and wet wash all surrounding surfaces and window well;

7. Inspect the window and when no visible dust or debris is found, encapsulate window components with white latex paint;

8. Keep critical barriers intact;

9. When no visible dust or debris is found, window replacement shall proceed;

10. Install new window, stops and new facings.

PART 4: REMOVAL AND REPLACMENT OF EXISTING WOODEN PRIMARY WINDOWS FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE HOUSE.

A. For window removal from the interior side, visqueen shall be taped to the exterior walls prior to any window removal. These critical barriers shall remain in place until the windows are replaced. Children cannot be present in the house until the visqueen is removed due to the suffocation and lead hazards. Protect the soil/floor from contamination by installing visqueen at the perimeter of the work area and out at least five feet.

B. Using a HEPA vacuum equipped with a metal attachment, remove and vacuum all loose chips and flakes of paint from the window trough components and remove any existing storm windows and screens and dispose of as construction debris.

C. Using a garden sprayer or atomizer, lightly mist the component to be removed with water to help keep the dust down during the removal process.

D. Using a utility knife or other sharp instrument, carefully score all affected painted seams. Any damage to adjacent surfaces due to component removal shall be repaired and restored with similar or better materials.

E. The sequence of work for the component removal shall follow this prescribed order:
1. Carefully pry off interior stops and remove;

2. Remove bottom sash;

3. Remove parting beads with pry or pliers;

4. Remove top sash;

5. Remove all loose dirt and debris, HEPA vacuum and wet wash all surrounding surfaces and window wells;

6. Inspect window components and when no visible dust or debris is present encapsulate with latex paint;

7. Keep critical barriers intact;

8. Window replacement shall proceed.

F. If there are any large cavities around window opening, stuff with batt insulation until full.

G. Caulk around all window trim to prevent air infiltration, smooth caulk for a nice appearance.

H. Remove all stickers and labels from the new windows.

I. Windows shall be of appropriate size to match window opening.

J. Windows shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions

K. If mini-blinds are present, they shall be removed for installation of the new window. Upon completion of the window installation, the blinds shall be reinstalled in accordance with manufacture's recommendations.

PART 5: WET SCRAPING AND REPAINTING

A. Protect the floor/ground with two layers of visqueen.

B. Mist the subject components with water. Wet scrape or wet sand to remove all loose paint and provide a smooth surface for repainting.

C. Upon completion of the wet scraping or sanding, immediately remove one layer of the visqueen and dispose of waste properly.

D. Allow sufficient time to dry. Paint with a minimum of two coats of premium quality interior or exterior paint.

E. Thoroughly clean the area using the HEPA vacuum, wet wash sequence.

F. Dispose of waste properly.
1. Small debris is to be placed in a six-mil trash bag tied in gooseneck method. Bend top of trash bag down about six inches and tie down or tape whereas debris cannot escape bag. May be discarded at a municipal solid waste landfill.

2. Place large debris in a container that closes and has lockable doors. Send to a solid waste landfill or combustor.

PART 6: DOOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT

A. Preparation procedures shall be performed to minimize lead dust contamination. (Cover the work area floor with visqueen.)

B. Carefully score paint and caulk lines at walls adjoining casings with razor knife. Removal of jambs and casings shall not damage existing plaster or gypsum board and paint.

C. Carefully pry jambs and casings from wooden anchors and remove, using a wood block as a fulcrum point to protect the plaster or gypsum.

D. Remove any protruding paint ridges. Wet scrape and HEPA vacuum all loose paint and debris.

E. Interior doors will be replaced with pre-hung wood or masonite door unit. Exterior door will be replaced with an insulated steel door unit or a wood solid core door that includes all necessary hardware.

F. Door and trim will be finished to match existing paint or stain trim.

G. Door will be hung following manufacture's instructions, paying particular attention to install the door plumb and square.

H. Door will meet the frame properly at the top and bottom of the stops.

I. All painted surfaces will receive a primer coat (unless pre-painted) and two finish coats of premium paint.

J. If installing a solid core slab carefully remove pins from hinges and remove the door.

Carefully remove hinges from doorjambs. Wet scrape and HEPA vacuum all loose paint and debris. Encapsulate with paint if necessary. Proceed with normal installation of the door.

K. Thoroughly clean the area with a HEPA vacuum.

L. Dispose of waste properly.

CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF LEAD PAMPHLET

I have received a copy of the pamphlet, Renovate Right - Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools, informing me of the potential risk of the lead hazard exposure. I have been made aware that my house has lead hazards, and that the Weatherization Assistance Program measures installed on my home will not disturb the lead-based paint.

_____________________________ _____________________

Printed Name of Recipient Date

_____________________________

Signature of Recipient

MOLD AND MILDEW CERTIFICATION

I acknowledge that I have been informed that my house has mold and mildew. I further acknowledge that I have been informed that the Weatherization Assistance Program is not responsible for removing or correcting the problems causing the mold and mildew and that there are health risks associated with mold and mildew if not removed. The work being performed will not alleviate the mold condition nor will it promote new mold growth. I certify that I have received a copy of EPA 402-K-02-003, A Brief Guide to Mold, Moisture and Your Home.

_________________________________ _ _ ________________________

Printed Name of Recipient Date

____________________________________

Signature of Recipient

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

MOLD AND MILDEW TRAINING PLAN

DEFINITION OF MILDEW/MOLD

Superior growth produced by fungi on various surfaces, mildew can form on most materials or products which are exposed to moisture resulting In discoloration and decomposition of a surface

INTRODUCTION TO MOLDS

Mold produce tiny spores to reproduce. Mold spores waft through the indoor and outdoor air continually. When mold spores land on a damp spot indoors, they may begin growing and digesting whatever they are growing on in order to survive. There are molds that can grow on wood, paper, carpet, and foods. When excessive moisture or water accumulates indoors, mold growth will often occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or unaddressed. There is no practical way to eliminate all mold and mold spores in the indoor environment; the way to control indoor mold growth is to control moisture.

WHERE DOES MOLD COME FROM?

Basically the only requirements for mold growth indoors are a food source and a little moisture. Food sources are plentiful in our homes and can include cellulose products such as drywall, wood, insulation, cardboard and paper, as well as, invisible bio-film on hard surfaces, carpet backing, wallpaper adhesive, many fabrics, leather, and especially house dust which is primarily dead skin cells shed from humans. Moisture sources are also multiple and can include humidity trapped inside of homes which are constructed more airtight than they used to be, all areas where moisture builds up as condensation, former or active roof leaks, plumbing leaks, backed-up floor drains, and water seepage through siding or foundations. Due to the abundant food and moisture sources indoors, most homes inspected will have multiple locations where mold is actively growing.

MOISTURE PROBLEMS

Moisture causes billions of dollars in property and high-energy bills each year in American homes.

MOISTURE CONTROL IN HOMES

Moisture control is the key to mold control

TEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT MOLD

Potential health effects and symptoms associated with mold exposures include allergic reactions, asthma, and other respiratory complaints.

There is no practical way to eliminate all mold and mold spores in the indoor environment.

If mold is a problem in your home or school, you must clean up the mold and eliminate sources of moisture.

Fix the source of the water problem or leak to prevent mold growth.

Reduce indoor humidity (to 30-60%) to decrease mold by; venting bathrooms, dryers, and other moisture-generating sources to the outside; using air conditioners and de-humidifiers; increasing ventilation; and using exhaust fans whenever cooking, dishwashing, and cleaning.

Clean and dry any damp or wet building materials and furnishings within 24-48 hours to prevent mold growth.

Clean mold off hard surfaces with water and detergent, and dry completely. Absorbent materials such as ceiling tiles, that are moldy, may need to be replaced.

Prevent condensation: Reduce the potential for condensation on cold surfaces (i.e., windows, piping, exterior walls, roof, or floors) by adding insulation.

In areas where there is a perpetual moisture problem, do not install carpeting (i.e., by drinking fountains, by classroom sinks, or on concrete floors with leaks or frequent condensation).

Molds can be found almost anywhere; they can grow on virtually any substance, providing moisture is present. There are molds that can grow on wood, paper, carpet, and foods.

MOISTURE IN YOUR HOME CAN COME FROM MANY SOURCES

Leaking

Seeping

Showers

Cooking

No insulation in walls or other areas

Rooms closed off

Temperature difference between rooms

No air circulation

Landscape of property

The amount of moisture that the air in your home can HOLD depends on the temperature of the air. As the temperature goes down, the air is able to hold less moisture. This is why in cold weather moisture will condense on cold surfaces.

THERE ARE MANY WAYS TO CONTROL MOISTURE IN YOUR HOME:

Fix leaks and seepage. If water is entering the house from the outside, your options range from simple landscaping to extensive excavation and waterproofing.

Place plastic sheeting over the dirt in crawlspaces to prevent moisture from coming from the ground. Be sure crawlspaces are well ventilated.

Use exhaust fans in bathrooms and kitchens to remove moisture to the outside (not in attic). Vent your clothes dryer to the outside.

Turn off certain appliances (such as humidifiers or kerosene and other non-vented sources), if you notice moisture on windows and other surfaces.

Use dehumidifiers and air conditioners, especially in hot, humid climates, to reduce moisture in the air.

Raise the temperature of cold surfaces where moisture condenses. Use insulation or storm windows. (A storm window installed on the inside works better than one installed on the outside.) Open doors between rooms (especially doors to closets which may be colder than the rooms) to increase circulation. Circulation carries heat to the cold surfaces. Increase air circulation by using fans and by moving furniture from wall corners to promote air and heat circulation. Be sure that your house has a source of fresh air and can expel excessive moisture from the home.

Pay special attention to carpet on concrete floors. Carpet can absorb moisture and serve as a place for biological pollutants to grow. Use area rugs that can be taken up and washed often.

Moisture problems and their solutions differ from one climate to another.

INSPECT THE BUILDING FOR SIGNS OF MOLD, MOISTURE, LEAKS, OR SPILLS

* Check for moldy odors

* Look for water stains or discoloration on the ceiling, walls, floors, and windowsills

* Look around and under sinks for standing water, water stains and mold

* Inspect bathrooms for standing water, water stains, or mold

* Do not let water stand in air conditioning or refrigerator drip pans

THE INDOOR AIR PROBLEM

Sick homes or "Sick Building Syndrome," as it is more often called, is actually a term that refers to homes and buildings that collect pollutant or directly contribute to the contamination of the air inside. This results in the sickness and disease of the individuals who live or work inside. Since the 1970's, we have been making our homes and buildings very airtight and energy efficient without considering the affect this would have on the indoor air we breathe. In essence, we have sealed in energy saving heat and air conditioning and sealed out everything that is good for us.

