Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 9, September, 2024
1.0
PURPOSE
1.01 The purpose of these
rules is to establish the requirements and procedures concerning the Teacher
Excellence and Support System.
2.0
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
2.01 These rules shall be known as the
Arkansas Department of Education Rules Governing the Teacher Excellence and
Support System.
2.02 These rules
are enacted pursuant to the authority of the State Board of Education under
Ark. Code Ann. §§
6-11-105,
6-13-1305,
6-15-1004,
6-15-1402,
6-17-704,
6-17-705,
6-17-1504,
6-17-2801 through
6-17-2809,
6-20-2305,
25-15-201 et seq. and Act 1209 of
2011.
3.0
LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND PURPOSE
3.01 The
State Board of Education notes that, with regard to the Teacher Excellence and
Support System, it is the intent of the Arkansas General Assembly to:
3.01.1 Provide a program affording public
school districts and public charter schools a transparent and consistent
teacher evaluation system that ensures effective teaching and promotes
professional learning;
3.01.2
Provide an evaluation, feedback, and support system that will encourage
teachers to improve their knowledge and instructional skills in order to
improve student learning;
3.01.3
Provide a basis for making teacher employment decisions;
3.01.4 Provide an integrated system that
links evaluation procedures with curricular standards, professional development
activities, targeted support, and human capital decisions;
3.01.5 Encourage highly effective teachers to
undertake challenging assignments;
3.01.6 Support teachers' roles in improving
students' educational achievements;
3.01.7 Inform policymakers regarding the
benefits of a consistent evaluation and support system in regard to improving
student achievement across the state; and
3.01.8 Increase the awareness of parents and
guardians of public school students concerning the effectiveness of public
school teachers.
3.02
The purposes of these rules are, without limitation, to:
3.02.1 Recognize that student learning is the
foundation of teacher effectiveness and many factors impact student learning,
not all of which are under the control of the teacher or the school, and that
evidence of student learning includes trend data and is not limited to a single
assessment;
3.02.2 Provide that the
goals of the Teacher Excellence and Support System are quality assurance and
teacher growth;
3.02.3 Reflect
evidence-based or proven practices that improve student learning. Nothing in
these rules should be construed to prohibit teachers from using innovative
approaches in the classroom;
3.02.4
Utilize clear, concise, evidentiary data for teacher professional growth and
development to improve student achievement;
3.02.5 Recognize that evidence of student
growth is a significant part of the Teacher Excellence and Support
System;
3.02.6 Ensure that student
growth is analyzed at every level of the evaluation system to illustrate
teacher effectiveness. The purpose of requirement is to ensure that student
growth is taken into account during all phases of the teacher evaluation
system;
3.02.7 Require annual
evidence of student growth from artifacts and external assessment
measures;
3.02.8 Include clearly
defined teacher evaluation categories, performance levels, and evaluation
rubric descriptors for the evaluation framework;
3.02.9 Include procedures for implementing
each component of the Teacher Excellence and Support System; and
3.02.10 Include the professional development
requirements for all superintendents, administrators, evaluators, and teachers
to obtain the training necessary to be able to understand and successfully
implement the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2802 and §
6-17-2804
4.0
DEFINITIONS
4.01 "Artifact" means a
documented piece of evidence chosen by the teacher being evaluated, the
evaluator, or both, that:
4.01.1 Relates to
the evaluation rubric; and
4.01.2
Represents output from one (1) or more of the following, without limitation:
4.01.2.1 Lesson plans or pacing guides
aligned with the state standards;
4.01.2.2 Self-directed or collaborative
research approved by an evaluator;
4.01.2.3 Participation in professional
development;
4.01.2.4 Contributions
to parent, community, or professional meetings;
4.01.2.5 Classroom assessments including:
4.01.2.5.1 Unit tests;
4.01.2.5.2 Samples of student work,
portfolios, writing, and projects;
4.01.2.5.3 Pre-assessments and
post-assessments; and
4.01.2.5.4
Classroom-based formative assessments;
4.01.2.6 District-level assessments
including:
4.01.2.6.1 Formative
assessments;
4.01.2.6.2 Grade or
subject level assessments;
4.01.2.6.3 Department-level assessments;
and
4.01.2.6.4 Common
assessments;
4.01.2.7
State-level assessments including:
4.01.2.7.1
End-of-course assessments;
4.01.2.7.2 Statewide assessments of student
achievement; and
4.01.2.7.3 Career
and technical assessments; and
4.01.2.8 National assessments including:
4.01.2.8.1 Advanced placement
assessments;
4.01.2.8.2
Norm-referenced assessments; and
4.01.2.8.3 Career and technical
assessments.
