Arizona Administrative Code
Title 4 - PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 43 - Board of Occupational Therapy Examiners
Article 3 - HEARINGS
Section R4-43-302 - Rehearing or Review of Decision
Current through Register Vol. 30, No. 38, September 20, 2024
A. The Board shall provide for a rehearing and review of its decisions under A.R.S. Title 41, Chapter 6, Article 10 and rules established by the Office of Administrative Hearings.
B. A party is required to file a motion for rehearing or review of a decision of the Board to exhaust the party's administrative remedies.
C. A party may amend a motion for rehearing or review at any time before the Board rules on the motion.
D. The Board may grant a rehearing or review for any of the following reasons materially affecting a party's rights:
E. The Board may affirm or modify a decision or grant a rehearing to all or any of the parties on all or part of the issues for any of the reasons in subsection (D). An order modifying a decision or granting a rehearing shall specify with particularity the grounds for the order.
F. When a motion for rehearing or review is based upon affidavits, they shall be served with the motion. An opposing party may, within 15 days after service, serve opposing affidavits. The Board may extend this period for a maximum of 20 days, for good cause as described in subsection (I).
G. Not later that 10 days after the date of a decision, after giving parties notice and an opportunity to be heard, the Board may grant a rehearing or review on its own initiative for any reason for which it might have granted relief on motion of a party. The Board may grant a motion for rehearing or review, timely served, for a reason not stated in the motion.
H. If a rehearing is granted, the Board shall hold the rehearing within 60 days after the issue date on the order granting the rehearing.
I. The Board may extend all time limits listed in this Section upon a showing of good cause. A party demonstrates good cause by showing that the grounds for the party's motion or other action could not have been known in time, using reasonable diligence, and: