Current through Register Vol. 30, No. 38, September 20, 2024
A. In this Section,
unless the context otherwise requires:
1.
"Intensive reading instruction" is a proactive instructional approach used to
reduce the likelihood of future reading problems by addressing severe and
persistent difficulties with learning to read through the use of evidence-based
instruction in smaller-group settings, increased instructional time, and
increased intensity that is aligned to individual student needs or deficiencies
and is driven by ongoing student performance data from a valid assessment
tool.
2. "Interventions" are
instructional supports provided to students with the purpose of preventing and
remediating reading difficulties. These supports are organized in tiers which
provide increasing instructional intensity and support with each
level.
3. "Motivational
assessments" are measures of motivation or attitudes toward reading and produce
information to monitor student progress.
4. "Prevention" is instructional support
provided to students before students have experienced failure in learning to
read.
5. "Remediation" is
instructional support provided to students after a student has experienced
significant and persistent difficulties in learning to read.
6. "Universal screeners" are very brief
measures based on established standardized benchmarks or performance targets
developed through extensive research designed to improve accuracy of
identifying students who will likely need additional support for meeting grade
level reading standards.
B. Prior to the release of monies generated
by the K through three reading support level weight, each school district or
charter school shall submit to the Department on or before October 1, a
comprehensive local education agency K through three reading program plan,
using the format prescribed by the Department.
C. Pursuant to A.R.S. §§
15-211,
15-701 and 15-704, the K through three reading program plan submission shall
contain the following components for pupils in half-day and full-day
kindergarten programs and grades one through three:
1. School literacy contacts, literacy team
members and master K-3 school schedules, to include all subject areas, with a
clear emphasis on literacy instruction and displaying all levels of reading
support;
2. A list of the staff who
reviewed and approved the individual school K through three reading program
plan, including special education directors/staff and staff directly involved
with reading instruction;
3.
Program expenditures for the prior school year and a budget for the current
school year regarding the monies used only on instructional purposes intended
to improve reading proficiency from the K through three support level weight
and the K through three reading support level weight;
4. An analysis of the effectiveness of the
local education agency's K through three reading program for the previous
school year and plans for improvement for the current school year, including
the specific strategies being employed to support populations currently
eligible for exemption from retention, such as struggling readers, English
language learners, and students with disabilities;
5. Core reading programs which teach the
essential components of reading instruction including explicit and systematic
phonics pursuant to A.R.S. §
15-704(H)(1), with a description of the
frequency and duration of the instruction;
6. Date of last K through three reading
curriculum review for standards alignment;
7. Tier II and Tier III intensive reading
intervention programs including reading programs used for students with
disabilities (separate from specially designed instruction outlined within a
child with a disability's individualized education program), including
frequency and duration;
8. A sample
template of a parental notification letter;
9. Evidence-based intervention and remedial
services provided to students,
10.
Evidence of ongoing teacher training based on evidence-based reading research;
and
11. Assurance that all parts of
the assessment system are accessible to all students as required by federal
law.
D. The local
education agency shall submit universal screening data by October 1, winter
data by February 1 and spring data by June 1 for pupils in kindergarten
programs and grades one through three. Beginning with school year 2025-2026,
reported data to the Arizona Department of Education will include third grade
statewide ELA exam data disaggregated by subgroups.
1. Student counts of subgroups that are less
than 11 are to be reviewed by the LEA, but are to be redacted for reporting
purposes by the Arizona Department of Education.
2. Subgroups:
a. All,
b. English Learners,
c. American Indian or Alaska
Native,
d. Asian,
e. African American/Black,
f. Hispanic or Latino,
g. Multiple Races,
h. Native Hawaiian or Pacific
Islander,
i. White,
j. Income Eligibility 1 and 2, and
k. Students with Disabilities.
E. Each school district
or charter school governing body shall submit data for the prior school year on
the total number of pupils that were subject to retention, the total number
that were promoted, the total number actually retained and the interventions
administered pursuant to A.R.S. §
15-701 to the Department no later than
October 1 and prior to the release of monies generated by the K through three
reading support level weight.
F.
The State Board [p]rescribes competency requirements for the promotion of
pupils from the eighth grade and competency requirements for the promotion of
pupils from the third grade incorporating the academic standards in at least
the areas of reading, writing, mathematics, science and social studies. The
competency requirements for the promotion of pupils from the third grade
include the following:
1. A pupil shall not be
promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading
portion of the statewide assessment that does not demonstrate sufficient
reading skills as established by the state board. A pupil may not be retained
pursuant to this subsection if data regarding the pupil's performance on the
statewide assessment is not available before the end of the current academic
year and may not be retained due to Move On When Reading more than once. A
pupil who is not retained due to the unavailability of test data must receive
evidence-based intervention and remedial strategies pursuant to A.R.S. §
15-701(A)(2)(c) if the third-grade assessment data subsequently does not
demonstrate sufficient reading skills.
a. Each
school district shall continue to provide targeted reading interventions and
supports for students who are promoted to fourth grade due to one of the
good-cause exemptions. As an example, implementing the following evidence-based
practices:
i. Placement with a
highly-effective teacher, as determined by teacher evaluations;
ii. Use of a valid literacy assessment to
determine specific areas of struggle with reading;
iii. High-dose tutoring targeted to the
specific areas of struggle, including:
(1)
Continued development of phonological awareness skills;
(2) Continued development of decoding
skills;
(3) Continued development
of fluency skills;
iv.