Indoor air pollution is a widespread problem in both new and old homes, whether located in cities or in rural areas. Indoor air contaminants are non-discriminating, affecting everyone from infants to senior citizens.

On average, each human will breathe approximately 2,500 gallons of air every day without proper consideration of its purity.

We spend approximately 90% of our time indoors continuously inhaling dust particle pollutants, household chemicals and construction materials.

SYMPTOMS OF INDOOR AIR CONTAMINATION

STUFFY NOSE

COUGHING

NASAL DRIP

WHEEZING

ITCHY THROAT

TIREDNESS

ITCHY EYES

FATIGUE

TEARING EYES

LEARNING DISABILITIES

SNEEZING

ALLERGIES

INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE

WHAT YOU CAN DO

ADDRESS ALL INDOOR AIR QUALITY ISSUES

CONSIDER ADDITIONAL VENTILATION/PURIFICATION & FILTRATION

PURCHASE DEHUMIDIFIERS/AIR CONDITIONERS

OPEN ALL ROOM & CLOSET DOORS

MOVE FURNITURE AWAY FROM WALLS

REMOVE SOME CLOTHING FROM CLOSETS FOR AIR CIRCULATION

INSULATE WALL AREAS

CREW SAFETY

Basic safety rules are nothing more than common sense. Safe work habits protect you and your co-workers. Most accidents are caused by:

·Careless attitudes

·Unsafe working conditions

·Improper use of tools

·Improper lifting

A. Unsafe Working Conditions

The work site and structure should be checked for unsafe conditions before work begins.

B. Site Analysis

Check conditions outside the structure which may be hazardous. Below is a list of things to look for.

·Dogs and other pets

·Low electric lines

·Broken glass

·Insect nests

·Trash and debris

·Small children

Nails that stick through the sheathing of the roof are dangerous. Always wear a hard hat while working in the attic.

C. Safe Use of Tools and Equipment

Most accidents that happen during weatherization jobs can be prevented by:

·Wearing protective gear

·Using the right tools

·Using tools correctly

·Observing general safety rules

D. Protective Gear

The following protective gear should be made available to all crew members:

·Hard Hat

·Goggles with side eye protectors

·Gloves

·Respirator (for blown-in insulation and for Lead)

·Dust Mask

Crew members must accept responsibility for their safety by wearing the gear.

E. Ladders

Many serious injuries are caused by the improper use of ladders. Below are some tips for the safe use of ladders:

Use of ladders when climbing. Do not use boxes, chairs, etc.

·Keep ladder in good repair, check the ladder for broken rungs, steps and rails. Damaged ladders should be repaired or replaced immediately.

·Set up straight (extension ladders on a firm, level base at the proper angle).

·Do not set up ladders near doors or blind corners. If a ladder must be set up near a door, lock the door.

·Do not overreach when on a ladder. Always keep the hips within the side rails.

·Do not leave tools on top of step ladders. Keep tools in a bucket hooked to the ladder or on a tool belt.

·Always face the ladder when going up or down.

·Use caution when using metal ladder on metal roof with low electrical wires.

F. Blowing Machines

Blowing machines should be used cautiously and correctly. Observe the general safety points below while using blowers.

·Never use a blowing machine unless you have been taught to use it properly and safely.

·Electric blowing machines should always be grounded.

·Never use electric blowing machines when the ground is wet or during rain.

·Use heavy duty extension cords for lengths more than 100 feet.

·Always disconnect the power supply before oiling the applicator or making any adjustments to the lines.

·Never put your hands in the hopper when the blowing machine is connected to the power supply.

G. Hand Tools

The improper use of hand tools causes many injuries. Below are a few safety rules that apply to all hand tools.

1. First, and most important, USE THE PROPER TOOL TO DO THE JOB. Each tool is designed to do a particular job. Use tools for the job they were made for.

2. Keep tools clean. Wipe away grease, dirt, caulk, etc. Lubricate moving parts to ensure good working conditions.

3. Keep cutting edges sharp. Sharp tools are safer than dull tools and make work easier, improve accuracy, and save time.

4. Discard damaged tools. Be sure to follow proper procedures for disposing of property.

H. Power Tools

Power tools are not dangerous if used properly, but careless use has caused the loss of many fingers and hands. Accidents with power tools happen so quickly that a finger can be lost before you feel the pain. Shock is also a hazard when using power tools. A fall caused by shock can cause serious injury.

WHEN USING POWER TOOLS:

1. Use tools that are grounded.

2. Use three-prong extension cords only. When an adapter is used, it must be grounded.

3. REPORT any shock caused by power tools. This indicates a short which must be repaired.

4. Don't use defective power tools. Even minor defects can cause injury.

5. Don't use power tools in wet areas.

6. Don't use tools with damaged electric cords.

7. Never use a power tool unless you have been taught to operate it properly.

8. Wear eye protection when operating electric power tools.

9. Use ear plugs for loud power tools.

10. Be sure the switch is off before plugging the tool into the circuit.

11. Never talk to anyone using a power tool. Talking may distract the person long enough to cause an injury.

12. Check for wiring before cutting into walls.

13. Never remove the ground from a plug. Use a grounded adapter.

I. Housekeeping

Good housekeeping prevents injury and saves time. Areas cluttered with insulation bags, plastic film and trash are hazards. To keep the work site clean and safe:

1. Don't leave tools laying around. Tools should be returned to the tool box or tool pouch.

2. As batt and blanket wrappings are removed, place them in a trash bag or container.

3. As loose-fill insulation bags are emptied and counted, place them in a container or another bag.

4. Place all broken glass in metal containers. Never put broken glass in plastic bags.

5. Remove protruding nails from wood immediately.

6. Spilled grease or oil should be cleaned up immediately.

J. Lifting

Weatherization crew members should know how to lift correctly. Incorrect lifting causes strains, back injuries and hernias. When lifting:

1. Don't lift any more than you can handle.

2. Set feet solidly with one foot slightly ahead of the other.

3. Get as close to the object as possible.

4. Bend knees no more than 90°.

5. Keep the back straight. Bend at the hip and not at the back.

6. Grip the object firmly and lift with your legs.

7. Never carry an object you can't see around.

FIRST AID

Every crew member should know what to do when an accident happens. One person in each crew should be a graduate of a Red Cross First Aid Course. At a minimum, periodic first aid training should be provided to crew members.

The following will introduce you to some basic do's and don'ts when injuries occur-it is not a substitute for taking a first aid course.

GENERAL FIRST AID PROCEDURES:

1. Each crew should have one person responsible for first aid.

2. An industrial first aid kit (Red Cross approved) should be standard equipment for each crew.

3. Always be aware of the locations of the first aid kit and fire extinguisher.

4. The phone numbers of a physician, ambulance, hospital emergency room, fire department, and weatherization office should be posted on the first aid kit and dashboard of each program vehicle.

5. Report all injuries, even minor ones, to the crew chief or program director.

6. Get medical attention when someone is injured. Have a responsible person go with the victim.

7. Crew members should have tetanus shots.

BASIC RULES WHEN INJURIES OCCUR:

1. Call for medical help as soon as possible. Describe the injury and what is being done. If you are not sure what first aid is best, call the hospital emergency room. A doctor or nurse can advise you.

2. Don't move the victim unless absolutely necessary.

3. Keep the victim lying down, the head level with the body, until you know the extent of the injury.

4. Look for the control bleeding.

5. Make sure the victim is breathing.

6. Keep the person warm and as comfortable as possible.

7. Don't give liquid to a semi-conscious person.

8. Use a knife to remove clothing when necessary.

9. Make notes on the accident. Find out exactly what happened. This is important for insurance purposes and to prevent similar accidents in the future.

RENTAL PROCEDURES

MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL PLAN

Prevention of Undue Excessive Enhancements to Multi-Family Rental Dwelling Units

Subgrantees, in order to avoid undue or excessive enhancement in the value of rental dwelling units resulting from the provision of weatherization services, shall request financial participation from owners of buildings who request weatherization services. The amount requested will be a percentage of the total cost of the weatherization work to be performed, such amount requested to be reflective of the anticipated excessive or undue enhancement which will result from weatherization services.

In the situation where a building owner contends that he is unable to financially participate as requested by the subgrantee, an assessment of the owner's financial situation will be made. If it is determined that the building owner is financially unable to participate, his building will be eligible to receive weatherization services in the same priority as building owners who have financially participated. In the case of inability to pay, the subgrantee should, however, assess other means of assuring that no undue or excessive enhancement will occur.

Building owners who are willing to participate financially will be accorded priority in the receipt of weatherization services over building owners who are not willing to participate. Building owners who are financially able to participate will be required to pay 50% or the amount the subgrantee determines the landlord is able to contribute of the weatherization cost or contribute in-kind labor or materials with a fair market value of 50% of the weatherization. Further, if a financially able building owner refuses to participate and the subgrantee has weatherization funds remaining after providing service to participating owners, the subgrantee can provide weatherization services only if services to the non-participating owners will not result in undue or excessive enhancement.

If prior to the start of weatherization work, an escrow account is utilized to hold the funds that are provided by the building owner, the disposition of any interest that accrues from the account shall be the product of mutual agreement between the building owner and the subgrantee.

C-1

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 1

AGENCIES

COUNTIES

BLACK RIVER AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (BRAD) 1403 HOSPITAL DRIVE POCAHONTAS, ARKANSAS 72455 JIM JANSEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (870) 892-5218

CLAY

LAWRENCE

RANDOLPH

CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL (CADC)

722 GAUNT STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 580

BENTON, ARKANSAS 72018

LARRY COGBURN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 315-1121

LONOKE

COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR

CENTRAL ARKANSAS, INC. (CAPCA)

707 ROBINS STREET, SUITE 118

CONWAY, ARKANSAS 72034

PHYLISS FRY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 329-3891

CLEBURNE

CROWLEY'S RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

(CRDC)

2801 FOX MEADOW LANE

POST OFFICE BOX 1497

JONESBORO,ARKANSAS 72403

LOYD PRICE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 802-7100

CRAIGHEAD

CRITTENDEN

CROSS

GREENE

JACKSON

POINSETT

ST. FRANCIS

WOODRUFF

MID-DELTA COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.

