Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 9, September, 2024
1.0
PURPOSE
1.01 Under Ark. Code
Ann. §
6-17-2801 et seq., each public
school shall implement the Teacher Excellence and Support System for all
teachers employed at the public school under rules established by the State
Board of Education. The purpose of these rules is to establish the requirements
and procedures concerning the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
1.02 Building- or district-level leaders are
referred to the current ADE Rules Governing the Leader Excellence and
Development System for the Department's building- and district-level leader
evaluation system.
2.0
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
2.01 These
rules shall be known as the Arkansas Department of Education Rules Governing
the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
2.02 These rules are enacted pursuant to the
authority of the State Board of Education under Ark. Code Ann. §§
6-11-105,
6-13-1305,
6-15-1004,
6-15-1402,
6-17-704,
6-17-705,
6-17-1504,
6-17-2801 through
6-17-2809,
6-20-2305,
25-15-201 et seq. and Act 709 of
2013.
3.0
LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND PURPOSE
3.01 The State Board of Education notes that,
with regard to the Teacher Excellence and Support System, it is the intent of
the Arkansas General Assembly to:
3.01.1
Provide a program affording public school districts and public charter schools
a transparent and consistent teacher evaluation system that ensures effective
teaching and promotes professional learning;
3.01.2 Provide an evaluation, feedback, and
support system that will encourage teachers to improve their knowledge and
instructional skills in order to improve student learning;
3.01.3 Provide a basis for making teacher
employment decisions;
3.01.4
Provide an integrated system that links evaluation procedures with curricular
standards, professional development activities, targeted support, and human
capital decisions;
3.01.5 Encourage
highly effective teachers to undertake challenging assignments;
3.01.6 Support teachers' roles in improving
students' educational achievements;
3.01.7 Inform policymakers regarding the
benefits of a consistent evaluation and support system in regard to improving
student achievement across the state; and
3.01.8 Increase the awareness of parents and
guardians of public school students concerning the effectiveness of public
school teachers.
3.02
The purposes of these rules are, without limitation, to:
3.02.1 Recognize that student learning is the
foundation of teacher effectiveness and many factors impact student learning,
not all of which are under the control of the teacher or the school, and that
evidence of student learning includes trend data and is not limited to a single
assessment;
3.02.2 Provide that the
goals of the Teacher Excellence and Support System are quality assurance and
teacher growth;
3.02.3 Reflect
evidence-based or proven practices that improve student learning. Nothing in
these rules should be construed to prohibit teachers from using innovative
approaches in the classroom;
3.02.4
Utilize clear, concise, evidentiary data for teacher professional growth and
development to improve student achievement;
3.02.5 Recognize that evidence of student
growth is a significant part of the Teacher Excellence and Support
System;
3.02.6 Ensure that student
growth is analyzed at every phase of the evaluation system to illustrate
teacher effectiveness. The purpose of requirement is to ensure that student
growth is taken into account during all phases of the teacher evaluation
system;
3.02.7 Require annual
evidence of student growth from artifacts and external assessment
measures;
3.02.8 Include clearly
defined teacher evaluation domains, performance ratings, and evaluation rubric
components for the evaluation framework;
3.02.9 Include procedures for implementing
each component of the Teacher Excellence and Support System; and
3.02.10 Include the professional development
requirements for all superintendents, administrators, evaluators, and teachers
to obtain the training necessary to be able to understand and successfully
implement the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2802 and §
6-17-2804
4.0
DEFINITIONS
4.01 "Annual overall
rating" means the annual rating based on professional practice (performance
rating) and student growth.