4.02 "Evaluation" means the process under
these rules used to:
4.02.1 Assess with
evidence what a teacher should know and be able to do as measured by the
categories and performance levels of an evaluation framework; and
4.02.2 Promote teacher growth through
professional learning.
4.02.3
"Evaluation" does not include a teacher's performance relating to competitive
athletics and competitive extracurricular activities.
4.03 "Evaluation framework" means a
standardized set of teacher evaluation categories that provide the overall
basis for an evaluation.
4.04
"Evaluation rubric" means a set of performance descriptors for each teacher
evaluation category in the evaluation framework.
4.05 "Evaluator" means a person licensed by
the State Board of Education as an administrator who is designated as the
person responsible for evaluating teachers. "Evaluator" also includes public
charter school administrators who are designated by their public charter
schools as evaluators, even if the public charter school administrators do not
hold an administrator's license. While these rules allow for other school
personnel to guide the interim teacher appraisal process, the designated
evaluator remains responsible for conducting summative evaluations of teachers.
Before conducting summative evaluations of teachers pursuant to these rules, a
designated evaluator must successfully complete all training and certification
requirements for evaluators as set forth by the Arkansas Department of
Education. Prior to conducting summative evaluations of teachers pursuant to
these rules, public charter school administrators who are designated evaluators
must also successfully complete all training and certification requirements for
evaluators as set forth by the Arkansas Department of Education, even if the
public charter school administrators do not hold an administrator's license.
Public charter schools are nevertheless encouraged to employ or contract with
licensed administrators who serve as evaluators under the Teacher Excellence
and Support System.
4.06 "External
assessment measure" means a measure of student achievement or growth that is
administered, developed, and scored by a person or entity other than the
teacher being evaluated, except that the assessment may be administered by the
teacher being evaluated if the assessment is monitored by a licensed individual
designated by the evaluator. For public charter schools, the assessment may be
administered by the teacher being evaluated if the assessment is monitored by a
licensed individual designated by the evaluator or, if no licensed individuals
are employed by the public charter school, a degreed teacher employed by the
public charter school and designated by the evaluator.
4.07 "Formal classroom observation" means an
announced visit to a classroom by an evaluator that:
4.07.1 Is preceded by a pre-observation
conference to discuss the lesson plan and objectives;
4.07.2 Is conducted by an evaluator for at
least seventy-five percent (75%) of the class period either by observing the
teacher in the classroom or through the use of three-hundred-sixty-degree video
technology. The length of time for a formal classroom observation of a teacher
teaching in a block schedule or in a class period lasting longer than sixty
(60) minutes may be adjusted to allow for an observation for forty-five (45)
minutes or more of the teacher's class period;
4.07.3 Facilitates a professional dialogue
for the teacher and evaluator; and
4.07.4 Provides essential evidence of the
teacher's classroom practices.
4.08 "Formative assessment" means an
evaluation of a student's learning that is given before the student completes a
course of instruction to foster the student's development and improvement on a
specific strand within the course of instruction.
4.09 "Informal classroom observation" means
an observation conducted by an evaluator for the same purpose as a formal
classroom observation but may be:
4.09.1
Unannounced; or
4.09.2 For a
shorter period of time than a formal classroom observation.
4.10 "Intensive support status"
means the employment status administered under this subchapter that is assigned
to a teacher under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2807 and Section 7.0 of these
rules.
4.11 "Interim teacher
appraisal" means a form of evaluation, other than a summative evaluation, that:
4.11.1 Provides support for teaching
practices; and
4.11.2 Uses
standards for teacher growth and performance that are consistent with the
evaluation rubrics for the teacher evaluation categories of a summative
evaluation.
4.12 "Novice
teacher" means a teacher having less than one (1) school year of public school
classroom teaching experience.
4.13
"Post-observation conference" means a conference between the teacher and
evaluator following a formal classroom observation to discuss:
4.13.1 The evaluator's observations;
and
4.13.2 Artifacts presented by
the teacher after the formal classroom observation.