(MDCS)

POST OFFICE DRAWER 745

HELENA, ARKANSAS 72342

MARGARET STAUB, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 338-6406

LEE

MONROE PHILLIPS PRAIRIE

MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, ARKANSAS ECONOMIC

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, INC. (MCAEOC)

1400 NORTH DIVISION STREET

POST OFFICE DRAWER 1289

BLYTHEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72316-1289

SAM SCRUGGS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 776-1054

MISSISSIPPI

NORTHCENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL, INC. (NADC)

550 9TH STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 3349

BATESVILLE, ARKANSAS 72503

LARRY GOODWIN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 793-5765

FULTON

INDEPENDENCE

IZARD

SHARP

STONE

OZARK OPPORTUNITIES, INC. (OOI)

701 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE

POST OFFICE BOX 1400

HARRISON, ARKANSAS 72601

ROGER RUTHERFORD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 741-9406

SEARCY

PINE BLUFF-JEFFERSON COUNTY ECONOMIC

OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION, INC.

(PB-JCEOC)

817 SO. CHERRY STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 7228

PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS 71611

CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, INTERIM

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 536-0046

ARKANSAS

CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL (CADC)

722 GAUNT STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 580

BENTON, ARKANSAS 72018

LARRY COGBURN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 315-1121

SALINE

COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR

CENTRAL ARKANSAS, INC. (CAPCA)

707 ROBINS STREET, SUITE 118

PHYLISS FRY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 329-3891

FAULKNER WHITE

CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL (CADC)

5620 W. 12TH STREET, SUITE 9

LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72204

LARRY COGBURN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 603-0909

PULASKI

OZARK OPPORTUNITIES, INC. (OOI)

701 EAST PROSPECT

POST OFFICE BOX 1400

HARRISON, ARKANSAS 72602

ROGER RATCHFORD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 741-9406

VAN BUREN

UNIVERSAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (UHDC)

301 EAST THIRD STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 846

RUSSELLVILLE, ARKANSAS 72801

PATRICIA ATKINSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(479) 968-5001

CONWAY

YELL

PERRY

CRAWFORD-SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC. (C-SCDC)

4831 ARMOUR STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 4069

FORT SMITH, ARKNASAS 72914

MARK WHITMER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(479) 785-2303

CRAWFORD SEBASTIAN

OFFICE OF HUMAN CONCERN, INC. (OHC)

506 EAST SPRUCE STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 778

ROGERS, ARKANSAS 72757

AL WEST, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(479) 636-7301

BENTON

CARROLL

MADISON

WASHINGTON

OZARK OPPORTUNITIES, INC. (OOI)

701 EAST PROSPECT

POST OFFICE BOX 1400

HARRISON, ARKANSAS 72601

ROGER RATCHFORD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 741-9406

BAXTER

BOONE

MARION

NEWTON

UNIVERSAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (UHDC)

301 EAST THIRD STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 846

PATRICIA ATKINSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(479) 968-5001

FRANKLIN

JOHNSON

LOGAN

POLK

POPE

SCOTT

CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL (CADC)

722 GAUNT STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 580

BENTON, ARKANSAS 72018

LARRY COGBURN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 315-1121

CALHOUN

CLARK

COLUMBIA

DALLAS

HOT SPRINGS

OUACHITA

MONTGOMERY

PIKE

UNION

COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE, INC. (CSO)

600 WEST GRAND

POST OFFICE BOX 1175

HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSAS 71902

LEON MASSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(501) 624-5724

GARLAND

PINE BLUFF-JEFFERSON COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION, INC. (PB-JCEOC)

817 CHERRY STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 7228

PINE BLUFF, AR 71603

CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (870) 741-9406

CLEVELAND

JEFFERSON LINCOLN

GRANT

SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION

CORPORATION (SEACAC)

1208 MYRTLE STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 312

WARREN, ARKANSAS 71671

LARY HENDERSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870)226-2668

ASHLEY

BRADLEY

CHICOT

DESHA

DREW

SOUTHWEST ARKANSA DEVELOPMENT

COUNCIL (SWADC)

3902 SANDERSON LANE

TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS

RICKY PONDEXTER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

(870) 773-5504

HEMPSTEAD

HOWARD

LAFAYETTE

LITTLE RIVER

MILLER

NEVADA

SEVIER

ADMINISTRATIVE

EXPENDITURE

LIMITS

Administrative Expenditure Limits

Allowable expenditure under this part. Allowable expenditure for the Arkansas Weatherization Program shall be in accordance with 440.18 (c), (d) and (e).

In compliance with P.L. 101-440, which allows some subgrantees to use up to an additional five percent of their subgrants for administrative purposes, the following criteria is submitted:

A. Arkansas has 15 subgrantees and all will receive more than $350,000 in grant funds for the grant period, therefore administrative costs will be in accordance with 440.18d.

Expenditures not allowed under 10 CFR 440.18(e).

No grant funds awarded under this part shall be used for any of the following purposes:

A. To weatherize a dwelling unit which is designated for acquisition or clearance by a federal, state, or local program within twelve months from the date weatherization of the dwelling unit would be scheduled to be completed; or

B. To install or otherwise provide weatherization materials for a dwelling unit weatherized previously, except the following:

A house may be weatherized if it was previously weatherized prior to

September 30, 1994. Unless such dwelling unit has been damaged by fire, flood or act of God and repair of the damage to weatherization materials is not paid for by insurance.

C. Low-cost/no-cost weatherization shall be allowed.

MONITORING APPROACH

Click here to view image

Click here to view image

REGULATION REFERENCE: 440.14(b)(9)(i)

Subgrantees are monitored a minimum of two times annually, but may be required more often if requested by the agency or is deemed necessary by the State Weatherization Office.

Monitoring and evaluation activities include:

a. Review of the office procedures to determine if all systems are functioning according to written procedures;

b. Review the client intake procedures, i.e., income guidelines and point system;

c. Review client files for accuracy and completeness;

d. Review staffing levels and identify labor problems;

e. Review material management controls, check warehouse inventory/tools and equipment;

f. Review Financial Management System;

g. Review safety issues;

h. Make at least one home inspection per crew of completions and/or units in progress;

I. Hold an exit interview with the Program Director and Executive Director, and plan follow-up visits.

Following the visit, the monitor files a written report with the Executive Director and/or designee(s), and summarizes the findings along with suggested corrective action and comments.

1) Two full-time monitors will be involved in regularly monitoring the program. The services of the Office of Financial Management will be utilized on an as needed basis.

2) Each subgrantee will be monitored a minimum of two times annually. At least ten percent of the homes weatherized will be inspected by state staff to insure quality control and accountability.

3) Monthly reports, statistical review and monitoring and evaluation instruments are part of the weatherization manual.

4) In addition to the system for resolving problems described, reference the T/TA portion of the state plan which will detail training designed to eliminate problems.

5) Subgrantee Performance Evaluations are conducted through the monitoring process. Subgrantee performance standards are contained in the manual and the subgrantees are evaluated as to whether they are meeting those standards. Two substandard performance ratings by a subgrantee could result in a public hearing process to determine the adequacy of that subgrantee.

MONITORING PLAN

The monitoring plan will be used to monitor DOE ARRA funds. Monthly and quarterly reports will be submitted as required.

1. Improvements Based on Findings

Subgrantees have made improvements in use of new technology (blower door and carbon monoxide tester), inside caulking, solving moisture problems, and implementation of NEAT and MHEA.

2. Resources for Monitoring
a) Monitoring Staff:

Two full-time monitor positions will be utilized to monitor Arkansas' 15 subgrantees. In addition to the full-time monitors, the state has a Weatherization Training Coordinator and a Weatherization Program Administrator. All present state weatherization program staff have years of experience in weatherization.

b) Dollars: The monitoring activities will be accomplished with 100% administrative funds.

3. Number of Visits Each subgrantee will be monitored/evaluated at least two times annually.

4. Number of Units Inspected Ten percent of the units weatherized will be inspected.

5. Files inspected Ten percent of the units claimed as completions will be inspected.

6. Specifications of Materials

Monitors will examine materials in inventory to determine if the labels meet ARRA DOE requirements and standards. Subgrantees will also list federal specifications in advertisement bids.

7. Monitoring of Prices Paid for Materials

Subgrantees are required to have written procurement procedures which provide for compliance with OMB and DOE guidelines.

8. Pre/Post Inspections

The State monitors a statistically valid number of units for workmanship and compliance with the energy audit.

9. Monitoring Instrument

Each monitoring visit includes a review of program management, client files, procurement, inventory control, field home inspections, entrance and exit conferences. A written monitoring report is submitted to the program administrator within five working days after the visit. The report shall contain a summary of each system monitored, list of findings, units visited, and suggestions for corrective actions.

10. System for Resolving Problems

The subgrantee is required to submit a corrective action plan to remedy any deficiencies within 15 days of the date of the monitoring report. Follow-up visits will continue until the deficiencies have been corrected or until two consecutive quarterly evaluations with serious deficiencies may merit placing the subgrantee on probation. Follow-up action by the Office of Community Services' Assistant Director, if determined justifiable, could result in withholding of funds from such subgrantee. If deficiencies are serious enough to merit defunding a subgrantee, a public hearing will be arranged to receive comment(s).

11. Priority List

The state will use NEAT to determine priorities on single family units. The mobile home audit is being used to determine measures on mobile homes.

The process will be reviewed periodically to take into consideration new technology and funding flexibility.

The state reviews its maximum costs per unit annually. The cost is adjusted based on the average expenditure per unit the previous year.

12. Monitoring activities of the Arkansas Weatherization Office serve three principle purposes:
A. To disclose areas of non-compliance with contract and programmatic regulations;

B. To identify technical assistance needs among program personnel, provide training to correct deficiencies, and identify questions concerning program operations;

C. To assure quality workmanship on homes weatherized.

Monthly monitoring activities occur in OCS as staff reviews the monthly reports from the subgrantees. The monitoring lends itself to in-office or desk-top review since the fiscal records are readily accessible and the financial staff is usually available for consultation.