4.02
"Artifact" means a documented piece of evidence chosen by the teacher being
evaluated, the evaluator, or both, that:
4.02.1 Relates to the evaluation rubric;
and
4.02.2 Represents output from
one (1) or more of the following, without limitation:
4.02.2.1 Lesson plans or pacing guides
aligned with the state standards;
4.02.2.2 Self-directed or collaborative
research approved by an evaluator;
4.02.2.3 Participation in professional
development;
4.02.2.4 Contributions
to parent, community, or professional meetings;
4.02.2.5 Classroom assessments including:
4.02.2.5.1 Unit tests;
4.02.2.5.2 Samples of student work,
portfolios, writing, and projects;
4.02.2.5.3 Pre-assessments and
post-assessments; and
4.02.2.5.4
Classroom-based formative assessments;
4.02.2.6 District-level assessments
including:
4.02.2.6.1 Formative
assessments;
4.02.2.6.2 Grade or
subject level assessments;
4.02.2.6.3 Department-level assessments;
and
4.02.2.6.4 Common
assessments;
4.02.2.7
State-level assessments including:
4.02.2.7.1
End-of-course assessments;
4.02.2.7.2 Statewide assessments of student
achievement; and
4.02.2.7.3 Career
and technical assessments;
4.02.2.8 National assessments including:
4.02.2.8.1 Advanced placement
assessments;
4.02.2.8.2
Norm-referenced assessments; and
4.02.2.8.3 Career and technical assessments;
and
4.02.2.9 Evidence of
student growth other than the SOAR value attributed to a teacher under Section
6.03 of these rules.
4.03 "Contributing professional" means an
individual who has been assigned the responsibility to provide additional
services that support and increase a student's learning and/or access to
learning.
4.03.1 "Contributing professional"
includes a:
4.03.1.2 Classroom teacher, other
than the teacher of record, who is engaged directly in instruction with
students in a classroom setting;
4.03.1.2 Guidance counselor;
4.03.1.3 Library media specialist;
4.03.1.4 Instructional facilitator or
instructional coach; and
4.03.1.5
Teacher employed by an education service cooperative who instructs public
school students.
4.03.1.6 Speech
language pathologist;
4.03.1.7
Gifted and talented coordinator;
4.03.1.8 School psychologist;
4.03.1.9 English language learner instructor;
or
4.03.1.10 Person in another
position identified by the Department.
4.04 "Evaluation" means the process under
these rules used to:
4.04.1 Assess with
evidence what a teacher should know and be able to do as measured by the
domains and performance ratings of an evaluation framework; and
4.04.2 Promote teacher growth through
professional learning.
4.04.3
"Evaluation" does not include a teacher's performance relating to competitive
athletics and competitive extracurricular activities.
4.05 "Evaluation framework" means a
standardized set of teacher evaluation domains that provide the overall basis
for an evaluation.
4.06 "Evaluation
rubric" means a set of performance components for each teacher evaluation
domain in the evaluation framework.
4.07 "Evaluator" means a person licensed by
the State Board of Education as an administrator who is designated as the
person responsible for evaluating teachers and who is an employee of the school
district or open enrollment public charter school in which the evaluations are
performed.
4.07.1 "Evaluator" also includes
public charter school administrators who are designated by their public charter
schools as evaluators, even if the public charter school administrators do not
hold an administrator's license. While these rules allow for other school
personnel to guide the interim teacher appraisal process, the designated
evaluator remains responsible for conducting summative evaluations of teachers
and assigning the annual overall ratings.
4.07.2 Before conducting summative
evaluations of teachers and before assigning annual overall ratings pursuant to
these rules, a designated evaluator must successfully complete all training and
certification requirements for evaluators as set forth by the Arkansas
Department of Education. Prior to conducting summative evaluations of teachers
pursuant to these rules, public charter school administrators who are
designated evaluators must also successfully complete all training and
certification requirements for evaluators as set forth by the Arkansas
Department of Education, even if the public charter school administrators do
not hold an administrator's license. Public charter schools are nevertheless
encouraged to employ or contract with licensed administrators who serve as
evaluators under the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
4.08 "External assessment measure"
means a measure of student achievement or growth that is administered,
developed, and scored by a person or entity other than the teacher being
evaluated, except that the assessment may be administered by the teacher being
evaluated if the assessment is monitored by a licensed individual designated by
the evaluator. For public charter schools, the assessment may be administered
by the teacher being evaluated if the assessment is monitored by a licensed
individual designated by the evaluator or, if no licensed individuals are
employed by the public charter school, a degreed teacher employed by the public
charter school and designated by the evaluator.
4.09 "Formal classroom observation" means an
announced visit to a classroom by an evaluator that:
4.09.1 Is preceded by a pre-observation
conference to discuss the lesson plan and objectives;
4.09.2 Is conducted by an evaluator for at
least seventy-five percent (75%) of the class period either by observing the
teacher in the classroom or through the use of three-hundred-sixty-degree video
technology. The length of time for a formal classroom observation of a teacher
teaching in a block schedule or in a class period lasting longer than sixty
(60) minutes may be adjusted to allow for an observation for forty-five (45)
minutes or more of the teacher's class period;
4.09.3 Facilitates a professional dialogue
for the teacher and evaluator; and
4.09.4 Provides essential evidence of the
teacher's classroom practices.