4.14 "Pre-observation conference" means a
conference between the teacher and evaluator to discuss goals and planned
outcomes for a classroom lesson before a formal classroom
observation.
4.15 "Probationary
teacher" means the same as probationary teacher under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1502.
4.16 "Statewide assessment of student
achievement" means a statewide benchmark exam, end-of-course assessment, or a
summative assessment of student achievement administered through:
4.16.1 The Arkansas Comprehensive Testing,
Assessment, and Accountability Program Act, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-401 et seq.; or
4.16.2 A program of Common Core assessments
administered under rules of the State Board of Education.
4.17 "Summative assessment" means an
evaluation of student achievement given at the completion of a course of
instruction that cumulatively measures whether the student met long-term
learning goals for the course.
4.18
"Summative evaluation" means an evaluation of a teacher's performance that
evaluates all categories of the evaluation framework that supports:
4.18.1 Improvement in the teacher's teaching
practices and student achievement; and
4.18.2 A school district's employment
decision concerning the teacher.
4.19 "Teacher" means a person who is:
4.19.1 Required to hold and holds a teaching
license from the State Board of Education as a condition of employment;
and
4.19.2 Employed in a public
school as a:
4.19.2.1 Classroom teacher
engaged directly in instruction with students in a classroom setting;
4.19.2.2 Guidance counselor;
4.19.2.3 Library media specialist;
4.19.2.4 Special education teacher;
or
4.19.2.5 The following teachers
who instruct public school students:
4.19.2.5.1 Distance learning
teachers;
4.19.2.5.2 Virtual
charter school teachers;
4.19.2.5.3
Teachers at the Arkansas School for the Blind;
4.19.2.5.4 Teachers at the Arkansas School
for the Deaf;
4.19.2.5.5 Teachers
at the Arkansas Correctional School;
4.19.2.5.6 Instructional facilitators and
instructional coaches; and
4.19.2.5.7 Teachers employed by education
service cooperatives who instruct public school students.
4.19.3 "Teacher" also includes a
nonlicensed classroom teacher employed at a public charter school under a
waiver of teacher licensure requirements granted by the State Board of
Education in the charter.
4.19.4
"Teacher" does not include a person who is employed full time by a school
district or public school solely as a superintendent or
administrator.
4.20
"Teacher Excellence and Support System" means a statewide teacher evaluation
system that provides support, collaboration, feedback and targeted professional
development opportunities aimed at ensuring effective teaching and improving
student learning.
4.21 "Tested
content area" means a teaching content area that is tested under a statewide
assessment of student achievement.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2803 as modified
5.0
SUMMATIVE
EVALUATIONS
5.01 The evaluation
framework for a summative evaluation for a classroom teacher shall include:
5.01.1 The following teacher evaluation
categories (or domains):
5.01.1.1 Planning
and preparation;
5.01.1.2 Classroom
environment;
5.01.1.3 Instruction;
and
5.01.1.4 Professional
responsibilities; and
5.01.2 An evaluation rubric using nationally
accepted descriptors (or components) that consists of the following four (4)
performance levels:
5.01.2.1
Distinguished;
5.01.2.2
Proficient;
5.01.2.3 Basic;
and
5.01.2.4
Unsatisfactory.
5.02 A summative evaluation shall result in a
written:
5.02.1 Evaluation determination for
the teacher's performance level on each teacher evaluation category;
and
5.02.2 Summative evaluation
determination of the teacher's performance level on all teacher evaluation
categories as a whole.
5.03 A summative evaluation shall use an
appropriate evaluation framework, evaluation rubric, and external assessment
measurements for a teacher who is not a classroom teacher, including without
limitation:
5.03.1 A guidance
counselor;
5.03.2 A library media
specialist;
5.03.3 A special
education teacher; or
5.03.4 The
following teachers:
5.03.4.1 Distance learning
teachers;
5.03.4.2 Virtual charter
school teachers;
5.03.4.3 Teachers
at the Arkansas School for the Blind;
5.03.4.4 Teachers at the Arkansas School for
the Deaf;
5.03.4.5 Teachers at the
Arkansas Correctional School;
5.03.4.6 Instructional facilitators and
instructional coaches; and
5.03.4.7
Teachers employed by education service cooperatives who instruct public school
students.