Before making a monitoring visit, the monitor reviews all reports, requests, and pertinent correspondence from the agency to be visited to get an idea of the agency's performance over a period of three months. The audit for the last contract period and the monitoring reports made previously are also reviewed. Year-to-date statistical data is compiled monthly.

The monitor also reviews the production schedule for each agency based on the Arkansas

Weatherization Assistance Program allocation formula and compares it to projections and expenditures.

Subgrantees are monitored a minimum of two times annually, but is made more often if requested by the agency or if deemed necessary by the State weatherization office. Monitoring activities include:

a) Review of the office procedures to determine if all weatherization systems are functioning according to written procedures;

b) Review the client intake procedures, i.e., income guidelines and point system;

c) Review the client files for accuracy and completeness;

d) Review staffing levels and identify labor problems;

e) Review material management controls - review warehouse inventory, tools, and equipment;

f) Review purchasing system; an financial information.

g) Review safety issue;

h) Using the Building Check Job Order Sheet (BCJOS) and Client file, make at least one inspection per crew of completions and/or units in progress; and i) Hold an exit interview with the Program Director and Executive Director, if available, and plan follow-up visits.

Following the visit, the monitor files a written report with the Office of Community Services' Weatherization Assistance Program Administrator and summarizes the findings along with recommendations and comments.

If serious deficiencies are listed, the subgrantee is required to submit to the Office of Community Services, within fifteen days, a corrective plan of action to remedy the deficiencies.

Follow-up monitoring visits will continue until the deficiencies have been corrected or until two consecutive quarterly evaluations listing serious deficiencies have been made, which may merit placing the subgrantee on probation. Follow-up action by the Office of Community Services' Assistant Director, if determined justifiable, could result in withholding of funds from such subgrantee. If deficiencies are serious enough to merit defunding a subgrantee, a public hearing will be arranged to receive comments.

1. Two full-time monitors will be involved in monitoring of the program. Services of the Division of

Finance will be obtained on an as needed basis.

2. All subgrantees will be monitored twice annually at a minimum.

At least ten percent of the units weatherized in the state will be inspected by state staff to insure quality control and accountability.

3. Statistical reviews are compiled monthly from subgrantee reports.

4. In addition to the system for resolving problems described above, reference the T/TA portion of the plan.

5. Subgrantee Performance Evaluations are conducted in the last quarter of each program year.

All subgrantees are required to conduct a single agency audit in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 covering all funds received by the agency. A copy of the report will be provided directly to the Department of Human Services, Office of Chief Counsel.

1. Audits shall be made in accordance with the General Accounting Office (GAO) Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions; the GAO Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audits of Federally Assisted Programs; OMB-approved audit compliance supplements; and generally accepted auditing standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

2. An audit shall be conducted and the results reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, and the audit work papers and reports shall be retained for a minimum of three years from the date of audit report.

3. If the audit report does not meet the standards of Circular A-133, the subgrantee will receive notice as to what further action, if any, is necessary to meet the requirements.

4. Audits shall be made annually and submitted to OCS 120 days after the audit has been completed. The audit must meet standards set forth in Circular A-133.

5. All subgrantees shall submit a close-out report of their weatherization program forty five days after the end of the DOE fiscal year.

1001 Client Files

Definition: Client files are defined as those files that contain information on the recipients of weatherization services.

Policy: The weatherization monitor will review a minimum of ten client files on each monitoring visit.

Procedure: The monitor will check the files for the following information:

a. Application - signed by client, dated and income certified and verified by agency representative.

b. Rental Agreement - signed by both parties and dated.

c. Client Response Form - signed by client or a note why client did not sign.

d. Building Check Job Order Sheet - with materials listed in correct categories, priority list on front, start and completion dates, labor hours and pre-audit dates.

e. Post Inspection Sheet - signed, dated, client name, address and job number.

f. Form WAP 8405 - signed by client and agency representative or its equivalent (Fair Hearing).

g. Material distribution of all materials on unit from warehouse to the unit.

h. Invoice for any material purchase for unit.

1002 Procurement

Definition: Procurement is defined as the purchasing or leasing of goods and services $500 and over.

Policy: The weatherization monitor will review all purchases since the last monitoring visit to determine if procurement procedures are followed.

Procedure: The weatherization monitor will review the following:

a. The subgrantee written policy and procedures that govern procurement for compliance with state and federal guidelines.

b. Solicitation records based on clear and accurate description of the technical requirements of the procured item.

c. Procurement records and files of purchases shall include:
(i) Contractor selection or rejection.

(ii) The basis for the cost or price.

d. A system for contract administration for ensuring that the contractor conforms with the terms, conditions and specification of the contract, and to ensure adequate and timely follow-up of all purchases.

e. Purchases up to $5,000 may be made without competitive bids however, competition should be used to the maximum extent practicable.

f. Purchases that exceed $5,000.00 and up to $25,000.00 shall require at least three informal bids. These may be either verbal or written. The records should indicate these bids and how they were obtained.

g. Purchases over $25,000.00 shall be made only after receiving competitive sealed bids in response to advertised requests.

Weatherization monitors will become familiar with state and federal procurement procedures.

1003 Inventory Control

Definition: Inventory control is defined as the method used to track and control weatherization materials and tools.

Policy: Weatherization monitors will review written inventory procedures to determine if subgrantee is in compliance with minimum standards as stated in the Arkansas Minimum Performance Standards (AMPS) or its equivalent.

Procedure: The monitor will review the following:

a. Written policy vs. actual practice.

b. Identify type of inventory control system.

c. Monitor will track a minimum of 10% of client files through the system. (Monitor will note any variance from written procedures.)

d. Inventory records to see if they are posted to date and if materials can be traced to the client unit and back into the warehouse, and if excess materials were checked out of the warehouse.

e. Once yearly, the monitor will reconcile inventory.

f. The inventory control system to determine if it conforms with the minimum controls outlined in the Arkansas Minimum Performance Standards. Verify financial information based on the amount of funds requested on quarterly reports.

1004 Field/Home Inspection

Definition: Field/Home Inspection is defined as the inspection of the unit using the OCS Home

Inspection Sheet and the standards set forth in this manual and the Arkansas Weatherization Minimum Performance Standards.

Policy: The weatherization monitor will inspect a minimum of ten percent of the units weatherized since his last visit, on each monitoring visit.

Procedure: The monitor will randomly select an appropriate number of units weatherized since the last monitoring visit and inspect each unit using the OCS Home Inspection Sheet. The monitor will use the standards listed in the weatherization installation standards manual.

1005 Entrance Interview

Definition: Entrance interview is the meeting with the Executive Director or his designee, the

Weatherization Director and other staff designated by the Executive Director to explain the purpose of the monitoring visit, the procedures to be used and the time frame involved.

Policy: Before each monitoring visit the weatherization monitor will hold an entrance conference.

Procedure: As defined in definition.

1006 Exit Conference

Definition: The exit conference is the meeting after the monitoring visit is completed to explain the findings and make suggestions or recommendations. The exit conference shall involve the Executive Director or his designee, the Weatherization Director, and other staff as designated by the Executive Director.

Policy: Each monitoring visit will conclude with an exit conference. No monitoring visit is complete until the exit conference has taken place.

Procedure: All recommendations, suggestions, shall be in accordance with written rules, regulations,

policies, procedures, or accepted practices. If in doubt, contact the State Weatherization Director.

The weatherization monitor shall prepare a written summary of his findings and recommendations for the exit interview. This summary will be placed on file to verify monitors position in case of complaints or questions.

1007 The Written Monitoring Report

Definition: The written monitoring report is a statement of facts, findings, recommendations or concerns that is prepared for the State Weatherization Program Administrator after each visit. The report is sent to the Executive Director of the agency monitored, for corrective action and to inform him/her of the program's progress.

Policy: A written monitoring report is due to the State Weatherization Program Administrator at least five days after the monitoring visit.

Procedure: The written report shall state:

A. A summary of each system monitored.
1. Program Management

2. Client Application Procedures

3. Inventory Process

4. Procurement Procedures

B. List of Findings.

C. Units Visited:
1. Job number, name, address of each unit visited.

2. Description of unit by priority measure.

1008 The Home Inspection Sheet

Policy: A home inspection sheet will be completed on each unit inspected on the monitoring visit.

EVALUATION

OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN

The Weatherization Director should be prepared for an evaluation visit from the Office of Community Services weatherization monitors in the last quarter of the contract period. This evaluation should not be viewed with reluctance, rather, as an opportunity for someone from the outside to assess program activities and make recommendations.

The state evaluation activities typically take 2 or more days. These days consist of reviewing the following:

1. Program client files

2. Financial records

3. Contract with the state

4. Financial operations manual

5. Procurement files and Policy and Procedures

6. Property records

7. Inventory Management System

8. Lead Safe Work Practices

The monitor will be looking at the system the agency has for insuring that all DOE regulations and requirements are being met. The areas which the monitor assesses include:

Regulatory

1. Verification of client eligibility

2. Verification that dwelling unit has not previously been weatherized with DOE funds

3. Materials dollar limitation was not exceeded

4. Repair cost dollar limitation was not exceeded

5. Materials used meet DOE standards

6. Federal and State guidelines were followed regarding:
a. Cash depositories

b.Bonding and insurance

c.Record retention

d.Program income

e.Standards for grantee financial management

f.Financial reporting

g.Monitoring and reporting program performance

h.Grant payment requirements

i.Budget revision procedures

j. Grant close-out procedures

k.Procurement procedures

l.Audit requirements

m. Lead Safe Work Practices

7. Verification of Lead Safe Work Practices

Resource Management

1. Did budget for program support address needs?

2. Was budget followed as planned?

3. Is the monitoring system adequate for budget management?

4. Cost controls of expenditures

5. Adequate maintenance of financial records

Management Information System

1. Forms and records simple, effective, and adequate for needs

2. Records and forms utilized as planned

3. Required reports completed and submitted correctly and promptly

The second day is typically spent inspecting units that have been weatherized. The monitor inspects units to insure:

1. Priorities were followed

2. The client file agrees with the work

Quality of Work

1. Satisfaction of service recipients

2. Quality of work

3. Timeliness of service; for example, were there any delays in provision of service

4. Pre- and post-inspections completed

5. Trace materials from warehouse or purchase order to client unit

TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE APPROACH

WEATHERIZATION TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

Training and Technical Assistance is a vital part of the Weatherization Assistance Program (T/TA). Through the state's training and technical assistance program, subgrantees are kept abreast of new weatherization techniques and methodology, as well as provided an environment to enhance their organizational management skills.