4.10 "Formative assessment" means an
evaluation of a student's learning that is given before the student completes a
course of instruction to foster the student's development and improvement on a
specific strand within the course of instruction.
4.11 "Informal classroom observation" means
an observation conducted by an evaluator for the same purpose as a formal
classroom observation but may be:
4.11.1
Unannounced; or
4.11.2 For a
shorter period of time than a formal classroom observation.
4.12 "Intensive support status"
means the employment status administered under this subchapter that is assigned
to a teacher under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2807 and Section 11.0 of these
rules.
4.13 "Interim appraisal"
means a form of evaluation, other than a summative evaluation, that:
4.13.1 Provides support for teaching
practices; and
4.13.2 Uses
standards for teacher growth and performance that are consistent with the
evaluation rubrics for the teacher evaluation domains of a summative evaluation
that are identified in the teacher's professional growth plan.
4.14 "Novice teacher" means a
teacher having less than one (1) school year of public school classroom
teaching experience.
4.15
"Post-observation conference" means a conference between the teacher and
evaluator following a formal classroom observation to discuss:
4.15.1 The evaluator's observations;
and
4.15.2 Artifacts presented by
the teacher after the formal classroom observation.
4.16 "Pre-observation conference" means a
conference between the teacher and evaluator to discuss goals and planned
outcomes for a classroom lesson before a formal classroom
observation.
4.17 "Probationary
teacher" means the same as probationary teacher under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1502.
4.18 "Statewide assessment of student
achievement" means a statewide benchmark exam, end-of-course assessment, or a
summative assessment of student achievement administered through:
4.18.1 A program of Common Core assessments
administered under rules of the State Board of Education; or
4.18.2 If a Common Core assessment is not
available, the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment, and Accountability
Program Act, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-401 et seq.
4.19 "Student-Ordered Assessment
Rank (SOAR)" is the method used to calculate a percentile value of student
growth between the immediately preceding school year and the current school
year, and that compares students only to other students of the same prior
achievement level.
4.20 "Summative
assessment" means an evaluation of student achievement given at the completion
of a course of instruction that cumulatively measures whether the student met
long-term learning goals for the course.
4.21 "Summative evaluation" means an
evaluation of a teacher's performance that evaluates all domains and components
of the evaluation framework that supports:
4.21.1 Improvement in the teacher's teaching
practices and student achievement; and
4.21.2 A school district's employment
decision concerning the teacher.
4.22 "Teacher" means a person who is:
4.22.1 Required to hold and holds a teaching
license from the State Board of Education as a condition of employment;
and
4.22.2 Employed as a:
4.22.2.1 Teacher of record in a public
school;
4.22.2.2 Contributing
professional;
4.22.2.3 One of the
following teachers who instruct public school students:
4.22.2.3.1 Distance learning
teacher;
4.22.2.3.2 Virtual charter
school teacher;
4.22.2.3.3 Teacher
at the Arkansas School for the Blind;
4.22.2.3.4 Teacher at the Arkansas School for
the Deaf; or
4.22.2.3.5 Teacher at
the Arkansas Correctional School.
4.22.3 "Teacher" also includes a nonlicensed
classroom teacher or contributing professional employed at a public charter
school under a waiver of teacher licensure requirements granted by the State
Board of Education in the charter.
4.22.4 "Teacher" does not include a person
who is employed full time by a school district or public school solely as a
superintendent or administrator.
4.23 "Teacher of record" is an individual or
individuals in a teaching or co-teaching assignment who is/are assigned the
lead responsibility for student learning in a subject or course with aligned
curriculum standards. A teacher of record plans instruction, delivers
instruction, assesses student learning, and assigns grades.
4.24 "Teacher Excellence and Support System"
means a statewide teacher evaluation system that provides support,
collaboration, feedback and targeted professional development opportunities
aimed at ensuring effective teaching and improving student learning.