5.04 In a tested content area, one-half (1/2)
of the artifacts considered by the teacher and evaluator shall be external
assessment measures chosen by the teacher and evaluator, or by the evaluator if
the teacher and evaluator are unable to agree. The other one-half (1/2) of the
artifacts in a tested content area shall consist of evidence related to each
teacher evaluation category and their respective components and may include the
artifacts set forth in Section 5.04.2 of these rules.
5.04.1 Except as provided in Section 5.04.2
of these rules for a nontested content area, one-half (1/2) of the artifacts
considered by the teacher and evaluator, or by the evaluator if the teacher and
evaluator cannot agree, shall be external assessments.
5.04.2 If an external assessment measure does
not exist for the nontested content area, the following types of artifacts may
be used to satisfy the external assessment measure requirement under Section
5.04.1 of these rules.
5.04.2.1 Knowledge
measures, including without limitation, pre-tests, post-tests, or other written
tests;
5.04.2.2 Performance
measures used to evaluate student improvement in a particular subject matter
during a semester or school year;
5.04.2.3 Attitude/behavior measures used to
evaluate student improvement during a semester or school year as reflected in
parental and/or student surveys;
5.04.2.4 Student performance in group
projects or project-based learning activities; and
5.04.2.5 Schoolwide measures, including
without limitation:
5.04.2.5.1 Attendance
rate;
5.04.2.5.2 Graduation rate;
and
5.04.2.5.3 Literacy
scores.
5.05 A summative evaluation process shall
include:
5.05.1 A pre-observation conference
and post-observation conference;
5.05.2 A formal classroom observation and
informal classroom observation;
5.05.3 Presentations of artifacts chosen by
the teacher, the evaluator, or both;
5.05.4 An opportunity for the evaluator and
teacher to discuss the review of external assessment measures used in the
evaluation;
5.05.5 A written
evaluation determination for each teacher evaluation category and a written
summative evaluation determination.
5.05.6 Feedback based on the evaluation
rubric that the teacher can use to improve teaching skills and student
learning; and
5.05.7 Feedback from
the teacher concerning the evaluation process and evaluator.
5.06 Student growth measures will
be included in the summative evaluation process as set forth in Section 14.00
of these Rules.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2805
6.0
TEACHER SUPPORT
COMPONENTS
6.01 Except as provided in
Section 6.03 of these rules, a teacher being evaluated and the evaluator,
working together, shall develop a professional learning plan for the teacher
that:
6.01.1 Identifies professional learning
outcomes to advance the teacher's professional skills; and
6.01.2 Clearly links professional development
activities and the teacher's individual professional learning needs identified
through the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
6.02 The professional learning plan shall
require that at least one-half (1/2) of the professional development hours
required by law or rule for a teacher are directly related to one (1) or more
of:
6.02.1 The teacher's content
area;
6.02.2 Instructional
strategies applicable to the teacher's content area; or
6.02.3 The teacher's identified
needs.
6.03 If a teacher
and evaluator cannot agree on a professional learning plan, the evaluator's
decision shall be final.
6.04 For a
teacher in intensive support status, the evaluator or an administrator
designated by the evaluator shall have final approval of the teacher's
professional learning plan.
6.05
Until the teacher is removed from intensive support status, all professional
development identified in the professional learning plan, except professional
development that is required by law or by the public school where the teacher
is employed, shall be directly related to the individual teacher's
needs.
6.06 Interim teacher
appraisals shall be used to support teachers on an ongoing basis throughout the
school year and:
6.06.1 Provide a teacher with
immediate feedback about the teacher's teaching practices;
6.06.2 Engage the teacher in a collaborative,
supportive learning process; and
6.06.3 Help the teacher use formative
assessments to inform the teacher of student progress and adapt teaching
practices based on the formative assessments.
6.07 The interim teacher appraisal process
may be guided in whole or in part by an evaluator or by one (1) or more of the
following persons designated by the evaluator:
6.07.1 A teacher designated by an
administrator as a leader for the teaching content area of a teacher who is
being evaluated;
6.07.2 An
instructional facilitator;
6.07.3 A
curriculum specialist; or
6.07.4 An
academic coach for the teacher's content area.
6.07.5 As noted in Section 4.05 of these
Rules, while other school personnel may guide the interim teacher appraisal
process, the designated evaluator remains responsible for conducting summative
evaluations of teachers.