Training needs are assessed through monitoring activities of the Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program, which identifies subgrantees' training and technical assistance needs. T/TA needs may be submitted by the subgrantee. Requests for training will be accepted by phone or writing.

Training needs will also be assessed by the training coordinator through on-site evaluations of the individual programs.

Training will be provided in management skills, basic weatherization skills, and contractor workshops.

Weatherization subgrantees are not the only ones who benefit from organized training. Everyone associated with energy program needs to be fully aware of the limits and goals of the Weatherization Assistance Program, the structure of organization, and available resources. In addition, civic and church groups, senior adult groups and other concerned citizens are demanding more and more information concerning the Weatherization Assistance Program for low-income persons. For these reasons, the weatherization training and technical assistance activities will be targeted toward three trainee groups:

1) Subgrantees:

Agency directors, fiscal staff, weatherization directors, crew supervisors, crew members, and contractors (labor only) doing business with local agencies;

2) State and local agencies:

Office of Energy, LIHEAP programs;

3) Non-Profit Community Based Organizations:

Civic groups, church groups, and human services agencies.

Subgrantees attendance at training is required. The weatherization training curriculum includes five different modules designed to meet the needs of the trainees:

I. ORIENTATION - PROGRAM EXPLANATION (New Staff)

A. Enabling Legislation and Purpose/Funding Sources

B. Weatherization Procedures - Client intake to completion of unit (Point System, etc.)

C. Overview of Federal Regulations/State Plan and State Guidelines

D. Minimum Performance Standards
1. Program paperwork - Client Files

2. Material Installation

3. Health and Safety

4. Inventory and Materials Control

E. Review

F. Questions, Comments, Observations;

Formats: Lecture, Hand-outs and Slides w/cassettes Time: One day per agency

II. Job Estimates and Hands-on Weatherization Skills (on-site), prerequisite Weatherization Orientation:

A. Energy Audit

B. Understanding the BCJOS

C. Tools and Equipment

D. Caulking

E. Glazing - Reset Glass

F. Weatherstripping Doors/Windows

G. Siding with Roll Roofing

H. Skirting/Foundation Ventilation Time: Two days (no more than three crews)

Time as needed where individual hands-on training required

III. DOE Rules and Regulations/Arkansas Guidelines:

An in-depth review of DOE's Federal Regulations and State Policy and Procedures, plus new technologies. Training designed for program directors/managers.

Formats: Lecture, small group discussion, guest speakers/presenters,

Performance Standards and Policy Directives.

Time: 1/2 Day

IV. Management Skills

Program coordinators, bookkeepers, file clerks and crew supervisors will receive training in the following areas:

A. Forms and reporting requirements

B. Allowable expenditures

C. Reimbursement claims

D. Purchase of materials and tools

E. Inventory control

F. Utilizing the expenditure sheet as a management tool

G. Standards of workmanship

H. Client eligibility and files

I. Monitoring procedures

J. Team building, motivation, supervising, leadership

Time: 1/2 Day - 1 Day

V. Residential Energy Conservation Education (RECE)

A. Why conserve
1. Dollars - diminishing supplies of energy

2. Comfort

B. How to conserve
1. Low costs

2. No costs

C. Weatherization
1. General Heat Waste
a.Caulking

b.Glazing

c.Door Sweeps/Thresholds

d.Weatherstrip Kits

e.Building Envelope

f.Inside Attic Access

2. Ceiling
a. Insulation

b.Attic Ventilation

3. Crawl Space
a.Foundation Ventilation

4. Walls
a.Insulation

b.Vapor Barrier

5. Storm Windows

6. Floor Insulation/Vapor Barriers

7. Repairs

D. Energy Savings Ideas
1. Lighting and Appliances

2. Apartments and Mobile Homes

3. Conclusions, Questions, Comments and Observations

Formats: Lecture, Film (Saving Energy at Home: Arkansas Energy Office Information); Books, pamphlets, etc.

Time: One Full Day

Weatherization T/TA will be provided in conjunction with the following activities:

A) The Annual Community Action Agency Conference

B) Regular Statewide Weatherization Conferences

C) Training and Technical Assistance Workshops, Seminars, and Meetings

D) Weatherization Directors' Meetings

E) Regional/National Training Conferences/Workshops

F) Weatherization Training Center

The monitoring activities of the Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program are used to identify the Subgrantee's training and technical assistance needs. T/TA requests may be submitted by the subgrantee. Requests for training will be accepted by phone or in written form from all interested persons and the scheduling of the sessions will be coordinated with other monitoring, evaluation and T/TA visits made by the Office of Community Services.

CONTRACTORS WORKSHOP

The purpose for a workshop for contractors (labor only) is to be sure that the contractor and the agency fully understand what is expected from the contractor. The contractor is educated as to agency policies, state policies and DOE policies. Agency Fiscal Officer, as well as the Weatherization Director, are expected to attend this workshop.

The training curriculum is as follows:

A. Film Slides
1. Caulking

2. Glazing

3. Repair of Envelope of House

4. Weatherization of Doors and Windows

5. Attic Insulation
a. Venting and Preparation

b.Application of Materials

B. Why Retrofit? This explains to the reader why it is necessary to save energy and how to apply the material for measures listed above. This material becomes the property of the contractor.

C. Arkansas Minimum Performance Standards: A copy is given to each contractor for his personal use. This session is to educate the contractor on what type of work is expected, and that all completions must pass the agency's final inspection before reimbursement.

D. A house where all NEAT or MHEA measures are needed:
1. Contractors evaluate work needed on house

2. Contractors estimate labor and materials to weatherize such house

3. Contractors are then taken over the house step by step and shown what measures are to be done and how they are to be done.

E. General Session
1. Questions and Answers

2. Advised to contact State Labor Department and the

Internal Revenue Services for proper procedures to follow as a self-employed person.

F. How to respond to an advertised bid

VI. "Whether or not the state requires any certification or training of subgrantee staff prior to hire or by date certain of hire,"

The state does not require certification or training of subgrantee staff prior to hire or by date certain of hire.

Although the state does not certify its local program operators, the state provides statewide training programs that promote similar understanding of the state plan, federal rules and regulations and state policy. On-going training is an intricate part of the Arkansas Weatherization Program. Most of the training is focused on quality control issues, such as quality workmanship and final inspections.

VII. "How the state compares productivity between subgrantees and what rewards or penalties are used,"

Each month the state compiles a comparison of local programs. This comparison looks at units completed vs. units projected, budget expended vs. approved budget, percentage of budget expended, materials expended, program support expended, materials expended, and average weatherization cost per unit. The comparison report provides a clear picture of each local agency's progress to completing their goals. It also provides a clear comparison of the local programs and a look at local productivity.

The state does not have a reward or penalty system other than through redistribution of carryover funds to those agencies in compliance with rules, regulations, and performance standards and are in need of additional funds.

If follow-up action is required of the Assistant Director, Office of Community Services, the result could be withholding of funds from the subgrantee. If deficiencies are serious enough to merit defunding a subgrantee, a public hearing will be arranged to receive comments.

VIII. "How much, and how state T/TA funds will be allocated for state monitoring efforts. Identify and describe any other funding sources that will be used for state monitoring efforts."

ARRA monitors will be paid from state administrative funds.

IX. Assessment of T&TA Activities

"The states' T/TA plans should identify those T/TA activities undertaken by grantees and subgrantees that will allow them to run more efficient and effective programs and raise non-federal funding and leverage available monies." One such activity is a joint activity between a subgrantee, the State Weatherization Program and the electric utility provider.

SUMMARY

ALLOCATION FORMULA

AGENCY

PERCENTAGE

BRAD

3.1915%

CADC

18.9016

CAPCA

4.7135

CRDC

11.7306

C-SCDC

4.1754

CSO

2.1688

MCAEOC

2.1266

M-DCS

4.6048

NADC

5.1753

OHC

8.1517

OOI

6.3513

PB-JCEOC

6.2719

SEACAC

5.3882

SWADC

7.2986

UHDC

9.7502%

TOTAL

100.000%

ARKANSAS SUBGRANTEES USING CONTRACTORS

AGENCY

CONTRACTORS

CREW

BRAD

X

X

CADC

X

X

CAPCA

X

CRDC

X

X

C-SCDC

X

CSO

X

MCAEOC

X

X

M-DCS

X

NADC

X

OHC

X

OOI

X

X

PB-JCEOC

X

X

SEACAC

X

SWADC

X

UHDC

X

X

Click here to view image

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES ARRA WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

PREAMBLE

WHEREAS, Public Law 111-5 authorizes funding for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to make grants to and has made available a grant to the STATE OF ARKANSAS through the DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES/DIVISION OF COUNTY OPERATIONS/OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES (DHS/DCO/OCS):

WHEREAS, the SUBGRANTEE is contracting with DHS/DCO/OCS for the purpose of operating a local American Recovery and Reinvestment Act weatherization project to assist low-income persons and both parties are in agreement upon terms herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and subject to the conditions contained herein, the DHS/DCO/OCS and the SUBGRANTEE herein do mutually agree as follows:

The monitoring reports provide ideas for training and in turn access the effectiveness of the training. The monitors provide a considerable amount of T/TA on-site during the monitoring reviews.

I. PURPOSE OF CONTRACT

The SUBGRANTEE agrees to provide all services specified in this CONTRACT as described in the terms and special conditions of the contract and approved by DHS/DCO/OCS. Said terms and special conditions are incorporated herein. DHS/DCO/OCS agrees to make available funds to the SUBGRANTEE for the purposes set forth in the CONTRACT in accordance with the approved terms and special conditions. The terms of this CONTRACT are contingent upon the terms of the grant award between DHS/DCO/OCS. If the terms of said award become null and void, so does the terms of the CONTRACT.

II. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

The applicable compliance requirements include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Title IV, Part A. Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons/ P.L. 101-440;

2. 10 CFR, Part 440 Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons.