4.25 "Tested content area" means a teaching
content area that is tested under a statewide assessment of student
achievement.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2803 as modified
5.0
GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
5.01
Each teacher employed by the board of directors of a school district shall be
evaluated in writing under the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
5.02 A teacher shall:
5.02.1 Participate in the Teacher Excellence
and Support System, including without limitation in:
5.02.1.1 Classroom observations;
and
5.02.1.2 Pre-observation and
post-observation conferences; and
5.02.2 Collaborate in good faith with the
evaluator to develop the teacher's professional growth plan under Ark. Code
Ann. §
6-17-2806(a) and
Section 10.0 of these rules. If a teacher and evaluator cannot agree on the
professional growth plan, the evaluator's decision shall be final.
5.03 A failure to comply with
Section 5.02 of these rules may be reflected in the teacher's
evaluation.
5.04 At a time other
than an evaluation conducted under the Teacher Excellence and Support System,
if a superintendent or other school administrator charged with the supervision
of a teacher believes or has reason to believe that the teacher is having
difficulties or problems meeting the expectations of the school district or its
administration and the administrator believes or has reason to believe that the
problems could lead to termination or nonrenewal of contract, the
superintendent or other school administrator shall:
5.04.1 Bring in writing the problems or
difficulties to the attention of the teacher involved; and
5.04.2 Document the efforts that have been
undertaken to assist the teacher to correct whatever appears to be the cause
for potential termination or nonrenewal.
5.05 A public school is deemed to have met
the requirements of Section 1.01 of these rules if the school obtained
permission from the Department to continue to use a nationally recognized
system of teacher evaluation and support that is substantially similar to the
Teacher Excellence and Support System and that the school district used in the
2012-2013 and 2013-2014 school years. The Department granted permission to
certain school districts that qualified by providing evidence to the Department
of Education, Assistant Commissioner for Human Resources and Licensure by
December 31, 2012, of:
5.05.1 The name of the
alternate, nationally recognized system of teacher evaluation and support;
and
5.05.2 A brief description of
the alternate, nationally recognized system of teacher evaluation and support,
including an explanation of how it is substantially similar to the Teacher
Excellence and Support System.
5.06 If the Arkansas Department of Education
Assistant Commissioner for Human Resources and Licensure denied the application
of a school district for the continued use of the alternate, nationally
recognized system of teacher evaluation and support beyond the 2013-2014 school
year, the school district shall use the Teacher Excellence and Support System
as prescribed by these rules.
5.07
Schools shall use the electronic platform provided by the Department for
conducting evaluations and assigning ratings as required under these rules.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1504 and §
6-17-2808
6.0
ANNUAL OVERALL
RATING
6.01 To determine a teacher's
annual overall rating, a school district shall use both the teacher's
performance rating and student growth measure.
6.02 Performance rating -
6.02.1 In a summative evaluation year, a
Domain Average is derived from the average of all component scores in each
domain of the evaluation framework. Each Domain Average is 25% of the Overall
Weighted Score. Based on the Overall Weighted Score, the teacher is assigned a
performance rating.
6.02.2 In an
interim appraisal year, the performance rating used in the annual overall
rating is derived only from the average of the components that align to the
educator's professional growth plan. There is no Overall Weighted Score
associated with an interim appraisal.
6.03 Student growth measure -
6.03.1 Annually, a Student-Ordered Assessment
Rank (SOAR) value that reflects whether the teacher's summary growth statistics
meet or exceed a threshold of student growth among all teachers in the state.
6.03.1.1 The applicable growth thresholds
used for all growth determinations necessary for compliance with these rules
and the Teacher Excellence and Support System will be based upon a Student
Growth Percentile Model with the threshold percentile determined by the
Department annually with input from the Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee
and published on the Department's website.
6.03.1.2 For teachers teaching grades 4
through 11, the 2014-2015 school year PARCC assessments will provide baseline
data. Beginning with the 2015-2016 school year, PARCC assessments will be used
as the external assessment measure required by these rules and the Teacher
Excellence and Support System.
6.03.1.3 For teachers teaching kindergarten
through grade 3, special education teachers, and teachers who only teach
seniors, during the 2014-2015 school year, the Department will conduct a study
to determine the appropriate assessments to be used to measure student growth.
The 2015-2016 school year will provide baseline data using the assessments.
Beginning with the 2016-2017 school year, the assessments will be used as the
external assessment measure required by these rules and the Teacher Excellence
and Support System.
