Alabama Administrative Code
Title 810 - ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Chapter 810-27-1 - MULTISTATE TAX COMPACT
Section 810-27-1-.19 - Public Law 86-272 Exemption From Income Tax

(a)Public Law 86-272, 15 U.S.C. 381-384, (hereafter " P.L. 86-272 ") restricts a state from imposing a net income tax on income derived within its borders from interstate commerce if the only business activity of the company within the state consists of the solicitation of orders for sales of tangible personal property, which orders are to be sent outside the state for acceptance or rejection, and, if accepted, are filled by shipment or delivery from a point outside the state. The term "net income tax" includes a franchise tax measured by net income. If any sales are made into a state which is precluded by P.L. 86-272 from taxing the income of the seller, such sales remain subject to throwback to the appropriate state which does have jurisdiction to impose its net income tax upon the income derived from those sales.

(b) Signatory State is a state which has signed the Statement of Information Concerning Practices of Multistate Tax Commission and Signatory States under Public Law 86-272, as amended, from time to time.

(c) It is the policy of Alabama hereto to impose its net income tax, subject to Alabama and Federal legislative limitations, to the fullest extent constitutionally permissible. Interpretation of the solicitation of orders standard in P.L. 86-272 requires a determination of the fair meaning of that term in the first instance. The United States Supreme Court has recently established a standard for interpreting the term "solicitation" and this rule has been revised to conform to such standard. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co., 505 U.S., 112 S.Ct. 2447, 120 L.Ed.2d 174 (1992) . In those cases where there may be reasonable differences of opinion between Alabama and a Signatory State as to whether the disputed activity exceeds what is protected by P.L. 86-272, Alabama will apply the principle that the preemption of state taxation that is required by P.L. 86-272 will be limited to those activities that fall within the "clear and manifest purpose of Congress." See Department of Revenue of Oregon v. ACF Industries, Inc., et al., U.S., 114 S.Ct. 843, 127 L. Ed.2d 165 (1994), Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S., 112 S.Ct. 2608, 120 L. Ed.2d 407, 422 (1992); Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Com., 409 U.S. 275, 281-282 (1972).

(d) The following rule reflects Alabama's practice with regard to:

(a) Only the solicitation to sell personal property is afforded immunity under P.L. 86-272; therefore, the leasing, renting, licensing or other disposition of tangible personal property, or transactions involving intangibles, such as franchises, patents, copyrights, trademark, service marks and the like, or any other type of property are not protected activities under P.L. 86-272.

(b) The sale or delivery and the solicitation for the sale or delivery of any type of service that is not either (i) ancillary to solicitation or (ii) otherwise set forth as a protected activity under the subsection (5) (b) below is also not protected under Public Law 86-272 or this rule.

(a) For the in-state activity to be a protected activity under P.L. 86-272, it must be limited solely to solicitation (except for de minimis activities described in paragraph (4) and those activities conducted by independent contractors described in paragraph (6) below).

(b) Solicitation means:

(c) Ancillary activities are those activities that serve no independent business function for the seller apart from their connection to the solicitation of orders. Activities that a seller would engage in apart from soliciting orders shall not be considered as ancillary to the solicitation of orders. The mere assignment of activities to sales personnel does not, merely by such assignment, make such activities ancillary to solicitation of orders. Additionally, activities that seek to promote sales are not ancillary, because P.L. 86-272 does not protect activity that facilitates sales; it only protects ancillary activities that facilitate the request for an order. The conducting of activities not falling within the foregoing definition of solicitation will cause the company to lose its protection from a net income tax afforded by P.L. 86-272, unless the disqualifying activities, taken together, are either de minimis or are otherwise permitted under this rule.

(a) De minimis activities are those that, when taken together, establish only a trivial connection with the taxing State. An activity conducted within a taxing State on a regular or systematic basis or pursuant to a company policy (whether such policy is in writing or not) shall normally not be considered trivial. Whether or not an activity consists of a trivial or non-trivial connection with the State is to be measured on both a qualitative and quantitative basis. If such activity either qualitatively or quantitatively creates a non-trivial connection with the taxing State, then such activity exceeds the protection of P.L. 86-272. Establishing that the disqualifying activities only account for a relatively small part of the business conducted within the taxing State is not determinative of whether a de minimis level of activity exits. The relative economic importance of the disqualifying in-state activities, as compared to the protected activities, does not determine whether the conduct of the disqualifying activities within the taxing State is inconsistent with the limited protection afforded by P.L. 86-272.