6.08 The Teacher Excellence and Support
System also shall include novice teacher mentoring and induction for each
novice teacher employed at the public school that:
6.08.1 Provides training, support, and
follow-up to novice teachers to increase teacher retention;
6.08.2 Establishes norms of professionalism;
and
6.08.3 Leads to improved
student achievement by increasing effective teacher performance.
6.08.4 Novice teachers shall undergo
mentoring and induction as otherwise set forth by Arkansas law or rules of the
State Board of Education.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806
7.0
INTENSIVE
SUPPORT STATUS
7.01 An evaluator shall
place a teacher in intensive support status if the teacher has a rating of
"Unsatisfactory" in any one (1) entire teacher evaluation category of the
evaluation framework.
7.02 An
evaluator may place a teacher in intensive support status if the teacher has a
rating of "Unsatisfactory" or "Basic" in a majority of descriptors in a teacher
evaluation category.
7.03 If a
teacher is placed in intensive support status, the evaluator shall:
7.03.1 Establish the time period for the
intensive support status; and
7.03.2 Provide a written notice to the
teacher that the teacher is placed in intensive support status. The notice
shall state that if the teacher's contract is renewed while the teacher is in
intensive support status, the fulfillment of the contract term is subject to
the teacher's accomplishment of the goals established and completion of the
tasks assigned in the intensive support status.
7.04 The period of time specified by the
evaluator for intensive support status shall afford the teacher an opportunity
to accomplish the goals of and complete the tasks assigned in the intensive
support status.
7.05 Intensive
support status shall not last for more than two (2) consecutive semesters
unless the teacher has substantially progressed and the evaluator elects to
extend the intensive support status for up to two (2) additional consecutive
semesters.
7.06 The evaluator shall
work with the teacher to:
7.06.1 Develop a
clear set of goals and tasks that correlate to:
7.06.1.1 The professional learning plan;
and
7.06.1.2 Evidence-based
research concerning the evaluation category that forms the basis for the
intensive support status; and
7.06.2 Ensure the teacher is offered the
support that the evaluator deems necessary for the teacher to accomplish the
goals developed and complete the tasks assigned while the teacher is in
intensive support status.
7.07 If the intensive support status is
related to student performance, the teacher shall use formative assessments to
gauge student progress throughout the period of intensive support status. The
teacher shall be offered the support necessary to use formative assessments
under these rules during the intensive support status.
7.08 At the end of the specified period of
time for intensive support status, the evaluator shall:
7.08.1 Evaluate whether the teacher has met
the goals developed and completed the tasks assigned for the intensive support
status; and
7.08.2 Provide written
notice to the teacher that the teacher either:
7.08.2.1 Is removed from intensive support
status; or
7.08.2.2 Has failed to
meet the goals and complete the tasks of the intensive support
status.
7.09
If a teacher does not accomplish the goals and complete the tasks established
for the intensive support status during the period of intensive support status,
the evaluator shall notify the superintendent of the school district where the
teacher is employed and provide the superintendent with documentation of the
intensive support status.
7.10 Upon
review and approval of the documentation, the superintendent shall recommend
termination or nonrenewal of the teacher's contract.
7.10.1 A recommendation for termination or
nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under these rules shall be made pursuant to
the authority granted to a superintendent for recommending termination or
nonrenewal under the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
7.10.2 When a superintendent makes a
recommendation for termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under
Section 7.10 of these rules, the public school:
7.10.2.1 Shall provide the notice required
under the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq., but is exempt
from the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1504(b);
and
7.10.2.2 If the public school
has substantially complied with the requirements of Section 7.10 of these
rules, is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the public school has a
substantive basis for the termination or nonrenewal of the teacher's contract
under the applicable standard for termination or nonrenewal under the Teacher
Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq. The presumption
may be rebutted by the teacher during an appeal under the Teacher Fair
Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
7.11 These rules do not
preclude a public school superintendent from:
7.11.1 Making a recommendation for the
termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract for any lawful reason under
the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.; or
7.11.2 Including in a recommendation for
termination or nonrenewal of a teacher's contract under this section any other
lawful reason for termination or nonrenewal under the Teacher Fair Dismissal
Act of 1983, Ark. Code Ann. Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1501 et seq.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2807
8.0
GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
8.01
Each teacher employed by the board of directors of a school district shall be
evaluated in writing under the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
8.02 At a time other than an evaluation
conducted under the Teacher Excellence and Support System, if a superintendent
or other school administrator charged with the supervision of a teacher
believes or has reason to believe that the teacher is having difficulties or
problems meeting the expectations of the school district or its administration
and the administrator believes or has reason to believe that the problems could
lead to termination or nonrenewal of contract, the superintendent or other
school administrator shall:
8.02.1 Bring in
writing the problems or difficulties to the attention of the teacher involved;
and
8.02.2 Document the efforts
that have been undertaken to assist the teacher to correct whatever appears to
be the cause for potential termination or nonrenewal.