6.03.1.4 The
SOAR value for a contributing professional is the school's SOAR
value.
6.03.2 A
teacher's SOAR value will be applied to the performance rating to determine the
annual overall rating.
6.03.2.1 Schools shall
use the roster verification system developed by the Department to ensure that
the student growth measure is accurately calculated and attributed to the
teacher.
6.03.2.2 A teacher may
have multiple SOAR values.
6.03.2.3
If the teacher meets or exceeds the student growth threshold, the annual
overall rating is the same as the performance rating under Section 7.04.2 of
these rules.
6.03.2.4 A teacher
will not be designated as Distinguished unless that teacher's summary growth
statistics meet or exceed the student growth threshold.
6.03.2.4.1 If the teacher has multiple SOAR
values, all SOAR values must meet or exceed the student growth threshold before
the teacher may be designated as Distinguished.
6.03.2.5 If a teacher's summary growth
statistics do not meet the applicable threshold of growth for two (2)
consecutive years the teacher's summative performance rating or annual overall
rating based on an interim appraisal shall be lowered by one performance rating
level.
7.0
SUMMATIVE EVALUATIONS
7.01 Annually during a school year, a public
school shall conduct a summative evaluation for every teacher employed in the
public school who is a:
7.01.1 Novice
teacher;
7.01.2 Probationary
teacher; or
7.01.3 Teacher who
successfully completed intensive support status within the current or
immediately preceding school year.
7.02 At least one (1) time every three (3)
school years, a public school shall conduct a summative evaluation for a
teacher who is not in a status under Section 7.01 of these rules.
7.03 Nothing in this rule shall be construed
to prevent a public school from conducting a summative evaluation of a teacher
more often than one (1) time every three (3) school years.
7.04 The evaluation framework for a summative
evaluation for a classroom teacher shall include:
7.04.1 The following teacher evaluation
domains:
7.04.1.1 Planning and
preparation;
7.04.1.2 Classroom
environment;
7.04.1.3 Instruction;
and
7.04.1.4 Professional
responsibilities; and
7.04.2 An evaluation rubric using nationally
accepted components that consists of the following four (4) performance
ratings:
7.04.2.1 Distinguished;
7.04.2.2 Proficient;
7.04.2.3 Basic; and
7.04.2.4 Unsatisfactory.
7.05 A summative evaluation shall
result in a written:
7.05.1 Evaluation
determination for the teacher's performance rating on each teacher evaluation
domain; and
7.05.2 Summative
evaluation determination of the teacher's performance rating on all teacher
evaluation domains as a whole.
7.06 A summative evaluation shall use an
evaluation framework, evaluation rubric, and external assessment measures that
are appropriate for a teacher who is not a classroom teacher, including without
limitation:
7.06.1 A guidance
counselor;
7.06.2 A library media
specialist;
7.06.3 A special
education teacher; or
7.06.4 The
following teachers:
7.06.4.1 Distance learning
teachers;
7.06.4.2 Virtual charter
school teachers;
7.06.4.3 Teachers
at the Arkansas School for the Blind;
7.06.4.4 Teachers at the Arkansas School for
the Deaf;
7.06.4.5 Teachers at the
Arkansas Correctional School;
7.06.4.6 Instructional facilitators and
instructional coaches; and
7.06.4.7
Teachers employed by education service cooperatives who instruct public school
students.
7.07 The external assessment measure required
to be considered by law for a summative evaluation is the student growth
measure under Section 6.03 of these rules.
7.08 The artifacts considered by the teacher
and evaluator in a summative evaluation for the performance rating shall
consist of evidence related to each teacher evaluation domain and the
respective components and may include:
7.08.1
External assessment measures that are not the student growth measure under
Section 6.03 of these rules;
7.08.2
Knowledge measures, including without limitation, pre-tests, post-tests, or
other written tests;
7.08.3
Performance measures used to evaluate student improvement in a particular
subject matter during a semester or school year;
7.08.4 Attitude/behavior measures used to
evaluate student improvement during a semester or school year as reflected in
parental and/or student surveys;
7.08.5 Student performance in group projects
or project-based learning activities; and
7.08.6 Schoolwide measures, including without
limitation:
7.08.6.1 Attendance
rate;
7.08.6.2 Graduation rate;
and
7.08.6.3 Literacy
scores.