3. 10 CFR Part 600 DOE Financial Assistance Rules;

4. DOE Weatherization Assistance Program, Bulletins;

5. Weatherization Minimum Performance Standards in Southeast Region Field Guide.

6. State and SUBGRANTEE Weatherization Plans;

7. DHS/DCO/OCS Weatherization Policy Directives;

8. 40 CFR Part 745 : Lead, requirement for Hazard Education before renovation of target housing.

All activities authorized by this CONTRACT shall be performed in accordance with applicable conditions, relevant directives, guidelines, federal regulations, assurances and requirements as attached hereto or, otherwise, provided by the DHS/DCO/OCS. The SUBGRANTEE acknowledges adherence to all applicable federal regulations and special conditions from DOE to which the DHS/DCO/OCS is subject, as well as issuance of policy directives from DHS/DCO/OCS.

III. INSURANCE

The SUBGRANTEE agrees to procure and keep in force for the terms of this CONTRACT, adequate insurance (including liability insurance for weatherization projects for personal injury and for property damage), issued by a reputable insurer, licensed to do business in Arkansas, as will adequately protect the interest of the DHS/DCO/OCS and the SUBGRANTEE and will insure the funds granted herein shall be used for the purposes set forth.

IV. PROCUREMENT

SUBGRANTEE is to operate in compliance with the Department of Energy Financial Assistance Rule 10 CFR 600 and procurement standards with the Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102 or A-110 and other policies as applicable.

V. AUDIT

All SUBGRANTEES are required to conduct a single agency audit in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, covering all funds received by the agency. A copy of the report will be provided directly to DHS.

1. Audits shall be made in accordance with the General Accounting Office (GAO) Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions; the GAO Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audits of Federally Assisted Programs; OMB-approved audit compliance supplements; and generally accepted auditing standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

2. An audit shall be conducted and the results reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, and the audit work papers and reports shall be retained for a minimum of three years from the date of the audit.

3. If the audit report does not meet the standards of Circular A-133, the subgrantee will receive notice as to what further action, if any, is necessary to meet the requirements. The cost of an audit that does not meet these requirements may be disallowed as charge against weatherization funds.

4. Audits shall be made annually and submitted to OCS 120 days after the audit has been completed. The audit must meet standards set forth in Circular A-133.

5. All subgrantees shall submit a close-out report of their Weatherization Program forty five days after the end of the DOE fiscal year.

VI. PAYMENTS TO SUBGRANTEE AND BUDGET CATEGORIES

DHS/DCO/OCS payment to the SUBGRANTEE will be based upon their monthly report and request for funds up to the CONTRACT limit. Advance funding will be paid to the SUBGRANTEE.

DHS/DCO/OCS shall limit advance payments to the minimum amounts necessary for immediate cash advance requirements of the SUBGRANTEE. The timing and amount of cash advances shall be as close as administratively feasible to actual disbursements of allowable cost.

DHS/DCO/OCS advance payment procedure will comply with DOE Financial Assistance Rule 10 CFR 600 and Treasury Circular 1075. All expenditures determinations will be made in accordance with the DOE Financial Assistance Rule 10 CFR 600, Program Rule 10 CFR 440 and applicable cost principles, either Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87 or A-122.

VII. RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS

The SUBGRANTEE, at its principal office or place of business shall maintain, using accepted procedures, complete and accurate accounts and records reflecting all matters and activities covered by the CONTRACT. The SUBGRANTEE shall maintain records for a period of three years from the date of audit, except in cases where unsolved audit questions may require maintaining all records for a longer period. Furthermore, accounting for equipment, material, and supplies shall be as follows:

A. Non-expendable equipment, material and/or supplies purchased with weatherization funds where the original cost exceeds $25,000.00 and has a life expectancy of one year or more, must have prior approval from DHS/DCO/OCS.

B. All term purchases of equipment by the SUBGRANTEE, shall have prior approval of DHS/DCO/OCS and shall list the SUBGRANTEE as owner and shall list DHS/DCO/OCS as having the first lien on such purchases.

C. Comprehensive and current equipment and materials inventories for expendable and nonexpendable items shall be maintained and reported to DHS/DCO/OCS as required.

D. The SUBGRANTEE agrees that within forty five days of the expiration of the CONTRACT, or any renewed CONTRACT negotiated under this grant, all equipment, material and supplies purchased with weatherization monies, and not properly expended, will be made available for return to DHS/DCO/OCS.

VIII. REPORTING

The SUBGRANTEE shall complete and submit to the DHS/DCO/OCS, at least quarterly the Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program Progress Report (WAP-01). If not received by the fifteenth of the month following each quarter, then no reimbursement will be made until the following month. The SUBGRANTEE shall be reimbursed only after the progress report has been received and verified by DHS/DCO/OCS. The DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds contingent upon the receipt and verification of all items listed.

The SUBGRANTEE shall furnish to the DHS/DCO/OCS, such progress and periodic reports in such form and quantity as the DHS/DCO/OCS, may, from time to time, require; including, but not limited to, status reports of the project, fiscal reports statements, certificates, approvals, proposed budgets, copies of all sub-contracts executed and proposed, follow-up reports and any and all other information relative to the project, including specific questionnaires as determined by OCS to be necessary to carry out its responsibilities or the responsibilities of Secretary of the Department of Energy.

IX. ASSIGN AND TRANSFER

The SUBGRANTEE is not permitted to assign or transfer any provision of the CONTRACT except as follows:

The SUBGRANTEE is permitted to enter into a third party contract to fulfill the labor obligation of this CONTRACT.

X. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

The parties agree that they will comply with Affirmative Action Regulations as set forth by the Office of Federal Compliance Contracts Program.

The Department of Human Services (DHS) and its contractor/service provider will not discriminate against any employee, client or applicant for employment services because of physical or mental handicap. The DHS and its contractor, sub-contractor/service provider agree to take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment and otherwise treat qualified handicapped individuals without discrimination based upon their physical or mental handicap in all employment practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training.

The DHS and its contractor, sub-contractor/service provider further agree to comply with the rules and regulations promulgated by federal funding sources. DHS and its contractor, subcontractor/service provider will comply with all Federal statutes relating to non-discrimination. These include but are not limited to:

(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin;

(b)Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C.§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;

(c)Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps;

(d)the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6101-6107) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age;...

(h)Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 ( 42 U.S.C. § 36001 et seq.) as amended, relating to non-discrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing;

(i) any other non-discrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made;

(j)the requirements of any other non-discrimination statue(s) which may apply to the application; and

(k) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

XI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This CONTRACT, when signed by the DHS/DCO/OCS and the SUBGRANTEE constitutes the full and complete understanding of all parties and may not be in any manner interpreted or fulfilled in contradiction and its expressed terms as provided herein. This CONTRACT may be cancelled by either party upon thirty days receipt of written notice by either party.

XII. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS

A. Subgrantee will increase staff, provide for the necessary training, purchase the additional equipment and provide any other resources necessary to meet the significant increase in units to be weatherized with Recovery funds. All laborers and mechanics on projects funded directly by or assisted in whole or in part by and through funding appropriated by the Act shall be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on projects of a character similar in the locality as determined by subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (Davis-Bacon Act).

B. Funds can be used in conjunction with other funding sources as necessary to complete units, but tracking and reporting must be separate to meet the reporting requirements of the Recovery Act and related OMB Guidance.

C. Subgrantees will maintain a financial system to segregate, track and maintain ARRA funds separate and apart from other revenue streams. (No part of funds from the Recovery Act shall be commingled with any other funds or used for a purpose other than that of making payments for costs allowable for Recovery Act and OMB).

D. In making the agreements to pay for contractor training, subgrantees should stipulate that contractors will work in the program, at a minimum, for a specific amount of time and should align with the cost of the T & TA provided.

E. Any employees of any non-federal employer receiving covered funds under the Recovery Act may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing gross mismanagement of covered funds, a gross waste of covered funds; a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety related to the implementation or use of covered funds, an abuse of authority related to the implementation or use of covered funds; a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant, awarded or issued relating to covered funds.

F. Subgrantee shall promptly refer to the DHS/DCO/OCS, DOE or other appropriate Inspector General any credible evidence that a principal, employee, agent, contractor, subgrantee, subcontractor or other person has submitted a false claim under the False Claims Act or has committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, gratuity or similar misconduct involving covered funds.

G. Subgrantee may be required to submit backup documentation for expenditures for funds under the Recovery Act including such items as timecards and invoices. Subgrantees shall provide copies of backup documentation at the request of DHS/DCO/OCS, the Contracting Officer, or other designee.

H. With respect to each award, any representative of an appropriate inspector general appointed under section 3 or 8G of the Inspector General Act of 1988 (5 U.S.C. App) or of the Comptroller General is authorized to examine all records pertaining to the grant award. Interview any officer or employee of the subgrantee, contractor, or agency regarding such transactions.

I. DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds when two monthly reports containing original signatures are submitted late in a twelve month cycle.

J. DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds when subgrantee fails to comply with the 30% materials by the end of a six month period.

K. DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds when subgrantee fails to expend 40% of funds and weatherize 40% of units by the end of the first twelve month cycle.

L. Subgrantee agrees that failure to install required measures of a SIR of 1 or greater shall require the agency to install measures from nonfederal funds and provide supporting documentation to DHS/DCO/OCS.

M. DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds if subgrantee fails to ensure that contractors comply with the Davis Bacon requirements.

N. DHS/DCO/OCS reserves the right to withhold funds if an appropriate subgrantee personnel fails to attend 60% of mandatory training sessions and retain documentation of trainings.

O. Subgrantees will apply approved DOE measures within the NEAT & MHEA set-ups on each unit. Failure to apply appropriate measures will require the agency to install the measures from nonfederal funds and provide supporting documentation to DHS/DCO/OCS.

440.16 MINIMUM PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

A. No dwelling unit may be weatherized without documentation that the dwelling unit is an eligible dwelling unit as provided in 440.22.
1. A dwelling unit shall be eligible for weatherization assistance if it is occupied by a family unit whose income is at or below 200% of poverty level determined by the office of Management and Budget.

2. Which contains a member who has received cash assistance payments under Title IV or XVI of the Social Security Act or applicable state or local law during the twelve month period preceding the determination of eligibility for weatherization assistance; or

B. Priority is given to identifying and providing weatherization assistance to elderly and disabled low-income persons, and such priority as the subgrantee determines is appropriate is given to single-family or other high energy consuming dwelling units.