8.03 Annually during a school year, a public
school shall conduct a summative evaluation for every teacher employed in the
public school who is a:
8.03.1 Novice
teacher;
8.03.2 Probationary
teacher; or
8.03.3 Teacher who
successfully completed intensive support status within the current or
immediately preceding school year.
8.04 At least one (1) time every three (3)
school years, a public school shall conduct a summative evaluation for a
teacher who is not in a status under Section 8.03 of these rules. Nothing in
this rule shall be construed to prevent a public school from conducting a
summative evaluation of a teacher more often than one (1) time every three (3)
school years.
8.05 In a school year
in which a summative evaluation is not required for a teacher under Section
8.04 of these rules, the teacher:
8.05.1 Shall
focus on elements of the teacher's professional learning plan as approved by
the evaluator that are designed to help the teacher improve his or her teaching
practices; and
8.05.2 With the
evaluator's approval may:
8.05.2.1 Collaborate
with a team of teachers on a shared plan that benefits the whole school, a
content area, or a grade level; or
8.05.2.2 Conduct self-directed research
related to the teacher's professional learning plan under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2806 and Section 6.0 of these
rules.
8.06
During the two (2) years in which a summative evaluation is not required, a
public school may conduct an evaluation that is lesser in scope than a
summative evaluation but uses the portions of the evaluation framework and
evaluation rubrics that are relevant to the evaluation.
8.07 A teacher shall:
8.07.1 Participate in the Teacher Excellence
and Support System, including without limitation in:
8.07.1.1 Classroom observations;
and
8.07.1.2 Pre-observation and
post-observation conferences; and
8.07.2 Collaborate in good faith with the
evaluator to develop the teacher's professional learning plan under Ark. Code
Ann. §
6-17-2806(a) and
Section 6.0 of these rules. If a teacher and evaluator cannot agree on the
professional learning plan, the evaluator's decision shall be final.
8.07.3 A failure to comply with Section 8.07
of these rules may be reflected in the teacher's evaluation.
8.08 A public school that in the
2012-2013 and 2013-2014 school years uses a nationally recognized system of
teacher evaluation and support that is substantially similar to the Teacher
Excellence and Support System may continue to use that system and is deemed to
have met the requirements of Section 8.0 of these rules. In order for a public
school to continue to use an alternate, nationally recognized system of teacher
evaluation and support that is substantially similar to the Teacher Excellence
and Support System beyond the 2013-2014 school year, the public school shall
submit the following in writing to the Arkansas Department of Education,
Assistant Commissioner for Human Resources and Licensure, by December 31, 2012:
8.08.1 The name of the alternate, nationally
recognized system of teacher evaluation and support; and
8.08.2 A brief description of the alternate,
nationally recognized system of teacher evaluation and support, including an
explanation of how it is substantially similar to the Teacher Excellence and
Support System.
8.08.3 The Arkansas
Department of Education Assistant Commissioner for Human Resources and
Licensure shall, by March 31, 2013, approve or deny the continued use of the
alternate, nationally recognized system of teacher evaluation and support
beyond the 2013-2014 school year.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-1504 and §
6-17-2808
9.0
ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATIONS
The Department of Education shall provide technical assistance
to school districts for developing and implementing instruments to evaluate
administrators that weight an administrator evaluation on student performance
and growth to the same extent as provided for teachers under the Teacher
Excellence and Support System.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2809
10.0
INCORPORATION INTO SCHOOL
DISTRICT CONTRACTS AND POLICIES
10.01
Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §
6-13-1305, the policy adopted by
local school district boards of directors to implement site-based decision
making shall address teacher evaluations, professional learning plans, and
teacher support under the Teacher Excellence and Support System, Ark. Code Ann.