7.09
A summative evaluation process shall include:
7.09.1 A pre-observation conference and
post-observation conference;
7.09.2
A formal classroom observation and informal classroom observation;
7.09.3 Presentations of artifacts chosen by
the teacher, the evaluator, or both;
7.09.4 An opportunity for the evaluator and
teacher to discuss the review of external assessment measures used in the
evaluation;
7.09.5 A written
evaluation determination for each teacher evaluation domain and a written
summative evaluation determination.
7.09.6 Feedback based on the evaluation
rubric that the teacher can use to improve teaching skills and student
learning; and
7.09.7 Feedback from
the teacher concerning the evaluation process and evaluator.
7.10 In a school year in which a
summative evaluation is not required under these rules, the teacher:
7.10.1 Shall focus on elements of the
teacher's professional growth plan as approved by the evaluator that are
designed to help the teacher improve his or her teaching practices;
and
7.10.2 With the evaluator's
approval may:
7.10.2.1 Collaborate with a
team of teachers on a shared plan that benefits the whole school, a content
area, or a grade level; or
7.10.2.2
Conduct self-directed research related to the teacher's professional growth
plan under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806 and Section 10.0 of these
rules.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2805
8.0
INTERIM APPRAISALS
8.01 Interim
appraisals shall be used to:
8.01.1 Support
teachers on an ongoing basis throughout the school year;
8.01.2 Provide a teacher with immediate
feedback about the teacher's teaching practices;
8.01.3 Engage the teacher in a collaborative,
supportive learning process;
8.01.4
Help the teacher use formative assessments to inform the teacher of student
progress and adapt teaching practices based on the formative assessments;
and
8.01.5 Provide a performance
rating that is included in the annual overall rating.
8.02 The interim appraisal process may be
guided in whole or in part by an evaluator or by one (1) or more of the
following persons designated by the evaluator:
8.02.1 A teacher designated by an
administrator as a leader for the teaching content area of a teacher who is
being evaluated;
8.02.2 An
instructional facilitator;
8.02.3 A
curriculum specialist; or
8.02.4 An
academic coach for the teacher's content area.
8.03 While other school personnel may guide
the interim teacher appraisal process, the designated evaluator remains
responsible for conducting summative evaluations and assigning annual overall
ratings of teachers.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806
9.0
MENTORING AND
INDUCTION
9.01 The Teacher Excellence
and Support System also shall include novice teacher mentoring and induction
for each novice teacher employed at the public school that:
9.01.1 Provides training, support, and
follow-up to novice teachers to increase teacher retention;
9.01.2 Establishes norms of professionalism;
and
9.01.3 Leads to improved
student achievement by increasing effective teacher performance.
9.02 Novice teachers shall undergo
mentoring and induction as otherwise set forth by Arkansas law and the ADE
Rules Governing Educator Licensure.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806
10.0
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
PLAN
10.01 Except as provided in
Section 10.03 of these rules, a teacher being evaluated and the evaluator,
working together, shall develop a professional growth plan for the teacher
that:
10.01.1 Identifies professional learning
outcomes to advance the teacher's professional skills; and
10.01.2 Clearly links professional
development activities and the teacher's individual professional learning needs
identified through the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
10.02 The professional growth plan
for a teacher shall require that at least one-half (1/2) of the professional
development hours required by law or rule for teacher licensure are directly
related to one (1) or more of:
10.02.1 The
teacher's content area;
10.02.2
Instructional strategies applicable to the teacher's content area; or
10.02.3 The teacher's identified
needs.
10.03 If a
teacher and evaluator cannot agree on a professional growth plan, the
evaluator's decision shall be final.
10.04 For a teacher in intensive support
status, the evaluator or an administrator designated by the evaluator shall
have final approval of the teacher's professional growth plan.
10.05 Until the teacher is removed from
intensive support status, all professional development identified in the
professional growth plan, except professional development that is required by
law or by the public school where the teacher is employed, shall be directly
related to the individual teacher's needs.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806
11.0
INTENSIVE
SUPPORT STATUS
11.01 An evaluator
shall place a teacher in intensive support status if the teacher has a rating
of "Unsatisfactory" in any one (1) entire teacher evaluation domain of the
evaluation framework.