Priority is given to the elderly and disabled low income persons. Priority is also given to single-family or other high energy consuming dwelling units as determined appropriate by the local subgrantee.

C. Financial assistance provided under this part will be used to supplement, and not supplant, state or local funds, and to the maximum extent practicable as determined by DOE, to increase the amounts of these funds that would be made available in the absence of federal funds provided under this part.

Department of Energy funds are used to supplement and not supplant state or local funds. Efforts are being made to increase financial participation on the state and local level.

D. To the maximum extent practicable, the grantee will secure the services of volunteers, training participants and public service employment workers. The Office of Community Services will work with all subgrantees to secure volunteers.

E. To the maximum extent practicable, the use of weatherization assistance shall be coordinated with other federal, state, local, or privately funded programs in order to improve energy efficiency and to conserve energy.

The Office of Community Services coordinates the Weatherization Assistance Program with the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, Rural Economic and Community Development Services, Housing and Urban Development, Public Service Commission, Public Utility companies and other state, local and federal agencies in the state.

F. The low-income members of an Indian tribe shall receive benefits equivalent to the assistance provided to the other low-income persons within a state unless the grantee has made the recommendation provided in 440.12 (b) (5).

The low-income members of an Indian tribe shall receive benefits equivalent to the assistance provided to other low-income persons within the state.

G. No dwelling unit may be reported to DOE as completed until the subgrantee, or its authorized representatives have performed a final inspection and certified that applicable work has been completed in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with the priority determined by the audit procedures required by 440.21(b).

Each subgrantee must complete a final inspection and certify that all applicable work has been completed according to established minimum performance standards before that unit can be reported as completed to the Office of Community Services. If during a monitoring visit it is found the unit was certified incorrectly as complete, the unit is disallowed and the appropriate funds are withheld. Units are completed in accordance with 440.21.

Click here to view image

SUBGRANTEES

A. The grantee shall ensure that:
1. Each subgrantee is a CAA or other public non-profit entity:

The Office of Community Services contracts with fifteen subgrantees.

2. Each subgrantee is selected on the basis of public comment received during the public hearing conducted pursuant to 440.14 (a) and other appropriate findings regarding:

Prior to the preparation of the final state plan, a proposed plan was prepared according to 440.14, paragraph (b) for a public hearing. Subgrantees and affected state agencies.

(i) The subgrantee's experience and performance in weatherization or housing renovation activities:

The Arkansas weatherization subgrantees have operated the DOE Weatherization Program from its inception in 1977. The subgrantees have developed many innovative weatherization techniques.

(ii) The subgrantee's experience in assisting low-income persons in the area to be served:

The fifteen subgrantees have been in the business of serving low-income persons for thirty-two years.

(iii) The subgrantee's capacity to undertake a timely and effective Weatherization Program:

The Arkansas weatherization subgrantees have nearly systematically exceeded completion goals every year and have operated within DOE guidelines and budget limitations.

3. In selecting a subgrantee, preference is given to any CAA or other public or non-profit entity which has, or is currently administering an effective program under this part or under Title II of 1964, with program effectiveness evaluated by consideration of factors including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
(a) The extent to which the past or current program achieve or is achieving weatherization goals in a timely fashion, Arkansas will comply with the maximum average followed by DOE.

(b) The quality of work performed by the subgrantee:

The state will use monitoring findings from the previous year to develop a training plan for the upcoming year.

(c) The number, qualifications, and experience of the staff members of the subgrantee: The number, qualifications, and experience of the staff members of the subgrantees' staffing levels in regular DOE vary greatly. One has been with the program since its beginning. Others have different number of years experience with the program.

(d) The ability of the subgrantee to secure volunteers, training participants, and public service employment workers will be secured to work under the supervision of qualified supervisors and foremen.

To the maximum extent practicable, the services of volunteers, training participants and public service employment workers will be secured to work under the supervision of qualified supervisors and foremen.

B. The grantee shall ensure that the funds received under this part will be allocated to the entities selected in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, in such a way that funds be allocated to areas on the basis of the relative need for a weatherization project by low-income persons.

The allocation of funds is based on relative need. The percentage of available funds allocated to each subgrantee (by county data) is determined by the following allocation formula:

1. Average of HDD + CDD and poverty.

C. If DOE finds that a subgrantee, selected to undertake weatherization activities under this part, has failed to comply substantially with the provisions of the act or this part and should be replaced, such findings shall be treated as a finding under 440.30 (d) for purposes of 444.30.

If the Office of Community Services finds that a subgrantee selected to undertake weatherization activities under this part has failed to comply substantially with the provisions of the act or this part should be replaced, such findings shall be treated as a finding under 440.30 (b) for purposes of 444.30.

D. Any new or additional subgrantee shall be selected at a hearing in accordance with 440.14 (a) and upon the basis of the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section.

In the selection of new or additional subgrantees, the Office of Community Services shall make this selection at a hearing in accordance with 440.14 (a) and upon the basis of the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW

The state has an established review process under provisions of Executive Order 12372 and 10 CFR 1005.

The single point of contact is:

Arkansas Department of Finance and

Administration Office of Intergovernmental Services Post Office Box 3278 1515 West 7th Street, Room 412 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203

The single point of contact will be notified of the application.

QUALITY CONTROL

QUALITY CONTROL ELEMENTS

I. STATE WIDE REQUIREMENTS:

A. INSPECTIONS

ELEMENTS: Describe the State's system for verifying that all units have final inspection prior to subgrantee claiming them as completions.

The Arkansas State Weatherization Assistance program requires that each subgrantee conduct a final inspection of the unit prior to reporting the unit as a completion.

The final inspection must be conducted by someone who was not involved in performing the measures.

QUALITY CONTROL ELEMENTS

B. MEASURES LIST ELEMENT: Describe the State's method for ensuring that its measures priorty list reflects both its housing stock and climate.

The priorities addressed are justified by the National Energy Audit and Mobile Home Energy Audit, which takes into consideration the climate.

C. PRIORITY LIST REVIEW ELEMENT: Describe the process, and how often, the State reviews its measures priority list to take into consideration new technology and funding flexibility.

The State reviews the priority list annually to assure that new available technology is utilized, where the technology has been proven effective and approved by DOE. Any flexibility in funding allowed by DOE is provided to subgrantees. The state seeks other funding to assist subgrantees in addressing the housing and energy needs of clients. The state assists subgrantees in applying for other housing funds when possible.

II. PURCHASING CONTROLS

A. MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS ELEMENT: Describe how the State ensures that all materials used in the program meet Federal specifications.

The state requires that subgrantees procure materials according to approved procedures, which require that subgrantees purchase materials that meet federal specifications.

The monitor reviews for compliance as a normal part of the process. Any costs for materials that do not meet federal specifications will be refunded from non-federal funds. The subgrantee provides as assurance that materials will meet federal specifications in their annual applications for funds.

B. COST OF MATERIALS ELEMENT: Indicate how the State ensures that the price paid for all materials at the local level is the most cost-effective and that the process used to determine this is consistent throughout the State.

All subgrantees are required to purchase materials according to competitive bidding procedures.

C. MAXIMUM-COST LIMIT ELEMENT: Describe the process by which, and how often, the State reviews its maximum cost-per-unit limit.

The state reviews the maximum cost-per-unit limit annually. The state establishes a statewide maximum and maximum average. However, each subgrantee maximum and maximum average is established in their annual application for funds. The limit is established by reviewing the previous year costs and projected new year costs. No agency is allowed to exceed the limit established by DOE.

QUALITY CONTROL ELEMENTS

III. TRAINING

A. TRAINING AND CERTIFYING STATE STAFF

ELEMENT: Describe how the State trains and/or certifies persons responsible for quality control on the State level.

The State Weatherization Program Training Coordinator trains the state staff when new staff are hired. When necessary, the state obtains training from other state offices, or other sources, with the required expertise.

The State will plan to establish a training center to provide training on a continuous basis. The state will also coordinate with the Arkansas Energy Office for development of training through educational institutions.

B. CERTIFYING LOCAL QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL

ELEMENT: Describe how the State trains and/or certifies those persons responsible for quality

control on the local level.

The state will work with the WAP Training Centers to develop a certification process. However, the State Weatherization Training Coordinator will coordinate the training needs of the subgrantee staff when new staffs are hired, or when it is determined through the monitoring process, that training is needed to improve the quality of work.

C. TRAINING LOCAL QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL ELEMENT: Describe how the State provides on-going training to those persons responsible for quality control on the local level.

The state provides on-going training to subgrantee staff responsible for quality control at the local level. The training is provided at statewide and regional levels, as well as at each subgrantee when it is necessary. Training is provided in all aspects of the program, to include; management and administration, client files, contractor training, client education, skills training, and energy audit.

The state has established two training centers using educational institutions to provide training on a continuous basis and to develop a certification program. The state has coordinated with the Arkansas Energy Office in the development of the training centers.

D. TRAINING LOCAL CREWS AND CONTRACTORS ELEMENT: Describe how the State ensures the crews or contractors who weatherize units have appropriate skills to complete the work in a quality manner.

Subgrantee contractor skills and work history are considered during the competitive bidding process. Contractors will be required to become certified through one of the state training centers.

All crew members new and existing must attend training at one of the state training centers. The state will not allow any staff to be grandfathered‖ into certification.

The State will plan to establish a training center to provide training on a continuous basis. The State will also coordinate with the Arkansas Energy Office for development of training through educational institutions.

IV. ON-SITE LOCAL CONTROLS

A. SEPARATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR POST-WORK INSPECTIONS

ELEMENT: Describe how the State ensures that subgrantee staff performing post-work inspections are different from those completing the prescribed work.

The subgrantee provides an assurance in the annual application that the post-work inspection will be by someone other than those completing the work. The State Monitors review this during the on-site monitoring.

B. VALIDATING THE ACCURACY OF WORK ORDERS AND INSPECTIONS

ELEMENT: Describe how the State periodically reviews a sample of local work orders and post-work inspections for accuracy.

The state monitor reviews 25% of the work orders and post-work inspections for accuracy during the on-site review process.

C. INACCURATE WORK ORDERS AND INSPECTIONS

ELEMENT: Describe the State's procedures for dealing with program operators who repeatedly have a high number of inaccurate work orders or post-work inspections.