Use of a valid and reliable literacy assessment for regular progress
monitoring;
v. Regular
communication with the parents/guardians of students receiving supports to
detail the reports received at school and specific strategies that parents can
use to support students in the home.
b. Each school district or charter school
governing body shall use a valid and reliable literacy assessment to collect
and provide updated data on the progress of students who are promoted to fourth
grade due to one of the good-cause exemptions.
2. A school district governing board or the
governing body of a charter school may promote a pupil from the third grade who
does not demonstrate sufficient reading skills pursuant to R7-2-318(F)(1) of
this section if the pupil:
a. Is an English
learner or a limited English proficient student as defined in A.R.S. §
15-751 and has had fewer than three years of English language
instruction.
b. Is in the process
of a special education referral or evaluation for placement in special
education, has been diagnosed as having a significant reading impairment,
including dyslexia, or is a child with a disability as defined in A.R.S. §
15-761 if the pupil's individualized education program team and the pupil's
parent or guardian agree that promotion is appropriate based on the pupil's
individualized education program.
c. Has demonstrated or subsequently
demonstrates sufficient reading skills or adequate progress toward sufficient
reading skills of the third grade reading standards as evidenced through a
collection of valid and reliable reading assessments approved by the State
Board of Education, which includes an alternative standardized reading
assessment approved by the state board. The approved alternative standardized
reading assessment shall be a re-administration of the statewide third-grade
English language arts exam, which shall be administered by the Arizona
Department of Education, and shall use the same State Board approved K-3
Reading (Move On When Reading) cut score.
d. Receives intervention and remedial
services during the summer or a subsequent school year pursuant to A.R.S.
§
15-701(A)(2)(c) and demonstrates sufficient progress based on guidelines
issued in A.R.S. §
15-701(B)(7). Sufficient progress toward reading may be
demonstrated by meeting the State Board of Education approved cut score for the
K-3 Reading Program (Move On When Reading) on a readministration of the
statewide third-grade English language arts exam as administered by the Arizona
Department of Education.
G. On or before December 15, the Department
of Education shall submit an annual report on the K-3 reading program to the
governor, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives and shall provide a copy of this annual report to the Secretary
of State, the State Board of Education and the chairpersons of the education
committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The report shall
contain all of the following:
1. Information
on the improvement of K-3 reading in this state, including achievement data
statewide and achievement data at the school district and charter school level.
The information pursuant to this paragraph shall include data and information
on continued proficiency on the statewide assessment in subsequent
grades.
2. A description of the
activities of the department to support school districts and charter schools in
improving K-3 reading.
3. Specific
findings on methods by which the department may continue to improve support and
assistance for school districts and charter schools in the administration of
K-3 reading program plans.
4.
Information and data on K-3 reading program plans throughout this state and the
expenditure of K-3 reading monies by school districts and charter
schools.
5. Information on the
progress towards reading at grade level of students who were promoted in the
previous year due to a good cause exemption, including strategies used to
support these students and the progress they have made towards grade-level
reading.
a. Example Strategies:
i. Placement with a highly-effective teacher,
as determined by teacher evaluations;
ii. Use of a valid literacy assessment to
determine specific areas of struggle with reading;
iii. High-dose tutoring targeted to the
specific areas of struggle, including;
(1)
Continued development of phonological awareness skills;
(2) Continued development of decoding
skills;
(3) Continued development
of fluency skills;
iv.
Use of a valid literacy assessment for regular progress monitoring;
v. Regular communication with the
parents/guardians of students receiving supports to detail the reports received
at school and specific strategies that parents can use to support students in
the home.
b. Data
reported pursuant to A.R.S. § section 15-701(A)(2)(d).
c. Beginning with school year 2025/2026, the
Arizona Department of Education shall disaggregate and report the data
submitted by local education agencies by subgroup by grade level for each of
the three data submission windows.
6. Student counts of subgroups that are less
than 11 are to be redacted for reporting purposes.
a. Subgroups:
i. All,
ii. English Learners,
iii. American Indian or Alaska
Native,
iv. Asian,
v. African American/Black,
vi. Hispanic or Latino,
vii. Multiple Races,
viii. Native Hawaiian or Pacific
Islander,
ix. White,
x. Income Eligibility 1 and 2,
xi. Students with Disabilities;
b. Subgroups:
i. Autism,
ii. Developmental delay,
iii. Emotional disability,
iv. Hearing impairment,
v. Other health impairment,
vi. Specific learning disability,
vii. Mild, moderate, or severe intellectual
disability,
viii. Multiple
disabilities,
ix. Multiple
disabilities with severe sensory impairment,
x. Orthopedic impairment,
xi. Preschool severe delay,
xii. Speech/language impairment,
xiii. Traumatic brain injury,
xiv. Visual impairment.