§
6-17-2801 et seq.
10.02 Every teacher contract renewed or
entered into after July 27, 2011 is subject to and shall reference Title 6,
Chapter 17, Subchapter 28 of the Arkansas Code.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-13-1305 and §
6-17-2808
11.0
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT, LICENSING AND FUNDING
11.01 Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1004, to renew a teaching
license, a teacher shall participate in continuing education and professional
development:
11.01.1 Based on the teacher's
evaluation and professional learning plan under the Teacher Excellence and
Support System;
11.01.2 As required
under Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-704 and other law;
and
11.01.3 As required by the
State Board of Education.
11.02 Licensed personnel may earn the twelve
(12) hours of professional development credit required under Ark. Code Ann.
§
6-17-405 through online
professional development credit approved by the Department of Education and
related to the:
11.02.1 School district's
Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement Plan; or
11.02.2 Teacher's professional learning plan
under the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
11.03 A teacher shall complete any missed
hours of professional development through professional development that is:
11.03.1 Substantially similar to the
professional development missed and approved by the person responsible for the
teacher's summative evaluation under the Teacher Excellence and Support System;
and
11.03.2 Delivered by any
method, online or otherwise, approved by the Department of Education under the
State Board of Education rules.
11.04 Funding for professional development
for teachers in Arkansas public schools required under the Teacher Excellence
and Support System, other law or rule, or by the school district shall be used
for professional development activities and materials that:
11.04.1 Improve the knowledge, skills, and
effectiveness of teachers;
11.04.2
Address the knowledge and skills of administrators and paraprofessionals
concerning effective instructional strategies, methods, and skills;
11.04.3 Lead to improved student academic
achievement; and
11.04.4 Provide
training for school bus drivers as outlined in rules promulgated by the State
Board of Education.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1004; §
6-17-704; §
6-17-705; and §
6-20-2305
12.0
SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE REPORT
Beginning with the 2017-2018 school year, for the school year
covered by a school performance report pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1402, the school performance
report shall include:
12.01 The total
number of teachers who are employed in the public school; and
12.02 Of that total, the number who meet each
of the following criteria:
12.02.1 Highly
qualified teacher;
12.02.2
Identified as proficient or above under the Teacher Excellence and Support
System for the school; and
12.02.3
Certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-15-1402
13.0
EFFECTIVE
DATE
Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, a public school shall
implement the Teacher Excellence and Support System for all teachers employed
at the public school under these rules established by the State Board of
Education.
Source: Ark. Code Ann. §
6-17-2808
14.0
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES
14.01 The following student growth measures
will be incorporated into the summative evaluation process prior to the
implementation of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and
Careers (PARCC) assessment system:
14.01.1 In
grades and subjects where growth model data are available, and of sufficient
number of students to support reliable inferences, the Arkansas Comprehensive
Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP) assessments will be
used as external assessments in the determination of teacher's
ratings.
14.01.2 No teacher will be
designated as Distinguished unless that teacher's summary growth statistics
meet or exceed a threshold of growth among all teachers in the state.
14.01.3 If a teacher's summary growth
statistics do not meet the applicable threshold of growth for the two
consecutive years immediately preceding the teacher's evaluation, the teacher's
summative evaluation determination set forth in Section 5.02.2 of these rules
shall be lowered by one performance level.
14.01.4 For the 2012-2013 school year, the
Department of Education shall establish the applicable growth threshold(s) and
will disseminate the threshold(s) to all public school districts and
open-enrollment charter schools.
14.01.5 The applicable growth thresholds
shall be initially based upon one or more of the following growth models:
14.01.5.1 The federally-approved
Growth-to-Standard Model;
14.01.5.2
The Student Growth Percentile Model;
14.01.5.3 The Gains Index Model.
14.02 In order to allow
for further review of the proposed PARCC assessments, the Arkansas Department
of Education shall establish applicable growth models following the full
implementation of the PARCC assessment system. Beginning with the 2015-2016
school year, the PARCC assessment will be used as the external assessment
measure required by these rules and the Teacher Excellence and Support
System.
14.03 The applicable growth
models established by the Arkansas Department of Education shall be used for
all growth determinations necessary for compliance with these rules and the
Teacher Excellence and Support System.