Subgrantees that are found to have inaccurate work orders or post-work inspections are required to correct the inaccurate work and provide a corrective action plan to assure that the problem is corrected. The state monitor follows-up at the next on-site monitoring to assure that the corrective action is being adhered to.

D. MEASURING PRODUCTIVITY

ELEMENT: Describe the State system for measuring the comparative productivity of different program operators.

The state reviews monthly reports to compare production of the different program operators. This information is published on an annual basis. The state provides technical assistance to any agency that is falling behind on production.

CRISIS RELIEF PLAN

OUTLINE

I. Executive Summary

Description of the Program Statement of Purpose Market Opportunities Projected Results Financing Requirements

II. Organization Plan

Key Personnel

Services

History

III. Market Research

Economic and Social Factors Target Customers Market Opportunities Expected Benefits

IV. Strategy

Forecasting

Short and Long-Term Results

Controls/Evaluation

I. Executive Summary Description of Program

The enhanced concept for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Weatherization Assistance Program as administered by the Office of Community Services is called the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Crisis Relief Plan. The traditional Weatherization Assistance Program focuses on reducing the heating and cooling costs in homes of low-income families, while ensuring the safe operation of the building equipment. The WAP Crisis Relief Plan will address weather-related emergencies ensuring the safe operation of building equipment (heating and/or cooling).

Statement of Purpose

By expanding the scope of the Program to address weather related emergencies, the WAP Crisis Relief Plan can:

[LESS THAN] Save lives;

[LESS THAN] Significantly increase energy savings;

[LESS THAN] Further reduce emissions of air pollutants such as carbon monoxide;

[LESS THAN] Increase the leveraging potential of the Weatherization network; and

[LESS THAN] Expand the program's benefits to the state's communities.

Market Opportunities

[LESS THAN] Supply does not meet current demand for Weatherization services.

[LESS THAN] New resources created through utility restructuring offer significant opportunities to expand Weatherization services.

[LESS THAN] Potential to increase community role: Weatherization agencies are firmly planted in the local communities and are the natural delivery mechanism for other programs outreach efforts.

Projected Results

Lives saved and citizens helped during times of crisis.

Financing Requirements

Weatherization Funds.

II. Organization Plan

The Weatherization Assistance Program serves every county in the state. This work is administered through the Department of Human Services, Division of County Operations, Office of Community Services with support from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Pennsylvania Regional Office. A network of 15 local agencies comprised of Community Action Agencies and one nonprofit housing development corporation carries out weatherization work.

Key Personnel

Office of Community Services staff work with DOE Headquarters and PMC Office staff in administering the Program. The local agencies, then, are the entities that actually carry out this expanded program as the service providers. The vast majority of service providers that DOE funds are Community Action Agencies (CAA) which are multi-purpose service and community development organizations run by locally selected governing boards from the affected community and the private sector.

Services

Program provides energy efficiency measures to low-income families.

History

The Weatherization Assistance Program is the nation's program for delivering energy efficiency services to low-income Americans. Weatherization was created during the 1973 Arab oil embargo to assist low-income families who lacked the resources to respond to price or regulatory signals by investing in efficiency. In the beginning, temporary measures like plastic storm windows, weatherstripping, and caulking were installed by volunteer labor. The Program has evolved into one in which professional staff use sophisticated energy audit protocols and advanced diagnostic equipment to determine which cost-effective measures and services should be installed to achieve the greatest energy efficiency and cost payback. Throughout the evolution of this Program, Weatherization has remained committed to its fundamental mission.

III. Market Research

Economic and Social Factors

There are 400,000 households currently eligible for Weatherization services in the state of Arkansas. The need for Weatherization services remains strong and in recent years, the number of households federally eligible for Weatherization and LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) actually increased. A total of 1,225 households received Weatherization assistance in 2007.

Target Customers

Our customers are the low-income families, particularly the elderly, people with disabilities, and children. Over 90% of our customers have households with an annual income under $15,000. These low-income households spend 14% of their annual income on energy versus 3.5% spent by other households.

Market Opportunities

Potential to increase community role: Weatherization agencies are firmly planted in the local communities and are the natural delivery mechanism for other programs outreach efforts.

Expected Benefits

[LESS THAN] Low-income citizens are able to access benefits of energy efficiency technologies otherwise accessible only to those with greater means.

[LESS THAN] Energy efficiency programs educate low-income customers about reduced energy consumption and provide actual Weatherization services to their dwellings that decrease energy use. Both of these aspects allow for a smaller utility bill which low-income customers can afford to pay.

[LESS THAN] Alleviation of high energy burdens allows low-income families increased financial independence and flexibility to spend household income on other needs.

[LESS THAN] Reduces the need for other tax-supported programs such as fuel assistance, housing, and health care, while improving housing conditions.

Effective energy efficiency programs reduce the payment-related costs incurred by utility companies. These costs include late payments, bad debt, credit and collection expenses, termination and reconnection costs, negotiation of payment plans, and regulatory expenses.

[LESS THAN] Reduces costs related to health and safety emergencies. Weatherization measures performed on low-income housing reduce the chance for fires, carbon monoxide poisoning, and hypothermia, thereby reducing costs associated with emergency calls.

[LESS THAN] Energy efficiency measures increase the equity in low-income homes, improve housing maintenance, reduce client utility bills, reduce moves and associated costs, decrease homelessness, reduce adverse health effects, and decrease the energy cost burden.

[LESS THAN] Increasing investments in Weatherization Programs also provide non-energy, non-environmental benefits for society. These benefits include decreased public funds expenditures (e.g. social services, homeless shelters, health care, public safety, etc.), maintaining the real estate tax base, and increasing housing values. Therefore, investing in Weatherization capitalizes on known energy benefits as well as substantial non-energy and non-environmental benefits for individuals, utilities, and society.

IV. Strategy

The WAP Crisis Relief Plan will be implemented using the following strategy:

Increased Flexibility - No funds are set aside due to increased funding. Agencies will address crisis relief using regular program funds.

[LESS THAN] Client Education will be conducted by local agency staff with clients being advised of low cost no cost measures that can be done on a regular basis to assist in lowering utility cost. Energy Conservation literature will be left with the client.

[LESS THAN] By assisting and educating citizens during weather related crisis, the Weatherization Crisis Relief Plan may reduce the number of walk-a-ways.

Energy Conservation information materials will be distributed to local churches for distribution to their membership. This material will also be made available to all faith based organizations. This way state staff and local agency staff will be free to assist citizens as they apply for services.

V. FORECASTING

Short and Long-Term Results

The Weatherization Assistance Program Crisis Relief Plan will:

1) Result in lives saved;

2) More efficient, healthier, and livable communities;

[LESS THAN] Reduce the export of local energy dollars out of the community; low-income communities spend more than 20 percent of their gross income on energy and up to 80 percent of it immediately leaves the community;

[LESS THAN] Create jobs by keeping more money in the local economy; a conservative estimate is that every retained dollar produces three dollars in multiplier benefits;

[LESS THAN] Improve local air quality and reduce adverse health effects, particularly asthma.

3) Result in the State of Arkansas being able to respond to a weather related crisis in a prompt and efficient manner;

[LESS THAN] Attract utility restructuring dollars by becoming the delivery mechanism of choice for public benefits funds ear-marked for low-income energy efficiency and electric base load conservation.

[LESS THAN]

Controls/Evaluation

The Weatherization Assistance Program Crisis Relief Plan will be monitored using the same criteria as the regular Weatherization Assistance Program to ensure compliance with State and Federal regulations.

The state evaluation activities typically take 2 or more days. These days consist of reviewing the following:

1. Program client files

2. Financial records

3. Contract with the state

4. Financial operations manual

5. Procurement files and Policy and Procedures

6. Property records

7. Inventory Management System

8. Lead Safe Work Practices

The monitor will be looking at the system the agency has for insuring that DOE regulations and requirements are being met. The areas, which the monitor assesses, include:

Regulatory

1. Verification of client eligibility

2. Verification that a dwelling unit has not previously been weatherized with DOE funds*

3. Material dollar limitations was not exceeded with a waiver

4. Repair cost dollar limitation was not exceeded

5. Materials used meet DOE standards

6. Federal and State guidelines were followed regarding:
a. Cash depositories

b.Bonding and insurance

c.Record retention

d.Program income

e. Standards for grantee financial management

f.Financial reporting

g.Monitoring and reporting program performance

h.Grant payment requirements

i.Grant closeout procedures

j.Budget revision procedures

k.Procurement procedures

l. Audit requirements

7. Verification of Lead Safe Work Practices

Resource Management

1. Did budget program support address needs?

2. Was budget followed as planned?

3. Is monitoring system adequate for budget management?

4. Cost controls of expenditures

5. Adequate maintenance of financial records

*Under the WAP Crisis Relief Plan, this requirement will be suspended.

Management Information Systems

1. Forms and records simple, effective and adequate for needs

2. Records and forms utilized as planned

3. Required reports completed and submitted correctly and promptly

The second day is typically spent inspecting units that have been weatherized. The monitor inspects units to insure:

1. Priorities were followed

2. The client file agrees with the work

Quality of Work

1. Satisfaction of service recipients

2. Quality of work

3. Timeliness of service; for example, were there any delays in provision of services

4. Pre and post inspections completed

5. Trace materials from warehouse or purchase order to client unit

FIELD GUIDE

FIELD GUIDE

As part of its annual grant guidance to the CAAs, OCS has issued a manual dealing with weatherization crews work in homes. The guidelines contained in the manual are meant to provide guidance on the installation of allowable measures in the Weatherization Assistance Program and to protect workers providing weatherization services. The manual is called the Arkansas Weatherization Field Guide.

The Southeast Weatherization Field Guide is published for the Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program. Written as a reference document, the field guide provides step by step instructions on the process and procedures used in the Weatherization Assistance Program as well as client education and healthy safety procedures. Subgrantees will be required to use the field guide in the Weatherization Assistance Program and are encouraged to train new staff with this guide.

While the field guide was written for states in the southeastern portion of the country, all measures detailed in the field guide do not apply to Arkansas. Listed below are the measures that are not allowable measures in the Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program.

(1) Asbestos removal

(2) Landscaping

(3) Interior shading

(4) Storm Doors

(5) Knob and tube wiring

(6) Plumbing

(7) Clothes dryer replacement

Please note: Arkansas requires that a vapor barrier be installed on only 80% of the ground when installing floor insulation.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Arkansas may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.