11.02 An
evaluator may place a teacher in intensive support status if the teacher has a
rating of "Unsatisfactory" or "Basic" in a majority of components in a teacher
evaluation domain.
11.03 If a
teacher is placed in intensive support status, the evaluator shall:
11.03.1 Establish the time period for the
intensive support status; and
11.03.2 Provide a written notice to the
teacher that the teacher is placed in intensive support status. The notice
shall state that if the teacher's contract is renewed while the teacher is in
intensive support status, the fulfillment of the contract term is subject to
the teacher's accomplishment of the goals established and completion of the
tasks assigned in the intensive support status.
11.04 The period of time specified by the
evaluator for intensive support status shall afford the teacher an opportunity
to accomplish the goals of and complete the tasks assigned in the intensive
support status.
11.05 Intensive
support status shall not last for more than two (2) consecutive semesters
unless the teacher has substantially progressed and the evaluator elects to
extend the intensive support status for up to two (2) additional consecutive
semesters.
11.06 The evaluator
shall work with the teacher to:
11.06.1
Develop a clear set of goals and tasks that correlate to:
11.06.1.1 The professional growth plan;
and
11.06.1.2 Evidence-based
research concerning the evaluation domain that forms the basis for the
intensive support status; and
11.06.2 Ensure the teacher is offered the
support that the evaluator deems necessary for the teacher to accomplish the
goals developed and complete the tasks assigned while the teacher is in
intensive support status.
11.07 If the intensive support status is
related to student performance, the teacher shall use formative assessments to
gauge student progress throughout the period of intensive support status. The
teacher shall be offered the support necessary to use formative assessments
under these rules during the intensive support status.
11.08 At the end of the specified period of
time for intensive support status, the evaluator shall:
11.08.1 Evaluate whether the teacher has met
the goals developed and completed the tasks assigned for the intensive support
status; and
11.08.2 Provide written
notice to the teacher that the teacher either:
11.08.2.1 Is removed from intensive support
status; or
11.08.2.2 Has failed to
meet the goals and complete the tasks of the intensive support
status.
11.09
If a teacher does not accomplish the goals and complete the tasks established
for the intensive support status during the period of intensive support status,
the evaluator shall notify the superintendent of the school district where the
teacher is employed and provide the superintendent with documentation of the
intensive support status.
11.10
Upon review and approval of the documentation, the superintendent shall
recommend termination or nonrenewal of the teacher's contract.
11.10.1 A recommendation for termination or
nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under these rules shall be made pursuant to
the authority granted to a superintendent for recommending termination or
nonrenewal under the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
11.10.2 When a superintendent makes a
recommendation for termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under
Section 11.10 of these rules, the public school:
11.10.2.1 Shall provide the notice required
under the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq., but is exempt
from the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1504(b);
and
11.10.2.2 If the public school
has substantially complied with the requirements of Section 11.10 of these
rules, is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the public school has a
substantive basis for the termination or nonrenewal of the teacher's contract
under the applicable standard for termination or nonrenewal under the Teacher
Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq. The presumption
may be rebutted by the teacher during an appeal under the Teacher Fair
Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
11.11 These rules do
not preclude a public school superintendent from:
11.11.1 Making a recommendation for the
termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract for any lawful reason under
the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.; or
11.11.2 Including in a recommendation for
termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under this section any other
lawful reason for termination or nonrenewal under the Teacher Fair Dismissal
Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2807
12.0
INCORPORATION
INTO SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACTS AND POLICIES
12.01 Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §
6-13-1305, the policy adopted by
local school district boards of directors to implement site-based decision
making shall address teacher evaluations, professional growth plans, and
teacher support under the Teacher Excellence and Support System, Ark. Code Ann.
§
6-17-2801 et seq.
12.02 Every teacher contract renewed or
entered into after July 27, 2011 is subject to and shall reference Title 6,
Chapter 17, Subchapter 28 of the Arkansas Code.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-13-1305 and §
6-17-2808
13.0
SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE REPORT
Beginning with the 2017-2018 school year, for the school year
covered by a school performance report pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1402, the school performance
report shall include:
13.01 The total
number of teachers who are employed in the public school; and
13.02 Of that total, the number who meet each
of the following criteria:
13.02.1 Highly
qualified teacher;
13.02.2
Identified as proficient or above under the Teacher Excellence and Support
System for the school; and
13.02.3
Certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1402