(a) Unprotected Activities. The following in-state activities (assuming they are not of a de minimis level) are not considered as either solicitation of orders or ancillary thereto or otherwise protected under P.L. 86-272 and will cause otherwise protected sales to lose their protection under P.L. 86-272 :

(b) Protected Activities. The following in-state activities will not cause the loss of protection for otherwise protected sales:

(a)P.L. 86-272 provides protection to certain in-state activities if conducted by an independent contractor that would not be afforded if performed by the company or its employees or other representatives. Independent contractors may engage in the following limited activities in the state without the company's loss of immunity:

(b) Sales representatives who represent a single principal are not considered to be independent contractors and are subject to the same limitations as those provided under P.L. 86-2722 and this rule.

(c) Maintenance of a stock of goods in the state by the independent contractor under consignment or any other type of arrangement with the company, except for purposes of display and solicitation, shall remove the protection.

(a) When it appears that Alabama and another Signatory State, due to the use of a throwback rule, have included or will include the same receipts from a sale in their respective sales factor numerators, at the written request of the company mailed to both states, Alabama may confer in good faith with the other state to determine which state should be assigned said receipts. Such conference may identify what law, rule or written guideline, if any, has been adopted in the state of destination with respect to the issue. The state of destination shall be that location at which the purchaser or its designee actually receives the property, regardless of f.o.b. point or other conditions of sale.

(b) In determining which state is to receive the assignment of the receipts at issue, preference may be given to any clearly applicable law, rule or written guideline that has been adopted in state of destination. However, except in the case of the definition of what constitutes "tangible personal property", Alabama is not required by this rule to follow any other state's law, rule or written guideline should Alabama determine that to do so (i) would conflict with its own laws, rules, or written guidelines and (ii) would not clearly reflect the income-producing activity of the company within Alabama.

(c) Notwithstanding any provision set forth in this rule to the contrary, as between Alabama and any other Signatory State, Alabama will apply the definition of "tangible personal property" that exists in the state of destination to determine the application of P.L. 86-272 and issues of throwback, if any. Should the state of destination not have any applicable definition of such term so that it could be reasonably determined whether the property at issue constitutes "tangible personal property", then Alabama will treat such property in any manner that would clearly reflect the income- producing activity of the company within Alabama.

(a) Application of Rule to Foreign Commerce. Alabama will apply the provisions of Public Law 86-272 and of this rule to business activities conducted in foreign commerce. Therefore, whether business activities are conducted by (i) a foreign or domestic company selling tangible personal property into a country outside of the United States from a point within Alabama or by (ii) either company selling such property into Alabama from a point outside of the United States, the principles under this rule apply equally to determine whether the sales transactions are protected and the company immune from taxation in either Alabama or in the foreign country, as the case might be, and whether, if applicable, Alabama will apply its throwback provisions.

(b) Application to Corporation Incorporated in Alabama or to person resident or domiciled in Alabama. The protection afforded by P.L. 86-272 and the provisions of this rule, except for purposes of applying a throwback rule, do not apply to any corporation incorporated within Alabama or to any person who is a resident of or domiciled in Alabama

(c) Registration or Qualification to Do Business. A company that registers or otherwise formally qualifies to do business within Alabama does not, by that fact alone, lose its protection under P.L. 86-272. Where, separate from or ancillary to such registration or qualification, the company receives and seeks to use or protect any additional benefit or protection from Alabama through activity not otherwise protected under P.L. 86-272 or this rule, such protection shall be removed.

(d) Loss of Protection for conducting unprotected activity during part of tax year. The protection afforded under P.L. 86-272 and the provisions of this rule shall be determined on a tax year by tax year basis. Therefore, if at any time during a tax year the company conducts activities that are not protected under P.L. 86-272 or this rule, no sales in Alabama or income earned by the company attributed to Alabama during any part of said tax year shall be protected from taxation under said Public Law or this rule.